Home » Posts tagged "The New York Times"

Paul Krugman: Shock Doctrine, U.S.A.

Evans Liberal Politics
February 26, 2011

 

Paul Krugman: Shock Doctrine, U.S.A.

Shock Doctrine, U.S.A., © The New York Times, February 25, 2011, by Paul Krugman, photo from Wikipedia, republication in Common Dreams.org quoted verbatim:

Here’s a thought: maybe Madison, Wis., isn’t Cairo after all. Maybe it’s Baghdad — specifically, Baghdad in 2003, when the Bush administration put Iraq under the rule of officials chosen for loyalty and political reliability rather than experience and competence.

Wikipedia photograph of New York Times bestselling author and Nobel laureate Paul Krugman

As many readers may recall, the results were spectacular — in a bad way. Instead of focusing on the urgent problems of a shattered economy and society, which would soon descend into a murderous civil war, those Bush appointees were obsessed with imposing a conservative ideological vision. Indeed, with looters still prowling the streets of Baghdad, L. Paul Bremer, the American viceroy, told a Washington Post reporter that one of his top priorities was to “corporatize and privatize state-owned enterprises” — Mr. Bremer’s words, not the reporter’s — and to “wean people from the idea the state supports everything.”

The story of the privatization-obsessed Coalition Provisional Authority was the centerpiece of Naomi Klein’s best-selling book “The Shock Doctrine,” which argued that it was part of a broader pattern. From Chile in the 1970s onward, she suggested, right-wing ideologues have exploited crises to push through an agenda that has nothing to do with resolving those crises, and everything to do with imposing their vision of a harsher, more unequal, less democratic society.

Which brings us to Wisconsin 2011, where the shock doctrine is on full display.

Read the full article here.

Obama-GOP deal raises taxes on poorest earners

Evans Liberal Politics
December 9, 2010

 

Obama-GOP deal raises taxes on poorest earners

Obama-GOP deal raises taxes on poorest earners, The Raw Story, December 8, 2010, by Daniel Tencer, used with permission, quoted verbatim: Evans Liberal Politics is happy to partner with The Raw Story to bring you cutting edge news.

Quarter of tax savings will go to richest one percent

The plan to extend Bush-era tax cuts that President Barack Obama struck with the Senate Republican leadership will result in lower taxes for wealthy and middle-class Americans but will mean a tax hike for the very poorest earners.

Skyscraper - Pharmacy Checker Approved and CIPA certified Online Pharmacy

According to an analysis in the New York Times, the Obama-GOP deal will mean that individuals earning less than $20,000 and families earning less than $40,000 will see a small tax hike.

“It will come to a few dollars a week,” Roberton Williams, an analyst at the Tax Policy Center told the Times. “But it is an increase.”

As part of the deal, Obama agreed to drop the Making Work Pay credit that was created as part of the stimulus package, and replace it with a lower payroll tax. That lost credit — of $400 or $800 — is greater than the amount low-income earners will save from the lower payroll tax, meaning, in total, they will pay more.

Of the estimated $900 billion in new and continued tax breaks in the deal, about one-quarter — $225 billion — is expected to go to the top one percent of earners.

The Times reports:

[T]he tax benefits will flow most heavily to the highest earners, just as the original cuts did when they were passed in 2001 and 2003. At least a quarter of the tax savings will go to the wealthiest 1 percent of the population.

The wealthiest Americans will also reap tax savings from the proposal’s plan to keep the cap on dividend and capital gains taxes at 15 percent, well below the highest rates on ordinary income.

And negotiators have agreed that the estimated $900 billion cost of the cuts will simply be added to the deficit — not covered by reductions in spending or increases in other taxes. That is good news for hedge fund managers and private equity investors, who appear to have withstood an effort to get them to pay more by eliminating a quirk in the tax code that allows most of their income to be taxed at just 15 percent.

The analysis comes as President Obama worked Wednesday to sell Democratic leaders and his progressive base on a tax deal many of them say was an unnecessary giveaway to the wealthy and — from a fiscal perspective — bad policy.

