Posts Tagged ‘liberal commentary’

Should the Left & All Americans Trust Barack Obama?

Evans Caring Community
November 27, 2011

 

Should the Left & All Americans
Trust Barack Obama?

© 2009 Evans Caring Community, edit and rewrite of November 27, 2011, also published February 1, 2011, and May 8, 2009, by Dr. Jack E. Evans and Paul Evans. Originally published with the title “Why the Left and All Americans Should Trust Barack Obama” — please notice the new title. Photo of Dr. Jack E. Evans is from 1977 and is hereby placed into the public domain:

This article was originally published on May 8, 2009 on Evans Liberal Politics and has been rewritten and updated. I am introducing here my father, Dr. Jack E. Evans, who is a retired 86 year old professor of Russian language and literature with a doctorate from Yale University, and an old New Deal Democrat. A year after this article was first published, at the beginning of 2010, Dad had to go and live at a local nursing home, where he struggles with senile dementia. I have lived with Jack all of my life, almost. My father tried so very hard to impart to me the strongest of spiritual and mental gifts with which he tried to help me overcome my mental illness, and to try to develop my ability to think logically, and as an editor. I could not possibly show him enough gratefulness, and I know that he has been a far better father than I could possibly deserve.

In mid-2009, Dr. Evans felt that this topic was important enough that he wished to contribute to a discussion of it when it was originally published. I truly and strongly hope that I am successful in conveying his feelings about the current political situation. Dr. Evans was a marine officer in the Pacific in World War II. Later, he spent 13 years in charge of and as chief editor for translating sections for ASA, NSA and CIA, before getting his doctorate from Yale and teaching at several colleges. He also has a masters degree in Russian history from Georgetown. I (Paul Evans) mentioned above that I lived and interacted with Dr. Evans almost my whole life; We worked on the translation of 11 books together. Later, I was his caregiver before he had to go to live in a Wooster nursing home, where I visit him almost every day.

photo from 1977 of Yale Professor of Russian language and literature Dr. Jack E. Evans

We both wanted to simply say that, while as progressive Democrats we are sometimes critical of the actions of the (late) Democratic (now Republican) Congress and even the actions of President Obama, we trust Barack Obama’s heart and mind and remain committed to his Presidency and his success. However, our views are not some sort of blind loyalty either to President Obama or to the Democratic Party, but arise mainly through an understanding of the difficulties Obama has in this economy and with the current composition of Congress as well as the general political direction, or “mood” if you will, which our country has taken. Even so, that does NOT mean that we are at all content with the leadership that President Obama has shown in taking the country in a progressive direction.

Both Dr. Evans and I have been upset at the appointment to high office in the Obama administration of economic advisers with corrupt histories and very strong ties to Wall Street. Even the mainstream media has discussed what we feel to be unnecessary pain, hardship and suffering for ordinary Americans, brought on by what seems sometimes to be a corrupt American system of government.

Nonetheless, we remember well Barack Obama’s roots as a community organizer in South Chicago, and we do not feel he has changed much in his heart from who he was in those simpler days. We think he may well remain about as progressive in his personal identity as ever, but is compelled by a pragmatic outlook to follow “the art of the possible.” At least, we hope so.

We also feel that President Obama wants to represent all Americans, and not just those who feel they are progressive or liberal in their outlook. We think and pray that Obama is still a progressive in his heart and mind and still trying to move the nation in that direction. But nonetheless, we are both proud of Barack Obama specifically FOR trying to represent all Americans, and not just liberals and progressives. Really, that was a lot to attempt. Lately, however, we both have been wondering about that. One real disappointment for us is that Obama has had a Presidency so intertwined with corporate America, which was evident from the start when he chose as his economic advisers Summers, Geithner, Bernanke and crew. Now he is moving even more in this conservative direction with the emphasis on American competitiveness and the whole movement towards an austerity budget. (Did you know that the new budget contains a 12 percent increase for the Pentagon?)

Important liberal and progressive economists, such as Paul Krugman, Robert Reich and Daily Kos’s Bob Swern have exhorted the President about a growing crisis in the resources and job situation for our workers, yet Obama seems determined to capitulate to the Republican House without even attempting to defend the working class. At the same time he is all too willing to give rich Americans tax breaks and even seems willing to consider major cuts to entitlements. Dr Evans and I want to exhort the President to remain strong in the understanding that America’s business engine is built on the labor of the average American worker and their ability to make purchases, and it is primarily their welfare he needs to look out for, not that of Wall Street.

Thinking about the upcoming election of 2012, Obama needs to consider how disillusioned his supporters from 2008 are because of Obama’s apparent economic and fiscal conservatism that has only grown stronger with time. There comes a point when Obama may realize that his base is so disillusioned and heartsick about the “change we can believe in” having morphed into support for the rich and the status quo in general, that we may be unwilling to work very hard to reelect the President. I know I myself worked pretty hard in 2008, yet am weighing my options about 2012. Many progressives who I have talked to have confided to me that it is only upon considering the likely Republican nominees that they would even consider working for Obama at this point.

But it’s not just liberals who are upset and struggling over how much to support the President. Many independents and just ordinary Americans I have spoken with are VERY dissatisfied. Some people who have been ruined in their financial status say that the whole situation may even turn violent if the oppression of the American worker by the rich continues much further. I do not know, but I ask myself: why are ordinary Americans talking this way, and why would they unless something pretty profound is wrong with the way America is these days.

Informed progressives feel that America is in danger of becoming a two class oligarchy, and that it is up to all of us to stop this trend. To work to make America financially sound again, the vast majority of the American middle class and American workers must again be brought into a condition of prosperity. This is our main concern going forward, as it is that of some of our featured economics writers here such as Paul Krugman, Robert Reich and Bob Swern.

