Home » Posts tagged "Republican Party" (Page 2)

AP: Pawlenty announces presidential run in Web video

Evans Liberal Politics
May 23, 2011

 

AP: Pawlenty announces presidential run in Web video

Pawlenty announces presidential run in Web video, Associated Press on Yahoo News, May 23, 2011, by Brian Bakst:

DES MOINES, Iowa – Republican Tim Pawlenty offered a sneak peek Sunday at his presidential kickoff, blasting out an Internet video in which he promises a campaign that “tells the American people the truth” and suggests that President Barack Obama doesn’t.

Pawlenty Announces
Presidential Run in Web Video

In the new video, the former Minnesota governor formally declares he’s running for president, something aides said he’d do in person Monday morning during a town hall forum in Iowa. Pawlenty bypassed a launch in his home state to make his inaugural appearance as a candidate in the state that holds the leadoff caucuses, which he acknowledges he must fare well in to preserve his hopes of the GOP nomination.

He says in the video that the country needs a president who will be frank with Americans about the severe challenges facing the country and how America can get back on track. He mentions the climbing federal debt and a slow recovery from the economic recession that’s left millions jobless.

“We’re going to have to do more than just give fancy speeches; we’ve had three years of that and it’s not working,” Pawlenty says. “Join me tomorrow and around the country in the days and weeks ahead. You won’t hear empty promises, you’ll hear solutions.”

The hard swipes at Obama are central to Pawlenty’s effort to prove to GOP primary voters that he’s tough enough to take on the Democrat. He’s combatting an impression that he’s too nice to be an aggressive challenger.

Pawlenty makes no mention of prospective GOP rivals he’ll have to outlast to get his shot at Obama. Among the Republicans who have taken formal steps toward a White House campaign are former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and Texas Rep. Ron Paul.

The GOP field saw more signs of settling Sunday when Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels took his name out of consideration. ….

Read the full article here.

See T-Paw’s Problem, The New Republic, May 23, 2011, by Walter Shapiro:

Pawlenty needs time and money. He’ll be hard-pressed to find enough of both.

With Mitch Daniels officially out of the presidential race, it seems like the entire GOP is emulating Ethelred the Unready. Well, not quite everyone. In a contrarian move at odds with the Reluctant Republican ethos of the party, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty will actually make it official by declaring his candidacy today in Des Moines.

Along with the obligatory yawn-inducing “can you win Iowa?” question, Pawlenty almost certainly will be asked again about his ability to compete financially with Mitt Romney, the Daddy Warbucks of the truncated Republican field. Pawlenty recently answered that query with a nod to GM’s venerable product line: “Our goal is not to keep up with Mitt. Our goal is to raise enough money to have at least a Buick, if not a Cadillac-level, campaign.”

Watch No Go in 2012: Ind. GOP Gov. Daniels Not Running, AP video, May 22, 2011.

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Trump on top in new survey, but will any poll leaders actually run?

Evans Liberal Politics
April 12, 2011

 

Trump on top in new survey,
but will any poll leaders actually run?

Trump on top in new survey, but will any poll leaders actually run?, MSNBC First Read, April 12, 2011, by Carrie Dann, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Online and DVD Software Training

According to the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey, Trump and Huckabee are the first choice of 19 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, with former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin coming in at third with 12 percent.

But the one trait those three top-runners – making up exactly 50% of the first choice candidates of those polled – have in common? They all seem much less likely than other GOP competitors to actually mount a run for president.

While Trump could certainly deploy his news-cycle monopolizing publicity if he decided to run, the requirement that candidates publish a lengthy financial disclosure statement could preclude the business magnate from participating in the race.  ….

Read the full story, here.

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again

Evans Liberal Politics
April 10, 2011

 

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold
The Nation Hostage Again and Again

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again, Robert Reich.org, April 9, 2011, by Robert Reich, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

When I was a small boy I was bullied more than most, mainly because I was a foot shorter than than everyone else. They demanded the cupcake my mother had packed in my lunchbox, or, they said, they’d beat me up. After a close call in the boy’s room, I paid up. Weeks later, they demanded half my sandwich as well. I gave in to that one, too. But I could see what was coming next. They’d demand everything else. Somewhere along the line I decided I’d have a take a stand. The fight wasn’t pleasant. But the bullies stopped their bullying.

