Posts Tagged ‘Palin’

Sarah Palin’s Presidential Strategy, and the Economy She Depends On

Evans Liberal Politics
November 26, 2010

 

Sarah Palin’s Presidential Strategy,
and the Economy She Depends On


Sarah Palin’s Presidential Strategy, and the Economy She Depends On, Robert Reich.org, November 24, 2010, by Robert Reich, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Monday night, Sarah Palin watched from the audience as daughter Bristol danced on ABC. Twenty-three million other Americans joined her from their homes. Tuesday, the former vice-presidential candidate started a 13-state book tour for her new book, “America By Heart,” which has a first printing of 1 million. Her reality show on TLC, “Sarah Palin’s Alaska,” is in its third week. Last Sunday she was the cover story in the New York Times magazine.

Click the Evans Liberal Politics
Getaway Car to Visit Paul’s
Playlist of Rock & Pop Hits
* #1 Rated by Google *


photo link of Paul's 2002 Honda CR-V at the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Arboretum serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of 182 Rock, Pop and Electronic Hits

It’s all part of The Palin Strategy for becoming president in 2012 — or 2016 or 2020.

Republican leaders don’t believe it. “If she wanted the Republican nomination she’d be working on the inside,” one influential Republican told me a few days ago. “She’d be building relationships with Republican Senators and representatives, governors, and state party officials. She’d be smoothing the feathers she ruffled by backing Tea Party candidates. She’d be huddled with GOP kingmakers.” When I suggested she has a different strategy, the influential Republican smiled knowingly. “That’s how it’s done – how McCain, Bush, and everyone has done it. That’s the only way to do it. But all she really wants is celebrity.”

The Republican establishment doesn’t get it. Celebrity is part of The Palin Strategy – as is avoiding the insider game. She doesn’t want to do what Huckabee, Pawlenty, Gingrich, or Romney have to do. She has an outside game.

Palin’s game plan is directly related to America’ white working class, and the economy it faces – and the economy it’s likely to continue to experience for years.

No prospective candidate so sharply embodies the anger of America’s white working class as does Palin. And none is channeling that anger nearly as effectively.

White working class anger isn’t new, of course, nor is the Republican Party’s use of it. Apart from the South, where the anger came in response to the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, the more widespread working-class anxiety began in the late 1970s when the median male wage that had been rising for three decades began to stagnate.

As I noted in “Aftershock,” families responded by sending wives and mothers into the paid workforce, working longer hours, and then, finally, going deep into debt. These coping mechanisms allayed but did not remove the growing anxiety.

Over the years, Republicans have channeled the anxiety into anger, through overt appeals to a so-called “silent majority” that were overlooked by Democrats and liberals; through “tax revolts” by working and middle-class families that couldn’t afford to pay more; and in subtle and not-so-subtle appeals to racist fears (Willie Horton).

But now that the Great Recession has eliminated the last coping mechanism – ending the easy borrowing, and ratcheting up unemployment – the working class’s economic insecurities have soared. A recent Washington Post poll showed 53 percent of homeowners worried about meeting their mortgage payments. Home foreclosures have slowed largely because of bad paperwork on the part of banks, but the threat remains. Housing prices are still dropping.

The white working class has not benefitted from the recent rise in corporate profits and stock prices. To the contrary, both have been fueled by foreign sales of goods made abroad and by labor-saving technologies that have allowed American companies to do more with fewer workers here at home.

Joblessness among the white working class is far higher than the 9.6 percent average for the nation. While the unemployment rate among college grads (most of whom are professionals or managers) is around 5 percent, the average unemployment rate for people with only a high school degree or less (blue-collar, pink-collar, clerical) is almost 20 percent.

All of this is spawning a new and more virulent politics of anger in the nation’s white working class, stoked by Republicans – anger against immigrants, blacks, gays, intellectuals, and international bankers (consider the latest Fox News salvos against George Soros).

According to the right-wing narrative, the calamity that’s befallen the white working class is due to the global and intellectual elites who run the mainstream media, direct the government, dispense benefits to the undeserving, and dominate popular culture. (The story and targets are not substantially different from those that have fueled right-wing and fascist movements during times of economic stress for more than a century, here and abroad.)

Sarah Palin has special appeal because she wraps the story in an upbeat message. She avoids the bilious rants of Rush, Sean Hannity, and their ilk. But her cheerfulness isn’t sunny; she doesn’t promise Morning in America. She offers pure snark, and promises revenge. Over and over again she tells the same snide, sarcastic, inside joke, but in different words: “They think they can keep screwing us, but (wink, wink), we know something they don’t. We’re gonna take over and screw them.”

