Home » Posts tagged "The New York Times" (Page 2)

Final Primary Results: Tea Party Rampant, Republican Party Disadvantaged in Fall Elections

Evans Liberal Politics
September 15, 2010

 

Final Primary Results: Tea Party Rampant,
Republican Party Disadvantaged in Fall Elections

G.O.P. Insurgents Win in Del. and N.Y., © The New York Times, September 14, 2010, by Jeff Zeleny, photo © N.Y. Times/Jessica Kourkounis, excerpt quoted verbatim:

The Tea Party movement scored another victory on Tuesday, helping to propel a dissident Republican, Christine O’Donnell, to an upset win over Representative Michael N. Castle in the race for the United States Senate nomination in Delaware.

photo of Tea Party candidate Christine O'Donnell celebrating victory in last night's win in the Delaware Republican Senate primary

Mr. Castle, a moderate who served two terms as governor and had been reliably winning elections for the last four decades, became the latest establishment Republican casualty. Republican leaders, who had actively opposed Ms. O’Donnell, said the outcome complicated the party’s chances of winning control of the Senate.

With all precincts reporting, Ms. O’Donnell won 53 percent of the vote to Mr. Castle’s 47 percent. The primary drew 57,000 voters, a small slice of the overall electorate.

Ms. O’Donnell, a former abstinence counselor who had failed in previous attempts to run for office in Delaware, won the endorsement of Sarah Palin, Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina and other leaders of the party’s conservative wing.

“A lot of people said we can’t win the general election; yes we can!” Ms. O’Donnell said. “It will be hard work, but we can win if those same people who fought against me work just as hard for me.”

The results on the last big night of primaries highlighted the extent to which the Tea Party movement has upended the Republican Party and underscored the volatility of the electorate seven weeks from Election Day.

In New Hampshire, another candidate with strong backing from grass-roots conservatives, Ovide Lamontagne, was locked in a tight battle with his main opponent, Kelly Ayotte, in the Republican primary for Senate.

“In the interest of making sure all the votes are counted,” Mr. Lamontagne told supporters at a rally after midnight, “we’re going to continue to wait this out.” In Delaware, Ms. O’Donnell’s victory touched off a new round of recriminations among Republicans over the direction of their party, raising the question of whether there was still room for moderates and whether the drive for ideological purity would cost the party victories in November. The state and national Republican Party had mounted an aggressive campaign to defeat Ms. O’Donnell, but it fell short, with Mr. Castle unable to rely on independent voters who have long formed his base of support.

“The voters in the Republican primary have spoken, and I respect that decision,” Mr. Castle said, addressing crestfallen supporters who gathered in Wilmington. “I had a very nice speech prepared here, hoping I would win this race.”

In Maryland, former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. won the Republican nomination for governor, positioning him for a rematch with Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat who defeated him four years ago. Mr. Ehrlich defeated Brian Murphy, an investment executive, who was endorsed by Ms. Palin.

In Wisconsin, Scott Walker, the Milwaukee County executive, won the Republican nomination for governor. He defeated Mark Neumann, a former congressman, and will face Mayor Tom Barrett of Milwaukee, a Democrat, in November.

The contests on Tuesday night were the last big cluster in a seven-month string of primaries that will come to an end when Hawaii votes on Saturday and Louisiana holds a runoff early next month. Seven members of Congress had already been defeated in their bids for re-election.

In Delaware, O’Donnell supporters who gathered at an Elks lodge in Dover began chanting “Christine! Christine!” as returns began to trickle in and her lead steadily climbed. A little more than an hour after the polls closed, the race was called for Ms. O’Donnell.

In an interview, Ms. O’Donnell said she felt confident that she would have the support of Democrats and independents (neither group could vote in Delaware’s closed Republican primary). If elected in November, she said, she would “work to repeal the health care bill.”

Throughout the campaign, Ms. O’Donnell was dogged by reports — many of them generated by members of her own party — that she had trouble with personal finances, had fudged her educational history and was not fit for office. But Ms. O’Donnell continued to rebut, repudiate and push on, with a hefty dose of help from the Tea Party infrastructure and rank-and-file voters who were furious at Washington. ….

Read the full article, here.

TigerDirect Best Sellers

UPDATE: See Tea party wins could derail GOP bid for Senate control, McClatchy, September 15, 2010, by David Lightman and William Douglas, excerpt quoted verbatim:

WASHINGTON — The tea party movement’s upset victory Tuesday by an insurgent conservative in Delaware’s Republican Senate primary puts GOP chances to win control of the U.S. Senate in November in serious jeopardy.

They need to gain 10 seats to run the Senate. Most leading prognosticators had said they appeared to be within reach of that until Tuesday. (Although most analysts say Republicans still have a good chance to gain a majority in the House of Representatives, where they need to pick up 39 seats.)

Delaware’s not the only Senate race in November where Republicans will field a tea party candidate vulnerable to the “fringe” label against well-known Democrats in the Nov. 2 general elections.

Colorado and Nevada face the same scenario, with incumbent Democrats seeking re-election against tea party insurgents who defeated better-known Republican candidates in low-turnout contests.