Click the Peace Sign
to visit Paul’s Playlist of
230 Rock and Pop Hits
* Rated #1 by Google *


a beautiful and artful peace sign serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of 230 rock, pop and electronic hits

I hope the President decides he has to take a stand, and the sooner the better. Last December he caved in to Republican demands that the Bush tax cut be extended to wealthier Americans for two more years, at a cost of more than $60 billion. That was only the beginning — the equivalent of my cupcake.

Last night he gave away more than half the sandwich — $39 billion less than was budgeted for 2010, $79 billion less than he originally requested. Non-defense discretionary spending — basically, everything from roads and bridges to schools and innumerable programs for the poor — has been slashed.

The right-wing bullies are emboldened. They will hold the nation hostage again and again.

In a few weeks the debt ceiling has to be raised. After that, next year’s budget has to be decided on. House Budget Chair Paul Ryan has already put forward proposals to turn Medicare into vouchers that funnel money to private insurance companies, turn Medicaid and Food Stamps into block grants that give states discretion to shift them to the non-poor, and give even more big tax cuts to the rich.

There will also be Republican votes to de-fund the new health care law.

“Americans of different beliefs came together,” the President announced after agreement was reached. It was the “largest spending cut in our history.” He sounded triumphant. In fact, he’s encouraging the bullies onward.

All the while, he and the Democratic leadership in Congress refuse to refute the Republicans’ big lie — that spending cuts will lead to more jobs. In fact, spending cuts now will lead to fewer jobs. They’ll slow down an already-anemic recovery. That will cause immense and unnecessary suffering for millions of Americans.

The President continues to legitimize the Republican claim that too much government spending caused the economy to tank, and that by cutting back spending we’ll get the economy going again.

Even before the bullies began hammering him his deficit commission already recommended $3 of spending cuts for every dollar of tax increase. Then the President froze non-defense domestic spending and froze federal pay. And he continues to draw the false analogy between a family’s budget and the national budget.

He is losing the war of ideas because he won’t tell the American public the truth: That we need more government spending now — not less — in order to get out of the gravitational pull of the Great Recession.

That we got into the Great Recession because Wall Street went bonkers and government failed to do its job at regulating financial markets. And that much of the current deficit comes from the necessary response to that financial crisis.

That the only ways to deal with the long-term budget problem is to demand that the rich pay their fair share of taxes, and to slow down soaring health-care costs.

And that, at a deeper level, the increasingly lopsided distribution of income and wealth has robbed the vast working middle class of the purchasing power they need to keep the economy going at full capacity.

“We preserved the investments we need to win the future,” he said last night. That’s not true. The budget he just approved will cut Pell grants to poor kids, while states continue massive cutbacks in school spending — firing tens of thousands of teachers and raising fees at public universities. The budget he approved is cruel to the nation’s working class and poor.

It is impossible to fight bullies merely by saying they’re going too far.

Spiritual Cinema Circle

Robert Reich was the nation’s 22nd Secretary of Labor under Bill Clinton and is Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations. In 2008, Time Magazine named him one of the Ten Most Successful Cabinet Members of the century. He has written eleven books, including “The Work of Nations,” which has been translated into 22 languages. His recent book is “Supercapitalism.” For Professor Reich’s book page for Supercaptialism at Amazon, go here. Reich’s newest book, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future has been released September 21, and is available for ordering at this link (Amazon.com). The above article is from Reich’s new blog, and can be viewed here.

Robert Reich’s commentaries are available for listening to at Publicradio.com. Watch the video Aftershock: The next economy and America’s future (about his new book). Thanks to Professor Reich for permission to publish his articles on an ongoing basis.

Shutdown: The Political War In Washington

Evans Liberal Politics
April 1, 2011

 

Shutdown: The Political War In Washington

Shutdown: The Political War In Washington, Common Dreams.org, March 31, 2011, by Danny Schechter, quoted verbatim under Creative Commons 3.0 license:

Forget Libya; the real bombing is underway elsewhere. Pay less attention to Pakistan; the drone attacks there pale in comparison.

InformIT (Pearson Education)

The real US war is about to erupt in Washington pitting those who believe government has a necessary role to play and those determined to weaken it.

The former understand that, without regulations, without rules, without programs for those in need, we could have a system collapse — perhaps even an uprising — that will make Wisconsin look like a real tea party.

But America’s would be political suicide bombers could care less. They are on a holy our-way-or-the-highway mission.