The nation has fully embraced the full-bore pro-Capitalist spirit. This is all very well, but ordinary Americans are increasingly suffering. So long as that reality is true, the nation will never regain its full elan and vigor and move forward to meet the challenges of the 21st century as it should.

Still, overall, while our own expression is sometimes adamantly progressive in terms of what has been published on Evans Liberal Politics, we want to be sure to say that “we support you, President Obama, and we are still trying to trust you too.” We just wish you would be a lot more concerned with the economic pain of ordinary Americans and a little less preoccupied with the people who bankroll your campaigns and Congress. Ordinary Americans swept you into office and without us, you will not again be successful in 2012.

We do however understand the political reality you labor under, President Obama, and also that you are really trying to move the nation beyond hyperpartisanship and into a more caring and decent relation between those of differing views. While I do in fact feel that this is one of the President’s main goals, we have to ask ourselves: just who made the President bring Bush’s “wrecking crew” into his administration as it’s principal economic advisers at it’s start? Why would a truly liberal or progressive President bring in those people?

I used to be really skeptical of the effort to bring about bipartisanship, President Obama. Then I had a period in which I tried to be accepting of bipartisanship, believing that the President had the interests of all Americans in his heart — not just liberals and progressives.

A lot of people on the left have come to the conclusion that you have “sold out.” Dr. Evans and I still hope and pray for you, President Obama, and yet, all the legislation coming out of Washington is pretty darned Republican in what it appears to be, at least to the left. At what point do you stop working for bipartisanship when the other side refuses to compromise at all?

So, overall, there is a disconnect between what President Obama promised us during the campaign of 2008, and what has happened since then. Perhaps this all is not Barack Obama’s fault, but is more a product of our nation’s and Congress’ economic corruption. One wonders just how much better it would be if Republicans in Congress actually considered working with the President and Democrats in a bipartisan way. Could we not as a nation unify behind this man Barack Obama, who has shown himself to be a true patriot and true American citizen for all of us? My father and I truly hope that we will. Dr. Evans and I believe that true bipartisanship would solve a lot of problems in this country. And it is so sad to see the ideals of 2008 bow down before political reality.

That being said, Barack Obama used to be fully a “man of the people.” Now he has a lot of informed people questioning that. President Obama, you need to show the nation you still care about the average citizen more than Wall Street and big business. Carry the nation forward with that in mind, and we will all support you like we did in 2008. We trust that you are still our Barack Obama, and we implore you to stand up for ordinary Americans.

This article was originally published on Daily Kos. I can think of no better summary and end for it than to quote a commenter on the article there: “It’s not a question of a lack of trust, it’s about each of us playing our role. I do trust Obama, which is why I’m willing to follow the path he set us on. But that path includes applying pressure for what I know is right.” ~ Jack and Paul Evans

Download this article as a Word document here.

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

Visit our well known Guide to Liberal News & Politics on the Web, where you find out where to find out the truth.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock Playlist, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a Listen to the master Playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

Abbreviated Pundit Round-up for July 7, 2011

Evans Liberal Politics
July 7, 2011

 

Abbreviated Pundit Round-up for July 7, 2011

Abbreviated Pundit Round-up, Daily Kos, July 7, 2011, by DemFromCT, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

NY Times:

Click the pretty lady
to Visit Paul’s Playlist for
Great Rock & Pop Music!
*230 Hot Tracks!*

a pretty brunette draped only in an American flag serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of great streaming electronic rock and pop music

Mr. Obama, who is to meet at the White House with the bipartisan leadership of Congress in an effort to work out an agreement to raise the federal debt limit, wants to move well beyond the $2 trillion in savings sought in earlier negotiations and seek perhaps twice as much over the next decade, Democratic officials briefed on the negotiations said Wednesday.The president’s renewed efforts follow what knowledgeable officials said was an overture from Mr. Boehner, who met secretly with Mr. Obama last weekend, to consider as much as $1 trillion in unspecified new revenues as part of an overhaul of tax laws in exchange for an agreement that made substantial spending cuts, including in such social programs as Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security — programs that had been off the table.

EJ Dionne:

Here’s why getting to a deal on the debt ceiling is so complicated.President Obama’s main goal is to get through this fight with the government still running and his support from the political center intact, even if this means substantial concessions to Republicans.

House Republican leaders want to get by without inciting a revolt among right-wing Tea Partyers, which means they’re having trouble accepting Obama’s concessions.

And the Senate — well, the Senate resembles the Balkans without a peacekeeping force.

WaPo:

To their credit, Romney’s senior aides were up-front about his fundraising for the quarter — they said he would come in between $15 and $20 million — but still struggled beneath the heightened fundraising expectations for the nominal frontrunner in the race.“I think they learned an organizational lesson here,” said one senior Republican strategist. “Pledges are meaningless, and they need to pick up the collection efforts…

“I think it is relative,” said Mike Murphy, a Republican media consultant who has worked for Romney in the past but is not affiliated with him this time around. “It’s less than 2008, but the competition he faces is the crowd he has now, not then.”

Politico:

Evans Politics
Chat for our visitors!

Click the button to enter our
Dedicated Chat room: (just choose
a username, no password necessary)

Evans Politics logo button leading to our dedicated chat room

Mitt Romney fundraising sparks Republican fears

Ah, cutting to the chase.

The Hill:

Former Bush political guru Karl Rove said Wednesday that he thinks Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) will run for president.Rove, who enjoys longstanding and deep ties to Texas Republican politics, said he expects Perry to jump into the race for the GOP nomination — and raise big bucks if he does so.

“I think you’re right that he’s going to run,” Rove said on Fox Business Network.

