Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

President Obama’s Weekly Address for January 28, 2012

Logos57: A Caring Community

 

President Obama’s Weekly Address
for January 28, 2012

I am enthusiastic about the President’s Address this week. It seems as though he is attempting to advocate putting ethics and morality back into our Congress and our legislation. I have seen a few other descriptions of an an advocacy by the President along the lines of an ongoing return to the values that made this country great. And having some kind of idea (and abundant evidence) of what he is up against, this is very refreshing and encouraging to me, and should be to everyone who watches this video. ~ Paul Evans.

Also watch: The President’s State of the Union Address — 1:05:02

Also Watch: Ask President Obama or go to www.youtube.com/whitehouse and submit your question.

Soros: Not much difference between Obama and Romney

Logos57: a Caring Community

 

Soros: Not much difference
between Obama and Romney

Soros: Not much difference between Obama and Romney, The Raw Story, January 25, 2012, by Eric W. Dolan, used with permission, quoted verbatim: Logos57: a Caring Community is pleased to partner with The Raw Story to bring you cuttiing edge news.

Billionaire investor and philanthropist George Soros told Reuters Global Editor-at-Large Chrystia Freeland that he still supported President Barack Obama, but predicted voters would not be very enthusiastic about the 2012 elections if former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney was nominated by Republicans.

Soros on Romney vs. Obama

“Well, look, either you’ll have an extremist conservative, be it Gingrich or Santorum, in which case I think it will make a big difference which of the two comes in,” he said. “If it’s between Obama and Romney, there isn’t all that much difference except for the crowd that they bring with them.”

But he acknowledged that a major difference between Romney and Obama would be their potential Supreme Court nominations and their stance on taxation.

“That is the big difference, and that has led my hedge fund community to abandon Obama in favor of any Republican because they don’t like to be taxed,” Soros explained. “I personally believe that when it comes to policy, you shouldn’t be pursuing self-interest, but the public interest. And I think that the income differentials are too wide and ought to be narrowed.”

Soros has been demonized by some, most notably Lyndon LaRouche and Glenn Beck, for his liberal views and influence. He has donated millions to the Center for American Progress, MoveOn.org and the Drug Policy Alliance.

“Are you one of Lenin’s useful idiots in the view of your fellow hedge fund billionaires?” Freeland asked.

“Well, I suppose so,” he replied. “I am a traitor to my class.”

Comment by Paul Evans: It does seem to me that Ms. Freeland, the interviewer, went too far when she refered to Soros as “one of Lenin’s useful idiots.” The man courageously advocates for a fair and progressive system of taxation. That hardly makes him anyone’s “useful idiot.” As to the comparison of Romney with Obama, the fact of Obama’s advocacy of a fairer system of taxations has ramifications through much of the budgetary process. If a more progressive system of taxation could somehow be put in place, for example, the political pressure to cut entitlements would be much less (and the Democrats’ ability to succesfully oppose such cuts would be stronger). To liberals and progressives everywhere, this should be understood as a huge difference. Obama only advocates bringing the level of taxation back to what it was under Clinton. It may be noted that Clinton balanced the budget and that during his Presidency the economy grew at 4 percent per year. For the very rich, it was in fact not much of a burden at all.

Recommended: Feeling Heat From Gingrich, Romney Enters Attack Mode, The NY Times, January 25, 2012, by Michael D. Shear.

Also Recommended: Candidates Scramble to Win Hispanic Votes in Florida, The NY Times, January 26, 2012, by Michael D. Shear and Trip Gabriel.

Watch Colbert: ‘Gingrich would totally win a wet t-shirt contest’, Comedy Central on The Raw Story, January 25, 2012, by Andrew Jones — Paul Evans: That’s the funniest claim I’ve heard yet this year, maybe longer. Gingrich? Win a wet t-shirt contest??? ROTFL… The guy is about as ripped as a stuffed elephant!