What would a shutdown mean? The Boston Globe calls it a “downshift”:

A federal ‘shutdown’ is more like a massive downshift — the federal government reaches too deeply into the crevices of daily American life to close. Social Security payments would still be made. Air traffic controllers would scan the skies. The mail should arrive at the doorstep.

There are problems; apparently no one realized in the last shut down when the National Institute of Health was closed, no one was left to feed the lab animals. Ah, but who cares about them?

You can be sure the Republicans won’t defund the military in part because their operation is run like a military campaign complete with deceptive propaganda and iron discipline.

Already conservatives are blaming Democrats for the problem, and, naturally praising themselves.

Here’s House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, “House Republicans continue to offer serious solutions to get our fiscal House in order, but we cannot keep doing it alone. If Senators Reid and Schumer insist on shutting down the government because they want to protect every last dollar and cent of federal spending then that will be on their hands.”

Democrats like New York’s Schumer are firing back by calling them “extreme.” “Instead of lashing out at Democrats in a knee-jerk way, we hope House Republicans will finally stand up to the Tea Party and resume the negotiations that had seemed so full of promise.”

Each party is blaming the other. Each deploys message points. Each acts sanctimoniously.

And, as the Zogby Poll illustrates, the public is, predictably confused.

Voters are split on whether they are concerned about a possible government shutdown, and if they agree that a temporary shutdown would be a good thing because it will force spending cuts. Democrats, however, are much more likely than Republicans to be concerned and much less likely to think it would be a good thing.

It’s an institutional failure, not just a political one. In the end, if negotiations fail, America’s least approved institution, the Congress itself, will find itself rejected and disrespected by more Americans.

Make no mistake: behind the rhetoric, the hard-line ideological right is on a war footing. They don’t care who they will hurt, and are hell bent in shutting down the government, in defunding any programs Democrats like or people need. They are not into compromise, conciliation or even dialogue.

In response, the center operates more like the flabby do gooders of the Salvation Army, trying to save what it can, trying to keep their unraveling coalition together, compromising and colluding with whomever it can.

Click the pretty lady
to Visit Paul’s Playlist for
Great Rock & Pop Music!
*230 Hot Tracks!*

a pretty brunette draped only in an American flag serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of great streaming electronic rock and pop music

In contrast, the right is more like a more muscular Marine Corps, determined to seize that hill, in this case, Capitol Hill. They are, in one sense, true Jihadists in suits, on a mission from God, and in this case, the great deity’s chosen representatives on earth like the Billionaires, Koch Brothers and Rupert Murdoch.

This is not about Money; it is about Power. And it is coming to a head soon. Each party is scurrying to get the best deal but a large number of diehards have wrapped themselves in “live free or die” banners and are willing to take the government down with them.

It is a calculated tactic, akin to holding the country hostage, by creating a crisis that only they can solve, when their opponents cave into their demands, that is.

In essence it says to pols in Washington; do what we demand or we take your government away.

Writes David Johnson of the GOP:

Their election strategy for 2010 was to obstruct everything and keep the economy from creating jobs, and then blame Democrats. It worked. So now they’re doing it even more. But is that the whole plan? In every instance Republicans are obstructing the very things that can help the economy recover and provide the jobs people need. Everything they do is aimed at making things worse. It is hard to understand their actions except as a systematic attempt to blow up the economy.

Thomas Frank called Republicans the “Wrecking Crew” in a book of the same name well before they were able to beat up on a flabby, dispirited and poorly organized Democratic Party led by a President who wants to be everyone’s friend. Time Magazine said of his book:

Frank offers one damning anecdote after another. The Wrecking Crew explains how cynical conservatives have wrested control of the government by railing against its very existence, all while using federal perches to funnel billions into the pockets of lobbyists and the corporations they represent.

As Steve Koss explains:

According to Frank, the conservative worldview is totally committed to “the ideal of laissez faire, meaning minimal government interference in the marketplace, along with hostility to taxation, regulation, organized labor, state ownership, and all the business community’s other enemies.”

The conservative movement promotes the interests of business exclusively over all else in accordance with the motto, ‘More business in government, less government in business.’ So-called ‘big government,’ also tagged as the liberal state, is the enemy; in fact, virtually all government is the enemy, other than the national defense.

That said, where are we now?

