Sarah Palin’s Presidential Strategy, and the Economy She Depends On, Robert Reich.org, November 24, 2010, by Robert Reich, used with permission, quoted verbatim:
Monday night, Sarah Palin watched from the audience as daughter Bristol danced on ABC. Twenty-three million other Americans joined her from their homes. Tuesday, the former vice-presidential candidate started a 13-state book tour for her new book, “America By Heart,” which has a first printing of 1 million. Her reality show on TLC, “Sarah Palin’s Alaska,” is in its third week. Last Sunday she was the cover story in the New York Times magazine.
Click the Evans Liberal Politics Getaway Car to Visit Paul’s Playlist of Rock & Pop Hits * #1 Rated by Google *

|
It’s all part of The Palin Strategy for becoming president in 2012 — or 2016 or 2020.
Republican leaders don’t believe it. “If she wanted the Republican nomination she’d be working on the inside,” one influential Republican told me a few days ago. “She’d be building relationships with Republican Senators and representatives, governors, and state party officials. She’d be smoothing the feathers she ruffled by backing Tea Party candidates. She’d be huddled with GOP kingmakers.” When I suggested she has a different strategy, the influential Republican smiled knowingly. “That’s how it’s done – how McCain, Bush, and everyone has done it. That’s the only way to do it. But all she really wants is celebrity.”
The Republican establishment doesn’t get it. Celebrity is part of The Palin Strategy – as is avoiding the insider game. She doesn’t want to do what Huckabee, Pawlenty, Gingrich, or Romney have to do. She has an outside game.
Palin’s game plan is directly related to America’ white working class, and the economy it faces – and the economy it’s likely to continue to experience for years.
No prospective candidate so sharply embodies the anger of America’s white working class as does Palin. And none is channeling that anger nearly as effectively.
White working class anger isn’t new, of course, nor is the Republican Party’s use of it. Apart from the South, where the anger came in response to the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, the more widespread working-class anxiety began in the late 1970s when the median male wage that had been rising for three decades began to stagnate.
As I noted in “Aftershock,” families responded by sending wives and mothers into the paid workforce, working longer hours, and then, finally, going deep into debt. These coping mechanisms allayed but did not remove the growing anxiety.
Over the years, Republicans have channeled the anxiety into anger, through overt appeals to a so-called “silent majority” that were overlooked by Democrats and liberals; through “tax revolts” by working and middle-class families that couldn’t afford to pay more; and in subtle and not-so-subtle appeals to racist fears (Willie Horton).
But now that the Great Recession has eliminated the last coping mechanism – ending the easy borrowing, and ratcheting up unemployment – the working class’s economic insecurities have soared. A recent Washington Post poll showed 53 percent of homeowners worried about meeting their mortgage payments. Home foreclosures have slowed largely because of bad paperwork on the part of banks, but the threat remains. Housing prices are still dropping.
The white working class has not benefitted from the recent rise in corporate profits and stock prices. To the contrary, both have been fueled by foreign sales of goods made abroad and by labor-saving technologies that have allowed American companies to do more with fewer workers here at home.
Joblessness among the white working class is far higher than the 9.6 percent average for the nation. While the unemployment rate among college grads (most of whom are professionals or managers) is around 5 percent, the average unemployment rate for people with only a high school degree or less (blue-collar, pink-collar, clerical) is almost 20 percent.
All of this is spawning a new and more virulent politics of anger in the nation’s white working class, stoked by Republicans – anger against immigrants, blacks, gays, intellectuals, and international bankers (consider the latest Fox News salvos against George Soros).