However, among the Senate seats most analysts expected Republicans to gain was Delaware’s, where the GOP establishment’s choice for Senate nominee was Rep. Michael Castle. A former two-term governor, the popular 71-year-old Castle has won 12 statewide elections and routinely pulls many Democratic and independent votes.

Running, however, in a closed Republican primary Tuesday in which Democrats and independents couldn’t vote, Castle was upset by little-known tea party candidate Christine O’Donnell.

As of Sept. 1, Delaware has a total of 621,746 registered voters. Nearly half are registered Democrats, while another 146,000 are independents.

Despite the intense campaign in the small state, the GOP primary attracted only a 32 percent turnout Tuesday. That means that a passionate but relatively small tea party movement was able to win a majority of a light Republican turnout.

Next, however, O’Donnell must face Democrat Chris Coons in the Nov. 2 general election. He’s the executive of New Castle County, the most populous of the state’s three counties. O’Donnell pulled 30,561 votes Tuesday. In Delaware’s 2006 general election, Democratic Sen. Tom Carper won — with 170,567 votes.

Closed primaries, where only registered party members can vote, tend to reflect the “small, intensely held preferences of fringe groups, and compared to the electorate in open races, the small size of the tea party makes it a fringe group,” said Michael Munger, a political science professor at Duke University.

See National GOP Looks West: NRSC Washing Hands Of Delaware After Christine O’Donnell Win, Talking Points Memo, September 15, 2010, by Christina Bellantoni: "The national Republicans who whispered for weeks that Christine O’Donnell was unelectable are done with Delaware."

UPDATE: But See Four Reasons Why Christine O’Donnell Might Win, Alt Society Liberalism (Google group), September 16, 2010, by Knifefight Afterdance.

UPDATE and Exercise in Amazement: See O’Donnell In 2007: Scientists Have Created Mice With Human Brains!, Talking Points Memo DC, September 16, 2010, by Eric Kleefeld. Nooooo…. it couldn’t BEEE…. Could it???

See Tea Party win hurts Republicans’ Senate chances, Reuters, September 14, 2010, by Reuters staff, excerpt quoted verbatim:

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

The string of victories by Tea Party candidates was fueled by broad voter dissatisfaction with President Barack Obama and government in Washington, and left Republicans in turmoil.

“Delaware Republicans chose an ultra-rightwing extremist who is out of step with Delaware values,” said Democratic Senator Robert Menendez, who leads the party’s campaign committee.

The Republican Senate campaign committee issued a terse one-sentence statement of congratulations on O’Donnell’s win. O’Donnell shrugged off the likelihood the committee would not spend any money on her.

“They don’t have a winning track record this season,” she told CNN.

See Christine O’Donnell defeats Rep. Mike Castle in Delaware Senate primary, Politico, September 15, 2010, by Jonathan Martin.

See Christine O’Donnell upsets Mike Castle in Delaware Senate primary, The Washington Post, The Fix, by Chris Cillizza.

See N.H. Senate race too close to call, Politico, September 15, 2010, by Shira Toeplitz, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Former state Attorney General Kelly Ayotte led the field for the Republican nomination for the open New Hampshire Senate seat, in a race that was still too close to call by early Wednesday morning.

Ayotte led attorney Ovide Lamontagne by less than one percentage point, 38.2 percent to 37.5 percent, with just over 85 percent of precincts reporting.

Around 3 a.m., representatives from both campaigns said the race was too close to determine a winner and the candidates would wait until daylight Wednesday morning to hear the final results.

The GOP field also included two deep-pocketed businessmen, investor Bill Binnie and network-server company president Jim Bender, who each received 14 percent and 9 percent of the vote, respectively, despite spending their own money heavily on their bids.

The contest pitted the GOP establishment against grassroots conservatives and tea party activists. Ayotte, the early front-runner who was preferred by national Republicans, sought to fend off a late surge by Lamontagne, who ran with tea party support.

See Election Results Live: September 14 Primary Liveblog, The Huffington Post, September 15, 2010, by HuffPo.

Note by Evans Liberal Politics:According to the latest, updated election results for New Hampshire, Kelly Ayotte now leads with 38 percent, or 46,311 votes, to Ovide Lamontagne’s 37 percent, or 45,352 votes. We will bring you updated results here as they become available. ~ Paul Evans.

Highly recommended: Great piece on GOP political philosophy by David Brooks at the New York Times, The Day After Tomorrow, September13, 2010.

InformIT (Pearson Education)

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 187 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Axelrod hits at Boehner’s ‘tight ties’ to lobbyists

Evans Liberal Politics
September 13, 2010

 

Axelrod hits at Boehner’s ‘tight ties’ to lobbyists

 

NEWS FLASH: UPDATE: John Boehner Caves, Announces He Will Vote to Let Bush Tax Cuts Expire, AlterNet, September 13, 2010, by booman.

Axelrod hits at Boehner’s ‘tight ties’ to lobbyists, The Raw Story, September 12, 2010, by David Edwards and Daniel Tencer, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Boehner’s plan will raise taxes on 110 million families, White House adviser says

Spent $116,000 on country clubs in past 18 months, NYT reports

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

Senior White House advisor David Axelrod pointed Sunday to what may be the Democrats’ strategy to prevent House Minority Leader John Boehner from becoming the next House speaker.

