The Christian Fascists Are Growing Stronger, Truthout, June 7, 2010, by Chris Hedges of Truthdig, photo by Jim Moyers, quoted verbatim:

Tens of millions of Americans, lumped into a diffuse and fractious movement known as the Christian right, have begun to dismantle the intellectual and scientific rigor of the Enlightenment. They are creating a theocratic state based on “biblical law,” and shutting out all those they define as the enemy. This movement, veering closer and closer to traditional fascism, seeks to force a recalcitrant world to submit before an imperial America. It champions the eradication of social deviants, beginning with homosexuals, and moving on to immigrants, secular humanists, feminists, Jews, Muslims and those they dismiss as “nominal Christians”—meaning Christians who do not embrace their perverted and heretical interpretation of the Bible.

Those who defy the mass movement are condemned as posing a threat to the health and hygiene of the country and the family. All will be purged. The followers of deviant faiths, from Judaism to Islam, must be converted or repressed. The deviant media, the deviant public schools, the deviant entertainment industry, the deviant secular humanist government and judiciary and the deviant churches will be reformed or closed. There will be a relentless promotion of Christian “values,” already under way on Christian radio and television and in Christian schools, as information and facts are replaced with overt forms of indoctrination. The march toward this terrifying dystopia has begun. It is taking place on the streets of Arizona, on cable news channels, at tea party rallies, in the Texas public schools, among militia members and within a Republican Party that is being hijacked by this lunatic fringe.

Elizabeth Dilling, who wrote “The Red Network” and was a Nazi sympathizer, is touted as required reading by trash-talk television hosts like Glenn Beck. Thomas Jefferson, who favored separation of church and state, is ignored in Christian schools and soon will be ignored in Texas public school textbooks. The Christian right hails the “significant contributions” of the Confederacy. Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who led the anti-communist witch hunts of the 1950s, has been rehabilitated, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is defined as part of the worldwide battle against Islamic terror. Legislation like the new Jim Crow laws of Arizona is being considered by 17 other states.

The rise of this Christian fascism, a rise we ignore at our peril, is being fueled by an ineffectual and bankrupt liberal class that has proved to be unable to roll back surging unemployment, protect us from speculators on Wall Street, or save our dispossessed working class from foreclosures, bankruptcies and misery. The liberal class has proved useless in combating the largest environmental disaster in our history, ending costly and futile imperial wars or stopping the corporate plundering of the nation. And the gutlessness of the liberal class has left it, and the values it represents, reviled and hated.

The Democrats have refused to repeal the gross violations of international and domestic law codified by the Bush administration. This means that Christian fascists who achieve power will have the “legal” tools to spy on, arrest, deny habeas corpus to, and torture or assassinate American citizens—as does the Obama administration.

Those who remain in a reality-based world often dismiss these malcontents as buffoons and simpletons. They do not take seriously those, like Beck, who pander to the primitive yearnings for vengeance, new glory and moral renewal. Critics of the movement continue to employ the tools of reason, research and fact to challenge the absurdities propagated by creationists who think they will float naked into the heavens when Jesus returns to Earth. The magical thinking, the flagrant distortion in interpreting the Bible, the contradictions that abound within the movement’s belief system and the laughable pseudoscience, however, are impervious to reason. We cannot convince those in the movement to wake up. It is we who are asleep.

Those who embrace this movement see life as an epic battle against forces of evil and Satanism. The world is black and white. They need to feel, even if they are not, that they are victims surrounded by dark and sinister groups bent on their destruction. They need to believe they know the will of God and can fulfill it, especially through violence. They need to sanctify their rage, a rage that lies at the core of the ideology. They seek total cultural and political domination. They are using the space within the open society to destroy it. These movements work within the confining rules of the secular state because they have no choice. The intolerance they promote is muted in the public assurances of their slickest operators. Given enough power, and they are working hard to get it, any such cooperation will vanish. The demand for total control and for a Christian nation and the refusal to permit any dissent are on display within their inner sanctums. These pastors have established within their churches tiny, despotic fiefdoms, and they seek to replicate these little tyrannies on a larger scale.

Many of the tens of millions within the Christian right live on the edge of poverty. The Bible, interpreted for them by pastors whose connection with God means they cannot be questioned, is their handbook for daily life. The rigidity and simplicity of their belief are potent weapons in the fight against their own demons and the struggle to keep their lives on track. The reality-based world, one where Satan, miracles, destiny, angels and magic did not exist, battered them like driftwood. It took their jobs and destroyed their future. It rotted their communities. It flooded their lives with alcohol, drugs, physical violence, deprivation and despair. And then they discovered that God has a plan for them. God will save them. God intervenes in their lives to promote and protect them. The emotional distance they have traveled from the real world to the world of Christian fantasy is immense. And the rational, secular forces, those that speak in the language of fact and evidence, are hated and ultimately feared, for they seek to pull believers back into “the culture of death” that nearly destroyed them.

