Home » Posts tagged "war on terror" (Page 4)

Video – Breaking: McChrystal Out, Petreus In for Afghanistan

Evans Liberal Politics
June 23, 2010

 

Breaking: McChrystal Out,
Petreus In for Afghanistan

 

Video – Rolling Stone: Astonished by McChrystal Comments

Evans Liberal Politics
June 23, 2010

 

Rolling Stone: Astonished
by McChrystal Comments

 

These Right Wingers, of whom people like McChrystal are in the forefront, never gave Obama a chance. They undercut him at every opportunity. There’s NO WAY a man like McChrystal, who ran a concentration camp in Iraq for Special Forces, (which mysteriously lost 70 percent of it’s computer data when the International Red Cross was about to inspect it), should be a top level general in the Obama Administration. Maybe the Cheney Administration. But not a decent outfit like Obama’s. No way.

*****

Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 133 Rock and Pop Tracks


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Report: General McChrystal ‘offered to resign’

Evans Liberal Politics
June 23, 2010

 

Report: General McChrystal ‘offered to resign’

 

Report: General McChrystal ‘offered to resign’, The Raw Story, June 22, 2010, by Stephen C. Webster, excerpt quoted verbatim:

General Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has “offered to resign” according to Time magazine’s Joe Klein, who spoke to CNN.

close up of General Stanley McChrystal's face

Klein cites an unnamed yet “very reliable” source. The network was working to confirm the claim at time of this writing.

An earlier version of this story cited Klein in reporting that McChrystal had already resigned. Klein, via Twitter, later issued a “clarification.”

General McChrystal was summoned to Washington, D.C. on Tuesday morning after an unflattering profile by Rolling Stone magazine quoted him mocking Vice President Joe Biden, and his aides slamming Obama and other officials.

In the feature, McChrystal jokes sarcastically about preparing to answer a question referring to Vice President Joe Biden, known as a skeptic of the commander’s war strategy.

“‘Are you asking about Vice President Biden?’ McChrystal says with a laugh. ‘Who’s that?’” the article quotes him as saying.

“‘Biden?’ suggests a top adviser. ‘Did you say: Bite Me?’”

McChrystal tells the magazine that he felt “betrayed” by the US ambassador to Kabul, Karl Eikenberry, in a White House debate over war strategy last year.

Referring to a leaked internal memo from Eikenberry that questioned McChrystal’s request for more troops, the commander suggested the ambassador had tried to protect himself for history’s sake.

“I like Karl, I’ve known him for years, but they’d never said anything like that to us before,” McChrystal tells the magazine.

“Here’s one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, ‘I told you so.’”

Eikenberry, himself a former commander in Afghanisan, had written to the White House saying Afghan President Hamid Karzai was an unreliable partner and that a surge of troops could draw the United States into a open-ended quagmire.

The article revisits the friction between the White House and the military last fall as Obama debated whether to grant McChrystal’s request for tens of thousands of reinforcements.

Read the full story, here.

See Breaking: General Stanley McChrystal tenders his resignation, Telegraph.co.uk, June 22, 2010, by Toby Harnden.

See Robert Gates statement: General Stanley McChrystal survives for now, Telegraph.co.uk, June 22, 2010, by Toby Harnden, with full statement by Robert Gates, excerpt quoted verbatim:

The tide could be turning on this issue. Reading the full (Rolling Stone) article, it is clear that most of the worst comments are by McChrystal aides and not the general himself. The piece is written with a clear anti-war animus and agenda – it is extremely surprising that neither the Pentagon nor McChrystal’s staff are pushing back against Rolling Stone (though Team McChrystal is doubtless in disarray – his top civilian press aide Duncan Boothby has already resigned).

Robert Gates, the Pentagon chief, is clearly very angry but the terms “significant mistake” and “poor judgement” are an indication that McChrystal could – just – survive this.

But see McChrystal likely to resign over magazine comments, source says, CNN, June 23, 2010, by CNN Wire Staff, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Washington (CNN) — America’s top military commander in Afghanistan is unlikely to survive the fallout from remarks he made about colleagues in a magazine profile to be published Friday, according to a Pentagon source who has ongoing contacts with the general.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal will likely resign Wednesday, the source said. McChrystal’s fate is expected to hinge on a meeting scheduled Wednesday with President Obama, who was “angry” after reading the general’s remarks in Rolling Stone.

