Home » Posts tagged "U.S. news" (Page 3)

On Medicare anniversary, lawmakers tout inevitability of single payer

Evans Liberal Politics
August 1, 2010

 

On Medicare anniversary, lawmakers
tout inevitability of single payer

 

On Medicare anniversary, lawmakers tout inevitability of single payer, The Raw Story, July 31, 2010, by Sahil Kapur, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

A trio of progressives in Congress invoked the 45th birthday of Medicare Friday to call for a national single payer health insurance system, predicting it’s “inevitable” if Americans want lower costs.

protest sign saying 'We want single payer universal care'

“It has never been more important to have a strong movement behind Medicare for All,” wrote Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Reps. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) and John Conyers (D-MI) in a letter addressed to “friends of health care for all.”

The trio, all of whom have sponsored single payer bills, argued that cost controls are insufficient in the health reform law enacted March and claimed the growing need to save money would galvanize support for such a system.

“As we honor Medicare’s 45th birthday today, I am proud to say that the movement for Medicare for All remains strong and vibrant,” Kucinich said.

While various lawmakers have endorsed single payer proposals, it remains far out of the reach of Congress due to the prevalence of anti-government public sentiments and the political influence of the private insurance industry, which would be torn down.

The Affordable Care And Patient Protection Act, enacted by President Barack Obama in March, is projected by the Congressional Budget Office to cover nearly all Americans and reduce the deficit. It has no new public insurance programs.

Although Sanders, Kucinich and Conyers all voted for the new law, they said in the letter that it “does not adequately contain costs” for Americans.

“In my view, the single-payer approach is the only way we will ever have a cost-effective, comprehensive health care system in this country,” said Sanders.

Symbolic Animal Adoptions help animals affected by the Oil Spill. Make a difference today & get Free Shipping!

A Commonwealth Fund report last month found that Americans spend roughly twice as much on medical costs than residents of other industrialized nations yet the US system lags in areas of quality, efficiency and equity.

Sanders and Kucinich have led on pushing for national or state-based single payer programs in the Senate and House respectively, but have failed to garner the necessary support.

According to reports, Medicare, a single payer system for the elderly in America, has lower overhead costs and higher satisfaction rates than private insurance on average.

The White House and Democratic National Committee on Friday proclaimed their commitment to sustaining and strengthening Medicare.

“We believe Medicare for All is inevitable in the United States,” the lawmakers wrote. “It is up to all of us to determine when the inevitable becomes reality.”

Plea for Help from a Liberal Politics Website Owner


small photo of Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans in early 2009

Note by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: I am disabled myself, and though I want to get a job and reenter the work force, I cannot because if I did drop my disability, they would sell my father’s home out from under me to pay my father’s nursing home bills. It is a REAL SHAME in this country, that after everything is said and done in our lives, as elderly people, when we need assistance from a nursing facility, that private enterprise is going to rip you off for everything you have to pay for that. Nursing care in our declining years should be absolutely free, provided by the government.

A kind friend wrote me a note I want to share with you. She said: I understand exactly where you are coming from about the need to be on and stay on disability. There are easily hundreds, if not thousands, of folks in the United States who fit the scenario you describe. This does not make you or anyone else a government leach, as some would say. Nor does it make them inferior people. We have so many idiots out there who take the proposition of being a country which takes care of it’s own as some kind of threat to the dignity and quality of our country. Yet, looking at countries like Denmark, etc, who take care of their own — they have no homeless. Not any. America calls itself a “Christian” nation. Yet the way people who receive any help from our government are run down in churches in the communities around me — you’d never guess there was anything “Christian” around us.

The way they worship the Bush administrations, without prejudice — is so non-Christian! The way they worship the Reagans, Reagan philosophy, etc. is with a worship that is almost evil. No two administrations in the history of the United States can compare in the way these two took aim directly at those who cannot help themselves. None. It is like living and working in “Stepford Land.” They believe things beyond reason and don’t even try to “balance the account” purse’ with any common sense.

At the end of Christ’s ministry in the New Testament, He said, “I give you a new commandment . . . love your brother.” “Love your brother” is never mentioned, while people who receive any help from the government are lazy, sponges of some kind. The same bible they preach from said God told Adam that upon leaving the Garden of Eden he “mankind” would earn their living by the sweat of their brow. When you see how depressed, defeated, and shamed a person who cannot work is — it almost appears that mankind is born with a strong inborn desire to be productive and provide for themselves. No human being I ever met who was unable to provide for themselves has ever sat and said they don’t want to work. Not one. When people cannot work, whether for reasons you describe, either medically, or because of situations like you have with your father, and having to lose everything he ever owned and worked all their life for — or choose to take the steps you have to take to keep property and/or savings they spent their whole life to secure — doing things as you and your family are doing is the best choice you have, if not the only choice.

