Evans Liberal Politics
March 25, 2010
The Final Health Care Vote
and What it Really Means
It’s not nearly as momentous as the passage of Medicare in 1965 and won’t fundamentally alter how Americans think about social safety nets. But the likely passage of Obama’s health care reform bill is the biggest thing Congress has done in decades, and has enormous political significance for the future.
Medicare directly changed the life of every senior in America, giving them health security and dramatically reducing their rates of poverty. By contrast, most Americans won’t be affected by Obama’s health care legislation. Most of us will continue to receive health insurance through our employers. (Only a comparatively small minority will be required to buy insurance who don’t want it, or be subsidized in order to afford it. Only a relatively few companies will be required to provide it who don’t now.)
![]() |
|---|
Medicare built on Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal notion of government as insurer, with citizens making payments to government, and government paying out benefits. That was the central idea of Social Security, and Medicare piggybacked on Social Security.
Obama’s legislation comes from an alternative idea, begun under the Eisenhower administration and developed under Nixon, of a market for health care based on private insurers and employers. Eisenhower locked in the tax break for employee health benefits; Nixon pushed prepaid, competing health plans, and urged a requirement that employers cover their employees. Obama applies Nixon’s idea and takes it a step further by requiring all Americans to carry health insurance, and giving subsidies to those who need it.
So don’t believe anyone who says Obama’s health care legislation marks a swing of the pendulum back toward the Great Society and the New Deal. Obama’s health bill is a very conservative piece of legislation, building on a Republican rather than a New Deal foundation. The New Deal foundation would have offered Medicare to all Americans or, at the very least, featured a public insurance option.
The significance of Obama’s health legislation is more political than substantive. For the first time since Ronald Reagan told America government is the problem, Obama’s health bill reasserts that government can provide a major solution. In political terms, that’s a very big deal.
Click the Puppy (LINK to download viewer, |
|---|
Most Americans continue to be suspicious of government. That distrust is deeply etched in our culture and traditions. Our system of government was devised by people who distrusted government and intentionally created checks and balances, three separate branches, and almost insuperable odds against getting big things done. The period extending from 1933 to 1965 — the New Deal and the Great Society — was an historical aberration from that long tradition, animated by the unique crises of the Great Depression and World War II, and the social cohesion that flowed from them for another generation. Ronald Reagan merely picked up where Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover left off.
But Reagan’s view of government as the problem is increasingly at odds with a nation whose system of health care relies on large for-profit entities designed to make money rather than improve health; whose economy is dependent on global capital and on global corporations and financial institutions with no particular loyalty to America; and much of whose fuel comes from unstable and dangerous areas of the world. Under these conditions, government is the only entity that can look out for our interests.
We will not return to the New Deal or the Great Society, but nor will we continue to wallow in the increasingly obsolete Reagan view that we don’t need a strong and competent government. Today’s vote confirms our hope that we can have both strength and competence in Washington. It is an audacious hope, but we have no choice.
*****
Robert Reich was the nation’s 22nd Secretary of Labor under Bill Clinton and is Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations. In 2008, Time Magazine named him one of the Ten Most Successful Cabinet Members of the century. He has written eleven books, including “The Work of Nations,” which has been translated into 22 languages. His latest book is “Supercapitalism.” For Professor Reich’s page on Amazon, go here. The above article is from Reich’s new blog, and can be viewed here.
Thanks to Professor Reich for permission to publish his articles on an ongoing basis. At Evans Liberal Politics, we give you the truth they don’t want you to see.
















rolety wrocław
April 4, 2011 at 8:46 am
Thanks a lot for your interesting text. I have been looking for such post for a very long time. Not everything is completely easy to understand to me, but it is definitely interesting and worth reading.
order Strattera online
February 26, 2011 at 12:19 pm
I added your blog to bookmarks. And i’ll read your articles more often! Before this, it would be possible for the government to arrest you just based on whatever you were saying, if they didn’t like it.
Backpacking
January 25, 2011 at 7:54 am
I know this isn’t exactly on topic, however i run a blog site using the same platform as well and i’m having troubles with the comments displaying. is there a setting i’m negelecting? it’s possible you may help me out? thx.
Sam Jones III
November 1, 2010 at 9:43 pm
Nice post….plz help me i also want to post here….
9¢ downloads
April 25, 2010 at 12:15 pm
Wow!, this was a real quality post. In theory I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real effort to make a good article… but what can I say… I keep putting it off and never seem to achieve anything
single mother
April 23, 2010 at 9:18 pm
For most families, daycare expenses form a huge chunk of their monthly budget, and it has become extremely difficult for them to see a way through it.
Jina Fuston
March 25, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Did you create your own blog or did a program do it? Could you please respond? 13
Paul
March 25, 2010 at 8:40 pm
O.K., even though you are probably basically spam advertising Victoria’s Secret, I am going to answer your question. I used to do Evans Liberal Politics with Adobe Dreamweaver CS3 and then CS4, and in fact I may in the future to a custom theme for it that way. However, we are a WordPress site, using that free online website creation program. It isn’t all that easy to set up, in fact, I hired a really great internet marketer, Website Consultants, out of Miami, to get the site up and running as a WordPress site…. and they did a GREAT job. However all the content, most of the sidebar features, and quite a lot of the details and the programming for the individual articles, is my own. ~ Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans
how to sing
March 25, 2010 at 2:14 pm
Just wanted to tell you that your page is not showing up correctly on the BlackBerry Browser. Anyway, I’m now on the RSS feed on my laptop, so it works!