Evans Liberal Politics, September 28, 2010, compiled and with commentary by Paul Evans:
Lately there have been a lot of efforts by the government — all in the name of fine-sounding programs such as counter-terrorism or cybersecurity or protecting copyright holders’ rights — to limit the freedom of the internet, and decrease our privacy online. This really got going under Bush, but, sadly, the efforts have only increased under Barack Obama.
 |
Are you one of those people who are concerned with online privacy? I’m laughing at you and so is the government. I’ve found that, the more you get these privacy disclosure forms from various organizations – your bank, government agencies, etc. – the less privacy there actually is. The Patriot Act has taken away our fundamental freedoms here, at least in terms of privacy. I won’t bother going over what the NSA is doing, collecting ALL electronic communications and sorting them by keyword in a huge database, with certain keywords triggering human analysis. NSA isn’t the only one doing this, folks. Microsoft collects all your emails and stores them in a another huge datebase, sorted by keyword, and as far the F.B.I. is concerned, since 2006, everyone who has ever connected with the internet has an untouchable, untraceable F.B.I. ‘cookie’ stored on their computer, to track your activity. The F.B.I. has now also asked ISP’s to track your online browsing activity and store the records for two years (February, 2010).
Don’t look over your shoulder!
As for me, as a member of the press, thanks to the Patriot Act, ALL of my emails, internet activities and phone conversations, including cell phone conversations, are subject to human analysis by the NSA. I’m the proverbial little goldfish swimming around in the bowl and hoping I can get away with a few music torrent downloads…. I’m not actually asking for privacy, I no longer expect it in today’s world, (but it would have been nice, wouldn’t it?)
We’re Counting on You!
If You Enjoy Evans Liberal Politics
Please Share Us with Your Friends & Contacts!
In my article, "Inspirational liberal political quotes & speeches," I provide a quotation by John Seabrook, a journalist working at the New Yorker, who speaks to the heart of the matter:
“The net poses a fundamental threat not only to the authority of the government, but to all authority, because it permits people to organize, think, and influence one another without any institutional supervision whatsoever.” — John Seabrook – American journalist, staff writer at The New Yorker since 1993 – Source: “My First Flame,” New Yorker, 6 June 1994
Even in 1994, when the internet was brand new and in its infancy, some people saw that there would be a fight about our freedom to use the internet as we wished, because it is a huge threat to entrenched power, providing as it does a way for all ordinary Americans to communicate and share information freely and without constraint. In the last few days we have seen further erosion of the freedom of the internet, and this is a sad, really terrible situation for all of us — for everyone who cherishes freedom and hopes for a better future for ordinary Americans. Without discussion, I am going to just post some of the latest horror stories:
U.S. should be able to shut Internet, former CIA chief says
Your Friends & Mine
>
|
U.S. should be able to shut Internet, former CIA chief says, Reuters on The Los Angeles Times, September 26, 2010, by Reuters:
SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) – Cyberterrorism is such a threat that the U.S. president should have the authority to shut down the Internet in the event of an attack, Former CIA Director Michael Hayden said.
Hayden made the comments during a visit to San Antonio where he was meeting with military and civilian officials to discuss cyber security. The U.S. military has a new Cyber Command which is to begin operations on October 1.
Hayden said the president currently does not have the authority to shut down the Internet in an emergency.
“My personal view is that it is probably wise to legislate some authority to the President, to take emergency measures for limited periods of time, with clear reporting to Congress, when he feels as if he has to take these measures,” he said in an interview on the weekend.
“But I would put the bar really high as to when these kinds of authorities might take place,” he said.
He likened cyberwarfare to a “frontier.” ….
Government Seeks Back Door Into All Our Communications
Government Seeks Back Door Into All Our Communications, Common Dreams.org, September 27, 2010, by Seth Schoen, Electronic Freedom Foundation:
The New York Times reported this morning on a Federal government plan to put government-mandated back doors in all communications systems, including all encryption software. The Times said the Obama administration is drafting a law that would impose a new “mandate” that all communications services be “able to intercept and unscramble encrypted messages” — including ordering “[d]evelopers of software that enables peer-to-peer communication [to] redesign their service to allow interception”.
Throughout the 1990s, EFF and others fought the “crypto wars” to ensure that the public would have the right to strong encryption tools that protect our privacy and security — with no back doors and no intentional weaknesses. We fought in court and in Congress to protect privacy rights and challenge restrictions on encryption, and to make sure the public could use encryption to protect itself. In a 1999 decision in the EFF-led Bernstein case, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals observed that
[w]hether we are surveilled by our government, by criminals, or by our neighbors, it is fair to say that never has our ability to shield our affairs from prying eyes been at such a low ebb. The availability and use of secure encryption may offer an opportunity to reclaim some portion of the privacy we have lost. Government efforts to control encryption thus may well implicate not only the First Amendment rights of cryptographers intent on pushing the boundaries of their science, but also the constitutional rights of each of us as potential recipients of encryption’s bounty.
For a decade, the government backed off of attempts to force encryption developers to weaken their products and include back doors, and the crypto wars seemed to have been won. (Indeed, journalist Steven Levy declared victory for the civil libertarian side in 2001.) In the past ten years, even as the U.S. government has sought (or simply taken) vastly expanded surveillance powers, it never attempted to ban the development and use of secure encryption.
Now the government is again proposing to do so, following in the footsteps of regimes like the United Arab Emirates that have recently said some privacy tools are too secure and must be kept out of civilian hands.