Paul Evans: How true. How unchristian of us as a nation that we do not really take care of our own. At the end of his life here on earth, Jesus asked Peter three times if he loved him. Three times Jesus, said, after hearing Peter protest his love, “Feed my sheep.” It’s in the first three Gospels. Isn’t that what “loving your neighbor as yourself” is supposed to be all about?

I am in fact looking to supplement my government minimum disability by working from home. Please visit the Hire Paul Evans! page if you might be interested in hiring me. I type 75 wpm, can program in 3 languages well, and am familiar in using other programming languages, I am familiar with the Office programs and I have edited 12 books. If your computer is acting up I can do a very creditable job at Computer Repair anywhere in Northeast Ohio, at prices less than what is usually charged. I need somebody to step up to the plate so that I can make my way in this world. I also have a nice (if aging) car and would be interested in any reasonable job in the Akron – Canton – Mansfield – Medina area. Please feel encouraged to email me if you are interested. ~ Paul Evans

Perfectmatch.com

*****

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page, and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 152 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

BP, Coast Guard ignored order to stop using dispersants: report

Evans Liberal Politics
August 1, 2010

 

BP, Coast Guard ignored order
to stop using dispersants: report

 

BP, Coast Guard ignored order to stop using dispersants: report, The Raw Story, July 31, 2010, by Raw Story, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

BP continued spraying large amounts of a controversial dispersant onto the surface of the Gulf of Mexico even after an EPA order to stop doing so, the Washington Post reports.

Skyscraper - Pharmacy Checker Approved and CIPA certified Online Pharmacy

According to the Post, BP used a loophole in the EPA’s order that allowed the Coast Guard to rubber-stamp “exemptions” to the order.

In late May, under pressure from environmental groups, the EPA ordered BP to stop using certain product lines of the dispersant Corexit on the water surface. But it allowed the Coast Guard — which has the final say on oil cleanup operations — to issue exemptions in “rare” circumstances. The Post found that those circumstances weren’t rare at all:

Despite the order — and concerns about the environmental effects of the dispersants– the Coast Guard granted requests to use them 74 times over 54 days, and to use them on the surface and deep underwater at the well site. The Coast Guard approved every request submitted by BP or local Coast Guard commanders in Houma, La., although in some cases it reduced the amount of the chemicals they could use, according to an analysis of the documents prepared by the office of Rep. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.).

The documents indicate that “these exemptions are in no way a ‘rare’ occurrence, and have allowed surface application of the dispersant to occur virtually every day since the directive was issued,” Markey wrote in a letter dated Aug. 1 to retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad W. Allen, the government’s point man on the spill. Markey chairs the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.

In the words of Rep. Markey, the order became “a meaningless paperwork exercise.”

Many marine biologists have raised concerns about the potential environmental and health effects of Corexit, which is used to break down oil.

A marine toxicologist working in the Gulf found that shrimpers who came into contact with a mixture of oil and Corexit suffered severe symptoms such as muscle spasms, heart palpitations, headaches that last for weeks and bleeding from the rectum.

A marine biologist said earlier this month that the Corexit used in the cleanup operation has made its way onto land and is “mixing with our everyday lives.”

The Post reports that the use of Corexit to break down the oil may have resulted in an environmental “trade-off.”

Now, scientists say, it’s difficult to tell what the added use of dispersants permitted by the Coast Guard meant for the gulf. The chemicals may have helped break up some oil before it reached sensitive marshes along the Louisiana coast. But it also may have poisoned ecosystems offshore, helped deplete underwater oxygen and sent oil swirling through the open-water habitats of fish and coral.

Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the head of the cleanup operation, defended the use of Corexit to the Post.

“There’s a dynamic tension that goes on when you’re managing an incident that has no precedent,” Allen said. “You establish general rules and guidelines, but knowing that the people on scene have the information” means trusting them to make decisions, he said.

In the end, Allen said: “You can quibble on the semantics related to ‘rare.’ I like to focus on the effects we achieved” by dispersing the oil. Officials have said that, in the days since the gusher was stopped, thick sheets of oil have nearly disappeared from the gulf’s surface.

Watch Corexit is Killing the Gulf, Part 1, YouTube video — 9:33.

Read Corexit Toxicity Tests not so hot, When Mixed with Oil, Daily Kos, May 30, 2010, by James Siebert. The skinny on the real toxicity of Corexit, with lots of data.