Also See: Obama and GOP candidates offer a campaign preview, AP News on CenturyLink, January 26, 2012, by David Espo.

Also See: Obama Calls for Wealthy to Pay More Taxes to Restore Fairness, Bloomberg Businessweek, January 25, 2012, by Catherine Dodge and Kate Andersen Brower.

Our Top Three Headlines for January 14, 2012

Evans Community of Caring
January 14, 2012

 

A Caring Place Where People
May Help Each Other
and Talk Politics or Religion

Our Top Three Headlines for January 14, 2012


Cruise disaster: three confirmed dead
and 69 passengers still missing

Telegraph.co.uk, January 14, 2012, by Roya Nikkhah.

The President’s Weekly Address
Helping American Businesses Succeed (YouTube)

DRINKING 3 BEERS WITH NO HANDS
IN 37 SECONDS FOR WORLD RECORD!! (YouTube)

Paul Krugman: The Post-Truth Campaign

Evans Community of Caring
December 24, 2011

 

Merry Christmas Everyone!

Christmas Fun:
A Brief History of Santa, Wired.com, December 24, 2011, by Roy Wood.

Evans Community of Caring:
A Caring Place Where People
May Help Each Other
and Talk Politics or Religion

Paul Krugman: The Post-Truth Campaign

The Post Truth Campaign, The New York Times, December 22, 2011, by Paul Krugman:

Note by Paul Evans: I often stop by the NY Times since they correctly wear the mantle of the best run, most highly thought of liberal and truthful online news source. When I go there, I make it a point to take in the latest column by Paul Krugman, who is a strong voice for truth and progressive economic opinion. Usually I do not usually post any of his articles on my website, since they are copyrighted and in fact I have no right to post them on Evans Community of Caring. I am making an exception for the first half of Krugman’s opinion piece from December 22nd. I know we are only supposed to take small excerpts, but if the people who run the Times would take the time to read this editorial, they would see how important it is and let myself and others publish the whole article. I am compromising with the first half of Krugman’s article.

Click the Peace Sign
to visit Paul’s Playlist of
230 Rock and Pop Hits
* Rated #1 by Google *


a beautiful and artful peace sign serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of 230 rock, pop and electronic hits

I only wish the American people would take the time to read this piece and realize its importance.

Paul Krugman: Suppose that President Obama were to say the following: “Mitt Romney believes that corporations are people, and he believes that only corporations and the wealthy should have any rights. He wants to reduce middle-class Americans to serfs, forced to accept whatever wages corporations choose to pay, no matter how low.”

How would this statement be received? I believe, and hope, that it would be almost universally condemned, by liberals as well as conservatives. Mr. Romney did once say that corporations are people, but he didn’t mean it literally; he supports policies that would be good for corporations and the wealthy and bad for the middle class, but that’s a long way from saying that he wants to introduce feudalism.

But now consider what Mr. Romney actually said on Tuesday: “President Obama believes that government should create equal outcomes. In an entitlement society, everyone receives the same or similar rewards, regardless of education, effort, and willingness to take risk. That which is earned by some is redistributed to the others.”

And in an interview the same day, Mr. Romney declared that the president “is going to put free enterprise on trial.”

This is every bit as bad as my imaginary Obama statement. Mr. Obama has never said anything suggesting that he holds such views, and, in fact, he goes out of his way to praise free enterprise and say that there’s nothing wrong with getting rich. His actual policy proposals do involve a rise in taxes on high-income Americans, but only back to their levels of the 1990s. And no matter how much the former Massachusetts governor may deny it, the Affordable Care Act established a national health system essentially identical to the one he himself established at a state level in 2006.

Over all, Mr. Obama’s positions on economic policy resemble those that moderate Republicans used to espouse. Yet Mr. Romney portrays the president as the second coming of Fidel Castro and seems confident that he will pay no price for making stuff up.

Welcome to post-truth politics.

