Posts Tagged ‘Iraq’

Obama confirms plan for US troop withdrawal from Iraq

Evans Liberal Politics
August 3, 2010

 

Obama confirms plan
for US troop withdrawal from Iraq

 

Obama confirms plan for US troop withdrawal from Iraq, BBC News, August 2, 2010, by BBC News, excerpt quoted verbatim:

President Obama: “Our commitment in Iraq is changing from a military effort”

US President Barack Obama has confirmed the end of all combat operations in Iraq by 31 August.

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

Some 50,000 of 65,000 US troops currently in Iraq are set to remain until the end of 2011 to advise Iraqi forces and protect US interests.

Mr Obama proclaimed that the end of operations would arrive “as promised and on schedule”.

It comes amid a dispute between the US and Baghdad over the latest casualty numbers in Iraq.

Struggle for Iraq

    * Coalition questions
    * Iraq: Key facts and figures
    * Death toll dispute highlights concerns
    * Q&A: Parliamentary polls

The thrust of Mr Obama’s speech was the fulfilment of his campaign promise to end the Iraq war, which was a defining characteristic of his 2008 candidacy.

Mr Obama made his announcement in a speech to the national convention of the Disabled American Veterans in Atlanta, Georgia.

The remaining 50,000 troops will stay in the country in order to train Iraqi security forces, conduct counterterrorism operations and provide civilians with ongoing security, said Mr Obama.

An agreement negotiated with the Iraqis in 2008 states that these troops must be gone from the country by the end of next year.

But the president warned the US had “not seen the end of American sacrifice in Iraq”.

He added: “But make no mistake, our commitment in Iraq is changing – from a military effort led by our troops to a civilian effort led by our diplomats.”

Meanwhile, according to the US military, 222 people died in attacks last month. Baghdad says 535 lost their lives – which would make July the deadliest month in the country for more than two years.

The US released its own figure after Baghdad’s estimate prompted concern that insurgents were exploiting a post-election power vacuum – and would wreak more havoc as the US withdrew more troops. ….

Read the full article here.

See Death toll dispute highlights Iraq security concerns, August 2, 2010, by BBC News.

See The US Must Capture the Heart of the Afghans, The Huffington Post, August 3, 2010, by Ehsan Azari Stanizai.

Also see Pakistan’s Zardari says war with Taliban being lost, Reuters, August 3, 2010, by John Irish and Daniel Flynn.

Middle East Afghanistan – Iraq News Audio Update



President Obama today reaffirmed that American troops will cease combat operations in Iraq by the end of the month and leave altogether in a year "Obama Reaffirms Iraq Withdrawal Timetable:" Obama said again that American troops will cease combat operations within a month, with the withdrawal of an additional 20,000 troops. — Voice of America — 3:03

thumbnail of a photo of a small group of Afghanistan villagers is a linke to audio about an exit plan for Afghanistan "Afghanistan exit strategy remains a sticking point:" PBS News Hour with Jim Lehrer — 10:55

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 159 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Iraq Withdrawal? Obama and Clinton Expanding US Paramilitary Force in Iraq

Evans Liberal Politics
July 25, 2010

 

Iraq Withdrawal? Obama and Clinton
Expanding US Paramilitary Force in Iraq

 

Iraq Withdrawal? Obama and Clinton Expanding US Paramilitary Force in Iraq, The Nation, July 22, 2010, by Jeremy Scahill, excerpt quoted verbatim:

UPDATE: In Iraq today, three private security contractors were killed in a rocket attack on Baghdad’s Green Zone. All of them were employees of Triple Canopy, the security company hired by the Obama administration to take over much of Blackwater’s work in Iraq. Another fifteen people were wounded in the attack. The dead included two Ugandans and a Peruvian. The attack highlights the inevitable consequences of an emerging Obama administration policy wherein more contractors are going to be deployed to Iraq and many of them will be so-called third country nationals like those killed in today’s attack. The coming surge in contractors in Iraq is being done under the auspices of the State Department’s diplomatic security division, which was massively expanded under the Bush administration paving the way for the Department’s almost total reliance on private contractors for security in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

a U.S. army patrol encounters harsh conditions in the desert in Iraq

As a candidate for president, Senator Hillary Clinton vowed to ban the use of private security contractors, which she referred to as mercenaries. “These private security contractors have been reckless and have compromised our mission in Iraq,” Clinton said in February 2008. “The time to show these contractors the door is long past due.” Clinton was one of only two senators to sponsor legislation to ban these companies. Fast forward to the present and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is presiding over what is shaping up to be a radical expansion of a private, US-funded paramilitary force that will operate in Iraq for the foreseeable future–the very type of force Clinton once claimed she opposed.

The State Department is asking Congress to approve funds to more than double the number of private security contractors in Iraq with a State Department official testifying in June at a hearing of the Wartime Contracting Commission that the Department wants “between 6,000 and 7,000 security contractors.” The Department also has asked the Pentagon for twenty-four Blackhawk helicopters, fifty Mine-Resistant Ambush-Protected (MRAP) vehicles and other military equipment. “After the departure of U.S. Forces [from Iraq], we will continue to have a critical need for logistical and life support of a magnitude and scale of complexity that is unprecedented in the history of the Department of State,” wrote Patrick Kennedy, under secretary of state for management, in an April letter to the Pentagon. “And to keep our people secure, Diplomatic Security requires certain items of equipment that are only available from the military.”