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

The Daily Beast reports:

Senate Democrats are preparing to offer $20 billion in new spending cuts in order to avoid a government shutdown- but will it be enough for the Tea Party? (DS: They are now up to $30 B) The offer, which is Democrats’ highest yet, comes on top of $10 billion in cuts that have already been enacted. The House GOP, however, has so far stood by its demand for $61 billion in cuts as it faces pressure from the Tea Party activists. Congress returns from recess Monday and has until April 8 before funding runs dry.

On the sidelines is an emboldened Wall Street, “resurrected” in the words of the National Journal, into “a global financial elite even less under U.S. control than before the crash.” Its many lobbyists are hard at work toning down the rules that will govern the financial reform bill.

They are shifting their political money to Republicans, some even recognizing that the Tea Party is their best friend all in the name of the “free: (sic) market.”

Welcome to the age of stalemate and paralysis with the tone still set by an ever so cautious President who still hopes to make a deal rather than fight for his program. He is watching the polls— not listening to the cries of his supporters.

Contrast Obama’s failure to explain the real challenge with the stand taken by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1936. (He was re-elected three more times), condemning “business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, (and) war profiteering.”

FDR said then, “We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.”

The times have changed, although the conflicts that surfaced in the 1930’s are surfacing again as economic inequality grows and cutbacks intensify. A half a million people took to the streets in London last week. Don’t think the same or more can’t happen in the USA.

A last minute deal is likely to get done with more compromise on the left and more gloating on the right.

Who will get hurt? Not the wealthy, that’s for sure. But these issues, and this conflict are here to stay with or without a last minute compromise or a sell-out by Democrats.

Mediachannel’s News Dissector Danny Schechter investigates the origins of the economic crisis in his book Plunder: Investigating Our Economic Calamity and the Subprime Scandal (Cosimo Books via Amazon). Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Rift in the Right: Many Conservatives Reject the Tea Party’s Paranoid Views

Evans Liberal Politics
March 31, 2011

 

Rift in the Right: Many Conservatives
Reject the Tea Party’s Paranoid Views

Rift in the Right: Many Conservatives Reject the Tea Party’s Paranoid Views, AlterNet, March 30, 2011, by Adele M. Stan, excerpt quoted verbatim under Creative Commons license:

A new study shows a big rift in the right — between paranoid Tea Partiers and establishment conservatives. Before you conclude that’s good news, read on.

When you think of the word “conservative,” what comes to mind? Did you say the Tea Party? Well, if you did, you’d only be half-right. That’s because 51 percent of self-identified conservatives do not strongly identify with the Tea Party, and strong majorities within that non-Tea Party contingent reject some of the Tea Party movement’s signature sentiments, according to a new study by the University of Washington’s Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race and Sexuality — such as the notion that President Barack Obama is “destroying” America. Yet despite their rejection by the conservative mainstream, Tea Party leaders appear to control the Republican Party agenda.

Webroot Software Inc.

Among Tea Party-aligned conservatives, 71 percent said that Obama was “destroying the country.” Only six percent of those conservatives not strongly supportive to the Tea Party movement agreed with the statement, suggesting, according to a statement issued by institute, that the tea party is taking its philosophy in directions far more extreme than those of average conservatives.” In other areas, the contrast was similarly stark. A whopping 76 percent of Tea Party conservatives said they wanted Obama’s policies to fail, compared with (a still troubling) 32 percent of more mainstream conservatives.

And why do all those Tea Partiers want those policies to fail? Because they’re perceived, somehow, as “socialist,” despite the corporation-friendly nature of so-called financial reform, or a health-care reform plan rooted in the private sector. Three-quarters of Tea Party conservatives — 76 percent — told survey-takers that Obama’s policies were pushing the country toward socialism. While mainstream conservatives more reticent to cry “socialism,” 40 percent of them agreed with the Tea Partiers on that claim.

When it came to the conspiracy theories that fuel the Tea Party — tropes about Obama’s religion and place of birth — the gap narrowed, but remained significant.

Despite the president’s well-documented Christian faith, 27 percent of Tea Party-identified conservatives said the president was a practicing Muslim, compared to 16 percent of mainstream conservatives. Among mainstream conservatives, 46 percent agreed that the president is a practicing Christian, while only 27 percent of Tea Party conservatives agreed.

And despite Obama’s release, during the presidential campaign, of documentation of his birth in Hawaii, only 40 percent of Tea Party conservatives believe the information on his certificate of live birth, compared with a slim majority — 55 percent — of mainstream conservatives.