Politico:

Former President Bill Clinton Wednesday compared GOP efforts to limit same-day voter registration and block some convicted felons from voting to Jim Crow laws and poll taxes.In a speech to liberal youth activists Wednesday, the former president called out proposals in battleground states like Florida and Ohio that could limit the voter rolls.

Now, that’ll make for some competition for both Romney and Bachmann, even if he doesn’t win. Also-rans Pawlenty and Huntsman will be starved for media oxygen and we might actually see more stories written that their campaigns don’t measure up and they won’t be winning.

This was from Matt Bai last month:

Republicans talk about something called “Bush fatigue.” It almost always comes up in relation to Jeb Bush, the brainy and politically talented brother of George W. Bush, who was himself the popular governor of a pretty sizable state. It’s a common theory in conservative circles that while Jeb (everyone calls him Jeb) might be the most formidable candidate out there to challenge President Obama, he is nonetheless cursed by his last name.That’s because a lot of Americans, and no small number of Republican primary voters, reminisce about the last Bush presidency the way they might about, say, once having contracted shingles. The sullied family brand is thought to be a deal breaker, at least for the moment.

When I interviewed Jeb Bush last year, he told me that he didn’t worry about the brand and wouldn’t hesitate to run for president if he really felt like it. And I’ve never been entirely sold on the Bush fatigue theory, either. Jeb Bush bears little resemblance to his older brother physically or temperamentally, and you can imagine him dominating Republican debates in a way that would quickly differentiate him.

In Mr. Perry’s case, however, the biographical and visceral similarities to Mr. Bush might actually prove harder to ignore.

So what’s changed? Nothing. A combo of blind ambition and wariness of Romney will likely prove those predicting a Perry run to be correct. And that Perry might run is more evidence of Romney’s weakness than his fund raising.

NY Times on Rupert Murdoch’s problems in the UK:

Line-skirting has always been part of doing business for Rupert Murdoch, but a voice-mail hacking scandal poses a new type of threat to News Corporation’s image.

Not all the news is bad.

Connecticut has become the first state to require companies to provide employees with paid sick leave with legislation signed into law by Gov. Dan Malloy (D), who announced his action Tuesday.The measure requires businesses in the service industry with 50 or more employees to allow workers to accrue one hour of sick time for every 40 hours worked. Backers estimate that between 200,000 and 300,000 workers will benefit. Opponents said the law will make Connecticut less competitive.

The Onion:

Final Minutes Of Last Harry Potter Movie To Be Split Into Seven Separate Films – Warner Bros. will recut the last four minutes of “The Deathly Hollows: Part 2″ and stretch it into seven films so fans can enjoy the Harry Potter franchise for another decade.

Rumor has it Harry, Ron and Hermione have already destroyed the first three, but the last four will be harder to find.

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

DemFromCT is a longtime member of the Daily Kos community with interests ranging from polling to Iraq to bird flu, and has graciously agreed to allow us here at Evans Liberal Politics to publish his articles on an ongoing basis. He is a founding editor of Flu Wiki (www.fluwikie.com) and its sister site, the Flu Wiki Forum (www.newfluwiki2.com). Since its inception in June 2005, Flu Wiki has grown into an international clearinghouse of pandemic influenza information and links.

You can view his diaries at Daily Kos, here. DemFromCT is a featured writer at Daily Kos, and you can read more about him here. You are invited to email DemFromCT.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

NOTICE: We have been figuratively crying “wolf” as to our lack of funding and poverty for a few months now. Nonetheless, push has come to shove and so we are notifying our readers that, owing to our inability to pay our bills, today or tomorrow our phone and internet will be shut off and the only posts we will be able to make will be from various cyber cafes. We regret this interruption in our efforts to bring you truthful liberal news and politics, but, barring some miracle, at this point an interruption is inevitable.

Anyone wishing to help please send a money order to Paul Evans, 5396 Overton Road, Wooster, Ohio 44691.

Washington Post – Eugene Robinson: Don’t Make the Economy Worse

Evans Liberal Politics
June 29, 2011

 

Washington Post – Eugene Robinson:
Don’t Make the Economy Worse

Don’t Make the Economy Worse, The Washington Post, June 27, 2011, by Eugene Robinson, excerpt quoted verbatim:

There is no good reason for negotiations on the budget and the debt ceiling to be deadlocked, because the solution is obvious: First, do no harm.

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

The Hippocratic injunction should be something befuddled economists and warring politicians can agree on. With the nation struggling to recover from a devastating recession, unemployment stuck at crisis levels, financial markets spooked by the possibility of European defaults and consumers disinclined to consume, it makes no earthly sense to suck money out of the economy.

Democrats are right that this is a terrible moment for spending cuts. Republicans are right that this is an awful moment for tax increases. The only reasonable thing to do is kick the can down the road — but in a purposeful, intelligent way.

As a practical matter, this means Republicans must swallow an increase in the debt ceiling, and Democrats must accept painful spending curbs that kick in when the economy is off its sickbed. It means conservatives have to be patient in bringing expenditures down and progressives have to be patient in returning tax rates — even for the wealthy — to what many of us consider appropriate levels. ….

Read the full article here.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

NY Times Editorial: A.E.P. Protests Too Much

Evans Liberal Politics
June 20, 2011

 

NY Times Editorial:
A.E.P. Protests Too Much

A.E.P. Protests Too Much, NY Times, Editorial, June 19, 2011

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

American Electric Power, one of the nation’s largest utilities, warned last week that new air quality rules could force it to “prematurely” shut down about two dozen big coal-fired units and fire hundreds of workers. This is a deceptive and particularly cynical claim. The utility is making a business decision that has little to do with the rules.