There are wild contradictions within this belief system. Personal independence is celebrated alongside an abject subservience to leaders who claim to speak for God. The movement says it defends the sanctity of life and advocates the death penalty, militarism, war and righteous genocide. It speaks of love and promotes fear of damnation and hate. There is a terrifying cognitive dissonance in every word they utter.

The movement is, for many, an emotional life raft. It is all that holds them together. But the ideology, while it regiments and orders lives, is merciless. Those who deviate from the ideology, including “backsliders” who leave these church organizations, are branded as heretics and subjected to little inquisitions, which are the natural outgrowth of messianic movements. If the Christian right seizes the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, these little inquisitions will become big inquisitions.

The cult of masculinity pervades the movement. Feminism and homosexuality, believers are told, have rendered the American male physically and spiritually impotent. Jesus, for the Christian right, is a muscular man of action, casting out demons, battling the Antichrist, attacking hypocrites and castigating the corrupt. This cult of masculinity, with its glorification of violence, is deeply appealing to those who feel disempowered and humiliated. It vents the rage that drove many people into the arms of the movement. It encourages them to lash back at those who, they are told, seek to destroy them. The paranoia about the outside world is stoked through bizarre conspiracy theories, many championed in books such as Pat Robertson’s “The New World Order,” a xenophobic rant that includes attacks on liberals and democratic institutions.

The obsession with violence pervades the popular novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins. In their apocalyptic novel, “Glorious Appearing,” based on LaHaye’s interpretation of biblical prophecies about the Second Coming, Christ returns and eviscerates the flesh of millions of nonbelievers with the sound of his voice. There are long descriptions of horror and blood, of how “the very words of the Lord had superheated their blood, causing it to burst through their veins and skin.” Eyes disintegrate. Tongues melt. Flesh dissolves. The Left Behind series, of which this novel is a part, contains the best-selling adult novels in the country.

Violence must be used to cleanse the world. These Christian fascists are called to a perpetual state of war. “Any teaching of peace prior to [Christ's] return is heresy…” says televangelist James Robinson.

Natural disasters, terrorist attacks, instability in Israel and even the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are seen as glorious signposts. The war in Iraq is predicted, believers insist, in the ninth chapter of the Book of Revelations, where four angels “which are bound in the great river Euphrates will be released to slay the third part of men.” The march is inevitable and irreversible and requires everyone to be ready to fight, kill and perhaps die. Global war, even nuclear war, is not to be feared, but welcomed as the harbinger of the Second Coming. And leading the avenging armies is an angry, violent Messiah who dooms hundreds of millions of apostates to a horrible and gruesome death.

The Christian right, while embracing a form of primitivism, seeks the imprint of law and science to legitimate its absurd mythologies. Its members seek this imprint because, despite their protestations to the contrary, they are a distinctly modern, totalitarian movement. They seek to co-opt the pillars of the Enlightenment in order to abolish the Enlightenment. Creationism, or “intelligent design,” like eugenics for the Nazis or “Soviet” science for Stalin, must be introduced into the mainstream as a valid scientific discipline—hence the rewriting of textbooks. The Christian right defends itself in the legal and scientific jargon of modernity. Facts and opinions, once they are used “scientifically” to support the irrational, become interchangeable. Reality is no longer based on the gathering of facts and evidence. It is based on ideology. Facts are altered. Lies become true. Hannah Arendt called it “nihilistic relativism,” although a better phrase might be collective insanity.

The Christian right has, for this reason, its own creationist “scientists” who use the language of science to promote anti-science. It has fought successfully to have creationist books sold in national park bookstores at the Grand Canyon and taught in public schools in states such as Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas. Creationism shapes the worldview of hundreds of thousands of students in Christian schools and colleges. This pseudoscience claims to have proved that all animal species, or at least their progenitors, fit on Noah’s ark. It challenges research in AIDS and pregnancy prevention. It corrupts and discredits the disciplines of biology, astronomy, geology, paleontology and physics.