What is unfolding is the face of President Obama’s scaled-down, rebranded mini-occupation of Iraq. Under the terms of the Status of Forces agreement, all US forces are supposed to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011. Using private forces is a backdoor way of continuing a substantial US presence under the cover of “diplomatic security.” The kind of paramilitary force that Obama and Clinton are trying to build in Iraq is, in large part, a byproduct of the monstrous colonial fortress the United States calls its embassy in Baghdad and other facilities the US will maintain throughout Iraq after the “withdrawal.” The State Department plans to operate five “Enduring Presence Posts” at current US military bases in Basrah, Diyala, Erbil, Kirkuk and Ninewa. The State Department has indicated that more sites may be created in the future, which would increase the demand for private forces. The US embassy in Baghdad is the size of Vatican City, comprised of twenty-one buildings on a 104-acres of land on the Tigris River.

Perfectmatch.com

In making their case to Congress and the Defense Department for the expansion of a private paramilitary force in Iraq, State Department officials have developed what they call a “lost functionality” list of fourteen security-related tasks that the military currently perform in Iraq that would become the responsibility of the State Department as US forces draw down. ….

Read the full article here.

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 150 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

U.S. withdrawal from Iraq will be on time, Vice President Biden says

Evans Liberal Politics
May 27, 2010

 

 

 

U.S. withdrawal from Iraq will be on time,
Vice President Biden says

 

U.S. withdrawal from Iraq will be on time, Vice President Biden says, The Washington Post, May 27, 2010, by Scott Wilson, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Well, here’s some encouraging news coming out of the otherwise dim lights shining over in Iraq. Vice President Biden, in charge of troop reduction efforts there, says the United States will keep to its committment to reduce troop strength according to plan. Scott Wilson of the Washington Post reports:

President Obama called Iraq his predecessor’s war of choice. Now it is his war to exit — and quickly.

The challenge for Obama, whose opposition to the Iraq invasion helped propel him to the presidency, is sticking to his timeline for a U.S. military withdrawal despite a jump in violence and continued wrangling among Iraqi politicians over who will lead the country.

The sensitive departure is being managed by Vice President Biden, who says the U.S. military will reduce troop levels to 50,000 this summer, even if no new Iraqi government takes shape.

“It’s going to be painful; there’s going to be ups and downs,” Biden said in a 40-minute interview in his West Wing office this month. “But I do think the end result is going to be that we’re going to be able to keep our commitment.”

White House officials say Iraqis are increasingly relying on politics, rather than violence, to deal with disputes, diminishing the need for U.S. forces. But the situation on the ground demonstrates that Iraq remains fractured.

Rival factions have yet to establish a new government, nearly three months after close national elections, and politicians have begun warning of a power vacuum as neighboring Iran works to influence the outcome. Adel Abdul Mahdi, one of Iraq’s vice presidents, urged all parties this month to agree quickly on a new leader to head off attempts by “terrorist gangs to use the circumstances in the country to hurt the Iraqi people and the armed forces.”

Some recent attacks have had sectarian hallmarks that Iraqis fear could revive the divisions within their security forces that existed during the 2006 civil war. Iraq’s factions also have yet to resolve such essential long-term issues as how to share oil revenue among regions and how to settle territorial disputes rooted in history.

Speaking Saturday at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., Obama said that the U.S. commitment to Iraq endures and that, as U.S. troops depart, “a strong American civilian presence will help Iraqis forge political and economic progress.” He also reiterated his definition of success: “an Iraq that provides no haven to terrorists; a democratic Iraq that is sovereign and stable and self-reliant.” On the day Obama spoke, the number of U.S. troops in Iraq dipped below the number in Afghanistan for the first time since the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Biden, once a leading skeptic of U.S. involvement in Iraq, is now among the country’s most ardent cheerleaders. He is seeking to balance Obama’s determination to leave Iraq against growing concerns among some conservative critics that the current circumstances make a swift U.S. withdrawal too dangerous.

Read the full article, here.

Seymour Hersh on Obama Being “Dominated” by the U.S. Military

Evans Liberal Politics
May 9, 2010

 

Seymour Hersh on Obama
Being “Dominated” by the U.S. Military

 

Seymour Hersh on Obama Being “Dominated” by the U.S. Military, Michael Moore.com, May 8, 2010, by Seymour Hersch, quoted verbatim:

Seymour Hersh spoke at the Global Investigative Journalism Conference in Geneva on April 24, 2010:

REPORTER: You didn’t include Obama in your list of liar presidents. I’m wondering if you would include him also?


HERSH: To use a basketball or a football analogy, American football, fourth quarter – he may have a game plan. At this point he’s in real trouble. Because the military are dominating him on the important issues of the world: Iraq, Iran, Afghan and Pakistan. And he’s following the policies of Bush and Cheney almost to a fare-thee-well. He talks differently. And he’s much brighter, he’s much more of the world. So one only hopes he has a game plan that will include doing something, but he’s in real trouble, in terms of – he’s in real trouble.