Referring to a report in Sunday’s New York Times, Axelrod said on NBC’s Meet the Press that the lobbyist  community in Washington has “rallied to” Boehner’s campaign and “spent millions of dollars so that they can go back to writing the rules themselves.”They say, ‘We don’t need to buy access to Mr. Boehner, we already have that, we want him in power so that we’re in power,” Axelrod said.

The Times report described Boehner as “a leader tightly bound” to lobbyists:

He maintains especially tight ties with a circle of lobbyists and former aides representing some of the nation’s biggest businesses, including Goldman Sachs, Google, Citigroup, R. J. Reynolds, MillerCoors and UPS.

They have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns, provided him with rides on their corporate jets, socialized with him at luxury golf resorts and waterfront bashes and are now leading fund-raising efforts for his Boehner for Speaker campaign, which is soliciting checks of up to $37,800 each, the maximum allowed.

Some of the lobbyists readily acknowledge routinely seeking his office’s help — calling the congressman and his aides as often as several times a week — to advance their agenda in Washington. And in many cases, Mr. Boehner has helped them out.

The Times notes that the chain-smoking Boehner has especially close ties to the tobacco industry. Between 2000 and 2007, Boehner flew at least 45 times on corporate jets owned by companies that include cigarette maker R.J. Reynolds. People affiliated with the company have contributed at least $430,000 to Boehner’s campaigns.

Also in Boehner’s inner circle of lobbyists is Bruce Gates, who represents Altria, the tobacco company formerly known as Philip Morris.

The report also notes that Boehner has a seemingly insatiable taste for the high life: His expenses show in the past 18 months he has spent $116,000 at three country clubs in Florida, Ohio and Virginia.

TAX HIKES FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS?


On Meet the Press Sunday, Axelrod also accused Boehner of planning a tax hike for the middle class while pushing tax breaks for companies that outsource jobs to foreign countries.

“You listen to what John Boehner … has said about what he wants to do about the economy. He said he wants to restore the tax cuts to companies that ship our jobs overseas. He wants to cancel the Obama tax cuts that were part of the Recovery Act for the middle class and raise taxes on 110 million families, and yet he wants to borrow $700 billion to give millionaires and billionaires another tax cut and add to our deficits,” Axelrod told NBC’s David Gregory.

TalkingPointsMemo’s Christina Bellantoni reports that the Democrats are about to launch a new ad against Boehner, in which they accuse him of being “anti-jobs” because of his stance supporting companies that outsource jobs.

“Democrats are planning to use outsourcing against the GOP more on the campaign trail this fall,” Bellantoni reports.

Boehner’s staff are reportedly livid over the Times report, and have accused the paper of intentionally missing opportunities to give Boehner’s side of the story.

Read this on The Raw Story and see video of Axelrod from NBC’s Meet the Press, broadcast Sept. 12, 2010.

Comment on The Raw Story by ‘theoracle’ on this article:

“Boehner’s staff are reportedly livid over the Times report, and have accused the paper of intentionally missing opportunities to give Boehner’s side of the story.”

The Truth Hurts. It Buuurrrnns!!!

And how much do you wanna bet that the New York Times contacted Boehner’s office for comment but got rebuffed? IOW, when actual responsible journalism occurs, journalism that reports the facts, especially the facts about oily-garch leaning conservative Republicans, then the Republicans run…away…as fast as they can. (or at least run to oily-garch friendly Faux “News” where oily-garch Republican, nation-destroying propaganda has a home).

‘Mindboggeling’ comments:

He has paid $116,000 in country club fees? Isn’t that just about all his pay check for the year? How on earth can he afford that on a congressman’s salary? mmmmmmmm……..Payoffs?…….Bribes? God bless all those lobbyists, huh, boner?

‘Myth_slayer’ comments:

Every time I hear about, or see a photo of, Boehner I can’t help but remember that he never complete(d) Navy boot camp, then later claimed military service during Vietnam.

Of course, after being later called on it and threatened with legal action, as it is a crime to fraudulently claim military service, Boner ceased and desisted.

It’s always amazing these clowns have not a shred of self-respect, and can go before the public after committing such flagrant an(d) farcical scams.

UPDATE: See White House hopes GOP will accept tax cuts, The Associated Press on The Raw Story, September 13, 2010, by AP, excerpt quoted verbatim:

White House spokesman hoping GOP leader serious about accepting middle-class tax cuts

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs says the Obama administration hopes the top House Republican was serious in expressing support for renewing tax cuts for the middle class, adding that GOP hopes to also extend reductions for the rich lack common sense.

Gibbs spoke Monday as Congress was returning to the capital for a pre-election session likely to be dominated by a partisan battle extending Bush era tax reductions for all wage earners, now scheduled to expire at year’s end. On Sunday, Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, said he would support renewing tax cuts for the middle class but not the wealthy if that was his only choice.

Democrats are worried that November elections could hand the GOP control of the House and perhaps the Senate. The White House and its Democratic allies hope to use the tax-cut fight to cast themselves as defenders of the middle class and Republicans as a party eager to revive the days of the still unpopular former President George W. Bush.

“We’re going to take the next 50-some days to convince the public that’s exactly what the Republicans would do — back to the Bush policies,” Gibbs said.

See Fate of tax cuts is central as Congress returns, The Washington Post, September 13, 2010, by Shailagh Murray and Lori Montgomery.