Since the 1980 election of Ronald Reagan to the presidency, the Republican Party has become a nearly monolithically conservative party, a reflection of the party’s takeover by the religious right in 1979. Gone are the “Rockefeller Republicans” — politicians and their followers who were fiscally conservative and socially liberal.

So when we speak today of the conservative movement, we’re essentially talking about the GOP — which means that a rupture in the conservative movement, as revealed in the University of Washington data, could signal a rift in the Republican Party not unlike the one that launched the presidential candidacy of Sen. Barry Goldwater, R-Ariz., in 1964. While the result of that single race was disastrous for the G.O.P., it set the stage for Reagan’s ascent 16 years later. And given the speed with which the Tea Party movement sprang in response to the election of the nation’s first African-American president, if that acceleration maintains its momentum, could the G.O.P. become the Grand New Tea Party in four or eight years’ time?

SIGN PETITION

image of a shoping back with the words Defend NPR and PBS serves as a link to sign a petition

Already, establishment figures in the mainstream conservative movement — columnists and pundits such as George Will of the Washington Post, David Brooks of the New York Times and David Frum, the former Bush speechwriter who blogs at FrumForum — have begun pushing back against the Tea Party movement’s more preposterous themes. When former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, now testing a potential presidential run, insinuated that the president was raised in Kenya, George Will accused him of “spotlight-chasing” in a way that rendered him unworthy of overseeing “a lemonade stand, much less nuclear weapons.”

“Right around 50 years ago, you had this split in the Republican Party between the Goldwater people and the Rockefeller sort of Republicans,” said Christopher Parker, the University of Washington associate professor of political science, who led the survey. “We see the same split happening right now.” Although Parker sees some differences between the Tea Party followers and the John Birch Society fans who helped fuel the Goldwater candidacy, the Birchers “still had these really extreme ideas, you know these ideas embedded and rooted in conspiracy theories,” Parker told AlterNet. “Well, we see the same thing now,” he continued. “If you get the way that that treatment is worded — ‘Barack Obama will destroy the country’ — I mean, how much more extreme can one get? And you see that these conservatives who do not ally themselves strongly with the Tea Party, they don’t follow that line.” ….

Note by Paul Evans: The article goes on to say that yes, the Goldwater candidacy was disastrous for the G.O.P., but then it launched Reagan and the Bushes. Scary.

Read the rest of the article, here.

A Bright Glimmer: See Glenn Beck Dropped By Radio Station Because His Bizarre Religious Rants Hurt Ratings, AlterNet, March 28, 2011, by Media Matters for America and Joe Strupp.

Microsoft Store

Republicans target federal pollution regulations

Evans Liberal Politics
March 4, 2011

 

Republicans target federal pollution regulations

Republicans target federal pollution regulations, The Raw Story, March 3, 2011, by Eric W. Dolan, used with permission, quoted verbatim: Evans Liberal Politics is pleased to partner with The Raw Story to bring you cutting edge news.

Republicans introduced legislation to the House of Representatives and Senate on Thursday that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

dramatic photo of factory smokestacks belching forth black pollution into the air highlights this artice on Congress and EPA regulation

Rep Fred Upton, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, introduced the House version of the bill, called the Energy Tax Prevention Act. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) introduced the legislation to the Senate.

“The EPA’s rush to regulate greenhouse gases is nothing more than a national energy tax, and the effects will be far-reaching to businesses, consumers, and even more so to rural America,” said Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK).

The EPA has begun implementing new greenhouse gas regulations and is drafting additional regulations for electric power plants and refineries.

Republicans claimed the emission regulations were nothing but a “backdoor cap-and-trade energy tax.”

“As the Vice Chairman of the Subcommittee that will review this bill in the House, I look forward to working with Chairman Upton and Senator Inhofe to move this legislation forward to strip the EPA of its authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, something the Clean Air Act was never intended to do,” Rep. John Sullivan (R-OK) added.

In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled the EPA had the power to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. Section 202 of the act requires the agency to set emission standards for “any air pollutant.”

The Energy Tax Prevention Act, which has been praised by the American Farm Bureau Federation and the Industrial Energy Consumers of America, would prevent the EPA from regulating emissions that are blamed for global warming.