Why does Mr. Romney think he can get away with this kind of thing? Well, he has already gotten away with a series of equally fraudulent attacks. In fact, he has based pretty much his whole campaign around a strategy of attacking Mr. Obama for doing things that the president hasn’t done and believing things he doesn’t believe.

For example, in October Mr. Romney pledged that as president, “I will reverse President Obama’s massive defense cuts.” That line presumably plays well with Republican audiences, but what is he talking about? The defense budget has continued to grow steadily since Mr. Obama took office. ….

Read the full article, here.

Some things that matter to me:

logo button for Evans Liberal Politics which serves to launch a famous liberal political speech Martin Luther King: The amazing "I Have a Dream" speech. — 2:50

logo button for Evans Liberal Politics which serves to launch a famous liberal political speech Robert F. Kennedy: a speech by Bobby Kennedy made on the night Martin Luther King was assassinated. The pure goodness and wonder in this speech is amazing. — 6:10

Paul Evans: OK, I just wanted to throw in a couple quotes here:

Adlai Stephenson II (Democratic nominee and candidate in 1952 and 1956): “I have been thinking that I would make a proposition to my Republican friends… that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them.

This is particularly for my friend Betsy: “Someone once asked me why do you always insist on taking the hard road? and I replied why do you assume I see two roads?” ~ unknown

We Need Your Help!!

Look for Sam Stein, Robert Reich; DemFromCT, Bob Swern, Joan McCarter & MinistryOfTruth from Daily Kos; plus news from AlterNet, Truthout & Campaign for America’s Future and articles from our partner The Raw Story on Evans Liberal Politics (now remade into our new site, Evans Community of Caring), your source for U.S. liberal news and politics.

Here at Evans Community of Caring, our problem is not finding insightful, cutting edge journalism to report for you. Paul Evans, the sole owner and operator of this site simply does not have all that much time to work on the news. We really need someone out there to step up to the plate and help us provide my readers with the news we want to give them. If interested in working for us please email me. We would be happy to train you and enthusiasm counts for more than experience. Thanks ~ Paul

468X60

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Boehner announces deal with Reid on end to payroll tax impasse

Evans Community of Caring

 

A Caring Place Where People
May Help Each Other
and Talk Politics or Religion

Boehner announces deal with Reid
on end to payroll tax impasse

Boehner announces deal with Reid on end to payroll tax impasse, NBC Politics on MSNBC, December 22, 2011, by Tom Curry, msnbc.com National Affairs Writer, excerpt quoted verbatim: OK, so this is a little back into the murky world of politics. We’ll try not to do that too often, but this deal, as described below, is actually one of the first successes the Obama administration has had over the House Republicans. Savor it while you can. ~ Paul Evans

Click the pretty lady
to Visit Paul’s Playlist for
Great Rock & Pop Music!
*230 Hot Tracks!*

a pretty brunette draped only in an American flag serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of great streaming electronic rock and pop music

Tom Curry: Hearing anger from the people they represent, House Republicans found a way to make a deal and claim they accomplished something, too. NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell reports.

House Speaker John Boehner announced Thursday that he had agreed with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on a two-month extension of a package including a payroll tax cut and an extension of unemployment benefits.

Boehner said in statement he and Reid “reached an agreement that will ensure taxes do not increase for working families on Jan. 1 while ensuring that a complex new reporting burden is not unintentionally imposed on small business job creators.”

He said the Senate “will join the House in immediately appointing conferees, with instructions to reach agreement in the weeks ahead on a full-year payroll tax extension. We will ask the House and Senate to approve this agreement by unanimous consent before Christmas.”

See the full article, here.

See Also: BREAKING: Bah, humbug- Boehner CAVES, Daily Kos, December 22, 2011, by Earl from Ohio.

See Also: Boehner Takes Strong Hand With House GOP After Payroll Tax Meltdown, Talking Points Memo, December 22, 2011, by Brian Beutler.

See Also: Dems win one as GOP caves, The Washington Post (The Plum Line), December 22, 2011, by Greg Sargent.

