Home » Posts tagged "latest"

Two Inspirational Videos to Watch and Think About

Evans Community of Caring
December 28, 2011, 2011

 

Two Inspirational Videos
to Watch and Think About

Evans Community of Caring, December 28, 2011, revised commentary by Paul Evans: This one is a repeat from February 17, 2011 and January of 2010.

I really wanted you to see these videos and think about them. (I wouldn’t have republished this post twice if the videos did not strongly resonate with me.) Partly, it just comes from my own worry about the future of mankind and his increasing capacity for destruction.

O’ Caritas
by Cat Stevens – 1976

The first video is about the fear of apocalypse and the end of the world. The second video, on the other hand, is a strong example of a society starting from a traditional viewpoint and adapting (or evolving) in a way which is progressive and healthy, as should be obvious if you watch it. The common thread is caring and love, in the first case from a fear of the end of our society, and the second an inspirational example of a society’s successfully adapting when a change seemed needed.

O’Caritas: What an apocalyptic vision, set to music! This deeply affected me a few decades ago, about 1987 and at times since. “Caritas” is Latin, as are most of the words sung by Cat Stevens, but the video provides English subtitles. The word means spiritual love or compassion. From the album, Catch Bull at Four. If by some unlikely chance you don’t already know this, THIS (the end of the world) is what some people believe neocons are actively trying to MAKE happen. In their idiotic, simple view, because the Book of Revelation is in the Bible, and that says the end of the world will come on judgement day after a final, consuming battle, these militaristic fools are actively seeking to bring about the battle of Armageddon. I have read that the Book of Revelation is the second most influential written influence on our history, culture and society. Well, you know, in Genesis, God created light and dark on the first day, and yet the sun and moon were not created until the fourth day. So how does that work, can anyone tell me? No, Virginian, the Bible is not literally true, although certainly the truth is in it.

If, God forbid, the world might end somehow, let it be God’s decision in God’s own time. We don’t need people advocating the projection of American force in any manner which might by the furtherest stretch of the imagination let loose some devastation on earth. Pray that God’s love might yet save this old world.

Something to think about.

Be sure and watch both videos.

*****

The Dance
Robert Miribal – Navaho

You are going to be surprised by this video, based on how it starts and how it “gets going” a little way into it. Think about how the Navajo culture has adapted here, away from its static tradition, as all healthy cultures must over time. If a culture does not adapt and change, it dies, like the Maya.

“He who has ears, let him hear”

Change or perish.

Will western culture change enough, soon enough?

*****

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! In order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today?

POVERTY ACTION ALERT
Folks We Are in Real Need

EMERGENCY APPEAL: From Paul Evans: We need your donations, ASAP. I myself and two other friends live six miles outside of Wooster, Ohio, out in the country. For almost the last six months, we have not had a car. Neither can we afford to heat our home, and we are delinquent on our property taxes. Finally we have saved up $600 and have found a car we can purchase for that amount. Believe me, this alone is a huge relief for us. However, because of the need for that payment, we may have to discontinue our phone/internet for a month or more, unless we get help from you. If you enjoy Evans Caring Community, please send a money order to Paul Evans, 5396 Overton Road, Wooster, OH 44691. Help keep free journalism alive and help my family have gas for my car and continued phone internet service, so I can keep bringing you the kind of news you like. Thanks for considering us.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Oregon Senator Wyden freezes second Internet censorship bill

Evans Liberal Politics
May 28, 2011

 

Oregon Senator Wyden freezes
Second Internet censorship bill

Oregon Senator Wyden freezes second Internet censorship bill, The Raw Story, May 27, 2011, by Stephen C. Webster, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

A U.S. Senator from Oregon has once again taken a stand against his own party to defend what he sees as the inherent right to free speech on the Internet, placing a hold on a bill that could force search engines and Internet service providers to block websites deemed to be “infringing” on copyrights.

The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act — or “PROTECT IP” for short was part of a second attempt to pass provisions of the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA), which failed to clear Congress during its last session thanks to a parliamentary maneuver by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR).

And once again, Wyden has stepped forward to ensure those measures do not pass.

Skyscraper - Pharmacy Checker Approved and CIPA certified Online Pharmacy

“In December of last year I placed a hold on similar legislation, commonly called COICA, because I felt the costs of the legislation far outweighed the benefits,” he said in a prepared statement. “After careful analysis of the Protect IP Act, or PIPA, I am compelled to draw the same conclusion.”

“I understand and agree with the goal of the legislation, to protect intellectual property and combat commerce in counterfeit goods, but I am not willing to muzzle speech and stifle innovation and economic growth to achieve this objective,” Wyden added.

Internet freedom advocates claim the proposed laws could be used to shut down websites that link to other websites that authorities claim to be carrying out infringing activities. Internet advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation said it was “no less dismayed by this most recent incarnation than we were with last year’s draft.”