According to the right-wing narrative, the calamity that’s befallen the white working class is due to the global and intellectual elites who run the mainstream media, direct the government, dispense benefits to the undeserving, and dominate popular culture. (The story and targets are not substantially different from those that have fueled right-wing and fascist movements during times of economic stress for more than a century, here and abroad.)
Sarah Palin has special appeal because she wraps the story in an upbeat message. She avoids the bilious rants of Rush, Sean Hannity, and their ilk. But her cheerfulness isn’t sunny; she doesn’t promise Morning in America. She offers pure snark, and promises revenge. Over and over again she tells the same snide, sarcastic, inside joke, but in different words: “They think they can keep screwing us, but (wink, wink), we know something they don’t. We’re gonna take over and screw them.”
The Palin Strategy is to circumvent the Republican establishment, filled as it is with career Republicans, business executives, and Wall Streeters. That’s why her path to the Republican nomination isn’t the usual insider game. It’s a celebrity game – a snark-fest with the nation’s entire white working class. Vote for Bristol and we’ll show the media establishment how powerful we are! Buy my book and we’ll show the know-it-all coastal elites a real book directed at real people! Tune into my cable show and we’ll show the real America – far from the urban centers with immigrants and blacks and fancy city slickers!
As I believe will become clearer, the Palin Strategy will involve a political threat to the GOP establishment: Deny her the nomination she’ll run as independent. This will split off much of the white working class and guarantee defeat of the Republican establishment candidate. It will also result in her defeat in 2012, but that’s a small price to pay for gaining the credibility and power to demand the nomination in 2016, or threaten another third-party run in 2020.
Once nominated, her campaign for the general election will be purely populist. She’ll seek to broaden her base to become the candidate of the people, taking on America’s vested Establishment.
More than anything else, the Palin Strategy depends on the continuing fear and anger of America’s white working class. She’s betting that their economic prospects will not improve by 2012, or even by 2016 and beyond.
Sadly, this is likely to be the case. On Tuesday, the Fed issued a gloomy prognosis. Even if the U.S. economy began to grow at a rate more typical of recoveries than the current anemic 2 percent, unemployment won’t drop to its pre-recession level for 5 to 7 years. A minority of the Fed thought this was too optimistic.
The disturbing truth is the bad economy is likely to continue for most Americans beyond 7 years — maybe for ten or more — because of a chronic lack of aggregate demand. Apart from inevitable inventory replacements and the necessary replacements by consumers of cars, appliances, and clothing that wear out, nothing will propel the U.S. economy forward. So much income and wealth have now concentrated at the top that the broad middle and working class no longer has the buying power to do so. The top will resume buying but their purchases won’t be nearly enough.
Japan lost a decade of economic growth after its real estate bubble exploded. It seems entirely probable that the United States will suffer the same fate. Our economic structure – how we now allocate the gains of growth, the yawning gap between Wall Street and Main Street, the incentives operating on large corporations to pare American payrolls and expand abroad – almost dictates it.
We might change that structure, of course. But at this point that doesn’t seem in the cards. The President seems unable or unwilling to provide the clear narrative that explains what’s happened and what needs to be done, and Republicans are at this moment ascendant.
It all fits into Sarah Palin’s strategy.