468X60

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Should the Left & All Americans Trust Barack Obama?

Evans Caring Community
November 27, 2011

 

Should the Left & All Americans
Trust Barack Obama?

© 2009 Evans Caring Community, edit and rewrite of November 27, 2011, also published February 1, 2011, and May 8, 2009, by Dr. Jack E. Evans and Paul Evans. Originally published with the title “Why the Left and All Americans Should Trust Barack Obama” — please notice the new title. Photo of Dr. Jack E. Evans is from 1977 and is hereby placed into the public domain:

This article was originally published on May 8, 2009 on Evans Liberal Politics and has been rewritten and updated. I am introducing here my father, Dr. Jack E. Evans, who is a retired 86 year old professor of Russian language and literature with a doctorate from Yale University, and an old New Deal Democrat. A year after this article was first published, at the beginning of 2010, Dad had to go and live at a local nursing home, where he struggles with senile dementia. I have lived with Jack all of my life, almost. My father tried so very hard to impart to me the strongest of spiritual and mental gifts with which he tried to help me overcome my mental illness, and to try to develop my ability to think logically, and as an editor. I could not possibly show him enough gratefulness, and I know that he has been a far better father than I could possibly deserve.

In mid-2009, Dr. Evans felt that this topic was important enough that he wished to contribute to a discussion of it when it was originally published. I truly and strongly hope that I am successful in conveying his feelings about the current political situation. Dr. Evans was a marine officer in the Pacific in World War II. Later, he spent 13 years in charge of and as chief editor for translating sections for ASA, NSA and CIA, before getting his doctorate from Yale and teaching at several colleges. He also has a masters degree in Russian history from Georgetown. I (Paul Evans) mentioned above that I lived and interacted with Dr. Evans almost my whole life; We worked on the translation of 11 books together. Later, I was his caregiver before he had to go to live in a Wooster nursing home, where I visit him almost every day.

photo from 1977 of Yale Professor of Russian language and literature Dr. Jack E. Evans

We both wanted to simply say that, while as progressive Democrats we are sometimes critical of the actions of the (late) Democratic (now Republican) Congress and even the actions of President Obama, we trust Barack Obama’s heart and mind and remain committed to his Presidency and his success. However, our views are not some sort of blind loyalty either to President Obama or to the Democratic Party, but arise mainly through an understanding of the difficulties Obama has in this economy and with the current composition of Congress as well as the general political direction, or “mood” if you will, which our country has taken. Even so, that does NOT mean that we are at all content with the leadership that President Obama has shown in taking the country in a progressive direction.

Both Dr. Evans and I have been upset at the appointment to high office in the Obama administration of economic advisers with corrupt histories and very strong ties to Wall Street. Even the mainstream media has discussed what we feel to be unnecessary pain, hardship and suffering for ordinary Americans, brought on by what seems sometimes to be a corrupt American system of government.

Nonetheless, we remember well Barack Obama’s roots as a community organizer in South Chicago, and we do not feel he has changed much in his heart from who he was in those simpler days. We think he may well remain about as progressive in his personal identity as ever, but is compelled by a pragmatic outlook to follow “the art of the possible.” At least, we hope so.

We also feel that President Obama wants to represent all Americans, and not just those who feel they are progressive or liberal in their outlook. We think and pray that Obama is still a progressive in his heart and mind and still trying to move the nation in that direction. But nonetheless, we are both proud of Barack Obama specifically FOR trying to represent all Americans, and not just liberals and progressives. Really, that was a lot to attempt. Lately, however, we both have been wondering about that. One real disappointment for us is that Obama has had a Presidency so intertwined with corporate America, which was evident from the start when he chose as his economic advisers Summers, Geithner, Bernanke and crew. Now he is moving even more in this conservative direction with the emphasis on American competitiveness and the whole movement towards an austerity budget. (Did you know that the new budget contains a 12 percent increase for the Pentagon?)