The PROTECT IP Act was supported by businesses and organizations across the political spectrum, from labor unions to the Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, to the National Association of Broadcasters and the cable industry.

It was also widely supported by Republicans and Democrats in Congress — meaning that if it weren’t for Sen. Wyden, the bill would likely have passed.

Sen. Wyden’s full statement follows.

####

Online and DVD Software Training

Consistent with Senate Standing Orders and my policy of publishing in the Congressional Record a statement whenever I place a hold on legislation, I am announcing my intention to object to any unanimous consent request to proceed to S. 968, the PROTECT IP Act.

In December of last year I placed a hold on similar legislation, commonly called COICA, because I felt the costs of the legislation far outweighed the benefits. After careful analysis of the Protect IP Act, or PIPA, I am compelled to draw the same conclusion. I understand and agree with the goal of the legislation, to protect intellectual property and combat commerce in counterfeit goods, but I am not willing to muzzle speech and stifle innovation and economic growth to achieve this objective. At the expense of legitimate commerce, PIPA’s prescription takes an overreaching approach to policing the Internet when a more balanced and targeted approach would be more effective. The collateral damage of this approach is speech, innovation and the very integrity of the Internet.

The Internet represents the shipping lane of the 21st century. It is increasingly in America’s economic interest to ensure that the Internet is a viable means for American innovation, commerce, and the advancement of our ideals that empower people all around the world. By ceding control of the Internet to corporations through a private right of action, and to government agencies that do not sufficiently understand and value the Internet, PIPA represents a threat to our economic future and to our international objectives. Until the many issues that I and others have raised with this legislation are addressed, I will object to a unanimous consent request to proceed to the legislation.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

AP: Pawlenty announces presidential run in Web video

Evans Liberal Politics
May 23, 2011

 

AP: Pawlenty announces presidential run in Web video

Pawlenty announces presidential run in Web video, Associated Press on Yahoo News, May 23, 2011, by Brian Bakst:

DES MOINES, Iowa – Republican Tim Pawlenty offered a sneak peek Sunday at his presidential kickoff, blasting out an Internet video in which he promises a campaign that “tells the American people the truth” and suggests that President Barack Obama doesn’t.

Pawlenty Announces
Presidential Run in Web Video

In the new video, the former Minnesota governor formally declares he’s running for president, something aides said he’d do in person Monday morning during a town hall forum in Iowa. Pawlenty bypassed a launch in his home state to make his inaugural appearance as a candidate in the state that holds the leadoff caucuses, which he acknowledges he must fare well in to preserve his hopes of the GOP nomination.

He says in the video that the country needs a president who will be frank with Americans about the severe challenges facing the country and how America can get back on track. He mentions the climbing federal debt and a slow recovery from the economic recession that’s left millions jobless.

“We’re going to have to do more than just give fancy speeches; we’ve had three years of that and it’s not working,” Pawlenty says. “Join me tomorrow and around the country in the days and weeks ahead. You won’t hear empty promises, you’ll hear solutions.”

The hard swipes at Obama are central to Pawlenty’s effort to prove to GOP primary voters that he’s tough enough to take on the Democrat. He’s combatting an impression that he’s too nice to be an aggressive challenger.

Pawlenty makes no mention of prospective GOP rivals he’ll have to outlast to get his shot at Obama. Among the Republicans who have taken formal steps toward a White House campaign are former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and Texas Rep. Ron Paul.

The GOP field saw more signs of settling Sunday when Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels took his name out of consideration. ….

Read the full article here.

See T-Paw’s Problem, The New Republic, May 23, 2011, by Walter Shapiro:

Pawlenty needs time and money. He’ll be hard-pressed to find enough of both.

With Mitch Daniels officially out of the presidential race, it seems like the entire GOP is emulating Ethelred the Unready. Well, not quite everyone. In a contrarian move at odds with the Reluctant Republican ethos of the party, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty will actually make it official by declaring his candidacy today in Des Moines.

Along with the obligatory yawn-inducing “can you win Iowa?” question, Pawlenty almost certainly will be asked again about his ability to compete financially with Mitt Romney, the Daddy Warbucks of the truncated Republican field. Pawlenty recently answered that query with a nod to GM’s venerable product line: “Our goal is not to keep up with Mitt. Our goal is to raise enough money to have at least a Buick, if not a Cadillac-level, campaign.”

Watch No Go in 2012: Ind. GOP Gov. Daniels Not Running, AP video, May 22, 2011.