“I think the more they look at it, the more of them are going to say this makes sense,” the president said of the deal. “You’ve just had economists over the last 24, 48 hours examine this and say this is going to boost the economy; it is going to grow the economy; it is going to increase the likelihood that we can drive down the unemployment rate.”

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid said Wednesday that the Senate could begin to move on the deal as early as this week, something Reuters reported as “a sign Democrats may be conceding on the deal.”

However, opposition to the bill is gathering steam among some senators on both sides of the aisle. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an avowed democratic socialist, and Sen. Jim DeMint, considered one of the most conservative members of the chamber, have both declared they will filibuster the deal.

It’s unclear if there are 60 votes in the Senate to overcome a filibuster.

Commentary by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: See the N.Y. Times OpEd piece, "No Deficit of Courage, December 8, 2010, by Jon Meacham: Yes, with this compromise, I do believe Obama has shown courage. I’m not sure if it was the right thing to do, but time is running out on this Congress and Obama did not have many options. Personally I would give him some degree of praise for this, even though often my economic views often resemble those of Robert Reich and Bob Swern. He could have just struck out in the negotiations or not done as well as he did. I for one hope Congress will pass this compromise and that both sides will stop acting like children. ~ Paul Evans

UPDATE: See Not ready for that ‘adult conversation’ on debt?, MSNBC, December 9, 2010, by Tom Curry: Only a few days ago, debt reduction seemed to dominate political debate.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock Playlist, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a Listen to the master Playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

Economy loses 95,000 jobs as government cuts payrolls

Evans Liberal Politics
October 8, 2010

 

Economy loses 95,000 jobs as government cuts payrolls


Cuts in Government Led U.S. Economy to Lose 95,000 Jobs, © The New York Times, October 8, 2010, by Catherine Rampell, excerpt quoted verbatim:

The economy shed 95,000 nonfarm jobs in September, the Labor Department reported Friday, with most of the decline the result of the layoffs by local governments and of temporary decennial Census workers.

If You Agree
Click on Bad Old Bush
to Visit Paul’s Playlist
of 231 Rock & Pop Hits


magazine cover from the Daily Mirror with the words 'How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB' on Bush's re-election serves as a link to launch Paul's Playlist of 190 rock and pop hits

The steep drop was far worse than economists had been predicting. Most estimates were for a loss of only a few thousand jobs.

“September’s U.S. payroll report adds to the evidence that the recovery is losing what little forward momentum it had,” said Paul Ashworth, senior United States economist at Capital Economics.

The recovery that officially began in June 2009 has slowed considerably in recent months, raising concerns about the long slog the country will have to endure to dig itself out of the deepest downturn since the Great Depression. Private payrolls have been growing throughout 2009 but at a rate too sluggish to make much of a dent in unemployment. The outlook for the rest of the year is equally discouraging, economists say.

“We’re looking for companies to get more confident in the pace of recovery and start to hire around 150,000 jobs a month, which is what we need just to keep the unemployment rate flat,” said John Ryding, chief economist at RDQ Economics. “But I just don’t see that happening between now and the end of the year.”

While total government jobs fell by 159,000, private sector companies added 64,000 jobs last month. The unemployment rate, which measures the percentage of workers who are actively looking for but unable to find jobs, stayed flat at 9.6 percent.

A broader measure of unemployment, which includes people who are working part-time because they cannot find full-time jobs, and people who have given up looking for work, rose to 17.1 percent from 16.7 percent in August. This was largely because of a jump in the number of people who are reluctantly working part-time. ….

Read the full article here.

Comment by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: 77,000 of the newly unemployed were Census workers whose job ran out of time. Also, keep in mind that unemployment is not evenly distributed throughout the economy. For those workers making $200,000 a year or more, unemployment remains at a very acceptable rate of 3.2 percent. But for those workers making $20,000 a year or less, the official unemployment rate stands at 31 percent. That doesn’t count the underemployed, those working part time jobs who really want full time jobs, nor those workers who have given up and stopped looking for work.