UPDATE: See Maybe Not Such a Mid-Term Blowout, The Huffington Post, September 12, 2010, by Robert Kuttner.

UPDATE: See McConnell Favors Extension of Bush-Era Tax Rates, The New York Times, September 13, 2010, by David M. Herszenhorn. Independent Joe Lieberman (who generally votes with the Democratic Caucus) and four Democrats also favor keeping the Bush tax cuts at this point.

TigerDirect Best Sellers

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 187 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Frank Rich: Time for This Big Dog to Bite Back

Evans Liberal Politics
September 12, 2010

 

Frank Rich: Time for This Big Dog to Bite Back

 

Time for This Big Dog to Bite Back, © The New York Times, September 11, 2010, by Frank Rich, excerpt quoted verbatim:

NO, he can’t. President Obama can’t reverse the unemployment numbers by Election Day. He can’t get even a modest new stimulus bill past the Party of No, and even if he could, there would be few jobs to show for it until (maybe) 2011. Nor can he rewrite the history of his administration. Its signal accomplishments to date are an initial stimulus package that was overrun by the calamity at hand and a marathon health care battle as yet better known for its unseemly orgy of backroom wrangling than its concrete results. While that brawl raged, the White House seemed indifferent to the mounting number of Americans being tossed onto the Great Recession scrapheap.

CompUSA Best Sellers

And so the odds that Obama’s party will survive the midterms seem less than Indiana Jones’s in the Temple of Doom — as we are reminded hourly by the Beltway herd flogging the latest polls. The Democrats are facing a “historic” rout, an earthquake, a tidal wave — well, you know the drill. End of story.Unless it’s not. On Labor Day, the fighting Obama abruptly re-emerged, a far cry from the man whose Oval Office address on Iraq days earlier was about as persuasive as a hostage video. Speaking to workers in Milwaukee, the president finally started giving voice to the anger of America’s battered middle class. And he even let loose with a little anger of his own. The unspecified “powerful interests” aligned against him, he said, “talk about me like a dog.”

That inelegant line — “not in my prepared remarks,” Obama explained — landed because it was true and because he said it with a grin. Americans like their warriors happy, not petulant (cf, “You’re likable enough, Hillary”).

For a guy facing a tidal wave, the president was so ebullient, you had to wonder if he knew something we didn’t. Maybe he simply read the unabridged poll numbers rather than the CliffsNotes summaries of cable news. Those numbers are hardly as monochromatic as advertised. Obama’s approval rating, for months a consistent (not imploding) 45-ish percent, still makes him arguably America’s most popular national politician. The polls also continue to show that, while both political parties are despised, Democrats are slightly less despised than Republicans. In The Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, for instance, 36 percent of those surveyed rate the Democrats positively, compared with the G.O.P.’s 30 percent. It’s only when the November horse-race matchup is limited to “likely voters” that the tidal wave rolls in, giving the Republicans a roughly 10-point lead.

That spread is the Democrats’ dread “enthusiasm gap.” And since that gap can’t be bridged in two months by new government programs or divine intervention for the nearly one in six Americans who are un- or underemployed, what could give the Democrats even a slender reed of hope? If there’s any plausible answer, it can be drawn from the single poll finding that is most devastating for Obama, the question (as worded by The Washington Post/ABC News) of whether “he understands the problems of people like you.” There his numbers really have imploded. When he arrived in office, 72 percent answered Yes and 24 percent No. As of last week, Yes had fallen to 50 and No had doubled to 48.

That a former community organizer and insurgent presidential candidate from a rocky middle-class background could be branded an out-of-touch elitist is not entirely the fault of his critics. Obama has perhaps never recovered from handing his administration’s plum economic jobs to Robert Rubin protégés with dirty hands from the bubble — Lawrence Summers, a deregulation advocate from the Clinton administration, and Timothy Geithner, an indulgent regulator at the New York Fed. Their presence has helped Obama’s more unscrupulous adversaries get away with the lie that his White House, not President Bush’s, created TARP. Indeed, such is the Obama administration’s identification with the tarnished Wall Street culture that even Michael Bloomberg mistakenly identified Geithner, a longtime public servant who never worked at an investment bank, as a Goldman Sachs alumnus at a public event in New York last month.

The White House’s not-on-C-Span deal-making with the health care industry behemoths only cemented the administration’s corporatist image, as did Obama’s meandering path to what still looks like a loophole-ridden compromise on financial regulatory reform. This is why even many Democrats have become lukewarm in their conviction that their president “understands the problems of people like you.”

For Obama to make Americans believe he does understand their problems and close the enthusiasm gap, he cannot merely make changes of campaign style. Sporadic photo ops in shirtsleeves or factory settings persuade no one; a few terrific speeches can’t always ride to the rescue. Nor would there be much point in firing Summers and Geithner — a political nonstarter anyway, now that it’s been opportunistically proposed by the G.O.P. leader John Boehner (his one good idea). Certainly Obama can add powerful new hands who might actually fight to protect ordinary Americans from the sharks; the star consumer advocate, Elizabeth Warren, should have been front and center, even in a Senate confirmation battle, long ago. But in the short term between now and Election Day, Obama may have the most to gain by sharpening his attack on those “powerful interests” who liken him to a dog. A top dog bites back (with a smile).