The “magnitude and graveness” of McChrystal’s mistake in conducting the interview for the article were “profound,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said McChrystal had “made a significant mistake and exercised poor judgment.”

Highly recommended: Obama & Insubordination: Is He Truman or Mr. Milquetoast?, CommonDreams.org, June 23, 2020, by Ray McGovern, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Journalist Michael Hastings has given Rolling Stone magazine a graphic account of the arrogance, disarray and ineptitude that distinguish what passes for President Barack Obama’s policy on Afghanistan. For those of us with some gray in our hair, the fiasco is infuriatingly reminiscent of Vietnam.

In blowing off steam to Hastings, NATO/U.S. commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal and his top aides seem to have decided that, at this low point in the Afghanistan quagmire, political offense is the best defense for a military strategy sinking from waist to neck deep. In interviews with Hastings, McChrystal and his team direct mockery at many senior-level officials of the Obama administration. For instance, one of McChrystal’s aides refers to Obama’s national security adviser James L. Jones as a “clown.”

Members of McChrystal’s inner circle also quote the general as saying he was “pretty disappointed” with an Oval Office meeting and describing Obama as “intimidated” by McChrystal and other generals. Commenting on the controversy Tuesday, Obama said McChrystal and his team had shown “poor judgment” but the President added that he wanted to speak with McChrystal directly before making any decision on firing him. That happens today, according to press reports.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 133 Rock and Pop Tracks


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Message to Obama, Karzai and Congress: Americans and Afghans Need Jobs, Not War

Evans Liberal Politics
May 13, 2010

 

Message to Obama, Karzai and Congress:
Americans and Afghans Need Jobs, Not War

 

Message to Obama, Karzai and Congress: Americans and Afghans Need Jobs, Not War, CommonDreams.org, May 12, 2010, by Code Pink:

President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan is in Washington this week to meet with the Obama administration and Congress about the status of the war. Despite the platitudes coming from both sides, the conflict is intractable and there is no military solution. President Karzai is well aware of this, which is why he is organizing a peace gathering (called a jirga) in Afghanistan starting on May 20 to set the ground rules for negotiating with the Taliban and other armed insurgents.

Wikipedia photo of Afganistand President Hamid Karzai

After much pressure by Afghan women, 200 of them have won the right to be represented at the 1,200-person peace jirga. CODEPINK supports the jirga as a step in the process of negotiating a settlement and the reintegration of insurgents while demanding respect for women’s rights.

This is a delicate process that requires the full commitment and energy from the U.S. government. Instead, our government is focusing on a new military offensive. The looming June military attack against Kandahar will undoubtedly lead to the death of more innocent Afghans; it will lead to the spilling of more of our soldiers’ blood; and it will lead to more resentment and blowback against us, as we saw in the attempted Times Square bombing.

Just look at what happened in Marjah, where February’s offensive left locals feeling more negative about NATO forces than before the operation. Unlike Marjah, Kandahar is one of Afghanistan’s largest cities and the potential for massive civilian casualties is frightening. Tribal leaders and the public in Kandahar are strongly opposed to the forthcoming attack.

We call on President Obama , the Commander-in-Chief, to call off the Kandahar offensive and instead focus on peace talks. We need President Obama to protect us from terrorist attacks here at home, not wage endless wars overseas.

We call on President Karzai to promote a reconciliation process that ensures Afghan women a prominent place at the table and protects women’s rights. President Karzai should also promote economic policies that provide jobs for women, especially the over one million war widows who are desperately trying to care for their children.

We call on Congress to stop funding the war. Congress has been asked by the Administration to approve a $33 billion supplemental request. The money is supposed to pay for the 30,000 additional troops President Obama ordered to Afghanistan in December and are now starting to arrive for the offensive. Congress must take a stand and refuse to fund the war.

We also call on our Congressional representatives to co-sponsor the McGovern-Feingold bill (HR 5015, S.3197) requiring the President to provide a plan and timetable for “the safe, orderly and expeditious redeployment of US troops from Afghanistan.” There are presently 82 co-sponsors of this bill. We hope over 100 representatives will sign on, and the bill will generate a long overdue Congressional debate about the need to end this war.

We call on the American people to join us in calling for jobs, not war. After 9 years of U.S. occupation, Afghanistan remains one of the poorest countries in the world. They need jobs, not war. The American people are suffering from the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. We need jobs, not war. With just a fraction of the over $270 billion we have spent on this war (www.costofwar.com), we could be creating millions of jobs for both Americans and Afghans.