Important liberal and progressive economists, such as Paul Krugman, Robert Reich and Daily Kos’s Bob Swern have exhorted the President about a growing crisis in the resources and job situation for our workers, yet Obama seems determined to capitulate to the Republican House without even attempting to defend the working class. At the same time he is all too willing to give rich Americans tax breaks and even seems willing to consider major cuts to entitlements. Dr Evans and I want to exhort the President to remain strong in the understanding that America’s business engine is built on the labor of the average American worker and their ability to make purchases, and it is primarily their welfare he needs to look out for, not that of Wall Street.

Thinking about the upcoming election of 2012, Obama needs to consider how disillusioned his supporters from 2008 are because of Obama’s apparent economic and fiscal conservatism that has only grown stronger with time. There comes a point when Obama may realize that his base is so disillusioned and heartsick about the “change we can believe in” having morphed into support for the rich and the status quo in general, that we may be unwilling to work very hard to reelect the President. I know I myself worked pretty hard in 2008, yet am weighing my options about 2012. Many progressives who I have talked to have confided to me that it is only upon considering the likely Republican nominees that they would even consider working for Obama at this point.

But it’s not just liberals who are upset and struggling over how much to support the President. Many independents and just ordinary Americans I have spoken with are VERY dissatisfied. Some people who have been ruined in their financial status say that the whole situation may even turn violent if the oppression of the American worker by the rich continues much further. I do not know, but I ask myself: why are ordinary Americans talking this way, and why would they unless something pretty profound is wrong with the way America is these days.

Informed progressives feel that America is in danger of becoming a two class oligarchy, and that it is up to all of us to stop this trend. To work to make America financially sound again, the vast majority of the American middle class and American workers must again be brought into a condition of prosperity. This is our main concern going forward, as it is that of some of our featured economics writers here such as Paul Krugman, Robert Reich and Bob Swern.

The nation has fully embraced the full-bore pro-Capitalist spirit. This is all very well, but ordinary Americans are increasingly suffering. So long as that reality is true, the nation will never regain its full elan and vigor and move forward to meet the challenges of the 21st century as it should.

Still, overall, while our own expression is sometimes adamantly progressive in terms of what has been published on Evans Liberal Politics, we want to be sure to say that “we support you, President Obama, and we are still trying to trust you too.” We just wish you would be a lot more concerned with the economic pain of ordinary Americans and a little less preoccupied with the people who bankroll your campaigns and Congress. Ordinary Americans swept you into office and without us, you will not again be successful in 2012.

We do however understand the political reality you labor under, President Obama, and also that you are really trying to move the nation beyond hyperpartisanship and into a more caring and decent relation between those of differing views. While I do in fact feel that this is one of the President’s main goals, we have to ask ourselves: just who made the President bring Bush’s “wrecking crew” into his administration as it’s principal economic advisers at it’s start? Why would a truly liberal or progressive President bring in those people?

I used to be really skeptical of the effort to bring about bipartisanship, President Obama. Then I had a period in which I tried to be accepting of bipartisanship, believing that the President had the interests of all Americans in his heart — not just liberals and progressives.

A lot of people on the left have come to the conclusion that you have “sold out.” Dr. Evans and I still hope and pray for you, President Obama, and yet, all the legislation coming out of Washington is pretty darned Republican in what it appears to be, at least to the left. At what point do you stop working for bipartisanship when the other side refuses to compromise at all?

So, overall, there is a disconnect between what President Obama promised us during the campaign of 2008, and what has happened since then. Perhaps this all is not Barack Obama’s fault, but is more a product of our nation’s and Congress’ economic corruption. One wonders just how much better it would be if Republicans in Congress actually considered working with the President and Democrats in a bipartisan way. Could we not as a nation unify behind this man Barack Obama, who has shown himself to be a true patriot and true American citizen for all of us? My father and I truly hope that we will. Dr. Evans and I believe that true bipartisanship would solve a lot of problems in this country. And it is so sad to see the ideals of 2008 bow down before political reality.