Spiritual Cinema Circle

Check out our Famous Guide to Liberal News & Politics on the Web, the best guide to where to find "The Truth" in the news around the web.


Check out Paul’s Playlist of 206 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


NEW! For our readers: Check out our 40 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Obama and Dems Struggle to Reclaim Liberals’ Enthusiasm Ahead of Elections

Evans Liberal Politics
October 6, 2010

 

Obama and Dems Struggle to Reclaim
Liberals’ Enthusiasm Ahead of Elections


Obama Strains to Get Liberals Back Into Fold Ahead of Vote, © The New York Times, October 5, 2010, by Peter Baker, excerpt quoted verbatim:

WASHINGTON — With four weeks until Congressional elections that will shape the remainder of his term, President Obama is increasingly focused on generating enthusiasm within the base that helped put him in the White House two years ago, from college students to African-Americans.

If You Agree
Click on Bad Old Bush
to Visit Paul’s Playlist
of 206 Rock & Pop Hits


magazine cover from the Daily Mirror with the words 'How can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB' on Bush's re-election serves as a link to launch Paul's Playlist of 190 rock and pop hits

But Mr. Obama has aimed much of his prodding — and not a small amount of personal pique — at the liberals most deflated by the first two years of his presidency. Assuming that many independents are out of reach, White House strategists are counting on Mr. Obama to energize, cajole, wheedle and even shame the left into matching the Tea Party momentum that has propelled Republicans this year.

As he holds rallies aimed at college students and minority groups, sends e-mail to his old list of campaign supporters and prepares to host a town hall-style meeting on MTV, the president essentially is appealing to his liberal base to put aside its disappointment in him. Without offering regrets for policy choices that have angered liberals, Mr. Obama argues that the Republican alternative is far worse.

“You can’t sit it out,” he told a conference call of college student journalists last week. “You can’t suddenly just check in once every 10 years or so, on an exciting presidential election, and then not pay attention during big midterm elections where we’ve got a real big choice between Democrats and Republicans.” He added that “the energy that you were able to bring to our politics in 2008, that’s needed not less now, it’s needed more now.”

At times, though, the message has come across as scolding and testy, in the view of some Democrats. Mr. Obama told Rolling Stone magazine that Democrats “need to buck up” because it would be “inexcusable” for them to stay home. Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. told a fund-raiser recently that the base should “stop whining and get out there and look at the alternatives.”

The White House may be making progress closing the so-called enthusiasm gap with Republicans, according to Democratic strategists who point to improving poll numbers and fund-raising. But the fact that Mr. Obama needs to make such a concerted effort highlights the depth of disaffection among liberals over what they see as his failure to aggressively push for the change he promised.

“It’s great that President Obama is showing a fighting spirit in the weeks before an election, but what his former voters need to see is that same fighting spirit when he’s governing,” said Adam Green, a co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a group started last year to advocate for liberal goals and candidates.

David Axelrod, the president’s senior adviser, said the appeal to the base stemmed entirely from political reality. “It’s not frustration at all,” he said. “It’s fundamental. Almost the entire Republican margin is based on the enthusiasm gap, and if Democrats come out in the same turnout as Republicans, it’s going to be a much different election.” ….

Read the full article, here.

Why Pay More? $7.49 .COM Domains from GoDaddy.com 468x60

"The Republican Wave Has Crested;"
Democrats Gaining in Polls


“The Republican Wave Has Crested”; 2 New Polls Show Significant 7 Point Gains for the Democrats, Daily Kos, October 6, 2010, by TomP, excerpt quoted verbatim:

We have seen it recently in California where Brown and Boxer are opening up signifcant leads, in Washington and in Connecticut. Yes, the economy is making it a tough year, but new polling shows the Democrats coming back. The tradmed, however, is so invested in their wished-for Republican wave, that the news is not getting out. WE need to spread the word:

Submitted by Simon Rosenberg on 10/5/10

More evidence this morning confirming the argument we’ve been making for the past few weeks – the Republican wave has crested, and a new dynamic in election 2010 has taken hold.