“This House bill is yet another Dirty Air Act intended to give the nation’s biggest polluters a way out of limits to their carbon dioxide—pollution that’s likely to exacerbate asthma and lung diseases by worsening smog, and increase deadly heat waves and extreme weather conditions,” Earthjustice senior legislative representative Sarah Saylor said. “But climate change isn’t just threatening Americans’ health; It is also threatening our well-being and ability to prosper now and into the future.”

“It’s time for our elected representatives to stop acting on behalf of major polluting industries that would like to spew out their carbon dioxide pollution totally unrestrained, harming the rest of us,” Earthjustice associate legislative counsel Stephanie Maddin added. “It’s time for these polluters and their friends in Congress to get out of the way of clean air and a secure future for America.”

Microsoft Store

EMERGENCY APPEAL
Please Help Us Stay On Air!

In the next several days Evans Liberal Politics may well be forced off the air for nonpayment of my phone/internet bill. We have made emergency appeals before, but this one is urgent and there will be nothing I can do to bring you the news unless we get significant donations, soon. Please help me stay on air, and have fuel oil to heat my home, as currently my furnace is shut down and just a few, small electric heaters are giving us a little heat.

To Help, please send a money order to Paul Evans, 5396 Overton Road, Wooster, OH 44691. I’m saying a little prayer to God that some few kind and well-off souls will send us some help. Thank you and God Bless you. ~ Paul Evans

Acknowledging my Fans: My Top Ten Cities for Last Seven Days, in terms of the numbers of visitors were: Mountain View, California (1,528 visitors, Google, you are the best – tell your fellow techs about us!); Cabot, Arkansas (1,345 visitors, you are always on my list and have my true gratitude!); Redmond, Washington (663 visitors – Microsoft, we love you guys, too – tell all your IT friends about us!); Alexandria, Ohio (478 visitors – thank you and go Bucks!); Mt. Laurel, New Jersey (372 visitors – thanks for your loyalty!); Bloomington, Illinois, home of Illinois Wesleyan and nearby Illinois State (360 visitors, thank you sooo much!); Seattle Washington (240 visitors, thank you!); Beijing, China (211 visitors, thank you peng yo!); New York, New York (198 visitors, greetings to the Big Apple!); and Bucharest, Romania (174 visitors – Bună ziua de la Ohio!). Get YOUR city into the Game: Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts, using the icons at bottom of each post!

Robert Reich: The Republican Shakedown

Evans Liberal Politics
February 24, 2011

 

Robert Reich: The Republican Shakedown

The Republican Shakedown, Robert Reich.org, February 23, 2011, by Robert Reich, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

You can’t fight something with nothing. But as long as Democrats refuse to talk about the almost unprecedented buildup of income, wealth, and power at the top – and the refusal of the super-rich to pay their fair share of the nation’s bills – Republicans will convince people it’s all about government and unions.

Skyscraper - Pharmacy Checker Approved and CIPA certified Online Pharmacy

Republicans claim to have a mandate from voters for the showdowns and shutdowns they’re launching. Governors say they’re not against unions but voters have told them to cut costs, and unions are in the way. House Republicans say they’re not seeking a government shutdown but standing on principle. “Republicans’ goal is to cut spending and reduce the size of government,” says House leader John Boehner, “not to shut it down.” But if a shutdown is necessary to achieve the goal, so be it.

The Republican message is bloated government is responsible for the lousy economy that most people continue to experience. Cut the bloat and jobs and wages will return.

Nothing could be further from the truth, but for some reason Obama and the Democrats aren’t responding with the truth. Their response is: We agree but you’re going too far. Government employees should give up some more wages and benefits but don’t take away their bargaining rights. Private-sector unionized workers should make more concessions but don’t bust the unions. Non-defense discretionary spending should be cut but don’t cut so much.

In the face of showdowns and shutdowns, the “you’re right but you’re going too far” response doesn’t hack it. If Republicans are correct on principle, they’re more likely to be seen as taking a strong principled stand than as going “too far.” If they’re basically correct that the problem is too much government spending why not go as far as possible to cut the bloat?

The truth that Obama and Democrats must tell is government spending has absolutely nothing to do with high unemployment, declining wages, falling home prices, and all the other horribles that continue to haunt most Americans.

Indeed, too little spending will prolong the horribles for years more because there’s not enough demand in the economy without it.