That being said, Barack Obama used to be fully a “man of the people.” Now he has a lot of informed people questioning that. President Obama, you need to show the nation you still care about the average citizen more than Wall Street and big business. Carry the nation forward with that in mind, and we will all support you like we did in 2008. We trust that you are still our Barack Obama, and we implore you to stand up for ordinary Americans.

This article was originally published on Daily Kos. I can think of no better summary and end for it than to quote a commenter on the article there: “It’s not a question of a lack of trust, it’s about each of us playing our role. I do trust Obama, which is why I’m willing to follow the path he set us on. But that path includes applying pressure for what I know is right.” ~ Jack and Paul Evans

Download this article as a Word document here.

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

Visit our well known Guide to Liberal News & Politics on the Web, where you find out where to find out the truth.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock Playlist, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a Listen to the master Playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

Robert Reich: The Zero Economy

Evans Liberal Politics
September 3, 2011

 

Robert Reich: The Zero Economy

The Zero Economy, Robert Reich.org, September 2, 2011, by Robert Reich, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports today no jobs were created in August. Zero. Nada.

Wireless from AT&T

Well, not quite. The strike at Verizon reduced the labor force by 45,000. Minnesota government employees returned to work, adding 22,000. So in reality, America added 23,000 jobs. Almost zero.

In reality, worse than zero. We need 125,000 a month merely to keep up with population growth. So the hole continues to deepen.

Since this Depression began at the end of 2007, America’s potential labor force – working-age people who want jobs – has grown by over 7 million. But since then the number of Americans with jobs has shrunk by more than 300,000.

If this doesn’t prompt President Obama to unveil a bold jobs plan next Thursday, I don’t know what will.

The problem is on the demand side. Consumers (whose spending is 70 percent of the economy) can’t boost the economy on their own. They’re still too burdened by debt, especially on homes that are worth less than their mortgages. Their jobs are disappearinig, their pay is dropping, their medical bills are soaring.

And businesses won’t hire without more sales.

So we’re in a vicous cycle.

Republicans continue to claim businesses aren’t hiring because they’re uncertain about regulatory costs. Or they can’t find the skilled workers they need.

Baloney. If these were the reasons businesses weren’t hiring – and demand were growing – you’d expect companies to make more use of their current employees. The length of the average workweek would be increasing.

But the length of the average workweek has been dropping. In August it declined for the third month in a row, to 34.2 hours. That’s back to where it was at the start of the year – barely longer than what it was at its shortest point two years ago (33.7 hours in June 2009).

It’s demand, stupid.

So what does a sane nation do when the consumers and businesses can’t boost the economy on their own?

Government becomes the purchaser of last resort. It hires directly (a new WPA and Civilian Conservation Corps, for example). It helps states and locales, so they don’t have to continue to slash payrolls and public services. (The help could be structured as a loan, to be repaid when unemployment drops to, say, 6 percent.)

And it hires indirectly — contracting with companies to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, including school buildings, to take another example.

Not only does this create jobs but also puts money in the hands of all the people who get the jobs, so they can turn around and buy the goods and services they need – generating more jobs.

Get it? Not exactly rocket science.

So why don’t Republicans get it? Either they’re knaves – they want the economy to stay awful through next Election Day so Obama gets the boot. Or they’re fools – they’ve bought the lie that reducing the deficit now creates more jobs.

Every time you hear anyone say we’re “broke” or “can’t afford to spend more,” tell them we’ll be in worse shape if we don’t. If the economy remains dead in the water, the ratio of public debt to GDP balloons.

And remind them that the federal government can now borrow at fire-sale rates. Interest on the ten-year Treasury bill is 2 percent.

Do you hear me, Mr. President? Please — be bold next week. And if, as expected, Republicans refuse to go along, take it to the people. Mobilize the public. Use the bully pulpit. That’s what you have it for.