Read Why Is BP Using Highly Toxic Corexit Oil Dispersant?, Before It’s News, June 11, 2010, by Fellowship of Minds: a more readable but very informative article all about Corexit, it’s four formulations and their toxicity.

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page, and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 152 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

In Defense of President Obama

close up public domain photo of President Obamas faceclose up photo of former President George W. Bush's face

Evans Liberal Politics
July 31, 2010

 

In Defense of President Obama

 

In Defense of President Obama, OpEdNews, July 30, 2010, by Suzana Megles, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

I don’t know if I should even come to the defense of President Obama because he has let so many of us down re the environment, allowing the continued mismanagement of the BLM re the wild horses of the West, and a seeming indifference generally to the causes of animals who suffer at our hands -especially in Confined Animal Farm Operations (CAFOs). However, these are my priorities and sadly they do not seem to be for the majority of people of our nation.

Perfectmatch.com

Before launching into a defense of President Obama, I had to mention that despite having access to cabinet advisors and others, I realize that as a mortal being he will make judgments which will not please everyone and some of them may even hurt our nation. However, this is part of the human condition. We are ALL imperfect and realizing that, we should try to give the president as much latitude and leeway as possible. We should also give him due credit for any good he has done. Sadly, I see so much carping and criticizing of him on blogs and in e-mails that I believe that the good he has done is either forgotten or obscured at least momentarily.

I was really quite shocked how differently I and a person I e-mailed viewed the president. Admitting that the president was an improvement on Bush, she didn’t have much good to say about him either. She wrote me -"I just don’t like that Obama seems to not care about a lot of the things that this country was founded on. He seems to want to shortcut everything and that’s worrisome." I scratched my head and wondered what in the world was she talking about? Specifics please, I thought.

She continued: “He made a lot of promises during his campaign, as all politicians do but just seems like he’s done a really 180 degree flip on those promises. I don’t think he’s careful with our money and his whole thing of meddling in private industry isn’t cool.”

The last remark made me realize that she was clueless of how our hands- off policy re Wall Street and the Banks almost brought us to our knees but for the remedies Pres. Obama and his financial advisors put into place at the critical time of his first month as President.

I did respond to her e-mail and said: Thank you for your forthrightness. We do see him very differently. He came in with a huge deficit, the country spiraling from the breakdown of Wall Street and banking institutions, the housing market in turmoil and a huge debt from the two wars. God bless him. Even ONE of those problems would have been much for a new president. He tried to stimulate job growth with a stimulus package and he helped bailout General Motors. This man should be gray-haired by now.

You haven’t gone into specifics as I have. I think he was just what we needed. As for the two wars -he inherited them. I will give him the benefit of the doubt until he really misfires. Obviously, you think he has but you are too general in your condemnations.

In my opinion he has done a hellava job for the nation as a whole. He only disappoints me in is lack of care for the animal issues which I espouse. And I forgot to mention that I believe health care reform was much needed and sadly his appeal to the Republicans of Congress for bipartisanship was ignored. I also do not feel he has threatened our Christian beliefs as you do. I(f) so how?

Thus far I’ve gotten no response from her. One thing I have learned in my three-quarter century of living on planet earth is that we should give everyone their just due and most of all we should be grateful for any good we perceive in them. President Obama has been good for the country in many ways. I hope he will be good in the ways which are important to all of us and the nation as a whole. This is a humongous task and please -let us praying people pray for him and his administration every day. Criticizing is so easy to do – but understanding the problems which President Obama faces daily requires that we try to support him as best we can. I also try to be as positive as I can. We seem to only zero in on our perceived negatives. What is that song– “Accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative.” Wow -how far back does this song go? Some of you probably weren’t even born yet. But the message is good. Heed it America!

Yes, of course you political pundits know a lot more about politics than I. I’m not saying that we should all wear rose-colored glasses, but I think we should think twice before launching into wholesale criticism which MAY not have any merit and perhaps very little truth.

Suzana Megles has been concerned about animal suffering ever since she received her first puppy Peaches in 1975. She continues: "she made me take a good look at the animal kingdom and I was shocked to see how badly we treat so many animals. At 77, I’ve been a vegan for the past 30 years and I thank God every day that I am. I am most disturbed at how little the Catholic Church and Christian churches generally give to concern re animal suffering in their ministry. I wrote to 350 bishops in 2001 and only 10-13 responded. I feel that the very least they can do is to instruct that the priests give one sermon a year on compassion to animals. I am still waiting for that sermon. I also belong to Catholic Concern for Animals – founded in England in 1929."