In a second forceful speech last week, delivered outside Cleveland, Obama titillated the political press by calling out Boehner by name eight times. But though Boehner is a nice soft target — he belittled the economic meltdown as an “ant” and has staked his political capital on extending tax cuts for America’s wealthiest 3 percent — he’s merely a front-man. Obama must also call out the powerful interests who are pulling the G.O.P.’s strings (and filling its coffers), whether on Wall Street or in Big Oil or any other sector where special interests are aligned against reform in the public interest. ….

Read the full article, here.

Comment by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: What we are seeing here is a glimmer of that hope which inspired us so in the 2008 campaign. Wouldn’t it be something for Barack Obama to actually come out for the people and ardently against special interests, as we had always hoped? Certainly, special interests, Wall Street, big business and the rich and powerful are NOT the President’s friend. Wall Street, which used to divide its money almost equally between Democrats and Republicans in political campaigns, is now solidly in the Republican corner. Maybe the President has wised up and sees who his friends really are — we the people — and just who they aren’t. Is Obama now willing to take the bad guys on, and make that what the campaign is all about this fall? That would be one campaign platform that would close the enthusiasm gap the Democrats face, and really fast. We can only hope. Mr. President, are you listening?

Visit MyBarackObama.com Vote 2010 and see the campaign speeches the President has lined up.

TigerDirect Best Sellers

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 187 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Vacancies Strain White House’s Goals for Economy

Evans Liberal Politics
September 11, 2010

 

Vacancies Strain White House’s Goals for Economy

 

Obama Hints May Make Elizabeth Warren Appointment

 

Vacancies Strain White House’s Goals for Economy, © The New York Times, September 10, 2010, by Sewell Chan, excerpt quoted verbatim:

WASHINGTON — President Obama signaled on Friday that he was close to choosing a director for a new consumer bureau, but an array of top jobs that will be crucial to shaping economic policy and financial regulation for the rest of his term remain unfilled.

Click the Class War
Sign to Visit Paul’s Playlist
for Great Rock & Pop Hits!

protest sign saying They Only Call It Class War When We Fight Back serves as a link to Paul’s Playlist of 185 rock, pop and electronic hits

At a White House news conference, Mr. Obama praised Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard law professor who was the chief proponent of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and is a front-runner to lead it. Calling her “a dear friend” and a “tremendous advocate” for the new agency, the president said he had talked with her but added, “I’m not going to make an official announcement until it’s ready.”Ms. Warren is considered a foe of Wall Street but a favorite of liberals. If she were nominated to the post it could set off a partisan brawl similar to the battles that nearly swamped the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law Mr. Obama signed in July, which created the bureau.

That position, however, is only one of a half-dozen unfilled presidentially appointed posts that have vast powers over the mortgage market, financial stability and the banking and insurance industries. The seats have been vacant even though the new law directed regulatory agencies to make scores of major decisions that will shape Wall Street and the financial sector for years to come.

Delays in the appointment process — lengthened by Congressional brinksmanship and cumbersome vetting — are not new, and some choices have come quickly. On Friday, the president named Austan D. Goolsbee chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, filling a position that had just opened. But the confluence of vacancies in the economic realm comes at a time of regulatory transformation, a slowing economy and a Republican resurgence. (Mr. Goolsbee, who was previously confirmed as a member of the council, did not need a second Senate confirmation to become chairman.)

The prospect of Republicans making strong gains in Congress in November has complicated the appointment calculation, as nearly all of the unfilled jobs require Senate confirmation.

“There’s a normal attrition around midterm,” said Stuart E. Eizenstat, who was President Jimmy Carter’s chief domestic policy adviser and later President Bill Clinton’s deputy Treasury secretary. “What’s different now is the likelihood of a dramatic change in the composition of Congress, and the fact that the Republicans may use each and every one of these to make an economic point.”

The tight Congressional calendar also means that some of the jobs might go unfilled for months longer.

“It is close to impossible to think that the Senate can take a nomination, hold hearings and confirm the person before the election,” Mr. Eizenstat said. “And getting this done in the postelection session is possible, but very difficult.”

In some cases, the president has put forward names that have not been acted on.

For example, the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, which is considering additional steps to prop up the flagging recovery, has just four of its full complement of seven members. The Senate has yet to confirm three candidates Mr. Obama nominated in April to fill the vacancies.

One factor that has delayed the decision over the consumer post is the fierce opposition of banking and business groups to Ms. Warren, who is chairwoman of the Congressional panel that oversees the 2008 Wall Street bailout. Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, the chairman of the Banking Committee, has said she might have trouble being confirmed.

On Friday, Mr. Obama voiced frustration at Senate Republicans for routinely blocking his appointments, “even if I nominate somebody for dogcatcher.”

Pointing to vacant judgeships and unfilled positions at the Department of Homeland Security, he added: “It’s very hard when you’ve got a determined minority in the Senate that insists on a 60-vote filibuster on every single person that we’re trying to confirm.” The Republicans, he said, are “just playing games.”

Read the full article, here.

What keeps the Democrats from making their case?, OpEdNews, September 10, 2010, by Ralph Nader.