One more thing, Mr. President. You also have to tackle inequality. When so much income and wealth continues to flow to the very top, America’s vast middle class still won’t have enough purchasing power to boost the economy. Priming the pump is necessary but won’t be sufficient without enough water in the well.

468X60

Robert Reich was the nation’s 22nd Secretary of Labor under Bill Clinton and is Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations. In 2008, Time Magazine named him one of the Ten Most Successful Cabinet Members of the century. He has written eleven books, including “The Work of Nations,” which has been translated into 22 languages. His recent book is “Supercapitalism.” For Professor Reich’s book page for Supercaptialism at Amazon, go here. Reich’s newest book, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future has been released September 21, and is available for ordering at this link (Amazon.com). The above article is from Reich’s new blog, and can be viewed here.

Robert Reich’s commentaries are available for listening to at Publicradio.com. Watch the video Aftershock: The next economy and America’s future (about his new book). Thanks to Professor Reich for permission to publish his articles on an ongoing basis.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

The Truth Nobody Seems to Want to Talk About

Evans Liberal Politics
August 12, 2011

 

The Truth Nobody
Seems to Want to Talk About

Evans Liberal Christian Politics, August 27, 2011 (rewritten and republished); originally published August 12, 2011, by Paul Evans:

I’ve been dancing around (yet trying to avoid) the bitter truth since soon after I started this blog immediately after the election of 2008.

I was willing to give Obama the benefit of the doubt when he appointed Summers, Geithner and Bernanke as heads of his economic team, but now I believe that I was duped, as were many who worked to elect Obama as an agent of change. Will somebody please show me just what has improved in the actual lives of ordinary Americans since Bush?


I’ve seen quite a few other journalists and columnists doing the same thing – dancing around the truth with reluctance to make the cognitive leap towards an inescapable reality. I guess my favorite economics author who tells it like it is, is Bob Swern (bobswern) over at Daily Kos. But few seem to want to connect the dots and really summarize what is going on, so allow me try to make my own attempt.

Politics is depressing. The article which opened my eyes to this and resonated with me is, “Across the Universe: The Power of Disillusionment and the Politics of Despair,” OpEdNews, March 15, 2011, by Chris Floyd. A young man is disillusioned, somewhat depressed, and even contemplating drinking or suicide because his Mom’s hero Barack Obama is complicit in so much that is wrong. Instead of simply making a comment of some encouragement, Chris Floyd makes this commentary in its own article, of which I wish to quote part:

You have to remember that politics is a toxin. It will make you sick, taint your mind, poison your soul, blight your life if you let it. One has to deal with politics as a form of waste management, just as you need to have some kind of sewage system in your home or community to prevent disease.

Politics — the machinations of the stunted, damaged souls and third-rate minds who hanker for power — is just a small part of life. It entirely lacks the tragic element; nothing tragic or depthful about politics and power, it’s just brute force, greed, ignorance and spite. So there is no deep meaning to be found in it. No tragedy; no real joy either. Even the greatest moments, the epiphanies — and they do happen in politics on rare occasions, one must admit — will lead very quickly back into the sewage. And that’s OK, that’s the way it is; sewage, waste management — it’s part of life. But it’s not where meaning, joy, tragedy, the salt and savor of existence can be found. So why let the evil done by third-rate goobers drive you to despair of life itself? By hook, crook, lies and murder they’ve already amassed all kinds of power; why give them power over your very soul?

Very well put, don’t you think?

Still, it’s all very well to talk about politics not ruining our outlook or our lives, yet, isn’t that exactly what it’s doing?

It’s always been the very wealthy versus the rest of us. It’s just that once in a great while, usually following one of those periodic implosions we call a depression or even a bad recession, the Democrats manage to come up with enough populist leanings and legislation to make the playing field a little more level. “Equal” never really gets anywhere near to meaning “equality.” But with a few handfuls of beads thrown to the populous, there can be a minimal compression of inequality so that emotions are tamed long enough for the rich to resume their systematic plundering the puny earnings of ordinary Americans.