See the Guide to Liberal News and Politics on the Web for more on Evans Liberal Politics’ views about President Obama and the — in my opinion — relatively good job he has done. In particular, on that page we strongly recommend our article, “Barack Obama: In Crucial Ways, STILL Change We Can Believe In.” (There is an extensive discussion about and guide to liberal news and politics on the web there too, downloadable as a .doc Word document or a .pdf.)

While expressing my own disappointment that the President’s agenda has not been particularly progressive, Evans Liberal Politics thanks the President for his Herculean efforts to keep this country together. In fact, we believe that Obama has kept this country from totally falling apart, and at the same time enacted programs which are more liberal than many critics give him credit for. Keep fighting the good fight, Mr. President. ((And hire a new team of economic advisers. The current team of Summers, Geithner and Bernanke, and others like them, are doing you a discredit. Nobody on the left or on the right any longer has any faith in them. Their corrupt ties to Wall Street and the sweetheart deals they come up with for their buddies on the Street are hurting your credibility and dragging the country down. Oh, and hire Elizabeth Warren for the new Consumer Protection Agency! [Sign a petition in support of Elizabeth Warren here.] — Just a thought for you, Mr. President.)) ~ Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans.

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page, and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 152 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

News on Iran, Israel and Iran’s Purported Nuclear Weapons Capability

Evans Liberal Politics
July 31, 2010

 

News on Iran, Israel and Iran’s
Purported Nuclear Weapons Capability

 

Evans Liberal Politics, July 31, 2010, discussion by Paul Evans

We invite you to participate in a discussion we began on the White House’s LinkedIn group. We wanted to open up this little discussed but critical area of looming difficulty in the world to public discussion. I don’t know if transparency will help in this grave difficulty, but it couldn’t hurt!

News on Iran and Israel from CLG News:


What Happens When Push Comes to Shove with Iran and Israel?


CompUSA Best Sellers

What should the White House’s and the President’s proper response be if Israel attacks Iran? Should the United States stay neutral, adopt a stance of moderate logistical support for Israel, or join Israel in attacking Iran? Recent news suggests a higher likelihood of Israel in fact choosing a response of making an attack, on Lebanon (Hezbollah) and very likely Iran.

The following current news items support this assertion. The question is, if this happens, what should the White House response be? (~ Paul Evans)

House Republicans Give Green Light for Israeli Strike on Iran: Arutz Shiva – Israel National News.com: 28 Jul 2010 – Nearly one third of the Republican congressmen in the U.S. House of Representatives have introduced a resolution that would support Israel’s right to use “all means necessary to confront and eliminate nuclear threats posed by Iran”, including military force. The resolution was introduced by Rep. Louie Gohmert [R-Texas] and 46 co-sponsors. [See: House Resolution 1553.]

Israel says Iran sanctions not enough: Press TV (Iran national news organization): 30 Jul 2010:

Repeating its accusations against Tehran’s nuclear program, Israel says sanctions cannot stop a determined Iran from pursuing its nuclear goals.

"They’re determined to get nuclear military capability. We see it," Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” program on Friday, AFP reported. "I don’t believe that sanctions will work," he told the US-based cable news channel.

Barak said Israel agreed in essence with the sanctions and that Tel Aviv still believed it was time for sanctions to see whether they worked, but said the measure was not enough. "We have to realize, we cannot wink in front of tough realities, however tough they might be."

The UN Security Council approved a fourth set of sanctions on Iran in June — a slap in the face of the Islamic republic’s confidence building efforts and a tripartite nuclear swap declaration it signed with Brazil and Turkey in May.

Watch Israeli Mossad Chief Secretly visits Saudi Arabia, PressTV (Iranian national news) YouTube video — 0:41.

photo link to launch audio of Ehud Barak discussing Iran's nuclear program on Fox News Listen to Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak discuss Iran’s nuclear program on Fox News. — 4:57.


I then left the following comment to open up the discussion on the White House Group’s LinkedIn page:

I realize the controversial nature of any claim that Israel plans to attack Iran. The fact is, Israel has “dry-runned” the flight path to Iran and back twice, going the entire distance necessary to attack Iran from the air, and Israel has the world’s fourth largest air force. The second dry run included fighters equipped with extra fuel allowing them to accompany the bombers. Israel also has now developed predator drones, giving it a possible capacity to “decapitate” the Iranian regime. In fact, news items from around the internet suggest that Saudi Arabia has given Israel permission to use Saudi air space in any attack. The recent visit, referenced above, of the Israeli Mossad chief secretly visiting Saudi Arabia underscores the reality of the developing situation.