See The midterms: Who’s the ‘Party of No’?, MSNBC First Read, September 9, 2010, by MSNBC, excerpt quoted verbatim:

“The Republican National Committee turned the “party of no” label against Democrats in a new Web video, which clips together several Democrats’ campaign ads showing different members opposing healthcare reform, cap-and-trade legislation, the stimulus bill and other items,” The Hill writes.

Former New York Gov. George Pataki, who now runs the conservative nonprofit group Revere America, yesterday unveiled a seven-figure ad buy (YouTube video), part of the “Pledge to Win” campaign, which will target members of Congress who voted in favor of the health care reform law.

See Did Obama hint he’s going to appoint Elizabeth Warren?, The Washington Post, The Plum Line, September 10, 2010, by Greg Sargent.

See America Still Needs Elizabeth Warren, And The Bank Lobby Is Still Lying About Her, Campaign for America’s Future on Evans Liberal Politics, August 7, 2010, by Zach Carter.

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 185 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today? If you love liberalism, and love reading articles from the independent, free press, please spread the news about Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Blackwater Mercenaries Won Contracts with 30 False Companies

Evans Liberal Politics
September 5, 2010

 

Blackwater Mercenaries Won Contracts
with 30 False Companies

 

30 False Fronts Won Contracts for Blackwater, © The New York Times, September 3, 2010, by James Risen and Mark Mazzetti, excerpt quoted verbatim:

WASHINGTON — Blackwater Worldwide created a web of more than 30 shell companies or subsidiaries in part to obtain millions of dollars in American government contracts after the security company came under intense criticism for reckless conduct in Iraq, according to Congressional investigators and former Blackwater officials.

Spiritual Cinema Circle

While it is not clear how many of those businesses won contracts, at least three had deals with the United States military or the Central Intelligence Agency, according to former government and company officials. Since 2001, the intelligence

agency has awarded up to $600 million in classified contracts to Blackwater and its affiliates, according to a United States government official.The Senate Armed Services Committee this week released a chart that identified 31 affiliates of Blackwater, now known as Xe Services. The network was disclosed as part of a committee’s investigation into government contracting. The investigation revealed the lengths to which Blackwater went to continue winning contracts after Blackwater guards killed 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in September 2007. That episode and other reports of abuses led to criminal and Congressional investigations, and cost the company its lucrative security contract with the State Department in Iraq.

The network of companies — which includes several businesses located in offshore tax havens — allowed Blackwater to obscure its involvement in government work from contracting officials or the public, and to assure a low profile for any of its classified activities, said former Blackwater officials, who, like the government officials, spoke only on condition of anonymity.

Senator Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said in a statement that it was worth “looking into why Blackwater would need to create the dozens of other names” and said he had requested that the Justice Department investigate whether Blackwater officers misled the government when using subsidiaries to solicit contracts.

The C.I.A.’s continuing relationship with the company, which recently was awarded a $100 million contract to provide security at agency bases in Afghanistan, has drawn harsh criticism from some members of Congress, who argue that the company’s tarnished record should preclude it from such work. At least two of the Blackwater-affiliated companies, XPG and Greystone, obtained secret contracts from the agency, according to interviews with a half dozen former Blackwater officials.

A C.I.A. spokesman, Paul Gimigliano, said that Xe’s current duties for the agency were to provide security for agency operatives. Contractors “do the tasks we ask them to do in strict accord with the law; they are supervised by C.I.A. staff officers; and they are held to the highest standards of conduct” he said. “As for Xe specifically, they help provide security in tough environments, an assignment at which their people have shown both skill and courage.”

Congress began to investigate the affiliated companies last year, after the shooting deaths of two Afghans by Blackwater security personnel working for a subsidiary named Paravant, which had obtained Pentagon contracts in Afghanistan. In a Senate hearing earlier this year (PDF), Army officials said that when they awarded the contract to Paravant for training of the Afghan Army, they had no idea that the business was part of Blackwater. ….

Read the full article, here.

Check Out the Best Guide to Politics on the Web!
The Guide to Liberal News and Politics on the Web


Evans Liberal Politics Guide to Liberal News and Politics on the Web

Find Out Where to find the Truth in Politics!


See Iraq Withdrawal? Obama and Clinton Expanding US Paramilitary Force in Iraq, The Nation on Evans Liberal Politics, July 25, 2010, by Jeremy Scahill.

See ‘An Absolute Bargain’: Blackwater Settles Massacre Lawsuit by Paying Families of Dead Iraqis $100,000 Each, AlterNet on Evans Liberal Politics, January 9, 2010, by Jeremy Scahill.

See Scahill and Olbermann on Blackwater: Murderous Crusaders for Christ, Evans Liberal Politics, November 28, 2009, by Joshua Holland.

