Government attempts to keep torture case secret –Holding case taken by former Guantánamo detainees behind closed doors would set ‘very dangerous precedent’, says lawyer 08 Mar 2010 The government will attempt today to have a case about torture heard entirely behind closed doors in a move that some lawyers say would extend secrecy to a new area of hearings, overriding ancient principles of English law.

This morning a case will come before three appeal judges in London in which seven men are seeking damages against the government for mistreatment during what they say was their “extraordinary rendition” and torture facilitated by the British security services.

Alleged torture victims facing ‘secret and one-sided justice’ –Legal experts have warned the judgment threatens British principles of justice and have branded it a ‘constitutional outrage’. 08 Mar 2010 British intelligence services must be stopped from using secret evidence against former Guantanamo Bay detainees, the Appeal Court heard today. Alleged torture victims seeking to sue the Government over Britain’s complicity in their unlawful imprisonment are facing ‘secret and one-sided’ justice, their lawyer claimed. Six former detainees are hoping to win damages from the Government over allegations that Britain knew about their ill-treatment. Their lawyers have begun a challenge at the Court of Appeal against a ruling which would allow the security services and the Government to withhold evidence from the men during the civil case.

Commentary by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: They said Obama was “soft on terrorism”: exCuse me, is anybody listening here? Do you think they might be trying for a conviction, here??? Republicans, are you really that stupid, or are you just lying about how tough Obama in fact IS on terrorism and trying desperately to score some big political points. McCain tried that on Obama in the campaign, too. (The fact is, the United States has decided to do basically the same thing Great Britain is doing here: secret trials with military tribunals. Right, and the Patriot Act renewal, too. The surge in Afghanistan, do you think that might be evidence Obama is going to always do the right thing, even if the left doesn’t like it? Oh, I know you’re going to try to claim credit for that, the incredible force of your protests at the still possible trials in New York, the force of your incredible patriotism, I know.) You Could try actually reading the news…. Oh, you do that? Well then you are a bunch of lying demagogues, who don’t really care about the facts of the matter at all. What’s Actually going on is that Obama is so tough on secrecy, the Patriot Act renewal, terrorism, the surge in Afghanistan, etc., that he has managed to alienate the whole left wing of the Democratic Party, isn’t that the case? Go away Republicans, you are annoying Obama and nobody’s impressed. Seriously, grow up!

UPDATE: See Experts Urge Keeping Two Options for Terror Trials, The New York Times, March 8, 2010, by Charlie Savage and Scott Shane.