Here is what A.E.P. is not saying: These units are, on average, 55 years old. Some are running at only 5 percent of capacity. Many had long been slated for retirement, in part to comply with a 2007 settlement with the George W. Bush administration in which the company agreed to settle violations of the Clean Air Act by spending $4.7 billion to retire or retrofit aging units.

Blaming the rules is a transparent scare tactic designed to weaken the administration’s resolve while playing to industry supporters on Capitol Hill. Fortunately, Lisa Jackson, head of the Environmental Protection Agency, which proposed the rules, refuses to be bullied.

Ms. Jackson called the A.E.P. charges “misleading at best” and made clear she would not retreat from her statutory duty to protect public health. She said she would stick to her timetable and make the rules final this year. We hope that the White House is equally determined. ….

Read the full story, here.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

What I Have to Say to God in Heaven, Whether It Matters or Not

Evans Liberal Politics
June 3, 2011

 

What I Have to Say to God in Heaven
Whether It Matters or Not

A Christian Response to Poverty, Injustice and Suffering
And A Challenge for Each of You

Evans Liberal Politics, completely revised June 3, 2011 and May 23, 2011, originally published May 21, 2011, by Paul Evans:

I don’t give a damn. I don’t give a damn about any of this, about anything You put me through — whether God or Satan or the evil, sick society we live in. You made Socrates drink hemlock, and you killed Jesus. Gandhi, JFK, MLK, RFK — all martyred. I guess that is a complaint to God. If I so chose to, I could make almost an indictment or accusation. Free will, of course, yet ALL of those wonderful people gone. All of them and more like them. If you are omnipotent, how could you "let" that happen?


I wonder at the suffering in life — suffering I see each day on the news, suffering I see among people, and my own – and I do not understand why it must be. And yet, I am not starving, and I have a roof over my head. This morning driving into town I saw a tall black man walking towards town with a bag in hand. I damn well should have picked him up. And there are supposed to be ONE BILLION people in the world without access to clean drinking water. Why do you allow this, God?

I am powerless. Everyone on God’s green earth is absolutely powerless. All I can do… All we can do — logically — is to suffer our fates, live truly caring lives as we are able to, beyond all reasonableness, and try to hope. In other words, fight. Fight not simply for ourselves, but for each other. That is what we should all do, in whatever way we understand life. It is the proper logical response to life. To the near-meaninglessness that God Himself, for some reason inexplicable to me, enforces upon us. Perhaps — in fact I am saying, pretty definitely — it is not so much enforced on us as it is the result of our collective and individual failures to lead logical and caring lives.

A Word About Logic and Caring: The better you get with logic and the more caring of a life you try to live, you will see that it is impossible to be fully logical without living a fully caring life to the extent of sacrifice. Those people who claim, al la Ayn Rand and others, that selfishness is logical, have not thought out the matter fully, nor actually tried to live caring lives. And isn’t it amazing how all these Ayn Rand followers are these real big Christians, or say they are?

Leading a truly caring life is actually all we can do to make a logical response to the world in which we find ourselves. LOGOS, the logical order of the universe considered philosophically, has only one value, and that value is caring. (Or so thought the ancient, pre-Socratic Greeks and later the early Christian church, which remade Logos into a philosophical representation of the second person of the Holy Trinity, or Jesus.) You cannot be very logical and not be very caring.

These Republicans — and most all of my liberal friends too — talk about personal responsibility in life. That’s Bullsh*t. They’ve never been down and don’t know what they’re talking about. Like the song says, “when you’re down that’s where you’ll stay.” Oh, I know, you read the success stories, and the press and TV play them up, but that’s NOT real life for almost all of the poor and downtrodden.

What I would like to see, personally, is a lot of the money that now goes into prisons and law enforcement instead go into drug treatment facilities, and adult education. Did you know that fully 27 percent of African Americans have been in jail at least once for marijuana crimes (whatever a marijuana crime is…). If one switched from punishment to treatment as our priority, there would be plenty of money here to give those who need it a subsidized job. That would be the caring way to proceed. Many criminals see no way out for their lives and families, and so they revert back to criminal acts. Treating them, educating them and providing subsidized jobs with a living wage is the best alternative to prison, so far as I can see. It is certainly the caring, Godly way to help them and thus help society.

I was speaking above of “real life” for the poor and how few who have not been here can truly understand how degrading it is. Real life is wondering if you can get someone to give you some money for gas to go into town to the charity organization so you can get food to eat. And of course, you do realize that begging is illegal, right? Yes, the police have made me aware of this three or four times in the last year, while I was trying to get a little gas money at the gas station, through begging it off of people. Yes, many people will rat you out and turn you in to the police if you are resorting to this. Real life is hoping and praying that your car holds together for a few more thousand miles. Real life is helping your housemates with gas to drive 40 miles and back, so the woman can visit her children, even though helping her that way means that there will be zero money left for the rest of the month. O.K., here’s some real life that no one without an addiction can understand: real life is picking up a nice, juicy cigarette butt off of the sidewalk, because that is just how addicted to them you are and you have no money to buy any kind of smokes. Degrading, isn’t it? Real life is also begging for help from your friends until both the help and the friendships stop. If only ALL your friends would help, it would not be a hardship for any of them, would it? And yet — I know from firsthand experience — you really are going to lose all your friends if you keep asking for help. And real life is trying to keep the lights on and heating just a few rooms in your home by means of electric heaters through the winter so that your water pipes don’t freeze up and burst… and then trying to pay the huge electric bill.

At first your friends help, but it is not too long before there are “reasons” why not. They talk about things like that “personal responsibility” and “sustainability” and not being my bank. Yet so many of them, before they dropped me as their friends, were and are people of means, to whom $10 or so every second or third day means very little. Or at least they are a lot better off than I am. Yes, caring has these limits, you see — except for one person: Jesus, and I follow Him. Now, in my experience, almost all of these “Christians” who go to church each Sunday have shown themselves to be hypocrites. I believe there was a strong metaphor in an explanation Jesus gave… Something about a camel and the eye of a needle, am I right?