See Blackwater Said to Pursue Bribes to Iraq After 17 Died, The New York Times on Evans Liberal Politics, November 11, 2009, by Mark Mazzetti and James Risen.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 183 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

Our Playlist is #1 Rated by Google

Joe Sestak, the 60th Democrat

Evans Liberal Politics
August 19, 2010

 

Joe Sestak, the 60th Democrat

 

Focus on the Pennsylvania Senate Race

 

Joe Sestak, the 60th Democrat, © The New York Times, August 18, 2010, by Michael Sokolove, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Joe Sestak stepped out of a Chevy Suburban on the morning of July 3 and met up with a group of 15 campaign volunteers gathered in the parking lot of a drugstore in Canonsburg, Pa., just southwest of Pittsburgh. The town is the birthplace of Perry Como. It is also said to have the largest Independence Day parade in western Pennsylvania. Sestak and his supporters walked across an intersection and took their assigned place near the back of a procession amid firetrucks, dune buggies, a horse-drawn carriage, a bagpipe band and an S.U.V. ferrying Junior Miss Mid Mon Valley, an 8-year-old beauty queen sitting on top of the vehicle with her legs dangling through the sunroof. Sestak, a Navy admiral turned politician, surveyed the scene, then turned to me and said: “I heard this parade was gigantic and wonderful. But look at this!”

photo of Joe Sestak reporters holding up signs with his name on them

Not yet five years removed from military service, Sestak has shown himself to be a quick study in his new field. Twice already he has been elected to Congress by voters in his suburban Philadelphia district. And in May, he defeated the wily survivor and political contortionist Arlen Specter — while also overcoming the determined opposition of his own party — to become the Democratic candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania. In November, he’ll face the former congressman Pat Toomey, a former president of the Club for Growth, an economically libertarian, anti-tax organization, in what will be a closely watched battle of ideological opposites.

One of the best things Sestak has going for him is the bad thing that happened to him in the spring — being dissed by just about every prominent Democrat in the land, from President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden on down. (Even Magic Johnson, for whatever reason, felt compelled to stand up for Arlen Specter.) The high-level opposition has allowed Sestak to cast himself as something other than his party’s man, which may prove to be particularly useful this year. Democratic elders did not mean to strengthen Sestak — they wanted to defeat him — but their opposition earlier could end up preserving a Senate seat for the party.

Sestak’s approach to campaigning falls somewhere between tireless and maniacal. When the Independence Day parade got started, he was determined to shake as many hands as possible, so he took off on a trot, reaching out his hand to those gathered along the sides of Canonsburg’s main street. “I’m Joe Sestak — Happy Fourth,” was about all he had to time to say. To those whose attire indicated they were veterans, he said, “Thank you for your service.” After he had jogged about 50 yards, he crossed to the other side of the street — backtracking on a diagonal, and at a pace closer to a full sprint — so he could shake the hands he missed.

Sestak, who is 58, kept up this zigzag pattern for two hours along a nearly two-mile route, some of it up a steep hill. He nearly ran over a toddler at one point, and another time I had to step out of his way to avoid a collision. Beads of sweat formed on his forehead. He had not bothered to apply sunscreen, so his face and neck browned, then reddened. When his left foot cramped and he started to limp, he commented that maybe the loafers he was wearing were not the best shoes for running.

A couple of young campaign aides traveling with Sestak walked the middle of the street behind a banner with his name on it, and he began to pester them about timing. We were due elsewhere later in the day — about two and a half hours north, just outside Erie, for another parade. “Are we going to make it?” he asked. “Yes, sir,” the answer came back.

At the conclusion of the Canonsburg event, we walked about another quarter mile to our vehicles, which had been moved by his aides to a forward position near the end of the parade route. “Tactics are for amateurs; logistics are for professionals,” Sestak said, using one of the military phrases he likes to employ. ….

Visit the Joe Sestak campaign website.

Comment by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: Joe Sestak is that rarity of rarities, a true progressive candidate. On the other hand, his opponent Pat Toomey is the worst sort of Republican, a Tea Party type anti-tax, anti-Washington, anti-government right winger campaigning to disassemble government. Obama and especially Rahm Emanuel tried to freeze Sestak out during the primaries in favor of former Republican turned Democrat Arlen Specter. Now this gives him a certain advantage in the main race, having defeated Specter in the primaries, because he can claim a certain “outsider” status. Just to be sure you know. It’s be interesting to see how much weight Obama and the Democrats throw at this race against far right winger Pat Toomey. Toomey would be an absolute disaster in the Senate.

Read the rest of the article here.

Toomey Takes Lead Over Sestak in Senate Race

See Pat Toomey Takes 9-Point Lead Over Joe Sestak in Pa. Senate Race, Politics Daily, August 19, 2010, by America Online (AOL), excerpt quoted verbatim:

Former Republican Rep. Pat Toomey has jumped out to a 45 percent to 36 percent lead over Democratic Rep. Joe Sestak in their race to claim the seat currently held by Arlen Specter, according to a Public Policy Polling survey conducted Aug. 14-16. Twenty percent are undecided. The margin of error is 4.1 points.

Aside from the fact that the Sestak-Specter primary race is settled and the election drawing nearer, PPP puts more importance on this than past polls because it is now surveying likely voters. In June, when it polled registered voters who might or might not go to the polls, the two were tied at 41 percent each.

Toomey and Sestak still have a ways to go in familiarizing themselves to voters. About a third say they don’t know enough about either to express a favorable or unfavorable opinion. Toomey leads Sestak among self-described conservatives (44 percent of the sample) by 75 percent to 8 percent while Sestak leads among moderates (39 percent of the sample) by 51 percent to 25 percent. The balance are undecided.

Toomey holds a 50 percent to 23 percent lead, with 27 percent undecided, among independents, although they make up only 9 percent of the survey’s sample. ….