The truth is that while the proximate cause of America’s economic plunge was Wall Street’s excesses leading up to the crash of 2008, its underlying cause — and the reason the economy continues to be lousy for most Americans — is so much income and wealth have been going to the very top that the vast majority no longer has the purchasing power to lift the economy out of its doldrums. American’s aren’t buying cars (they bought 17 million new cars in 2005, just 12 million last year). They’re not buying homes (7.5 million in 2005, 4.6 million last year). They’re not going to the malls (high-end retailers are booming but Wal-Mart’s sales are down).

Only the richest 5 percent of Americans are back in the stores because their stock portfolios have soared. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has doubled from its crisis low. Wall Street pay is up to record levels. Total compensation and benefits at the 25 major Wall St firms had been $130 billion in 2007, before the crash; now it’s close to $140 billion.

But a strong recovery can’t be built on the purchases of the richest 5 percent.

The truth is if the super-rich paid their fair share of taxes, government wouldn’t be broke. If Governor Scott Walker hadn’t handed out tax breaks to corporations and the well-off, Wisconsin wouldn’t be in a budget crisis. If Washington hadn’t extended the Bush tax cuts for the rich, eviscerated the estate tax, and created loopholes for private-equity and hedge-fund managers, the federal budget wouldn’t look nearly as bad.

And if America had higher marginal tax rates and more tax brackets at the top – for those raking in $1 million, $5 million, $15 million a year – the budget would look even better. We wouldn’t be firing teachers or slashing Medicaid or hurting the most vulnerable members of our society. We wouldn’t be in a tizzy over Social Security. We’d slow the rise in healthcare costs but we wouldn’t cut Medicare. We’d cut defense spending and lop off subsidies to giant agribusinesses but we wouldn’t view the government as our national nemesis.

The final truth is as income and wealth have risen to the top, so has political power. The reason all of this is proving so difficult to get across is the super-rich, such as the Koch brothers, have been using their billions to corrupt politics, hoodwink the public, and enlarge and entrench their outsized fortunes. They’re bankrolling Republicans who are mounting showdowns and threatening shutdowns, and who want the public to believe government spending is the problem.

They are behind the Republican shakedown.

These are the truths that Democrats must start telling, and soon. Otherwise the Republican shakedown may well succeed.

TigerDirect Best Sellers

Robert Reich was the nation’s 22nd Secretary of Labor under Bill Clinton and is Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations. In 2008, Time Magazine named him one of the Ten Most Successful Cabinet Members of the century. He has written eleven books, including “The Work of Nations,” which has been translated into 22 languages. His recent book is “Supercapitalism.” For Professor Reich’s book page for Supercaptialism at Amazon, go here. Reich’s newest book, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future has been released September 21, and is available for ordering at this link (Amazon.com). The above article is from Reich’s new blog, and can be viewed here.

Robert Reich’s commentaries are available for listening to at Publicradio.com. Watch the video Aftershock: The next economy and America’s future (about his new book). Thanks to Professor Reich for permission to publish his articles on an ongoing basis.

EMERGENCY APPEAL
Please Help Us Stay On Air!

In the next few days Evans Liberal Politics will be forced off the air for nonpayment of my phone/internet bill. We have made emergency appeals before, but this one is urgent and there will be nothing I can do to bring you the news unless we get significant donations, soon. Please help me stay on air, and have fuel oil to heat my home, as currently my furnace is shut down and just a few, small electric heaters are giving us a little heat.

To Help, please send a money order to Paul Evans, 5396 Overton Road, Wooster, OH 44691. I’m saying a little prayer to God that some few kind and well-off souls will send us some help. Thank you and God Bless you. ~ Paul Evans

Microsoft Store

Acknowledging my Fans: My top seven cities for Wednesday, February 23 in terms of the numbers of visitors were: Beijing, China (330 visitors, thank you – 謝謝。!); Bloomington, Illinois, home of Illinois Wesleyan and nearby Illinois State, (92 visitors, thank you!); Alexandria, Ohio, (64 visitors, thank you! and Go Bucks!); Redmond, Washington (58 visitors – Microsoft, we love you guys, too – tell your fellow techs about us!); Albuquerque, New Mexico, where my dad trained for a Social Security position (43 visitors, thanks!); Seattle, Washington, (41, thanks again!); and Chicago, Illinois (29 visitors – how’s the weather in the Windy City?). Get YOUR city into the game: Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts, using the icons at bottom of each post!