But of course many understand — and it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter that I understand, at all. In many ways, for the common man, life sucks. And the only reason that this “got out there,” that I was allowed to think this through and to rewrite it and put this out on the internet for you is that — I think — despite the rambling, somewhat incoherent rant that this constitutes, God just wanted you people to "think about it" and realize about the way each of us is called to not judge each other and to lead a fully caring life. I do know this: personally, you can’t be at peace otherwise.

Oh, and the title of this article? It does matter…. but perhaps not in the long run, or in terms of us changing anything, or in terms of God allowing or causing the world to somehow be different than it is. Yet in our own lives, in terms of the peace we need in our own hearts, and for our friends and families and loved ones — and for the stranger we meet alongside the road — of course leading a caring life is what we are called upon by all the is decent and good in our hearts and in the world to do. For me, and for some small number of people in the world, to live in any other way is unthinkable. I challenge each of you to think logically about what is right and decent and “what Jesus wants” when confronted with poverty, suffering and injustice, and then to make changes in your life.

I have suffered a lot in my life, especially lately, what with mental illness, poverty, and various thus-far rather mild diseases, seeing all my loved ones die off and losing my friends because I stood up for what I believed the correct and Christian thing to do is (in terms of refusing to stop opening my home to sheltering two homeless people). They are homeless no more – now this is their home too. I do not have gas to drive into town, and am out of food. I beg from my friends, and have lost almost all of them as friends because of all of this. At this point, I now refuse to struggle any longer at all in terms of my own spiritual gifts and what that itself means I must go through. At this point, like the Tom Petty song below, “you can stand me up at the gates of hell, but I won’t back down.” All I can do is live my life in terms of what seems just and right to me. I am powerless and it is in God’s hands, and I cannot do other than I am now. God’s response is up to Him.

That is about all I have to say in words, not that it really matters, but here is a musical response to the experience of life that my viewers may appreciate, I hope:

What the response of Jesus might be. (For Anita)

My own response to mankind’s fate and the difficulties we all have in our lives is, in part.

Please join me in a short prayer for our President, Barack Obama: God, actively help and guide this man who shapes so much of our destiny. Spare him and grant him wisdom and health to work for all the people. Amen.

InformIT (Pearson Education)

The Black Crowes
She Talks to Angels

Third Day
King of Glory

Collective Soul
Heavy

Tom Petty
I Won’t Back Down

The Cost of Politics in Our Lives: Politics as Sewage & the Sublime

Evans Liberal Politics
May 13, 2011

 

The Cost of Politics in Our Lives:
Politics as Sewage & the Sublime

Evans Liberal Politics, May 13th, 2011, Commentary by Paul Evans, with excerpts from Addiction and Politics (Updated 2X), Evans Liberal Politics, March 31, 2011, by Paul Evans:

I have been strongly actively involved in political activism and political writing and blogging since 2005. I know that’s not very long, compared to a lot of people who might be considered more expert at this than I am. But I have learned a lot, and over the years, I have found the world of politics to be depressing and disappointing.

Actually, what really got me going in the area of activism, in the summer of 2005, was the music of U2, most particularly the song “Pride in the Name of Love,” which makes a comparison between the love and sacrifice of Jesus and that of Martin Luther King, Jr. Really, from the point where I started doing Evans Liberal Politics, the day after election day, 2008, that song was a major influence and motivation for me. I cried the first several times I heard it.

U2 Pride in the Name of Love

Now I have fewer hopes of truly living a life like that or making any kind of real influence in the world. Nonetheless, with an honestly humble attitude, I try to bring my readers as much of what is important and true about the world of news and politics as I have time for each day. I have no kind of idea that I might do more than help a few or several people on the road of life, yet this is enough for me.

The high point, of course, was the election of 2008 and the campaigning I did before this. Yet later, I became badly disappointed by Barack Obama, finding him to be essentially just another Democratic Politician, and not the agent for hope and change that I had so fervently hoped and worked for. Later, I realized that, at the national level, in the United States today, no man can be other than a political animal with a conventionally political mindset and hope to have any real success. This was very disillusioning for me, and for a short time turned me towards more radical, leftist positions.

Still, I have to ask, is it so radical and leftist for me to want America to take care of its people, for the individual and corporate tax structure to be truly progressive, for health care to be universal, and, for example, for crack mothers and crack babies to have a roof over their head and enough to eat, outside of a homeless shelter and an adoption agency? No, to me, those sorts of goals are the mainstream of my thought, as I know they are for many progressive activists.

I believe that many of us thought we had found the agent that would bring us “to the promised land” of Dr. Martin Luther King in Barack Obama, and that, by now, most of us have been pretty badly disappointed. Others, I realize, who supported the President in 2008, are not as fully progressive as I am and have not found Obama’s actions disappointing, at least not disappointing as to their truly progressive direction, or the lack thereof. On the other hand, can the man be entirely blamed or even much blamed when Congress exists as currently constituted? Yet it was all very disappointing and disillusioning….

Let me give you an excerpt from my March 31st article on addiction and politics which may offer some words of comfort here, or at least make the whole situation more livable, perhaps, for the progressive activist:

"Politics is depressing. In that regard, my old friend Betsy sent me a wonderful article which I need to share with you, called ‘Across the Universe: The Power of Disillusionment and the Politics of Despair,’ OpEdNews, March 15, 2011, by Chris Floyd. A young man is disillusioned, somewhat depressed, and even contemplating drinking or suicide because his Mom’s hero Barack Obama is complicit in so much that is wrong. Instead of simply making a comment of some encouragement, Chris Floyd makes this commentary in its own article, of which I wish to quote part:"

You have to remember that politics is a toxin. It will make you sick, taint your mind, poison your soul, blight your life if you let it. One has to deal with politics as a form of waste management, just as you need to have some kind of sewage system in your home or community to prevent disease.