The Palin Strategy is to circumvent the Republican establishment, filled as it is with career Republicans, business executives, and Wall Streeters. That’s why her path to the Republican nomination isn’t the usual insider game. It’s a celebrity game – a snark-fest with the nation’s entire white working class. Vote for Bristol and we’ll show the media establishment how powerful we are! Buy my book and we’ll show the know-it-all coastal elites a real book directed at real people! Tune into my cable show and we’ll show the real America – far from the urban centers with immigrants and blacks and fancy city slickers!

As I believe will become clearer, the Palin Strategy will involve a political threat to the GOP establishment: Deny her the nomination she’ll run as independent. This will split off much of the white working class and guarantee defeat of the Republican establishment candidate. It will also result in her defeat in 2012, but that’s a small price to pay for gaining the credibility and power to demand the nomination in 2016, or threaten another third-party run in 2020.

Once nominated, her campaign for the general election will be purely populist. She’ll seek to broaden her base to become the candidate of the people, taking on America’s vested Establishment.

More than anything else, the Palin Strategy depends on the continuing fear and anger of America’s white working class. She’s betting that their economic prospects will not improve by 2012, or even by 2016 and beyond.

Sadly, this is likely to be the case. On Tuesday, the Fed issued a gloomy prognosis. Even if the U.S. economy began to grow at a rate more typical of recoveries than the current anemic 2 percent, unemployment won’t drop to its pre-recession level for 5 to 7 years. A minority of the Fed thought this was too optimistic.

The disturbing truth is the bad economy is likely to continue for most Americans beyond 7 years — maybe for ten or more — because of a chronic lack of aggregate demand. Apart from inevitable inventory replacements and the necessary replacements by consumers of cars, appliances, and clothing that wear out, nothing will propel the U.S. economy forward. So much income and wealth have now concentrated at the top that the broad middle and working class no longer has the buying power to do so. The top will resume buying but their purchases won’t be nearly enough.

Japan lost a decade of economic growth after its real estate bubble exploded. It seems entirely probable that the United States will suffer the same fate. Our economic structure – how we now allocate the gains of growth, the yawning gap between Wall Street and Main Street, the incentives operating on large corporations to pare American payrolls and expand abroad – almost dictates it.

We might change that structure, of course. But at this point that doesn’t seem in the cards. The President seems unable or unwilling to provide the clear narrative that explains what’s happened and what needs to be done, and Republicans are at this moment ascendant.

It all fits into Sarah Palin’s strategy.

$1.99 Web Hosting at Go Daddy

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! In order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today?

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share, print or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the handy icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 230 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

Our Playlist is #1 Rated by Google

Sunday Talk – And They’re Off!

Evans Liberal Politics
September 26, 2010

 

Sunday Talk – And They’re Off!


Sunday Talk – And They’re Off!, Daily Kos, September 26, 2010, by Silly Rabbit, quoted verbatim:

On Thursday, House Republican leaders surrounded themselves with even more tools to unveil their long-awaited “Pledge to America“.Although the “Pledge” drew nearlyuniversalpraise from across the political spectrum, President Obama denounced it as a carbon copy of Newt Gingrich’s failed “Contract on America”.

Well, whatever…

He’s probably just upset that the GOP’s ideas are so much better than the Democrats’.

Morning TV lineup:


OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

Meet then Press: Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN); Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD); Roundtable: Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, DC Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee, Emergency Financial Manager for the Detroit Public Schools Robert Bobb and President of the American Federation of Teachers Randi Weingarten.

Face the Nation Republican Candidate for Florida Senate Marco Rubio; Republican Candidate for Colorado Senate Ken Buck; Chief Strategist for the Tea Party Express Sal Russo.

This Week: White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod; Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY); Queen Rania of Jordan; Roundtable: George Will (Washington Post), Democratic Strategist Donna Brazile, Republican Strategist Matthew Dowd and Ron Brownstein (National Journal).

Fox News Sunday: House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH); Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA); House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD); Roundtable: Brit Hume (Fox News), Mara Liasson (NPR/FNC), Bill Kristol (Weekly Standard) and Juan Williams (NPR/FNC).

State of the Union: Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL); Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN); Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA); Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT); Reliable Sources: Former Late Night Talk Show Host Dick Cavett; Lara Logan (CBS News).

The Chris Matthews Show: John Heilemann (New York magazine); Norah O’Donnell (MSNBC); Cynthia Tucker (Atlanta Journal-Constitution); Michael Gerson (Washington Post).

Fareed Zakaria GPS: Israeli President Shimon Peres; Turkish President Abdullah Gul; British Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg.