What are we talking about, put in a contemporary example? Let’s look at the Waltons, owners of that ubiquitous chain of Chinese goods, WalMart. Sam Walton used to be worth about 60 billion dollars. Then he died and three of his children inherited. Each of the three today is worth at least $20 billion. That’s enough to put two of the three in the top ten wealthiest people in America.

There are some different figures out there about just how bad the inequality is today. The most damning set of facts I’ve come across perhaps came from Michael Moore’s website, although I’m not sure. The claim is made that 400 very lucky people in this fair land own more than half of America’s wealth. Oh, and also, the lowest 80 percent of us own the shrinking sum of 17 percent of the wealth. This level of inequality is the worst, economists say, since the days of the old robber barons of the nineteen twenties.

Recently on Daily Kos, Bob Swern gave us some further proof of what’s been going on, specifically from 1992 to 2008, in NYT to Obama, Congress On Jobs: “Bad Policy, Craven Politics.” Buffett: “Stop Coddling Super-Rich”:

“…Referencing I.R.S. data and putting this all in context, Buffett tells us that, at the very highest income level for the 400 most successful Americans that submitted returns to the I.R.S. in 1992, they had total income of $16.9 billion and they paid federal taxes of 29.2%. By 2008, the income of the top 400 people reporting to the I.R.S. had risen to $90.9 billion, but they only paid federal taxes of 21.5%.”

It is instructive to look at Wall Street and the investment banks during and “after” the last recession (which some say isn’t over). While Goldman Sachs got ten billion from the bailout — the one Congress voted on, which was only a fraction of what the Fed actually handed out (some 2.4 trillion) — and also 19 billion from AIG bailout money that AIG owed Goldman, don’t worry, everything is hunky dory for these fine executives. The Goldman execs in 2009 got to split 23 billion in bonuses.

Now, Goldman Sachs owns Burger King. Many of these workers work 70 hour weeks and often do NOT even get paid for their overtime hours with commensurate pay. But $23 billion would give every single Burger King worker extra pay amounting to $18,000 a year. As if to rub salt in the wound, after the Obama administration’s “fiscal reforms,” last year Goldman gave out even more in executive bonuses.

What I am talking about is that, for the first time in history, after an economic nosedive which was the second worst in our recent history, there has been this really good recovery. I mean for rich people. ONLY for rich people. Yes, through the magic of a bought Congress and some really great lobbyists, plus the best computer programming money can buy and the connivance of the Federal Reserve, the economy is great for the rich, and yet really, really lousy for the rest of us. And that’s the way the rich set up this recovery. I can’t prove it, but I feel deep down in my bones that Washington and the various economic elites set it up this way on purpose, in order to solely benefit the elite and well to do.

You say, let me have some data to back that up. Here are some figures that were floating around last February which are telling: The fact is that as of that date, for those making $100,000 a year or more, the unemployment rate was a very livable 3.2 percent. However for those of us making $20,000 a year or less, the unemployment rate stood at 31 percent. There seems to be a now-permanent underclass and upward mobility seems frozen. Not only do the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, but if you ARE poor, there is very little chance you will ever be counted as a thriving member of the middle class.

So we are screwed, and maybe even a fair number of the underclass now understand this, yet even the Democrats who get elected are mostly far from liberal on economic issues. With the “compromise” that Obama and the Democrats made to get the debt ceiling raised, about which Boehner crowed that the Republicans got 98 percent of what they wanted, I really believe we should all consider just giving up and moving to Europe or Canada. The game seems over here in America. Greed and evil seem to have triumphed and to be fully in control of the future. I cannot imagine Congress, Obama or anyone else saving ordinary Americans from the suffering and anguish that have recently been imposed on them by the powers that be. I pray that the future proves me wrong. But I don’t think so.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.