New Rasmussen and Washington Post polls each show a 7 point swing towards the Democrats in the national Congressional Generic in the past few weeks. As we wrote yesterday this movement tracks similar movement seen in other polls released over the past few days, indicating that the Democrats have made substantial improvement in their position over the past month.

2 New Polls Show Significant 7 Point Gains for the Democrats

Simon Rosenberg is President and Founder of NDN and a veteran of the 1992 Clinton War Room. More from him:

In the lead Washington Post story on their new poll, the 7 point Democratic gain was “modest,” and the 6 point Republican lead “significant.” Not sure how that got by their editor this morning but shows how fundamentally invested much of DC’s political class is in the September version of this story which had Democrats losing the House, a wave election and big Republican gains were already “baked in the cake.”

2 New Polls Show Significant 7 Point Gains for the Democrats

Even with 9.5 % unemployment, the Republicans are having trouble winning both chambers of Congress. 9.5% unemployment. Yes, it was Bush’s fault, but people often just blame whoever is in office. 100s of millions of dollars spent by Big Business and the Billionaires, and yet the Republicans still have not put it away. This was their chance and they have not and will not succeed.

It’s despair that leads people to give up. We need to be agents of hope, showing that Dems can win. Simon Rosenberg sees Dem fortunes improving through October and into the election:

Given current trends it is reasonable to conclude that the Democrats could pick up another 3-6 points in the national polls before election day, which would have a significant impact of course on the many close races across the country.

Read the full article, here

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 206 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


NEW! For our readers: Check out our 40 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Karzai Names Panel for Embryonic Taliban Talks

Evans Liberal Politics
September 29, 2010

 

Karzai Names Panel for Embryonic Taliban Talks


Karzai Names Panel for Taliban Talks, © The New York Times, September 28, 2010, by Carlotta Gall, photo used with permission of Steve Evans, excerpt quoted verbatim:

KABUL, Afghanistan — Repeating his determination to find a peaceful solution to the war, President Hamid Karzai named a 70-member peace council on Tuesday, a long-awaited announcement that was the government’s first concrete step to open formal contacts with the Taliban.

Afghan rural villagers sit on the ground in a circle talking and look up with suspicion at the strangers

The American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David H. Petraeus, indicated support for the reconciliation process on Monday and said high-level members of the Taliban had already reached out to the government.

But some immediately dismissed Mr. Karzai’s council as unworkable, given that its membership was dominated largely by anti-Taliban figures.

While a handful of influential people from the former Taliban government have been included, the council is heavily weighted with many of the same factional leaders who have dominated the wars and politics of the past 30 years, and who have been fighting the Taliban for half that time.

Mr. Karzai also named at least eight women. Their appointment signaled the government’s intention to preserve the women’s rights guaranteed in the Constitution, but they are unlikely to have any influence with the Taliban.

The government defended the nominations, saying the council needed a broad range of powerful people. The council will have the authority to develop existing contacts and open direct negotiations with the Taliban and other armed foes, said the presidential spokesman, Waheed Omer.

“They will keep the president in the picture — it is his initiative — but they are very powerful people and will proceed as they see fit,” Mr. Omer said. The council will choose its own leader and way of operating. “The structure is such that in many ways they will have the authority and mandate to act,” he said.

Mr. Karzai has been calling for talks with the Taliban for months, and has gradually won the support of the United States and NATO for his plan. People close to the president say he has largely lost confidence in the ability of coalition forces to defeat the insurgency and is tentatively seeking his own course.

195 Hot Rock and Pop Tracks
for Your Listening Pleasure!


Paul's Playlist of 187 hot rock pop and electronic tracks for hours of listening pleasure

#1 Rated by Google

The extent of his concern about the failing war effort was displayed on national television on Tuesday when he burst into convulsive sobs during a speech to mark national literacy day at a Kabul high school.

He said he feared that the war would force his 3-year-old son, Mirwais, to leave the country and grow up a refugee. “I want him to go to school here,” Mr. Karzai said. “I swear to God I’m worried, I’m worried, oh people, I’m worried. God forbid Mirwais should be forced to leave Afghanistan,” he said, according to Agence France-Presse.