$1.99 Web Hosting at Go Daddy

Evening TV lineup:


60 Minutes will feature: a report from the border area between Afghanistan and Pakistan (preview); a report on the national debate surrounding the construction of an Islamic center near Ground Zero (preview); and, a profile of Super Bowl MVP Drew Brees (preview).

On Comedy Central:Jon Stewart, who appeared on The O’Reilly Factor this week, experienced deja vu all over again when he examined the Republicans’ “Pledge to America”.

The Daily Show

Monday: Talking Head/Author Bill O’Reilly (“Pinheads and Patriots”)

Tuesday: Blog Empress/Author Arianna Huffington (“Third World America”)

Wednesday: Author Linda Polman (“The Crisis Caravan”)

Thursday: Singer/Actor Justin Timberlake (“The Social Network”)

And Stephen Colbert, who testified before Congress this week (much to the dismay of some Republicans/Fox News hosts), weighed the evidence of Christine O’Donnell’s witchiness.

The Colbert Report

Monday: Documentarian Ken Burns (“Baseball: The Tenth Inning”)

Tuesday: Ross Douthat (New York Times)

Wednesday: Former Car Czar/Author Steve Ratner (“Overhaul”)

Thursday: Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin (“The Social Network”)

We’re Counting on You!
Please Share Evans Liberal Politics
With Friends & Contacts!


In related news:

Video surfaced of O’Donnell vowing to use her magical powers to rid America of sex.

humorous image claiming that abstinence is 99.99 percent effective at preventing pregnancy

O’DONNELL: The sad reality is — yes, there is something you can do about it. And the sad reality, to tell them slap on a condom is not –

NIES: You’re going to stop the whole country from having sex?

O’DONNELL: Yeah. Yeah!

NIES: You’re living on a prayer if you think that’s going to happen.

O’DONNELL: That’s not true. I’m a young woman in my thirties and I remain chaste.

With all of these classic clips floating around, is it any wonder that O’Donnell doesn’t feel the need to do any more national media interviews.

Meanwhile:

Fellow “Grizzly Mama” Sharron Angle is taking a different approach to the national media.

ANGLE: It’s going really well. If you’re interested in just the Internet part of that — and of course I’ve been criticized for saying that I like to be friends with the [press] — but here’s the deal: when I get a friendly press outlet — not so much the guy that’s interviewing me — it’s their audience that I’m trying to reach.

a box with one of those free internet advertising schemes inside of it

So, if I can get on Rush Limbaugh, and I can say, “Harry Reid needs $25 million. I need a million people to send twenty five dollars to SharronAngle.com.” The day I was able to say that [even], he made $236,000 dollars. That’s why it’s so important.

Somebody … I’m going on Bill O’Reilly the 16th. They say, “Bill O’Reilly, you better watch out for that guy, he’s not necessarily a friendly” … Doesn’t matter, his audience is friendly, and if I can get an opportunity to say that at least once on his show — when I said it on Sean Hannity’s television show we made $40,000 before we even got out of the studio in New York.

And, finally:

Despite all of the good that Sarah Palin’s endorsement did for O’Donnell and Angle (not so much for their party), not every teabagging candidate wants her brand of help.

HOST: A lot of tea party people who support you. The de facto leader, if there is one, in the tea party, Sarah Palin, do you want her to campaign for you in the 10th?

PERRY: No I don’t. I don’t want her to come down. She represents — she’s an entertainer, she represents the tea party movement nationally, but the tea party movement in the 10th district, whether it be the group in Quincy, the group in Pembroke, or the group on the Cape, they’re just hard working people [...].

HOST: Can we just for one second talk about that entertainer as you call her for one second. She calls you on the phone and says Jeff Perry, I’d like to come, I’m not asking you for to invite me — I’d like to come. You’re going to say no?

PERRY: I’m going to say no, yes.

If you liked it then you should have put a ring on it.
- Trix

A Good Weekend Read: See This week in crazy: Bishop Eddie Long, Salon, September 25, 2010, by Mary Elizabeth Williams: “Another powerful anti-gay pastor becomes ensnared in his own sordid same-sex scandal.”

We Now Have a Google Translation Button at the bottom of every post and page: just choose your language. ~ Paul Evans

Why Pay More? $7.49 .COM Domains from GoDaddy.com 468x60

How Conservative Women Politicians Make Life Harder for Working Moms

Evans Liberal Politics
June 21, 2010

 

How Conservative Women Politicians
Make Life Harder for Working Moms

 

How Conservative Women Politicians Make Life Harder for Working Moms, AlterNet, June 20, 2010, by Betsy Reed of The Nation, photo from White Rabbit cult, quoted verbatim:

Conservative women politicians are profiting from the feminist movement while promoting policies that make the lives of everyday women much harder.