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! In order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today?
*****
To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share, print or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the handy icons beneath the article.
We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!
Listen to 230 Rock and Pop Hits!

Our Playlist is #1 Rated by Google
What’s in a Name? – Party Labels as Representative of the American Political Experience
Evans Liberal Politics
October 6, 2010
What’s in a Name? – Party Labels
as Representative of the American Political Experience
A lighthearted look at political party names and what is really representative of America today.
Evans Liberal Politics, October 6, 2010, by Jim Evans:
I think it’s time for a Party expert to weigh in on the whole new Party scene happening in America. On the one hand, I have worked in advertising, marketing and now as a political consultant for quite a few years. On the other side of things, having attended Ohio University — one of the premier party schools in America — I consider myself to have a better perspective than most on this situation. As I am also a Patriot, it therefore is my duty to share with America deeper insights into the Possibilities of Potential Third Parties.
American Politics, 2010 Edition:
First off, let’s examine the whole concept of The Tea Party.
Click the Evans Liberal Politics
Getaway Car to Visit Paul’s
Playlist of Rock & Pop Hits
* #1 Rated by Google *
Unless you are a four year old girl with a plastic china set, the Tea Party label really shouldn’t excite you. Seriously — Tea? Isn’t anyone familiar with the phrase “Tea Totalers”? It’s a phrase used to indicate the exact opposite of a Party, in a different sense of the word. And, increasingly with every Christine O’Donnell press release I see, it also accurately describes what people like her would do to our country if we let them run it — Total it. As in a wreck that is too expensive to fix. But one thing for sure — these people are proving that no Tea Party is complete without some nutty fruitcakes.
The Coffee Party sounds attractive at first, but when I visualize the local Starbucks, and see bug-eyed, over-caffeinated people with no jobs, using wi-fi and chatting on Facebook about how they have no money, I think — of course you have no money! You don’t have a job and you are buying $5 coffee! And then it occurs to me — simply on the principle of more experience in deficit spending, plus the embracing of internet technology, The Coffee Party wins out over the Tea Party as being more qualified to run our government.
But is that really a good Party? Maybe if you graduated from Miami of Ohio. But for an Ohio U. guy — the kind who tells his Ohio State friends “I’m sorry about the beating Ohio gave you guys Saturday (of course, I’m talking about the mascots, not the football game” — the answer is No, that’s not a good party.
So let’s get serious. What we really need is The Reefer Party.
See if you can follow my logic, here.
The t-shirts would be cooler, because they would be tie-dye. There wouldn’t be any mad rantings about hating classes of people — the rally cry would be more like “I love you, dude!” And the economic recovery plan could be solely based on increased Dorito sales.
Plus, if we had some whack job who couldn’t pronounce an Iranian leader’s name, or thought they could see Russia from their doorstep, we would simply say, “How good is their stash?”
It might result in more teenage pregnancies. The candidates might lose track of their train of thought mid-sentence, and rely on a catch phrase to bail them out — like, I don’t know, maybe “you betcha!” Wait, that’s already in use by Tea Party types…. Oh, well.
The Reefer Party — they might make claims that are totally off the wall, and cave in completely under the pressure of sober interviews meant to judge intelligence, character and competency. That’s to be expected from stoners.
OMG — I think Sarah Palin has already invented this Party! Maybe I missed something. Maybe she really represents The THC Party.
That new Party would, however, face a stiff challenge from The Tequila Party.
Not surprisingly, this Party would have a solid Mexican immigration plan. A little salt on the hand, a twist of lime, and everyone does a shot. Whoever gets the worm gets citizenship.
That might work in the Southwest, but in the Heartland, I see a strong uprising from The Beer Party.
This Party would naturally be fond of Pork — preferably a nice grilled sausage with brown mustard. Conventions would be held in the parking lots of pro football games. And instead of loyalty oaths, only breathalyzers would be required.
It all sounds good for the common man, but the rich amongst us will want something different.
They will want The Costume Party.
Everyone will wear masks. No one will be able to see the ‘real you’– only the image you want to promote to the public. If you don’t dress up right, you won’t be let into the festivities. And of course, it is ‘invitation only’.
Kind of like our rulers want Washington to be right now, if you think about it. But do we even need a new “Costume Party?” We already have the GOP, right?
I know– it seems like I’m not taking the problems of our country seriously, at all. It seems like I am abandoning any pretense of dealing with reality.
What I am really abandoning is the joke that is American politics in 2010.
Let’s face it– the Democratic and Republican parties seem like they are just two puppets on the same billionaires’ hands. Like Punch and Judy, only in this play, it’s the public that gets whacked.
It takes one million Americans making $50,000 a year to make one Bill Gates. One member of the Walton family. Hell, it takes one thousand Oprahs to make one of them.
We spend over $30,000 a year to put people in prison. 90% of them wouldn’t be in that situation if we gave them a job making that much. And the super rich in this country think that only they should be able to have health care– or to put it more bluntly, it seems they want the poor to just die.
But we keep voting for the same two Parties that got us here.
It really brings a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘Party Crashing’, doesn’t it?
Because that’s what all these Parties seem to want to do to our country, our lives and our futures. America has been made into a nation of, by and for the rich.
In reality, though, the most accurate description of how the American public deals with politics could only be expressed by yet another new group label. Most Americans really seem to have their heads in the sand in regards to what established parties are doing to us and our once-proud nation. Only one label can truly capture our apathy, and our willingness to be ruled, and devastated, by our rich overlords:
The Slumber Party.
Evans Liberal Politics would like to welcome Jim Evans on board our team as a new contributor. Jim has worked as a political consultant since 2006 and before that worked in advertising and marketing. He has a rock album out in the band Ten of Clubs called "Sleight of Hand" that is really good. He is currently writing a novel to be titled "Agent 42-7". Visit Jim’s media-marketing website called Evans-Creations.com. You are invited to visit Jim on Facebook. Email Jim, here.
If you are interested in posting material as an author on Evans Liberal Politics and are serious about liberalism and changing the status quo in America, please feel encouraged to email Paul Evans.
Check out Paul’s Playlist of 206 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.
NEW! For our readers: Check out our 40 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!
Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on

Follow Paul Evans on

[Translate]