Supporters of peace talks welcomed the formation of the council as a first step and said it could work despite the preponderance of people opposed to the Taliban.

“These are faces from the jihad, the resistance, and from the Taliban, and they will have to resolve it,” said Hajji Abdul Baqi Raghbat, leader of the tribal affairs department in Kandahar Province, homeland of the Taliban. “These are the most famous people, and if not them, I don’t know who else there is.” ….

Read the full article, here.

Watch an ABC news video on President Karzai addressing the Afghan people, crying with the thought that his 4 year old son might not be able to live in a safe and free Afghanistan, and announcing news of this possible breakthrough.

See Karzai’s Tears: Afghan President Breaks Down on National TV over Fears ‘Next Generation’ Will Flee War-Torn Country, Mail Online, September 29, 2010, by Mail Foreign Service.

See Karzai to name panel for talks with insurgents, AP News on the Guardian.co.uk, September 4, 2010, by Amir Shah.

Taliban contacts still at embryonic stage: NATO envoy


Taliban contacts still at embryonic stage: NATO envoy, Reuters, September 28, 2010, by David Alexander, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Microsoft Store

(Reuters) – Some senior Taliban leaders appear to be open to reconciliation with Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s government, but contacts are in the embryonic stage and not likely to bear fruit soon, NATO’s top civilian in Afghanistan said on Tuesday.

Mark Sedwill, who was visiting Washington to prepare for a NATO summit in Lisbon in November, said Karzai’s government had been undertaking a “genuine effort” to reach out to insurgents who were willing to renounce violence, accept the constitution and re-enter Afghan society.

“There are significant leaders there who seem to be weary of the fight and seem to be willing to contemplate a future within the mainstream,” Sedwill told reporters at a news conference at the National Press Club.

Sedwill, the former British ambassador to Kabul, said it was hard to determine if the Taliban contacts represented individuals or groups of people who might be willing to abandon the struggle.

But he said it was “unlikely the Taliban as a movement is going to enter into a major political negotiation.” He also cautioned against overstating “the speed and prospects of that process completing any time soon.”

“My sense is … essentially we’re at the embryonic stage,” Sedwill said. “The channels of communication are open. I wouldn’t at this stage say that we’ve reached the point of real negotiation.”

General David Petraeus, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan and Sedwill’s military counterpart, has said there have been contacts between Kabul and very senior members of the Taliban. He, too, indicated the contacts were at an early stage and said it was premature to say whether those Taliban were willing to accept Karzai’s terms for pursuing reconciliation. ….

We’re Counting on You!
If You Enjoy Evans Liberal Politics
Please Share Us with Your Friends & Contacts!


Why Pay More? $7.49 .COM Domains from GoDaddy.com 468x60

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 193 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


NEW! For our readers: Check out our 37 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Why March Saturday? Take Back The Discourse (That The Tea Party Stole)

Evans Liberal Politics
September 27, 2010

 

Why March Saturday? Take Back
The Discourse (That The Tea Party Stole)


Why March Saturday? Take Back The Discourse (That The Tea Party Stole), Campaign for America’s Future, September 27, 2010, by Bill Scher, quoted verbatim:

This Saturday, progressives will be marching on Washington for the One Nation Working Together rally. Should you bother?

Click the Evans Liberal Politics
Getaway Car to Visit Paul’s
Playlist of Rock & Pop Hits
* #1 Rated by Google *


photo link of Paul's 2002 Honda CR-V at the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Arboretum serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of 182 Rock, Pop and Electronic Hits

The New York Times reports:

Predicting a crowd of more than 100,000, some 300 liberal groups — including the N.A.A.C.P., the A.F.L.-C.I.O., the National Council of La Raza and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force — are sponsoring a march on Saturday in the hope of transforming the national conversation so it focuses less on the Tea Party.

What does that mean?