Politics — the machinations of the stunted, damaged souls and third-rate minds who hanker for power — is just a small part of life. It entirely lacks the tragic element; nothing tragic or depthful about politics and power, it’s just brute force, greed, ignorance and spite. So there is no deep meaning to be found in it. No tragedy; no real joy either. Even the greatest moments, the epiphanies — and they do happen in politics on rare occasions, one must admit — will lead very quickly back into the sewage. And that’s OK, that’s the way it is; sewage, waste management — it’s part of life. But it’s not where meaning, joy, tragedy, the salt and savor of existence can be found. So why let the evil done by third-rate goobers drive you to despair of life itself? By hook, crook, lies and murder they’ve already amassed all kinds of power; why give them power over your very soul?

Sigh…. I believe I am gonna have more social interest articles on Evans Liberal Politics and concentrate a little less on the political angles. Probably will get me more viewers, and at least entertain, if not aid in some way, more people anyway.

May God grant you the serenity to accept the things you cannot change, courage to change the things you can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

Still, no matter what, “I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have: three meals a day for their bodies, – education and culture for their minds – and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits.” — Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. — And that’s why I am a liberal. And that’s why I will still work for progressive activism. ~ (From my page of Liberal Speeches & Quotes). ~ Paul Evans

Krugman: “Let’s Not Be Civil”

Evans Liberal Politics
April 18, 2011

 

Krugman: “Let’s Not Be Civil”

Krugman: “Let’s Not Be Civil”, Daily Kos, April 18, 211, by Bob Swern, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Paul Krugman is most legitimately righteous, and his newspaper’s editorial board even more vehemently so, about the so-called budget “negotiations” between Democrats and Republicans (led by the “‘Gang of Six’ In The Senate Seeking A Plan On Debt“), in his spot-on column in Monday’s NY Times, entitled: “Let’s Not Be Civil.”

Wireless from AT&T

Let’s Not Be Civil
By PAUL KRUGMAN
New York Times
April 18, 2011 Last week, President Obama offered a spirited defense of his party’s values — in effect, of the legacy of the New Deal and the Great Society. Immediately thereafter, as always happens when Democrats take a stand, the civility police came out in force. The president, we were told, was being too partisan; he needs to treat his opponents with respect; he should have lunch with them, and work out a consensus.

That’s a bad idea. Equally important, it’s an undemocratic idea…

Krugman walks through the past two week’s history reminding us of the House GOPer’s budget proposal, “…selling it to credulous pundits as a statement of necessity, not ideology — a document telling America What Must Be Done.”

He speaks of the Republican’s deficit/debt fear-mongering, and their focus upon maintaining low taxes among our nation’s wealthiest.

The bottom line is: “…it revealed a deep difference in views about how the world works.”

Krugman writes about how we should remember that the G.O.P. ran on fear-mongering regarding Medicare cuts during the mid-terms; but, somehow, they’re supporting a budget which would, eventually, “dismantle Medicare completely.”

In closing, he reminds us of recently publicized polls that “…suggest that the public’s priorities are nothing like those embodied in the Republican budget. Large majorities support higher, not lower, taxes on the wealthy. Large majorities — including a majority of Republicans — also oppose major changes to Medicare.”

Which brings me to those calls for a bipartisan solution. Sorry to be cynical, but right now “bipartisan” is usually code for assembling some conservative Democrats and ultraconservative Republicans — all of them with close ties to the wealthy, and many who are wealthy themselves — and having them proclaim that low taxes on high incomes and drastic cuts in social insurance are the only possible solution.This would be a corrupt, undemocratic way to make decisions about the shape of our society even if those involved really were wise men with a deep grasp of the issues…

…So let’s not be civil. Instead, let’s have a frank discussion of our differences. In particular, if Democrats believe that Republicans are talking cruel nonsense, they should say so — and take their case to the voters.

As I noted above, also in today’s edition, the Times’ editors talk of the Republicans and “…the full landscape of destruction that their policies would cause — much of which has already begun.”

The New Republican Landscape
Editorial
New York Times
April 18, 2011 Six months after voters sent Republicans in large numbers to Congress and many statehouses, it is possible to see the full landscape of destruction that their policies would cause — much of which has already begun. If it was not clear before, it is obvious now that the party is fully engaged in a project to dismantle the foundations of the New Deal and the Great Society, and to liberate business and the rich from the inconveniences of oversight and taxes.

At first it seemed that only a few freshmen and noisy followers of the Tea Party would support the new extremism. But on Friday, nearly unanimous House Republicans showed just how far their mainstream has been dragged to the right. They approved on strict party lines the most regressive social legislation in many decades, embodied in a blueprint by the budget chairman, Paul Ryan. The vote, from which only four Republicans (and all Democrats) dissented, would have been unimaginable just eight years ago to a Republican Party that added a prescription drug benefit to Medicare…

…President Obama, after staying in the shadows too long, is starting to illuminate the serious damage that Republicans are doing. Their vision, he said last week, “is less about reducing the deficit than it is about changing the basic social compact in America.” Other Democrats are also beginning to stand up and reject these ideas, having been cowed for months by the electoral wave. Their newfound confidence will give voters a clearer view of this bare and pessimistic landscape.

In yet another piece, from Sunday’s edition, we learn more about the current state of budget negotiations via the: “‘Gang of Six’ in the Senate Seeking a Plan on Debt.”