Feminists, what about this picture makes you mad???


First, let’s swallow hard and be fair. There is something to cheer in the so-called Year of the Woman. You don’t have to credit the Republican Party, which did next to nothing to bring on the wave that swept Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman, Sharron Angle and Nikki Haley to victory in June’s primary elections. Indeed, before the RNC began heralding its Mama Grizzlies, in Sarah Palin’s typically catchy but grating phrase, it was brushing off complaints about how its roster of 104 rising “Young Guns,” lavished with party attention and resources, included only seven women. Fiorina and Whitman bought their gleaming California wins with their own money, while Angle charged to victory in Nevada on sheer Tea Party adrenaline. There’s certainly nothing progressive about these women, but their brash, unapologetic and largely unsolicited emergence in Republican politics — in American politics — does represent progress, of a sort.

lasivious photo of Sarah Palin, with cleavage

That being said, it’s maddening that a party that has resisted every advance of feminism and undermined women’s economic strength at every turn now claims to embody “the overall triumph of the women’s movement,” as New York Times columnist Ross Douthat put it. To appreciate the breadth of the chasm between the party’s symbolism and its substance, consider the subject of working mothers. Some of today’s GOP women, like many more Democratic women before them, have indeed broken barriers by campaigning around the clock with young children at home. But what does it mean to be “comfortable” with the spectacle of a working mother, as Douthat claims Republicans now are, when you oppose the very supports that would make the lives of working mothers comfortable?

Fresh new faces aside, the Republican Party’s stance on the issues that matter to working mothers is as regressive as it has ever been. Recall how Republicans in Congress, at the behest of their corporate backers, tried mightily to block President Clinton’s Family and Medical Leave Act, which granted women the right to take unpaid time off to have a baby and still keep their jobs. The passage of the FMLA in 1993 was a real advance, but it is hardly sufficient. Because so many more men have lost their jobs in the Great Recession, an increasing number of families depend on a female wage-earner’s paycheck to survive, and many women simply cannot take unpaid time off to care for a baby without imperiling their families. President Obama slipped $50 million into his budget proposal to aid states interested in addressing this problem by guaranteeing paid leave. But this item, along with nearly all the other expenditures to blunt the pain of the downturn and restore economic health, has no support from Republicans, who have signed countless pledges to freeze spending, cut taxes and reduce the deficit, regardless of the human consequences.

Sarah Palin’s Greatest Hits


The new GOP women are at the front of the fiscal conservative pack. Fiorina, for example, signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge put out by Americans for Tax Reform, promising as a US senator to oppose any new taxes on California citizens or businesses — this when the state desperately needs federal help to close its $19.1 billion deficit and is poised to slash daycare, welfare, public school, and drug treatment programs and services for the poor. Obama has proposed another round of stimulus, which would put $50 billion into state coffers to ease the crisis California and other states are experiencing, but fiscal conservatives like Fiorina and South Carolina’s Haley (who stands by Governor Mark Sanford’s notorious decision to refuse federal stimulus money) oppose such intervention.

The fiscal crisis in the states cuts to the core of women’s economic security: as Heather Boushey of the Center for American Progress points out, women are suffering the brunt of it because they make up 60 percent of state and local government employees, and they depend disproportionately on the social services, such as childcare, that states provide. Although the first wave of this recession hit men hardest, Boushey says we are undergoing a shift toward job losses for women as cuts in the public sector mount. The reductions in childcare subsidies that states are contemplating, for example, will affect a workforce that is 95 percent female; and at the same time, the loss of services will surely make holding jobs impossible for many former welfare recipients who now, thanks to Democrat-inspired welfare reform, have nowhere else to turn. Women caught in this crisis definitely can’t count on the GOP’s new female leaders for solidarity. California’s Whitman — she of the $1.3 billion eBay fortune — pledges to reduce the lifetime limit on welfare from five years to two if she is elected governor. Nevada’s Angle, who makes Sarah Palin look like Eleanor Roosevelt, not only opposes all stimulus spending but wants to phase out Social Security and, for good measure, the IRS.