I am one liberal is who is not deeply concerned the Tea Party will gain enough political power to take over the country. As I wrote in July for The Hill, “The Tea Party is not large. Poll after poll has shown the Tea Party to be nothing more than a far-right faction of the Republican Party. They do not represent anything close to a majority of the country (a mere 18 percent in the April New York Times poll). And the more other Americans hear about the Tea Party’s conservative ideas, the less they like it.”

And the Tea Party was not effective in shaping the national conversation when the President and Congress were seriously legislating. Also from my earlier piece in The Hill: “After it’s main salvo to kill healthcare reform – spreading the ‘death panel’ smear – was flatly debunked in the September 2009 presidential address, dubious Tea Party claims ceased to be an obstacle to passage. (Reluctant ‘centrist’ Democrats, peddling their own false information about the cost of reform, were the ones who dragged out the process.) The Tea Party’s follow-up attack, twisting the Wall Street reform bill into a ‘permanent bailout’ bill, barely registered at all.”

In other words, when the left-center congressional majority was busy legislating, it crowded out Tea Party nonsense.

But now, the divided Democratic caucus in Congress has ceased to put any additional major reform on the table for the time being. And the Tea Party is filling the void.

With the media boost generated by right-wing victories in low-turnout Republican primaries, and a mere 87,000 who came out to hear Glenn Beck’s ramblings, Tea Party screeching has stolen the discourse and crowded out thoughtful policy discussion — such as 300 economists sounding the alarm about the need to put public investment in jobs ahead of deficit reduction.

If we can’t take back the discourse, it will be difficult to renew the mandate for change next year, press Congress to build upon the successes of the Recovery Act to create millions more jobs, and continue pursuit of critical progressive reforms in areas such as clean energy and immigration.

The media has been applying a lower bar of success for Tea Party rallies than it did during the massive protests against the Iraq War. So you might be skeptical that a large turnout Saturday would make a difference.

But the million-strong turnout of the 2006 pro-immigration rallies caught the media’s attention, took back the conversation from the anti-immigrant right-wing, and squelched the anti-immigrant legislation which had passed the House.

Similarly, a larger turnout Saturday in support of “jobs, justice and education” than Glenn Beck’s recent rally in support of “Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck” will be very hard for the media to ignore.

Simply achieving parity in media attention blunts the Tea Party’s corrosive influence on the discourse, opening up the possibility for a serious, responsible dialogue on the next steps America must take to recover from the conservative-created recession.

You can make that happen Saturday. Click here to join One Nation.

Why Pay More? $7.49 .COM Domains from GoDaddy.com 468x60

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 195 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


NEW! For our readers: Check out our 37 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Krugman, Morgenson Nail Wall Street Jobless Lies, Mortgage Fraud

a blocky golden dollar sign highlights this article on Wall Street greed, jobless lies and mortgage frauda blocky golden dollar sign highlights this article on Wall Street greed, jobless lies and mortgage fraud

Evans Liberal Politics
September 27, 2010

 

 

Krugman, Morgenson Nail Wall Street
Jobless Lies, Mortgage Fraud


Krugman, Morgenson Nail Wall St. Jobless Lies, Mortgage Fraud, Daily Kos, September 26, 2010, by Bob Swern, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

IMHO, there are two must-read pieces in Monday’s New York Times concerning unemployment and the Great Recession, Wall Street mortgage fraud, and our economy, in general.The first article of note is the paper’s Monday business lede, by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Gretchen Morgenson, “Raters Ignored Proof of Unsafe Loans, Panel Is Told,”  which publicizes testimony that occurred last week before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, wherein we learn of the truly astonishing extent of rampant, institutionalized, mortgage-investment-related fraud which was pervasive throughout Wall Street in the run-up to our economy’s crash and burn in September 2008.

Why Pay More? $7.49.COM Domains from GoDaddy.com - 336x280

The second piece is an op-ed by Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, entitled, “Structure of Excuses,” which continues a theme upon which I’ve posted multiple diaries of late: the concept of “structural unemployment” as the cause of our society’s extended joblessness problem is little more than a grossly-misleading myth perpetuated by our status quo via the MSM.