Once creationists can argue on the same platform as geologists, asserting that the Grand Canyon was not created 6 million years ago but 6,000 years ago by the great flood that lifted up Noah’s ark, we have lost. The acceptance of mythology as a legitimate alternative to reality is a body blow to the rational, secular state. The destruction of rational and empirically based belief systems is fundamental to the creation of all totalitarian ideologies. Certitude, for those who could not cope with the uncertainty of life, is one of the most powerful appeals of the movement. Dispassionate intellectual inquiry, with its constant readjustments and demand for evidence, threatens certitude. For this reason incertitude must be abolished.

“What convinces masses are not facts,” Arendt wrote in “Origins of Totalitarianism,” “and not even invented facts, but only the consistency of the system which they are presumably part. Repetition, somewhat overrated in importance because of the common belief in the masses’ inferior capacity to grasp and remember, is important because it convinces them of consistency in time.”

Augustine defined the grace of love as Volo ut sis—I want you to be. There is, he wrote, an affirmation of the mystery of the other in relationships based on love, an affirmation of unexplained and unfathomable differences. Relationships based on love recognize that others have a right to be. These relationships accept the sacredness of difference. This acceptance means that no one individual or belief system captures or espouses an absolute truth. All struggle, in their own way, some outside of religious systems and some within them, to interpret mystery and transcendence.

The sacredness of the other is anathema for the Christian right, which cannot acknowledge the legitimacy of other ways of being and believing. If other belief systems, including atheism, have moral validity, the infallibility of the movement’s doctrine, which constitutes its chief appeal, is shattered. There can be no alternative ways to think or to be. All alternatives must be crushed.

Ideological, theological and political debates are useless with the Christian right. It does not respond to a dialogue. It is impervious to rational thought and discussion. The naive attempts to placate a movement bent on our destruction, to prove to it that we too have “values,” only strengthens its legitimacy and weakness our own. If we do not have a right to be, if our very existence is not legitimate in the eyes of God, there can be no dialogue. At this point it is a fight for survival.

Those gathered into the arms of this Christian fascist movement are desperately struggling to survive in an increasingly hostile environment. We failed them; we owe them more: This is their response. The financial dislocations, the struggles with domestic and sexual abuse, the battle against addictions, the poverty and the despair that many in the movement endure are tragic, painful and real. They have a right to their rage and alienation. But they are also being used and manipulated by forces that seek to dismantle what is left of our democracy and abolish the pluralism that was once the hallmark of our society.

The spark that could set this conflagration ablaze could be lying in the hands of a small Islamic terrorist cell. It could be in the hands of greedy Wall Street speculators who gamble with taxpayer money in the elaborate global system of casino capitalism. The next catastrophic attack, or the next economic meltdown, could be our Reichstag fire. It could be the excuse used by these totalitarian forces, this Christian fascism, to extinguish what remains of our open society.

Let us not stand meekly at the open gates of the city waiting passively for the barbarians. They are coming. They are slouching toward Bethlehem. Let us shake off our complacency and cynicism. Let us openly defy the liberal establishment, which will not save us, to demand and fight for economic reparations for our working class. Let us reincorporate these dispossessed into our economy. Let us give them a reality-based hope for the future. Time is running out. If we do not act, American fascists, clutching Christian crosses, waving American flags and orchestrating mass recitations of the Pledge of Allegiance, will use this rage to snuff us out.

Chris Hedges, who writes a column every Monday for Truthdig and who graduated from Harvard Divinity School, is the author of “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America“. He was a reporter for many years with The New York Times. His latest book is “Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.”

One Christian Liberal’s Thoughts

Commentary by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: Well I am liberal and I am Christian, although many fundamentalists try to claim that this combination is not possible. To me, Jesus’ life on earth represents the embodiment of many good and liberal ideas, brought forth and demonstrated in a completely Godly life. Long ago I spent a lot of time reading books on religion and Christian theology. I see no conflict between science and religion. I see no problem with multiculturalism. And I am damned Christian. ((Or just damned if you ask the folks in Wooster’s thriving fundamentalist community, those few who know about me.)) I have no problem with homosexuality (though very much heterosexual) and I think Muslims may have as much chance of getting into heaven (or Paradise) as Christians do. God gave these cultures different religions for a purpose only He knows. Always remember that God is God and humans shouldn’t try to set themselves up as some kind of doctrinal God, giving doctrinal religious laws (or religiously based political laws) to people. Now in Texas they are removing Jefferson and separation of church and state from the textbooks. The religious right is trying to turn America into a fundamentalist theocracy. Laws should be reserved for political bodies and religions should stay out of that. The advice Jesus gave about this was to “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and render unto God what is God’s,” stated as two separate propositions.