It seems to me that America desperately needs a public discussion of just how far we, as a nation, are willing to go in supporting any future Israeli attack on Iran.

The fact is, Israel has a few to several hundred nuclear weapons in its possession. Should the possibility, or even the probability, of Iran developing a weapons capability, be sufficient cause to support Israel in an attack on Iran? This is one of the paramount questions of our time.

Of course, this is sensitive information, and any response, particularly a “positive” decision to support Israel in an attack, must be made in secret. Yet a national dialogue on the whole topic and danger seems to be lacking, and I am inviting the White House to allow this discussion and see what our American people’s will is in the matter.

See Israel’s Insane War on Iran Must Be Prevented, CASMII (Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran), July 30, 2010, by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach, excerpt quoted verbtim:

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

Israel’s attack on a humanitarian aid ship headed for Gaza may prove to be the greatest strategic error the government has ever made. Like the Soweto riots in South Africa in 1976, or Bloody Sunday – the American civil rights march on March 7, 1965, in Selma, Alabama, where police opened fire and killed civilians – the Mavi Marmora affair crossed a red line. It has triggered an international wave of condemnation, expressing a shift in attitude toward Israel. The hope is that this international outrage, flanked by growing anti-government dissent inside the country, will provoke an identity crisis among the elite and people of Israel, shake up the political kaleidoscope and allow for a viable pro-peace force to emerge. Unless this occurs, new Israeli aggression, including against Iran, will remain high on their immediate agenda.

See Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sites, The Times Online, June 12, 2010, by Hugh Tomlinson.

See ‘U.S., Israel officials hold talks on Iran’, Tehran Times, July 31, 2010, by Press TV, excerpt quoted verbatim:

"’As a matter of fact, this afternoon we have a meeting with the senior Israeli team to talk about Iran and to talk about sanctions,’" AFP reported Robert Einhorn, a U.S. State Department adviser, as saying on Thursday.

The diplomat did not divulge further information on the nature of the talks or the identity of the Israeli team members due to attend the White House meeting.

However, he hinted at the intelligence work involved and said that the Israelis "’are an important source of information. We cooperate on intelligence matters with lots of friendly countries around the world, but Israeli intelligence is particularly good.’"

Meanwhile, White House officials have remained (tight lipped) about the theme of the talks and other administration officials only said it was a White House meeting.

See US: Iran sanctions starting to bite, Jerusalem Post, July 30, 2010, by Hilary Leila Krieger, excerpt quoted verbatim:

WASHINGTON – New sanctions regimes against Iran are already bearing fruit, senior US officials said Thursday, though they acknowledged the need to press countries in the Middle East, Asia and South America more forcefully.

Accordingly, top US Treasury and State Department officials are scheduled to travel to those regions in the coming weeks to push for greater sanctions there – or at the very least that these countries refrain from taking advantage of the vacuum created in Iran’s energy sector as other international sanctions take effect. China and the United Arab Emirates were places of particular concern, according to the officials.

But Robert Einhorn, US State Department special adviser for nonproliferation and arms control, and Daniel Glaser, deputy assistant Treasury secretary for terrorist financing, also testified before Congress Thursday that they were already seeing progress from new sanctions. The UN Security Council passed a resolution in June adding sanctions on Iran if it didn’t halt uranium enrichment, followed by a new US law signed at the beginning of July, EU and Canadian sanctions this past week and Australian sanctions on Thursday.

“Our efforts have yielded significant results,” said Einhorn, who pointed to $50 billion to $60b. in held up or canceled oil and gas development deals, the unwillingness of a growing list of major suppliers to provide Iran gasoline, and Iran’s trouble in accessing financial services because of the refusal of international banks to do business with it.

“I think we’re starting to see that it’s working,” Glaser agreed. He noted Iran’s difficulties in getting investments in its energy sector, with the targeted Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps itself dropping out of deals, and said, “International corporations are increasingly unwilling to do business with Iran.”

See EU approves tougher sanctions against Iran, Xinhua News English, July 27, 2010.

Ex-CIA chief: Strike on Iran seems more likely now


Ex-CIA chief: Strike on Iran seems more likely now, AP hosted on Yahoo News, July 25, 2010, by The Associated Press, excerpt quoted verbatim:

WASHINGTON (AP) — A former CIA director says military action against Iran now seems more likely because no matter what the U.S. does diplomatically, Tehran keeps pushing ahead with its suspected nuclear program.

Michael Hayden, a CIA chief under President George W. Bush, says that during his tenure a strike was “way down the list” of options. But he tells CNN’s “State of the Union” that such action now “seems inexorable.”