It’s insidious how Republicans are deploying women candidates to pitch government belt-tightening to women as the “keepers of the family budget,” as if the stresses of working families are increased by childcare, healthcare, eldercare, after-school and other social programs. New Hampshire’s Kelly Ayotte, the Tea Party favorite running for the Senate, who signed the Club for Growth Repeal It healthcare pledge, declares, “You can’t spend money you don’t have. Like most New Hampshire families, Joe and I sit around our kitchen table, and we have to prioritize and live within our budget. Our government should be no different.” This analogy is not only flawed — the state, unlike individuals, must create the conditions for economic prosperity — it ignores how families frequently borrow money to invest in their future, to pay for education, for example. It’s not clear this message is resonating with women. According to a new survey by the Ms. Foundation for Women and the Center for Community Change, women — especially women of color, low-income women and single mothers — are more likely than men to believe the government should take a more active role in making the economy work (a majority of men believe this too).

It’s one thing — and not a small thing — to celebrate the strength of women in politics. But it’s supremely cynical to do so, as the GOP Year-of-the-Woman revelers have, while working to undercut the strength of women in society. Now, will the real Mama Grizzlies please rise up?

See Sarah Palin Boob Job?, limelife, June 11, 2010, by Kristine Gasbarre, excerpt quoted verbatim:

At the Belmonts last week, one Sarah Palin showed up looking as though her cup runneth over…and we’re not talking about a beverage. There’s speculation that Sarah Palin has gone under the knife for a little (big) breast enhancement — here’s what an insider’s saying.

Even after bearing five kids, 46-year-old Sarah Palin keeps a pretty admirable figure. Palin’s known to be an avid runner and said that when she was campaigning for the U.S. Vice Presidency alongside John McCain, she lost weight because she barely had time to eat while she was on the road. Palin has not been known, however, for endowment in the breast area, but now she’s boasting a much bigger bust.

Last weekend Sarah Palin and her husband Todd showed up in Elmont, New York at the legendary Belmont Stakes horse race. It’s reported that the Palins had a horse in the race…but Sarah Palin seemed to be sporting some new ponies under her white t-shirt too. Web chatter suggests that Palin has enhanced her figure with breast implants.

See Sarah Palin To OpenFor Jonas Brothers In Anchorage, Alaska, White Rabbit Cult, January 27, 2010, by White Rabbit

Comment by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: Hey, this is news, I guess. Sorry, feminists, about all the Palin cleavage business, but I guess that’s news around the blogosphere, too.

In the Spirit of Good Fun, let’s have a listen, shall we?

album cover from the song 'Girl Police' by 'The Dudes' “Girl Police”, by The Dudes (who else, right?) sing with praise and fear, of the “Girl Police” in this hilarious and surprisingly good sounding anthem. Part musical nod to 70’s rockers like Cheap Trick, and part post-alterna emo complain-core, it all adds up to 100% rad. — 3:25

custom cover art for U2 performing 'Love And Peace or Else' live from Brazil on their Vertigo Tour from 2005 "Love And Peace Or Else," U2 performs this wonderful song, full of portent and warning, on their Vertigo Tour in 2005, from Brazil. — 4:36 – See the music video of this song. Dedicated to the bravest woman I know, Shannon H., who inspires me every day, and to my father Jack, the nicest man I’ve ever known.

There’s 132 hot tracks of rock, pop and electronic Gold over on my Rock Playlist, with many commercial artists — #1 rated by Google. Stop on by and have a listen!

Boobgate – Palin: No, I haven’t had implants

Evans Liberal Politics
June 14, 2010

 

Boobgate – Palin: No, I haven’t had breast implants

 

Watch Did Sarah Palin Get a Boob Job?

Cheney and far right lead Republicans over cliff

Evans Liberal Politics
June 11, 2010

 

Cheney and far right lead Republicans over cliff

 

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson: Cheney and the far right, who represent the views of perhaps 7 percent of Americans, racist and in the pocket of Wall Street and corporate America, are leading the GOP over a cliff by latching onto issues like homosexuality and abortion and patching together an unholy alliance which resonates with a much larger portion of Republicans because of these other issues. Reporting from the Real News Network – 11:35.

Another of My Palin Videos on YouTube: Is McCain Palin’s Bitch

Evans Liberal Politics
June 10, 2010

 

Another of My Palin Videos on YouTube:
Is McCain Palin’s Bitch

 

WARNING: Parental Advisory – for Mature Audiences Only

My First Video Posted to YouTube: Palin on Oprah

Evans Liberal Politics
June 10, 2010

 

My First Video Posted to YouTube:
Palin on Oprah

 

WARNING: Parental Advisory – for Mature Audiences Only

The Daily Show On Topic: In the News – The Real America

Evans Liberal Politics
May 23, 2010

 

 

 

The Daily Show On Topic:
In the News – The Real America

 

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon – Thurs 11p / 10c
On Topic: In the News – The Real America
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorTea Party