Read the full article here.

Audio News on Bill Clinton on the Campaign
Trail for Joe Sestak:



img src=”http://evans-politics.com/images/Bill_CLinton_100px.jpg” alt=”thumbnail photo of former President Bill Clinton campaigning in Scranton for Senate Candidate Joe Sestak, with audio news on this” /> Bill Clinton campaigns for Senate Candidate Joe Sestak — 0:53.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

Listen to 180 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

Our Playlist is #1 Rated by Google

Better Car Engines and Alternative, Renewable Fuels

Evans Liberal Politics
August 18, 2010

 

Better Car Engines and Alternative, Renewable Fuels

 

The New York Times on Evans Liberal Politics, August 18, 2010:

There are two articles in today’s New York Times that offer hope in the automotive world. General Motors is working with a Chinese Partner to develop small, efficient engines and advanced transmissions, and the Federal government, led by energy secretary Stephen Chu, is funding research on fuels, hopefully renewable ones, which could replace petroleum fuels such as gasoline and diesel fuel altogether. These two developments offer some reason to hope for the future, and so I wanted to share them. – Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans

G.M. to Develop Small Engines With China Partner


beautiful image of a seedling sprouting from a clump of dirt held in a man's hand, all in a crystal globe against a blue sky

SHANGHAI — Deepening cooperation with one of its major partners in China, General Motors said Wednesday that it planned to jointly develop small, fuel-efficient engines and advanced transmissions here with S.A.I.C. Motor Corp.

The agreement is part of the American automaker’s plan to create more environmentally friendly technologies and expand its range of offerings in China’s fast-growing auto market, which has overtaken the United States as the world’s largest.

China is also General Motors’ biggest market. The company sold more vehicles in the first half of this year in China than in the United States. For 13 years, the company has been producing and selling cars here in a joint venture that is now majority owned by S.A.I.C., formerly known as Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp.

S.A.I.C. is one of China’s biggest auto makers and has a joint venture with Volkswagen as well.

As sales of G.M. cars have slowed in the United States and the rest of the world, its Buick division in China has been stellar. Analysts say this country’s fast-growing auto market has been one of the few bright spots for G.M., which is now majority owned by the U.S. government.

G.M. is expected to soon announce an initial public offering that could raise billions of dollars for the auto maker and help it repay some of funds it received from the U.S. government.

Much of General Motors’ value now depends on whether it can continue to expand overseas, while revamping its American division.

G.M. and S.A.I.C. have already agreed to make small cars and commercial vehicles together in India. And the decision to jointly develop engines with S.A.I.C. should help solidify G.M.’s ties to the Chinese government, which controls S.A.I.C. — perhaps giving G.M. an edge here.

Read the full article here.

But what if science, spurred on by business opportunities funded by the federal government, were able to develop an altogether alternative fuel instead of gasoline? This intriguing topic forms the basis for tonight’s second article from the New York Times:

Filling the Tank With Something Else


"Beyond Fossil Fuels: Gasoline Substitutes Researched with U.S. Funds":


CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Most research on renewable energy has focused on replacing the electricity that now comes from burning coal and natural gas. But the spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the reliance on Middle East imports and the threat of global warming are reminders that oil is also a pressing worry. A lot of problems could be solved with a renewable replacement for oil-based gasoline and diesel in the fuel tank — either a new liquid fuel or a much better battery.

Yet, success in this field is so hard to reliably predict that research has been limited, and even venture capitalists tread lightly. Now the federal government is plunging in, in what the energy secretary, Steven Chu, calls the hunt for miracles.

The work is part of the mission of the new Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy, which is intended to finance high-risk, high-reward projects. It can be compared to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, part of the Pentagon, which spread seed money for projects and incubated a variety of useful technologies, including the Internet.

The goal of this agency, whose budget is $400 million for two years, is to realize profound results — such as tens of millions of motor vehicles that would run 300 miles a day on electricity from clean sources or on liquid fuels from trees and garbage.

One miracle would be a better battery. A pound of gasoline holds about 35 times more energy than a pound of lead-acid batteries and about six times more than lithium-ion batteries. Cars must carry their energy and expend energy to carry it, so the less weight per unit of energy, the better.

David Danielson, an Energy Department official, oversees a program to invest in start-up companies with new approaches to batteries, which is a new strategy; in the early 1990s, the department decided to concentrate all its efforts in lithium-ion research and gave up on other chemistries.

One new technology would allow every car, at modest extra cost, to shut down automatically at each stop sign or red light; when the driver tapped the accelerator, the battery would instantly get it going again. (Hybrids like the Prius do that, but at a substantial cost premium.)

A team at an infant company is using tiny carbon structures called nanotubes to store electricity. The goal is to create something the size of a flashlight battery, holding only about 30 percent as much energy, but able to charge or discharge in two seconds, almost forever.

The technology could form part of the battery pack for a car, cheaply delivering the energy for a jackrabbit start, without damaging conventional chemical batteries, which can store vastly more energy but can only accept or deliver it slowly.

It could also provide a cellphone battery that would charge in five minutes. That kind of battery is called a capacitor.

Read the full article here.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 180 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Visitor TrackingData Recoveryforexbest forex broker