He predicts Iran will build its program to the point where it’s just below having an actual weapon. Hayden says that would be as destabilizing to the region as the real thing.

U.S. officials have said military action remains an option if sanctions fail to deter Iran.

Maybe Sanctions Are Working: Iran Ready to Halt Nuclear Enrichment – Report


Official: Iran ready to halt enrichment, Xinhua News, July 31, 2010, excerpt quoted verbatim:

BEIJING, July 31 (Xinhuanet) — The leader of Tehran’s Friday Prayers has repeated Iran’s expressed readiness to halt domestic uranium enrichment.

Ayatollah Mohammad Emami Kashani, also member of the country’s Assembly of Experts, says his nation will do so if it is provided with the 3.5 percent enriched uranium it requires for a research reactor.

He also urges world powers to stop opposing Iran, and let the country continue its nuclear activities under international supervision.

Mohammad Emami Kashani, Iranian Assembly of Experts Member, said, “Come and supervise all of our nuclear activities. Iran has shown its good intentions before, and is still proving them. These lies and violations of rules will not take you anywhere, and will not bring you any results from now on, either.”

Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization also says the country would be ready to negotiate with world powers over a fuel swap in the next few days.

See Israel Gets Brutal With Media, InterPress Service, July 23, 2010, by Mel Frykberg.

All we can do is pray for peace. Chinese papers typically follow an Iranian line on these matters so that the aforementioned news item may well constitute propoganda. Yet is is still a hopeful sign in the ongoing saber rattling, is it not? All this rather sounds like “wars and rumors of wars”, right? ~ Paul Evans

See ‘US psywar plan includes 2 hot wars’, Press TV (Iranian national news), July 26, 2010.

*****

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page, and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 152 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

NYT: Democrats in Congress should remind Obama of his campaign promises

Evans Liberal Politics
July 31, 2010

 

NYT: Democrats in Congress should remind
Obama of his campaign promises

 

NYT: Democrats in Congress should remind Obama of his campaign promises, The Raw Story, July 30, 2010, by Muriel Kane, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Senator Pat Leahy promises hearings into White House request for expanded surveillance powers

Click the Peace Sign
to visit Paul’s Playlist of
152 Rock and Pop Hits
* Rated #1 by Google *


a beautiful and artful peace sign serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of 152rock, pop and electronic hits

News that the White House has asked for a “clarification” in current law which would make it easier for the FBI to obtain private email and web browsing records without a court order has run into strong opposition from the New York Times.

In a Thursday editorial, the paper firmly opposed the expanded use of warrantless “national security letters,” which it points out have been widely used — and often abused — by both the FBI and the Pentagon.

“President Obama campaigned for office on an explicit promise to rein in these abuses,” the Times notes, citing a 2008 position paper which promised that “as president, Barack Obama would revisit the Patriot Act to ensure that there is real and robust oversight of tools like National Security Letters, sneak-and-peek searches, and the use of the material witness provision.”

“But instead of implementing reasonable civil liberties protections, like taking requests for e-mail surveillance before a judge,” the editorial concludes, “the administration is proposing changes to the law that would allow huge numbers of new electronic communications to be examined with no judicial oversight. Democrats in Congress can remind Mr. Obama of his campaign promises by refusing this request.”

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has already promised to hold hearings on the issue. In a statement released on Thursday, he writes that “the administration’s proposal to change ECPA to cover electronic communication transaction records raises serious privacy and civil liberties concerns.”

“While the government should have the tools that it needs to keep us safe, American citizens should also have protections against improper intrusions into their private electronic communications and online transactions,” Leahy’s statement continues. “We must also address past government abuses of these authorities. The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings this fall to study these and other important issues.”

photo button to launch audio of Julian Sanchez speaking about electronic privacy in the 21st century at the Cato Institute "Electronic privacy in the 21st century:" Julian Sanchez speaks at the Cato Institute. — 15:13.

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page, and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 152 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

BP fights lawsuit as jobless grow desperate

Evans Liberal Politics
July 30, 2010

 

 

Gulf coast fishermen increasingly desperate as BP begins legal wrangling, Agence France-Presse on The Raw Story, July 29, 2010, by Agence France-Presse, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

img of the sun shining off of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill shows us it's full extent

US spill chief Thad Allen failed Thursday to reassure desperate fishermen about their Gulf of Mexico oil clean-up jobs, while BP began the legal wrangling in a massive civil trial.

As engineers prepared next week’s vital operations to permanently kill the capped BP well, Allen met with parish presidents and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal in New Orleans to discuss how to safeguard local jobs going forward.