As the Internet security community explained years ago, intentionally weakening security and including back doors is a recipe for disaster. “Lawful intercept” systems built under current laws have already been abused for unlawful spying by governments and criminals. Trying to force technology developers to include back doors is a recipe for disaster for our already-fragile on-line security and privacy. And like the COICA Internet censorship bill, it takes a page from the world’s most repressive regimes’ Internet-control playbook. This is exactly the wrong message for the U.S. government to be sending to the rest of the world.
The crypto wars are back in full force, and it’s time for everyone who cares about privacy to stand up and defend it: no back doors and no bans on the tools that protect our communications.
Survey of Intelligence and Privacy News:
UPDATE: See White House Wants to Wiretap Internet Communications, AFP on AlterNet, September 27, 2010, by Agence France-Presse: "The Obama administration is drawing up legislation to make it easier for US intelligence services to eavesdrop on the Internet, including email exchanges and social networks."
Recommended: The Obama administration’s war on privacy, Salon, September 27, 2010, by Glenn Greenwald.
Gonna move some money around? See Money transfers could face anti-terrorism scrutiny, The Washington Post, September 27, 2010, by Ellen Nakashima.
See U.S. Tries to Make It Easier to Wiretap the Internet, The New York Times, September 27, 2010, by Charlie Savage.
Many privacy resources and solutions are available at Privacy Solutions, Center for Internet Freedom.
You will find many helpful free downloads and solutions to common computer problems including issues related to PC security and privacy on my own Free Useful Software page. Check it out!
See U.S. mounting first test of cyber-blitz response plan, Reuters, September 28, 2010, by Jim Wolf:
(Reuters) – The United States is launching its first test of a new plan for responding to an enemy cyber-blitz, including any attack aimed at vital services such as power, water and banks.
Thousands of cyber-security personnel from across the government and industry are to take part in the Department of Homeland Security’s Cyber Storm III, a three- to four-day drill starting Tuesday.
The goals are to boost preparedness; examine incident response and enhance information-sharing among federal, state, international and private-sector partners.
“At its core, the exercise is about resiliency — testing the nation’s ability to cope with the loss or damage to basic aspects of modern life,” said a release made available at DHS’s National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center in Arlington.
The simulation tests the newly developed National Cyber Incident Response Plan, a coordinated framework ordered by President Barack Obama.
See The Fine Balance Between Cybersecurity and Internet Freedom, The Epoch Times, June 29, 2010, by Joshua Phillip.
See Censorship of the Internet Takes Center Stage in “Online Infringement” Bill, Electronic Freedom Foundation, September 21, 2010, by Richard Esguerra: this bill may directly affect Evans Liberal Politics ability to continue to bring our viewers free music to listen to on our Playlist of Rock and Pop Hits, now up to 195 tracks, completely free for our viewers, and a lot of fun.
Read GLOBAL INTERNET FREEDOM AND THE RULE OF LAW II, Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee from March 2, 2010, by the Center for Democracy & Technology.
Visit the Center for Democracy & Technology: Keeping the Internet Open, Innovative and Free.
Read about the Electronic Freedom Foundation and visit their blog.
Visit Save the Internet.com and read about why internet neutrality is such an important issue for all of us.
Why aren’t I surprised: See Cheating Rampant on FBI Domestic Spying Test, Talking Points Memo, September 27, 2010, by Ryan J. Reilly.
Also in the news: See Are We Secretly Fighting a Cyberwar Against Iran?, AlterNet, September 27, 2010, by Robert Dreyfuss of The Nation: “Stuxnet, a virus (or ‘worm’) affecting Iran’s nuclear facilities, appears to be a case of sabotage. If the United States is behind it, then Obama is already at war with Iran.”
Don’t really care about all this stuff? Just want to watch the latest Lady GaGa video? Well, all the warning signs are here…. You know, history shows us that most of the time, we don’t really care enough to change the status quo — until they come for us, and then it’s too late, isn’t it? ~ Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans.

*****
Music to Get Paranoid With:
"Seagull:" Bad Company performs their thoughtful, haunting song live in 1976 — "Is this really the end of the world?" — 3:50
"These Times:" by Peter MacIntyre, from a nice guy who works at a camera shop in Arizona, and says, “this song is about the crazy times we live in, recession, depression, job loss, etc.”, © 2008. Have a listen! - 3:47
"They Call Us the Working Class:" blues rocker Walter Trout performs his hit “They Call Us the Working Class …but we ain’t workin’ any more. – a really great sound and a really great message. See Walter Trout mp3′s on Amazon.com
— 4:48
"Eye In the Sky:" The Alan Parsons Project performing their seminal hit live in 1995. If you haven’t heard this before, don’t get freaked! Put it together! Hey it’s on the dollar bill. The NSA thinks it’s the “eye in the sky”. But don’t you think the real Eye In the Sky is God? Who do you think really built the pyramids, anyway…. that might give you a clue. — 7:03
"Zoo Station:" U2 performs ‘Zoo Station,’ a song not so well known but sounding great, performed live on 08/16/1992 at Robert F. Kennedy Stadium – Washington, D.C. — 4:31
"The Sound of Silence:" Bob Dylan and Paul Simon team up live and unplugged in Portland, from 1999. Here’s a link to the video. — 7:07
"I Ran (So Far Away):" The late eighties group A Flock of Seagulls sings their biggest hit, which for me speaks of how far I ran from Christ’s love until I could not escape it. 5:12

NEW! For our readers: Check out our 37 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!
Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on  | Follow Paul Evans on  |
We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.
To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.