The Pharisees used Jesus’ violations of doctrinal law as a reason to crucify him, didn’t they? Jesus disliked the Pharisees for a reason. Jesus said that all the laws and doctrine which had come before can be fully summed up as “love God” and “love your neighbor as yourself.” THAT I believe. The only Christian doctrine I recognize is love.

Well, that isn’t quite true, there is one Christian idea, which man has made into a doctrine, that is tied up in fate and not really understandable to man, but it makes sense. I have known people, wonderful people, who will die as nonbelievers. I have tried to talk to some few of these and plant seeds in their minds, yet I feel that probably there is nothing I can do about their strong unbelief. A few I have known for many, many years. I cannot explain why God would choose to allow such obviously good – and kind and loving – people to die outside of the knowledge of his love except by some idea which follows the concept of predestination. Of course, equally, I cannot explain why I thought of myself as Christian for years and thought I must be saved yet did not really know I wasn’t and really wasn’t saved. All that – our individual fates and God’s will – seems to me to be something a mere human mind can never understand. I will not claim to ever understand God’s purpose in allowing really nice people to live and die outside of His love, seemingly, as Christianity teaches, to know some kind of punishment for not accepting that God is God and believing in Him. Yet I know all too well that this happens all the time. It truly troubles me, too. Perhaps it must mean that somehow God forgives them and that the idea God would punish anyone for beliefs or lack of belief is wrong. I know that as reported, Jesus here on earth loved everyone he came in contact with, regardless of their beliefs. Is not God love? Just because the Bible speaks of hell, do you not think that hell would be reserved for those who deliberately do wrong in their lives, know they are wrong and evil, and yet live evilly anyway? That sort of punishment I understand, but not the idea of punishment just because a person cannot understand and accept the reality of God and have faith. Many of these nonbelievers live lives that can only be described as caring and in every regard but faith, very Christian lives. The idea of hubris — intellectual pride — is very much present in a few of the people who are in this situation whom I have known. Faith is a decision. But though man may plants seeds which might lead to faith, I think the conclusion and decision to have faith is something which no one but God understands and can have any influence over. Predestination. But I will simply realize that I have a limited human mind and leave all that up to God.

Very recently I accepted Jesus fully into my heart and rededicated myself to living a truly Christian life in the full knowledge of Jesus’ caring love. In other words I can say now that I am saved. People who do not know what this is and what this means whom I have known – myself included – sometimes may scoff at this word “saved,” but now, to me, this is very real. I hope my few friends who are not Christian will tolerate me and still be my friends without belittling this or talking down to me about it. What that translates to in my actual life is I believe that I will have to be far less selfish. Very well, I welcome the discipline involved and am so grateful to God that I did not have to live my whole life, and then die, outside of His love…. I am a very lucky — and unworthy — man.

I tried to put most of my views on Christianity on two pages here at Evans Liberal Politics, A Plea for Tolerance of Muslims: What Would Jesus Do? (Final Update), which is strongly about what I feel Christian tolerance and caring and love should actively consist of; and Straight Talk on Caring. Jesus only had one value, while he was on earth, and that was CARING, actively, for all those who encountered him. That includes the Roman pagan centurian Cornelius, whose son Jesus healed, and the Samaritan woman, whom Jesus counseled despite the fact that devout Jews were not “supposed to” talk with those outside of Judaism. What about “love thy neighbor” and “judge not lest ye be judged” don’t these people get? I would like to think that a loving God would not damn someone because of what religious doctrine they followed, but rather, if God judges us, he must do so based upon how loving (or caring) a life we have lived, and nothing more or less. I do not claim to understand anything much more about salvation, I only know that I was not saved, and now I am.

Finally, I think it is important to differentiate between individual fundamentalist Christians, who mostly are very kind, decent and committed souls who wish nothing but to live Biblically based lives, and the national church organizations representing them, which in many cases are engaged in very questionable, highly right wing or perhaps arguably “Christian fascist” agendas and call for many changes which to me, aren’t very Christian. At least if it matters to you how Jesus lived his life and what is caring for all Americans. The national organizations are far more of a danger than are the individual, decent Christian people, many of whom are my neighbors. I know them to be very good, kind and giving people. ~ Paul

See Parallels in Muslim, Christian, and Jewish Fundamentalism, TheWorldandI.com, December, 2004, by Peter Huff.

See Secular fundamentalism, The New York Times, Opinion, December 19, 2003, anonymous.

See Fundamentalism, Lectures for Religion 166: Religious Life in the United States. Wake Forest University, July 27, 2008.

See Psychological Issues of Former Members of Restrictive Religious Group, JimMoyers.com, by Jim Moyers.

Please Share Evans Liberal Politics with Friends!