In Iraq I don’t have to tell anybody the prospects – in the American press they never mention Moqtada Sadr, but look out. He’s going to be the kingmaker of that country. He’s now studying in Iran. And he’s going to be the next ayatollah-to-be. I don’t know how he’ll work it out with Sistani. But he’s going to be the force, the Shia. And so this is going to be very complicated for us because the two men we talk about, Allawi and Maliki, have about as much to do with the average Iraqi – they’re both ex-pats. Allawi, let’s see, he was certainly an American agent and a British agent, the MI-6, the CIA, the Jordanians ran him probably for Mossad. I’m not telling you anything that is not a fact. So who knows?

So Iraq is very problematical. There’s going to be much more violence. Whether it’s civil war or not it’s going to be much more violence.

He’s never going to win, whatever that means, in Afghanistan. The only solution in Afghanistan is a settlement with the Taliban. And the only person to settle with is Mullah Omar, and he’s become another Hitler to the American public. So how we’re going to do that and survive politically?

And the same in Pakistan. He’s got the wrong policy there. So it is – and again for Obama, Iran’s not resolved, in terms of, the Iranians have come out of this crisis stronger than ever. We don’t want to believe that.

*****

We know, if you come here repeatedly,
you like Evans Liberal Politics. So, all we ask is that you
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

78 Great Electronic Rock and Pop Tracks
(Just Click the Banner!)


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming electronic rock and pop
#1 Rated by Google

Video World News Bulletin – 5:35 GMT update

Evans Liberal Politics
April 24, 2010

 

Video World News Bulletin – 5:35 GMT update

 

PBS: BILL MOYERS JOURNAL | Andrew Bacevich on Afghanistan

Evans Liberal Politics
April 16, 2010

 

PBS: BILL MOYERS JOURNAL
Andrew Bacevich on Afghanistan

 

PBS – April 15, 2010 – 35:08

Allawi’s Victory in Iraq Election Sets Up Period of Uncertainty

Evans Liberal Politics
March 27, 2010

 

Allawi’s Victory in Iraq Election
Sets Up Period of Uncertainty

 

Allawi’s Victory in Iraq Election Sets Up Period of Uncertainty © The New York Times, March 26, 2010, by Timothy Williams and Rod Nordland, excerpt quoted verbatim:

BAGHDAD — The secular party of Ayad Allawi, a former interim prime minister once derided as an American puppet, won a wafer-thin victory in Iraq’s election, setting the stage for a protracted period of political uncertainty and possible violence that could threaten plans to withdraw American troops.

Click President Obama
to Visit our Famous Guide
to Politics on the Web

funny Mad Magazine cover titled 'Obama, the first 100 minutes'

The outcome, announced Friday, was immediately challenged by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki and his supporters in the State of Law coalition, who hurled accusations of fraud and made vague references to the prime minister’s power as commander in chief.

Several parties have cried fraud as their fortunes waxed or waned in the slow vote count, an ominous reminder of an Iraqi political culture where winning is everything and compromise elusive. Western observers and an independent election commission said they saw no signs of widespread fraud. Mr. Allawi galvanized the votes of millions of Sunnis — who boycotted the last parliamentary elections in 2005 — to build his edge of 91 to 89 seats over his nearest rival, Mr. Maliki. That falls far short of the majority of 163 of the 325 seats in Parliament that he needs to form a government.

Iraqi political experts interviewed Friday doubted that Mr. Allawi would succeed in assembling a governing coalition. But even if he did, they said it would take at least until July, possibly even longer, a potentially destabilizing stretch in which a disgruntled Mr. Maliki would serve as caretaker prime minister of the nation.

In a statement that seemed to reflect American concerns about the potential for violence, United States Ambassador Christopher R. Hill and Gen. Ray Odierno, the top American military commander in Iraq, praised “the overall integrity of the election” and called on political parties to “refrain from inflammatory rhetoric or action.” There had been hope that the election would spell an end to Iraq’s sectarian politics. And though the balloting shattered the sectarian political template that brought Mr. Maliki to power in 2005, when an alliance of Shiite parties dominated the election, the outcome re-emphasized the country’s sectarian and regional divides and the deepening schism between Arabs and Kurds.

The vote in part reflected dissatisfaction with Mr. Maliki’s ability to provide security, government services, and jobs. Mr. Allawi appealed to Iraqis tired of the past domination of Iraqi politics by religious parties; others responded to his image as the sort of strongman leader they have lacked since Saddam Hussein was ousted.

Reactions in Iraq ranged from jubilation to fear. Some people partied in the streets, honking horns and firing weapons in the air; others stockpiled food in case of violence and renewed curfews.

Read the full article, here.

Petreus: Israeli Impunity Becoming a Liability

Evans Liberal Politics
March 19, 2010

 

Petreus: Israeli Impunity
Becoming a Liability

 

GritTV – March 18, 2010: The NY Times Passed on this story.