We’re told of  ”progressive” Illinois Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, the second-highest ranking senator in the majority party in that august body, and how he is working closely with two other Democrats (Warner of Virginia and Conrad of North Dakota), along with three Republicans (Chamblis of Georgia, Coburn of Oklahoma and Crapo of Idaho), and they’re “nearing consensus” on a $4-trillion debt reduction plan.

For over 30 years, the status quo’s minions in Washington have been eviscerating America’s middle and lower classes. As a result, we’re witnessing the greatest income inequality between our nation’s haves and have-nots since reliable metrics were first established, well before our nation’s Great Depression, to benchmark this inconvenient truth.

We now live in a world where the “bipartisan negotiation” meme is just another reminder that, inside the Beltway, as Joseph Stiglitz just noted it, it’s a government “Of The 1%, By The 1%, For The 1%.

The Pirates Of Capitol Hill,” the veritable foxes, guard the henhouse.

Since when did it become acceptable policy to negotiate with terrorists?

It is time for our government, from the White House on down, to focus their campaign financing efforts towards the same place where their mouths are directed.

Otherwise, at the end of the day–and it will be the very last “day” for many on Main Streets across this country, too–it’s just more of the same if Medicare is eviscerated and other economic transgressions against our country’s poor and those getting poorer are enabled under the moniker of “bipartisan negotiation.”

Online and DVD Software Training

F*ck that!

Never has Krugman been so spot-on as he is in today’s NY Times!

One more time, if for nothing else than EMPHASIS…

So let’s not be civil. Instead, let’s have a frank discussion of our differences. In particular, if Democrats believe that Republicans are talking cruel nonsense, they should say so — and take their case to the voters.

Take the case to the voters. They want what the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party wants. That’s what I would call the most important “consensus” of all.

And, while we’re at it, send a message to Conrad, Durbin, Warner and everyone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to drop this “bipartisan negotiation” bullshit!

What has “civility” done for our nation’s middle and lower classes over the past three decades?

This is Einstein’s definition of insanity, writ large: “Repeating the same action and expecting a different result.”

Democrats are at a crossroads. Right now. We can continue to do what we’ve done and we’ll get what we’ve got. Or, not!

“Let’s Not Be Civil!”

InformIT (Pearson Education)

Evans Liberal Politics would like to thank Bob Swern for permission to republish his work on an ongoing basis. Bob is our favorite progressive economics writer (along with Robert Reich). More than even Paul Krugman, Mr. Swern fleshes out his articles with lots of details and links, and so provides real grist for liberals and progressives to learn from. You are invited to email Bob Swern here.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

We’re Not Being Told the Truth on Libya

Evans Liberal Politics
April 11, 2011

 

We’re Not Being Told the Truth on Libya

We’re Not Being Told the Truth on Libya, Common Dreams.org, originaly from The Independent (UK), April 1, 2011, by Johann Hari, used under Creative Commons 3.0 license, quoted verbatim:

Look at two other wars our government is currently deeply involved in – because they show that the claims made for this bombing campaign can’t be true

Most of us have a low feeling that we are not being told the real reasons for the war in Libya. David Cameron’s instinctive response to the Arab revolutions was to jump on a plane and tour the palaces of the region’s dictators selling them the most hi-tech weapons of repression available. Nicolas Sarkozy’s instinctive response to the Arab revolutions was to offer urgent aid to the Tunisian tyrant in crushing his people. Barack Obama’s instinctive response to the Arab revolutions was to refuse to trim the billions in aid going to Hosni Mubarak and his murderous secret police, and for his Vice-President to declare: “I would not refer to him as a dictator.”

Click the Old
CIA E. Street Sign
to Visit Paul’s Playlist
of 230 Rock & Pop Hits
* #1 Rated by Google *


photo of the CIA's old 2430 East Street Headquarters sign serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of 183 hot rock and pop hits, rated number one by Google

Yet now we are told that these people have turned into the armed wing of Amnesty International. They are bombing Libya because they can’t bear for innocent people to be tyrannised, by the tyrants they were arming and funding for years. As Obama put it: “Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different”. There was a time, a decade ago, when I took this rhetoric at face value. But I can’t now. The best guide through this confusion is to look at two other wars our government is currently deeply involved in – because they show that the claims made for this bombing campaign can’t be true.

Imagine a distant leader killed more than 2,000 innocent people, and his military commanders responded to evidence that they were civilians by joking that the victims “were not the local men’s glee club”. Imagine one of the innocent survivors appeared on television, amid the body parts of his son and brother, and pleaded: “Please. We are human beings. Help us. Don’t let them do this.” Imagine that polling from the attacked country showed that 90 per cent of the people there said civilians were the main victims and they desperately wanted it to stop. Imagine there was then a huge natural flood, and the leader responded by ramping up the attacks. Imagine the country’s most respected democratic and liberal voices were warning that these attacks seriously risked causing the transfer of nuclear material to jihadi groups.
Related articles

* Nato says its planes struck Libyan rebels
* Video: Nato releases footage of Libya airstrike
* Oil prices soar
* Libyan rebels ask: ‘Do they want Gaddafi to win?’
* Donald Macintyre: Between sanctions and propaganda lies a reality of shortages and ballooning prices
* Search the news archive for more stories

Surely, if we meant what we say about Libya, we would be doing anything to stop such behaviour? Wouldn’t we be imposing a no-fly zone, or even invading?

Skyscraper - Pharmacy Checker Approved and CIPA certified Online Pharmacy

Yet, in this instance, we would have to be imposing a no-fly zone on our own governments. Since 2004, the US – with European support – has been sending unmanned robot-planes into Pakistan to illegally bomb its territory in precisely this way. Barack Obama has massively intensified this policy.