With little oil now floating in the Gulf, there are fears the popular “Vessels of Opportunity” program that employs fishing boats to skim crude off the surface of the sea might have to be scrapped.

Allen pledged to redeploy as many skippers as possible to other tasks, but could give no firm indication of how many of the 1,500 boats would still be working in the Gulf after next month.

“Obviously as we transition into a point where there’s not the threat of a spill, the involvement of Vessels of Opportunity is going to necessarily change,” he said after the meeting.

Allen said that over the next 10 days he would work with parish presidents and the governor to hammer out a plan for the fishermen and what to do with the program through to the end of August.

A large portion of the Gulf waters remain closed to commercial and recreational fishing and with lingering doubts about seafood safety, fishermen could effectively end up losing their jobs for a second time.

“The fishermen have missed a year, and we don’t know what the impact is going to be next year, or the year after that,” said Marty O’Connell, an environmental scientist at the University of New Orleans.

Many are worried it could be months or even years before they can fish again, and there are no guarantees the fish will be there in the same numbers when they do, or that they will be safe to eat.

“If BP uses the capping of the well as an excuse to minimize its clean-up operations, then shame on them,” said Mike Frenette, whose five boats in Venice, Louisiana missed an entire summer’s fishing due to the disaster.

Frenette had to apply four times before getting two of his five boats onto the program, which pays between 600 and 3,500 dollars a day, depending on the size of the boat.

“All that our Vessels of Opportunity work is doing is counting against our compensation claim. We’re not making any money, here, we’re just trying to keep our heads above water.”

Many disgruntled fishermen are expected to seek compensation for lost earnings and personal injury in the courts, and in Boise, Idaho on Thursday lawyers for disaster victims opened the first stage in a massive civil trial.

The hearing brought together a wide array of people and players linked to the disaster triggered by an April 20 explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig, some 50 miles (80 kilometers) off the coast of Louisiana.

Plaintiffs range from the families of the 11 workers killed in the explosion to Gulf fishermen whose catch has been contaminated by the spill, threatening them with financial ruin.

Evans Politics
Chat for our visitors!

Click the button to enter our
Dedicated Chat room: (just choose
a username, no password necessary)

Evans Politics logo button leading to our dedicated chat room

A seven-judge panel will decide over the next few weeks whether to consolidate the litigation into one or several cases, and where the trial or trials should take place.

BP and other firms named in the claims argued for the venue to be the oil headquarters of Houston, Texas, but victims’ lawyers said it should be somewhere closer to those hit hardest by the disaster, like New Orleans. Joining BP in court were Transocean, which leased the rig to BP, Cameron International, which manufactured the blowout preventer, the device which should have shut down the well but failed to work properly, and Halliburton, the oil services company which had finished cementing the well only 20 hours before the rig exploded.

BP hopes to begin a “static kill” operation as early as this weekend to plug the capped well with drilling mud and cement. Five days later a “bottom kill” through a relief well should finish the job once and for all.

A cap stopped the flow on July 15 after between three and 5.2 million barrels (117.6 million and 189 million gallons) had gushed out, making it likely the disaster is the biggest ever accidental oil spill.

See Incoming BP CEO: Time for ‘scaleback’ in cleanup, July 30, 2010, by The Associated Press.

Gulf Coast Oil Spill Audio News Update
and Relief & Protest Songs



ABC News update audio on the Gulf oil spill and the apparent degradation and disappearance of most of the oil ABC News Update on the Gulf oil spill and the apparent degradation and disappearance of most of the oil. — 2:18.

MSNBC’s Papantionio insists BP officials are looking at prison time over the Gulf Coast oil spill (The Ed Show) — 4:21.

Drill Baby Kill, a rocking Gulf coast oil spill relief and protest song "Drill Baby Kill," a rockin’ Gulf Coast relief and protest song — 5:10.

Oil is Blood is a heavy metal Gulf Coast oil spill protest song by Anfo Merc "Oil Is Blood," a heavy metal Gulf Coast oil spill protest song — 3:51.

a fisherman's skiff plies the Gulf Coast waterways of the Louisiana delta region "Cry For The Fishermen," (Gulf Oil Spill Disaster) – song — 3:30.

concert song by Melodeego on the BP oil spill "Melodeego’s Rolling BP Concert Series" song. — 3:05

song in protest of the BP oil spill "Song in Protest of the BP oil spill," with Christian overtones. — 3:00

U2 sings their famous protest song 'Silver and Gold' about how money can become something we are enslaved by U2 sings their favorite protest song “Silver and Gold” in this live performance. — 5:50