Let’s demand that our leaders put an end to this war and instead protect us here at home. Let’s tell them our national security includes a good education system, clean energy, healthcare and putting people to work in productive jobs that improve the lives of our communities.

CODEPINK is a women-initiated grassroots peace and social justice movement working to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, stop new wars, and redirect our resources into healthcare, education, green jobs and other life-affirming activities.

See Obama’s Afghanistan: No Political Strategy, No Benchmarks, No End Point, Politics Daily, May 12, 2010, by David Wood, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Afghan President Karzai’s meetings in Washington this week ended with no sign of a badly needed joint political strategy to buttress the U.S.-led military campaign.

In official meetings and public appearances over two days, neither Karzai nor administration officials defined what they want Afghanistan to look like in one year, or five, or 10. Nor did anyone mention benchmarks that could help chart progress or lack of progress toward that goal.

See Afghanistan Crossroads: Highlights from Karzai’s meeting with Obama, CNN, May 12, 2010, by CNN Wire staff.

See Karzai, Clinton wrap up visit in televised meeting, AP News hosted on Google, May 13, 2010, by Matthew Lee (AP), excerpt quoted verbatim:

WASHINGTON — Afghan President Hamid Karzai is wrapping up a four-day visit to Washington with a televised give-and-take with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The Obama administration has done its best to repair strained relations with the Afghan leader, its partner in the war against militants in Afghanistan. Karzai, meanwhile, will continue to seek to convince Americans that his regime is worth fighting and dying for, with a visit to Arlington National Cemetery and private talks with top lawmakers.

After a Capitol Hill lunch hosted by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., Karzai was to appear with Clinton at the U.S. Institute of Peace for what was billed as a “moderated discussion.” They were expected to talk about the ups and downs of the relationship and the way ahead.

Karzai leaves Washington on Friday. Before heading back to Kabul he is expected to visit Fort Campbell, Ky., home of the 101st Airborne Division, which is going to Afghanistan over the next several weeks, according to U.S. and Afghan officials.

Visit ReThinkAfghanistan.com.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share, print or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top.

We know, if you come here repeatedly,
you like Evans Liberal Politics. So, all we ask is that you
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

85 Great Electronic Rock and Pop Tracks


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming electronic rock
#1 Rated by Google

EXCLUSIVE: Secret Recording of Erik Prince Reveals Previously Undisclosed Blackwater Ops

Evans Liberal Politics
May 4, 2010

 

EXCLUSIVE: Secret Recording of Erik Prince
Reveals Previously Undisclosed Blackwater Ops

 

Investigative journalist and Democracy Now! correspondent Jeremy Scahill obtains a rare audio recording of a recent, private speech delivered by Erik Prince, the owner of Blackwater, to a friendly audience in January. The speech, which Prince attempted to keep from public consumption, provides a stunning glimpse into his views and future plans and reveals details of previously undisclosed activities of Blackwater. In a Democracy Now! exclusive broadcast we play excerpts of the recording and speak with Scahill about the revelations.

PBS: BILL MOYERS JOURNAL | Andrew Bacevich on Afghanistan

Evans Liberal Politics
April 16, 2010

 

PBS: BILL MOYERS JOURNAL
Andrew Bacevich on Afghanistan

 

PBS – April 15, 2010 – 35:08

Liz Cheney’s Keep America Safe: the Threat from the Right

Evans Liberal Politics
March 10, 2010

 

Liz Cheney’s Keep America Safe:
the Threat from the Right

 

Originally published as What Obama and the DOJ Can Learn From the Right, AlterNet, March 8, 2010, excerpt quoted verbatim:

On March 2, “Keep America Safe,” the neo-con think tank run by Liz Cheney and Bill Kristol, released a video demanding information about a group of Obama administration lawyers it labeled “the al-Qaeda Seven.” Since these lawyers once voluntarily represented Guantanamo inmates, K.A.S. argued, their continued practice jeopardizes the safety of American families.

Six days later, 19 prominent lawyers — including a few on the right — issued a statement slamming Cheney’s organization. “We consider these attacks both unjust to the individuals in question and destructive of any attempt to build lasting mechanisms for counterterrorism adjudications,” they wrote. A “zealous representation of unpopular clients” is a necessary feature of a fair legal system.