#            #            #

MORGENSON:Raters Ignored Proof of Unsafe Loans, Panel Is Told


In what might very well become a historical milestone concerning coverage of the events that ultimately led up to the 2008 implosion of Wall Street, NY Times Pultizer Prize-winning business journalist Gretchen Morgenson, on the front page of Monday’s NY Times’ business section, reports on testimony and events over the past week at the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission,  in “Raters Ignored Proof of Unsafe Loans, Panel Is Told.”

Quite clearly, based upon Ms. Morgenson’s report, it’s now obvious that the FCIC has been provided with an arsenal of smoking guns which collectively scream that–the credit ratings agencies were clearly complicit and directly enabling Wall Street’s misrepresentations to the investing public of the quality of their mortgage-backed securities throughout much of 2006, 2007 and 2008, but–virtually every major Wall Street firm was aware of the fraud they were committing at the time, as well.

The article tells us of last week’s testimony of D. Keith Johnson before the FCIC…

…D. Keith Johnson, a former president of Clayton Holdings, a company that analyzed mortgage pools for the Wall Street firms that sold them, told the commission on Thursday that almost half the mortgages Clayton sampled from the beginning of 2006 through June 2007 failed to meet crucial quality benchmarks that banks had promised to investors.

However, as Morgenson states it, “…until Mr. Johnson’s testimony last week, it was largely unknown that the ratings agencies had been told that vast numbers of loans were being packaged as securities even though they failed to meet underwriting standards.”

Of critical importance here, however, as far as this latest FCIC testimony is concerned, is the now-formally-recognized reality — a truth which has been widely known among Wall Street insiders all along, by the way — that while the Wall Street spin on all of this fraud for the past couple of years has been to blame the credit ratings agencies for Wall Street’s fraudulent transgressions,  the reality is that these same Wall Street firms were also contracting out due diligence services on these very same mortgage portfolios, directly, with the same firms that were providing similar services to the ratings agencies.

Essentially, as we’re now hearing it in Morgenson’s report regarding recent FCIC testimony, these Wall Street firms were fully aware of their misrepresentations to the investment community and to the public. And, as Morgenson also tells us, the Wall Street purveyors of these fraudulent mortgage-backed investment vehicles merely used these due diligence reports on their portfolios to negotiate better pricing with the mortgage firms that were bundling them!

As the article notes, in some instances, almost half of all of the mortgage loans initially bundled in certain mortgage-backed securitization (MBS) deals did not meet underwriting standards.

(Diarist’s Note: IMHO, the NYT article headline is somewhat misleading; perhaps perpetuating the Wall Street meme that attempts to pass along full blame for rampant mortgage fraud to the credit ratings agencies. Obviously, Morgenson’s article points out that my comment regarding Wall Street’s missteps rings true.)

Raters Ignored Proof of Unsafe Loans, Panel Is Told

By GRETCHEN MORGENSON
New York Times
September 27, 2010…The results of the Clayton analyses were not disclosed to investors buying the loan pools. Instead, Wall Street firms used the information to pressure the lenders issuing the most troubled loans to accept a lower price for them, according to prosecutors who have investigated these cases.

A more proper procedure, analysts said, would have been for lenders like these — New Century Financial and Fremont Investment and Loan among them — to buy back the problem loans and replace them with higher-quality mortgages. But because these companies did not have enough capital to do that, they were happy to sell the troubled mortgages cheaply to the brokerage firms.

Since Wall Street firms were paying lower prices for the troubled loans, they could have passed along those discounts to customers, reducing investor risk. But Wall Street charged investors the same high prices associated with better-quality loans, thereby increasing their own profits on the problematic securities, according to a law enforcement official and executives with Wall Street companies. To be sure, the prospectuses detailing the types of loans in these pools contained brief warnings that some of the mortgages might not meet stated underwriting standards. But few investors probably realized that huge portions of the pools had failed to meet the benchmarks…

Bold type is diarist’s emphasis.

textbookx.com (Akademos, Inc.)