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

Can you consider donating $5 or $10 to Evans Liberal Politics today? It’s tough all over, and we are hurting while trying to provide you with good liberal-progressive news and politics. The button to donate via PayPal is at the upper right of every page. Your kind consideration is appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 150 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Obama administration wants more warrantless surveillance of Americans

Evans Liberal Politics
July 30, 2010

 

Obama administration wants more
warrantless surveillance of Americans

 

Tech News About Your Privacy

 

Obama administration wants more warrantless surveillance of Americans, Daily Kos, July 29, 2010, by Joan McCarter, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

As Yglesias says, “The End of Probable Cause.” WaPo reports:

Perfectmatch.com

The Obama administration is seeking to make it easier for the FBI to compel companies to turn over records of an individual’s Internet activity without a court order if agents deem the information relevant to a terrorism or intelligence investigation.

The administration wants to add just four words — “electronic communication transactional records” — to a list of items that the law says the FBI may demand without a judge’s approval. Government lawyers say this category of information includes the addresses to which an Internet user sends e-mail; the times and dates e-mail was sent and received; and possibly a user’s browser history. It does not include, the lawyers hasten to point out, the “content” of e-mail or other Internet communication.

This power would be conferred upon the same FBI whose agents have “cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases.” Maybe this is just the administration’s way of making sure these people won’t have to cheat on future tests–not they won’t have to worry about the pesky details of conducting domestic surveillance legally, since they won’t have to worry about warrants.

Matt raises the question of “misused work resources . . . for personal purposes.” The larger concern, and anybody who lived through Nixon and is old enough to remember it will share it, is the very real potential for the systematic misuse of information for political purposes. It’s happened before and will happen again, and our government should at least have to go through the niceties of taking actual legal steps in order to spy on us. As Matt also points out, it’s not that hard. All it takes is “some kind of cause—probable cause, let’s say—to suspect someone of involvement in terrorism, [is to] just get a warrant.”

Probable cause and warrants. The stuff of democracy. The stuff, in fact, of the Constitution, the fourth amendment to be precise.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

TigerDirect Best Sellers

See ‘Private’ Browsing Sessions Not As Private As You Think, The Huffington Post, July 29, 2010, by Catherine Smith, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Surfing the Internet with a web browser’s “private mode” enabled may not keep users’ information as safe as they think, Switched reports, citing research conducted at Carnegie Mellon University.

Carnegie Mellon’s Collin Jackson told New Scientist that some sites may leave data on a computer’s hard drive, even if they were accessed while private browsing was enabled, effectively providing traces of what sites you’ve visited.

As Jackson and his team note, “sites visited while browsing in private mode should leave no trace on the user’s computer.” And yet, Jackson tells New Scientist that a hacker could “guess what sites you’ve been to based on traces left behind.” Switched summarizes the dilemma: “when your average surfer turns on the private mode in a browser, they expect their tracks to be erased, and erased they’re not.”

See Breaking a Promise on Surveillance, N.Y. Times Editorial, July 29, 2010, excerpt quoted verbatim:

It is just a technical matter, the Obama administration says: We just need to make a slight change in a law to make clear that we have the right to see the names of anyone’s e-mail correspondents and their Web browsing history without the messy complication of asking a judge for permission.

It is far more than a technical change. The administration’s request, reported Thursday in The Washington Post, is an unnecessary and disappointing step backward toward more intrusive surveillance from a president who promised something very different during the 2008 campaign.

In a 1993 update to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Congress said that Internet service providers have to turn over to the F.B.I., on request, “electronic communication transactional records.” The government says this includes the e-mail records of their subscribers, specifically the addresses to which e-mail messages were sent, and the times and dates. (The content of the messages can remain private.) It may also include Web browsing records. To get this information, the F.B.I. simply has to ask for it in the form of a national security letter, which is an administrative request that does not require a judge’s signature.

But there was an inconsistency in the writing of the 1993 law. One section said that Internet providers had to turn over this information, but the next section, which specified what the F.B.I. could request, left out electronic communication records. In 2008, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion saying this discrepancy meant the F.B.I. could no longer ask for the information. Many Internet providers stopped turning it over. Now the Obama administration has asked Congress to make clear that the F.B.I. can ask for it.

Jay Rockefeller offers the amazing opinion in Senate testimony that in his view it would have been better if the internet had never existed Jay Rockefeller — “It would have been better if the internet had never existed” – CSpan2 — 2:45 Amazing.

See Gates Assails WikiLeaks Over Release of Reports, July 29, 2010, by Charlie Savage.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 150 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google