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

U.S. Video News Roundup for April 23, 2011

Evans Liberal Politics
April 23, 2011

 

U.S. Video News Roundup for April 23, 2011

Social News from Around the United States
That Adds Meaning to Your Life

The Corporate Mindset: Changing
Views on the Environment

Two Contrasting Voices
About Planned Parenthood

Obama’s FaceBook Town Hall
Meeting – Full Video

Runnin’ Wild: It’s Time
to Ride Your Bikes Again!

Microsoft Store


Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock Playlist, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a Listen to the master Playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

How Did You Like Paying Your Taxes and What Do You Think of Corporate Freeloaders?

Evans Liberal Politics
April 20, 2011

 

How Did You Like Paying Your Taxes
and What Do You Think of Corporate Freeloaders?

Evans Liberal Politics Note by Paul Evans: That was as good a title for this gem from MoveOn.org as any other. Do you see the huge corruption in the data below? It’s Congress that made the tax laws that allow this criminal behavior. Congress made the tax laws of by and for the rich people. America, how long are you going to stand this?

Share This on Facebook


Senator Bernie Sanders Guide To Corporate Freeloaders

Fueled by Protests, Angry Wisconsin Voters Show Up to Fight

Evans Liberal Politics
April 7, 2011

 

NY Times: Fueled by Protests, Angry
Wisconsin Voters Show Up to Fight

Fueled by Protests, Angry Wisconsin Voters Show Up to Fight, The New York Times, April 6, 2011, by Monica Davey, excerpt quoted verbatim:

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

WAUKESHA, Wis. — Union supporters and Democrats unleashed their fury over Scott Walker, the Republican governor, and his efforts to diminish collective bargaining rights at the ballot box on Tuesday.

Angry voters managed a task some had said was impossible: they locked a veteran State Supreme Court justice, who is considered conservative, in a razor-thin race with an opponent who is much less well known. (The opponent declared victory on Wednesday.)

And voters rejected a Republican lawmaker for Milwaukee County executive — yet another contest that had been transformed, at least by some infuriated voters, into a referendum over the state’s new Republican leadership.

Democrats here trumpeted the outcome as the beginning of the end for Mr. Walker and the Republicans who swept into control of the state in November. “What the vote showed is that people really woke up to Walker’s agenda,” State Senator Chris Larson, a Democrat, said on Wednesday. “And I’d say they’re only getting warmed up.”

But while anti-Walker forces certainly turned out in remarkable numbers on Tuesday, others did too: a similar number of conservative-leaning voters. State officials had predicted a 20 percent turnout for the usually sleepy springtime election, but more than 30 percent of voters statewide wound up casting ballots (some polling places ran out of “I voted“ stickers).

And although the Supreme Court race was officially deemed nonpartisan, the vote appeared to reflect an almost evenly split philosophical divide — give or take a few hundred votes — among more than 1.4 million voters. ….

Read the full article here.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

House to Vote on Overturning Net Neutrality Laws (Updated)

Evans Liberal Politics
April 3, 2011

 

House to Vote on Overturning
Net Neutrality Laws (Updated)

House to Vote on Overturning Net Neutrality Laws, Truthout.org, April 1, 2011, by Nadia Prupis, republished under Creative Commons 3.0 license, quoted verbatim:

UPDATE: See OVERNIGHT TECH: House to vote on net neutrality, The Hill, April 6, 2011, by Sara Jerome, excerpt quoted verbatim:

THURSDAY’S BIG TELECOM STORY I: The House prepares to vote on a measure from Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) that would repeal net neutrality. The White House has already issued a veto threat, and House Dems plan to vote as a near-unanimous block against the measure.

SENATE GOP AIMS FOR SWIFT FOLLOW-THROUGH: From a Senate Commerce aide on the GOP side, “The Senate doesn’t have to take it up, but under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) Senate Republicans do plan on bringing it to the floor for a vote just as soon as we can. We have been working with the parliamentarian to discuss timing. All options are on the table for bringing this up in the Senate.”

Armed with an ideological agenda, House Republicans took aim at net neutrality again this month, quietly introducing a Congressional “resolution of disapproval” to overturn recent Federal Communications Commission (FCC) laws prohibiting anti-competitive behavior among Internet providers.

H.J. Res. 37 passed 30-23 on March 15, and will now go to the House of Representatives for a vote, which House Speaker John Boehner said in late February could happen “as early as next month.”

Franken: Net Neutrality “Biggest Issue
Since Freedom of Religion”

The resolution “disapproves the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to the matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices … and such rule shall have no force or effect.”

Republicans took control of the House in 2010 by pledging to focus on the economy and jobs creation – but many GOP leaders have thus far offered little more than talking points and symbolic measures that are unlikely to pass into law.

The resolution of disapproval is a rarely used procedure that allows Congress to formally reject and reverse the actions of a federal agency. House Republicans previously introduced a resolution of disapproval last November to overturn the Dodd-Frank financial reform law, but were unsuccessful.