Click the pretty lady
to Visit Paul’s Playlist for
Great Rock & Pop Sounds!

a pretty brunette draped only in an American flag serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of great streaming electronic rock and pop music

The lawyers’ words validated a chorus of defiance heard almost unanimously on progressive blogs, effectively imbuing the left’s critique of Cheney with some bipartisan momentum. For once, it seemed, folks at the Center for American Progress were able to find some common ground with Ken Starr.

But is this an argument that the right will win anyway? As a recent New Yorker piece by Jane Mayer illustrated, the superior efficacy of civilian trials for terror suspects is irrelevant to those who want simplified, no-bullshit revenge. People like Obama and Holder (and, in a broader sense, people on the left) can talk (and blog) about legal nuance, detainee rights etc. till they’re blue in the face and fingers; in the end, their best shot at maintaining some kernel of legal fairness will be to use neo-cons’ own weapons against them — that is, to make the fight for constitutional trials a battle about patriotism, not legal logistics.

The argumentative line could go something like this: “By jeopardizing the principles upon which our entire legal system was founded in the name of revenge, we are being coerced into an American self-sabotage, courtesy of Osama bin Laden.” Repeat. An oversimplified view, certainly, but one that would resonate on the same visceral level the right so masterfully taps. That the position actually involves a fair upholding of important legal structures is great. But that fact should be residual, not the argument’s central thesis.

Right now, we’re looking at a good example of the right outplaying the left in appealing to a base instinct.

Read the full article, here.

See Keep America Safe, and read the evil bullsh*t.

See Republicans scold Liz Cheney, March 3, 2010, by Ben Smith.

A group that includes leading conservative lawyers and policy experts, former Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and several senior officials of the last Bush administration is denouncing as “shameful” Republican attacks on lawyers who came to the Obama Justice Department after representing suspected terrorists.

Senate Republicans have demanded details of the lawyers’ past work and Liz Cheney’s group “Keep America Safe” has questioned their “values.” A drumbeat of Republican criticism forced the Justice Department reluctantly to identify seven of them last week. But the harshness of the criticism – Keep America Safe labeled a group of them the “Al Qaeda Seven” — has provoked a backlash from across the legal establishment.

“We consider these attacks both unjust to the individuals in question and destructive of any attempt to build lasting mechanisms for counterterrorism adjudications,” wrote the 19 lawyers whose names were attached to the statement as of early Monday.

See Mukasey calls Liz Cheney’s ‘Al-Qaeda 7′ ad ‘shoddy and dangerous.’, Think Progress, March 10, 2010, by Ben Armbruster, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Yesterday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) joined a growing chorus of conservatives condemning the McCarthy-like tactics of Keep America Safe, the new group led by Bill Kristol and Liz Cheney, which recently released an ad questioning the loyalties of Justice Department lawyers who were once involved in representing al-Qaeda terror suspects. Today in the Wall Street Journal — without mentioning Cheney, Kristol, their group, or the ad — former Bush Attorney General Michael Mukasey denounced their campaign:

See Cheney Group Attacks Obama’s DOJ, Where’s the Dem Pushback?, Daily Kos, March 3, 2010, by mcjoan, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Coming from the crew that turned the Department of Justice into a political arm of the Republican party, replete with loyalty oaths and politically motivated hirings and firings–remember the prosecutor purge that brought down Alberto Gonzales?–this is all the more despicable.

Liz Cheney’s group Keep America Safe, which has led the resurgent Republican attacks on President Obama’s national security policies, is releasing a video this morning that questions the loyalties of Justice Department lawyers who advocated for detained terror suspects during the Bush Administration.

The group has been hammering Attorney General Eric Holder for months on the issue, which has drawn increasing attention from Senate Republicans. Senator Charles Grassley last month pushed Holder to identify any lawyers who had represented detainees, and the Department said last month that nine Justice Department appointees filled that category — but he refused to name those whose work hadn’t been previously reported. Conservatives view the partial disclosure as another Holder misstep, and in a new video, the group is going on offense.

Adam Sewer has a must-read article on this effort–taken up by Andrew McCarthy at National Review.

Please Note: to have full ability to share, print, etc. each article on Evans Politics, please load the article individually from the dark blue titles at the very top.

For a Good Time Read
Is There Really a Backlash Against Casual Sex?,
AlterNet, March 10, 2010, by Vanessa Richmond.

Want to Listen to Some Party Music
While You Read? Click Here!

Get Down with some great tracks on Evans Liberal Politics Electronic Rock Playlist

Data Recovery SoftwareData Recoveryforex tradingforex