KRUGMAN: “Structure of Excuses


First, in referencing two of my posts over the past week, here are the first couple of paragraphs from my diary from Sunday (yesterday) morning: “‘Structural Unemployment’ & ‘Deleveraging,’ My Ass!

“Structural Unemployment” & “Deleveraging,” My Ass!

by bobswern
Daily Kos
Sun Sep 26, 2010 at 07:37:06 AM EDTOver the past couple of years, many have been sucked-in by a lot of bullsh*t economic pseudo-analysis from GOPers and misdirected Dems parroting totally false, Wall Street-centric memes and baseless “conventional wisdom” about our Great Recession.  Gradually, the obfuscated truths are finally coming to the fore.

This morning, Yves Smith picks up where respected economist and NetRoots Nation guest Mike Konczal left off a week ago, explaining that the widely-accepted, Orwellian theme of structural unemployment is completely bogus.

(Konczal irrefutably demonstrates, via his just-released study, that the statistical facts tell us that the jobless downturn–which is significantly and adversely affecting all business sectors, not just construction–was a direct byproduct of Wall Street’s stripmining of Main Street’s mortgage marketplace, and is/was due to a general lack of demand that is still extremely pervasive throughout our society. However, there is no “skills mismatch” in the marketplace [i.e.: the basic concept behind the structural unemployment meme]; and that’s just another Wall Street excuse for offshoring jobs and/or cutting pay/hours on Main Street among those who’ve been able to hold onto their jobs until now.)

For more detail on the bogus structural unemployment meme, here are links to other diaries I’ve posted on the subject in the past few days: “‘Proofiness’ and ‘Disestimation’,” (9/25/10), and “Konczal Study: Lack of Demand, Not Skills, Is Jobless Problem,” (9/20/10).

Now, onto the maestro’s take on Wall Street’s propaganda concerning joblessness amongst us little folk…

Structure of Excuses

By PAUL KRUGMAN
New York Times
September 27, 2010What can be done about mass unemployment? All the wise heads agree: there are no quick or easy answers. There is work to be done, but workers aren’t ready to do it — they’re in the wrong places, or they have the wrong skills. Our problems are “structural,” and will take many years to solve.

But don’t bother asking for evidence that justifies this bleak view. There isn’t any. On the contrary, all the facts suggest that high unemployment in America is the result of inadequate demand — full stop. Saying that there are no easy answers sounds wise, but it’s actually foolish: our unemployment crisis could be cured very quickly if we had the intellectual clarity and political will to act.

In other words, structural unemployment is a fake problem, which mainly serves as an excuse for not pursuing real solutions…

In Sunday’s diary, I went into fairly extensive detail on one of those quite “real” solutions towards the end of my post: a small ($1 billion program) but extremely successful jobs program praised by Dems and GOP’ers, alike…one which is about to come to a grinding halt due to a lack of desire on Capitol Hill to extend funding for it. Here’s Bob Herbert’s NY Times column from July 3rd on this very initiative, “A Jobs Program That Works.

Gradually, with hindsight being 20/20, we are learning more with each passing day concerning the details as to how 30 years of greed and unbridled capitalism-gone-wild  have brought us to where we are now. The solutions to our economy’s problems ARE out there. But, given Republican obstructionism, one may only wonder whether or not the collective will is there (in our government, and within our population as a whole) to solve them.

Evans Liberal Politics would like to thank Bob Swern for permission to republish his work on an ongoing basis. Bob is our favorite progressive economics writer. More than even Paul Krugman, Mr. Swern fleshes out his articles with lots of details and links, and so provides real grist for liberals and progressives to learn from. You are invited to email Bob Swern here.

Watch or download a devastating and scathing PowerPoint presentation on the Banking Industry and Subprime Mortgages: WARNING – contains obscenity, not for those under 18! (Download the FREE PowerPoint viewer direct from Microsoft if needed. — 60.3 MB)

Why Pay More? $7.49 .COM Domains from GoDaddy.com 468x60

Check out Paul’s Playlist of 193 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


NEW! For our readers: Check out our 37 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Data Recovery SoftwareData Recoverydata recovery softwareforex tradingforex