According to the Congressional Review Act, the resolution would have to pass in both the House and Senate and avoid a veto by President Barack Obama.

At a speech at the National Religious Broadcasters (NRB) Convention, Boehner said that the House would “use every tool at our disposal” to fight the FCC laws.

“Right now, freedom and free expression are under attack by a power structure in Washington populated with regulators who have never set foot inside a radio station or a television studio,” Boehner said at the time. “We see this threat in how the FCC is creeping further into the free market by trying to regulate the Internet.”

NRB President Frank Wright previously stated that the Fairness Doctrine threatens the livelihood of conservative and religious programming. “In the short run, the Fairness Doctrine has the immediate threat of being applied to Christian broadcasters and to the church in a very deleterious way,” Wright told Broadcasting & Cable.

The resolution had the support of GOP leaders from both the House and the Senate, including Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), Communications and Technology Subcommittee chairman Greg Walden (R-Oregon), and Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Fred Upton (R-Michigan).

Timothy Karr, campaign director of Free Press, called the passage of the resolution a “reckless action” that “opens the door even wider to corporate abuse of [a] principle that protects our ability to connect with everyone else online.”

“Open Internet protections actually prevent Speaker Boehner’s dark scenario from happening: They forbid companies from unfairly blocking or degrading Internet websites and applications while keeping control over Internet content in the hands of end users – people like you and me,” Karr wrote in a blog post. “The speaker knows full well that real Net Neutrality has nothing to do with a government takeover of the Internet.”

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) spoke out against net neutrality regulations last week at an event organized by the Safe Internet Alliance, calling it a “fairness doctrine for the Internet” that allows the FCC to police when the artistic community “can deploy their creativity … They do not want a czar to determine what speeds will be available.”

Enacted in 1949, the Fairness Doctrine required that broadcasters present balanced viewpoints of controversial or important stories. At the time, the majority of the media was controlled by three main networks – ABC, CBS, and NBC – and lawmakers worried that broadcasters could abuse their dominant status to air biased stories.

The FCC revoked the law in 1987 on the grounds that it restricted journalistic freedom.

Check Out the Best Guide to Politics on the Web!
The Guide to Liberal News and Politics on the Web


Evans Liberal Politics Guide to Liberal News and Politics on the Web

Find Out Where to find the Truth in Politics!

“The ‘Fairness Doctrine,’ that’s another threat to freedom with an innocuous name,” Boehner said in his February 28 speech.

Although the Fairness Doctrine is not likely to become law again in the future, some Democrat lawmakers have called for its reinstatement. Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan) said last year that “whether it’s called the Fairness Standard, whether it’s called something else – I absolutely think it’s time to be bringing accountability to the airwaves.” Her stance was echoed by numerous legislators, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-California), Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico) and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa).

Still, the law has a contentious history. Some legislators, like Sen. Al Franken (D-Minnesota) have avoided calling for its reinstatement and instead offer alternative ideas on how to enforce anti-discriminatory behavior. Franken and Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Washington) in January introduced the Internet Freedom, Broadband Promotion, and Consumer Act of 2011, which would create a “just and reasonable” standard for all charges and practices related to broadband Internet access. Speaking at the South by Southwest Festival in Austin, Texas, this year, Franken said the bill would “call violations of net neutrality out for what they are – anti-competitive actions by powerful media conglomerates.”

Obama has also repeatedly stated his opposition to the Fairness Doctrine. White House spokesman Ben LaBolt told Fox News that “as the president stated during the campaign, he does not believe the Fairness Doctrine should be reinstated.” In fact, Obama’s campaign press secretary Michael Ortiz wrote in a June 2008 statement that Obama, then still a candidate, wanted to open the airwaves to diverse viewpoints not through a Fairness Doctrine, but through net neutrality.

“Sen. Obama supports media-ownership caps, network neutrality, public broadcasting, as well as increasing minority ownership of broadcasting and print outlets,” Ortiz wrote.

Republicans recently began targeting public broadcasting as well, introducing legislation to cut off government funding for National Public Radio.

Following last week’s vote, Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee voiced their support of the measure. “I applaud the committee’s approval … that will next be considered by the full House as we work to create jobs, keep energy costs from rising unnecessarily, and rein the explosive expansion of the government,” Upton said.

Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-California) ranking Democrat on the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, said that repealing net neutrality regulations “will create market uncertainty, stifle consumer choice, and harm innovation and job creation. Americans overwhelmingly oppose practices which limit a free and open Internet, but Republicans have turned a deaf ear.”

Visit SaveTheInternet.com and learn about a coalition of "two million everyday people who have banded together with thousands of nonprofit organizations, businesses and bloggers to protect Internet freedom."

OCInkjet.com 392x72 banner, image is updated by season.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.