His administration claims they are killing al-Qa’ida. But there are several flaws in this argument. The intelligence guiding their bombs about who is actually a jihadi is so poor that, for six months, Nato held top-level negotiations with a man who claimed to be the head of the Taliban – only for him to later admit he was a random Pakistani grocer who knew nothing about the organisation. He just wanted some baksheesh. The US’s own former senior military advisers admit that even when the intel is accurate, for every one jihadi they kill, as many as 50 innocent people die. And almost everyone in Pakistan believes these attacks are actually increasing the number of jihadis, by making young men so angry at the killing of their families they queue to sign up.

The country’s leading nuclear scientist, Professor Pervez Hoodbhoy, warns me it is even more dangerous still. He says there is a significant danger that these attacks are spreading so much rage and hatred through the country that it materially increases the chances of the people guarding the country’s nuclear weapons smuggling fissile material out to jihadi groups.

So one of the country’s best writers, Fatima Bhutto, tells me: “In Pakistan, when we hear Obama’s rhetoric on Libya, we can only laugh. If he was worried about the pointless massacre of innocent civilians, there would be an easy first step for him: stop doing it yourself, in my country.”

The war in the Congo is the deadliest war since Adolf Hitler marched across Europe. When I reported on it, I saw the worst things I could have ever conceived of: armies of drugged and mutilated children, women who had been gang-raped and shot in the vagina. Over five million people have been killed so far – and the trail of blood runs directly to your mobile phone and mine.

The major UN investigation into the war explained how it happened. They said bluntly and factually that “armies of business” had invaded Congo to pillage its resources and sell them to the knowing West. The most valuable loot is coltan, which is used to make the metal in our mobile phones and games consoles and laptops. The “armies of business” fought and killed to control the mines and send it to us. The UN listed some of the major Western corporations fuelling this trade, and said if they were stopped, it would largely end the war.

Last year, after a decade, the US finally passed legislation that was – in theory, at least – supposed to deal with this. As I explain in the forthcoming BBC Radio 4 programme 4Thought, it outlined an entirely voluntary system to trace who was buying coltan and other conflict minerals from the mass murderers, and so driving the war. (There are plenty of other places we can get coltan from, although it’s slightly more expensive.) The State Department was asked to draw up some kind of punishment for transgressors, and given 140 days to do it.

Now the deadline has passed. What’s the punishment? It turns out the State Department didn’t have the time or inclination to draft anything. Maybe it was too busy preparing to bomb Libya, because – obviously – it can’t tolerate the killing of innocent people. (Britain and other European countries have been exactly the same.) Here was a chance to stop the worst violence against civilians in the world that didn’t require any bombs, or violence of our own. If the rhetoric about Libya was sincere, this was a no-brainer. It would only cost a few corporations some money – and they refuse to do it. So the worst war since 1945 goes on.

This all went unreported. By contrast, when the Congolese government recently nationalized a mine belonging to US and British corporations, there was a fire-burst of fury in the press. You can kill five million people and we’ll politely look away; but take away the property of rich people, and we get really angry.

Doesn’t this cast a different light on the Libya debate? We are pushed every day by the media to look at the (usually very real) abuses by our country’s enemies and ask: “What can we do?” We are almost never prompted to look at the equally real and equally huge abuses by our own country, its allies and its corporations – which we have much more control over – and ask the same question.

So the good and decent impulse of ordinary people – to protect their fellow human beings – is manipulated. If you are interested in human rights only when it tells you a comforting story about your nation’s power, then you are not really interested in human rights at all.

David Cameron says “just because we can’t intervene everywhere, doesn’t mean we shouldn’t intervene somewhere.” But this misses the point. While “we” are intervening to cause horrific harm to civilians in much of the world, it’s plainly false to claim to be driven by a desire to prevent other people behaving very like us.

Online and DVD Software Training

You could argue that our governments are clearly not driven by humanitarian concerns, but their intervention in Libya did stop a massacre in Ben Gazhi, so we should support it anyway. I understand this argument, which some people I admire have made, and I wrestled with it. It is an argument that you should, in effect, ride the beast of NATO power if it slays other beasts that were about to eat innocent people. This was the argument I made in 2003 about Iraq – that the Bush administration had malign motives, but it would have the positive effect of toppling a horrific dictator, so we should support it. I think almost everyone can see now why this was a disastrous – and, in the end, shameful – argument.

Why? Because any coincidental humanitarian gain in the short term will be eclipsed as soon as the local population clash with the real reason for the war. Then our governments will back their renewed vicious repression – just as the US and Britain did in Iraq, with a policy of effectively sanctioning the resumption of torture when the population became uppity and objected to the occupation.

So why are our governments really bombing Libya? We won’t know for sure until the declassified documents come out many years from now. But Bill Richardson, the former US energy secretary who served as US ambassador to the UN, is probably right when he says: “There’s another interest, and that’s energy… Libya is among the 10 top oil producers in the world. You can almost say that the gas prices in the US going up have probably happened because of a stoppage of Libyan oil production… So this is not an insignificant country, and I think our involvement is justified.”

For the first time in more than 60 years, Western control over the world’s biggest pots of oil was being rocked by a series of revolutions our governments couldn’t control. The most plausible explanation is that this is a way of asserting raw Western power, and trying to arrange the fallout in our favour. But if you are still convinced our governments are acting for humanitarian reasons, I’ve got a round-trip plane ticket for you to some rubble in Pakistan and Congo. The people there would love to hear your argument.

© 2011 Independent/UK

Johann Hari is a columnist for the London Independent. He has reported from Iraq, Israel/Palestine, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Venezuela, Peru and the US, and his journalism has appeared in publications all over the world.

TigerDirect Best Sellers

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.