Posts Tagged ‘election’

Massachusetts Joins Move to Bypass Electoral College

Evans Liberal Politics
August 18, 2010

 

Massachusetts Joins Move to Bypass Electoral College

 

(Everyone knows we have an outmoded and archaic Presidential election system whereby an electoral college vote, determined by each state, elects the President, rather than the popular vote. And everyone remembers the election of 2000, when Al Gore won the popular vote by some 543,895 votes, yet was robbed in the electoral college.):

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

Massachusetts Joins Move to Bypass Electoral College, About.com, Robert’s US Government Info Blog, August 11, 2010, by Robert Longley, quoted verbatim, with additions:

The State of Massachusetts – the sixth state to join the Union – has now become the sixth state to enact the National Popular Vote bill, the basis of a plan that would modify the Electoral College system by ensuring that the presidential candidate winning the nationwide popular vote would be elected.

“Massachusetts has moved the country one step closer to abandoning an outdated system that effectively disenfranchises two-thirds of the country and four times in our history has elected the second-place candidate,” said Pamela Wilmot, executive director of Common Cause Massachusetts in a press release. “With a national popular vote, all votes in every state will be equally important.” [Learn about the National Popular Vote plan...]

Also See: Electoral College: Who Really Elects the President?

According to the Common Cause Press Release on this:

The new law makes Massachusetts the sixth state to join an interstate compact that would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes nationwide; the agreement takes effect once a sufficient number of states have passed identical laws. Other participating states include Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and Washington.

With the Bay State’s 12 electoral votes, a total of 73 electors are now committed to the national popular vote program. That’s 27 percent of the 270 electoral votes needed to activate the proposal.

Once enough states have signed on, participating states will award their electors as a bloc to the candidate capturing the most votes nationwide. That guarantees that the candidate receiving the most votes will be declared the winner of the election.

“This reform is critically important,” said Bob Edgar, President of Common Cause. “We are not red states and blue states, we are the United States. This proposal would bring us together and establish the principal of ‘One person, one vote’ in the most important election in the world — for President of the United States.”

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! See Help a Christian Family in Need. The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 180 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Send a Clear Message: At 75 The Voters Don’t Want Social Security Cuts

Evans Liberal Politics
August 14, 2010

 

Send a Clear Message:
At 75 The Voters Don’t Want Social Security Cuts

 

Campaign For America’s Future, Landing Page, Social Contract, and as noted, August 14, 2010, by Campaign for America’s Future Staff, photo from Campaign For America’s Future, excerpts from CAF and other sources quoted verbatim:

A new poll shows that Americans overwhelmingly reject cutting Social Security and Medicare as a means of lowering the federal deficit, and support progressive proposals for reviving the economy. See the results.

a birthday cake celebrates Social Security's 75th birthday

Politicians will face major voter backlash if they advocate cuts in Social Security benefits or choose deficit reduction over job creation, according to a poll by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner commissioned by the Campaign for America’s Future and Democracy Corps, with support from MoveOn.org; the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the Service Employees International Union. Read the full poll results (.pdf).

Read The Big Decisions Ahead on Economic Renewal and Reduced Debt (.pdf), August 12, 2010, by Stan Greenberg, James Carville and Peyton M. Craighill.

TAKE ACTION

 

  1. We’re asking candidates running for Congress to make this pledge: Hands off Social Security: No increase in the retirement age, no privatization, no Social Security cuts. Sign the petition to your member of Congress.
  2. Where does your member of Congress stand on Social Security? Use ourfuture.org/handsoffsocialsecurity to find out.

Campaign for America’s Future has joined a major coalition of 60 organizations, representing 30 million people, delivering a simple message: “Strengthen Social Security … Don’t Cut It.” Learn the latest on the effort to strengthen Social Security.

See especially Now We Know What Public Wants – Get Candidates On The Record, Campaign for America’s Future, August 13, 2010, by Dave Johnson..

See At 75, Social Security Ripens as Voter Issue, ABC News, August 14, 2010, by John Fritze, USA Today, excerpt quoted verbatim:

They spent months on health care and Wall Street in Congress, but as lawmakers talk with voters during the summer recess they are increasingly focused on an entirely different issue: Social Security.

Hoping to capitalize on the popular program before the midterm elections, lawmakers in both parties are using this weekend’s 75th anniversary of Social Security to position themselves as guardians of its 53 million beneficiaries.

Democrats are holding events at senior centers and are attacking plans by some Republicans to privatize the program. GOP lawmakers say Democrats have “raided” the Social Security trust fund by spending, rather than saving, excess payroll taxes.

Obama: If GOP retakes Congress,
they will seek to destroy Social Security


Obama: If GOP retakes Congress, they will seek to destroy Social Security, AP on The Raw Story, August 14, 2010, by Associated Press: President Barack Obama used the anniversary of Social Security to trumpet Democrats’ support for the popular program and accuse Republicans of trying to destroy it.

Seventy-five years after President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Social Security into law, Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address Saturday: “We have an obligation to keep that promise, to safeguard Social Security for our seniors, people with disabilities and all Americans — today, tomorrow and forever.”

Sierra Club

Some Republican leaders in Congress are “pushing to make privatizing Social Security a key part of their legislative agenda if they win a majority in Congress this fall,” Obama said.

He contended that such privatization was “an ill-conceived idea that would add trillions of dollars to our budget deficit while tying your benefits to the whims of Wall Street traders and the ups and downs of the stock market.”

Most Republicans, in fact, are wary of touching that idea, because Social Security is virtually sacrosanct to voters, particularly seniors.

Nonetheless, Democrats have been able to seize on the issue because of a proposal by Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the top Republican on the House Budget Committee, that would allow younger people to put Social Security money into personal accounts.

Read the full story, here.

See Stop the plot against seniors!, The Huffington Post, August 14, 2010, by Rep. Alan Grayson, and SIGN THE PETITION.

Watch a Fox Business Network propaganda video Social Security Turns 75, Will There Be Another 75?.

Comment by Evans Liberal Poliitics owner Paul Evans: The Fox News analyst is almost reasonable, which is surprising. The answer conservative economists have for fixing Social Security, which ISN’T broken, is privatization, and raising the retirement age, and NEVER, never simply raising the cap on Social Security taxes. Right now the upper limit on taxable income for Social Security is around $100,000. Simply raising the Cap to say $300,000 fixes the system completely, but the rich people who control Congress won’t allow this to be even up for discussion. When he was a candidate, Barack Obama proposed having income between $100,000 and $225,000 exempt from Social Security taxes, and income above and below that level taxable. But there isn’t the stomach in Congress to even consider this, which would completely fix the system and even allow surplus funds to be used elsewhere by the government. Shameful.

Comment by @B3sideYouInTime on Twitter: ‘@BarackObama if you cut social security ur gonna lose alot of votes. act like a Liberal for gods sake, thats why we voted u in.’ I think President Obama "Gets it:" Listen to audio from the President, below:

The President’s Weekly Address


Weekly Address: Honoring Social Security, Not Privatizing It



a common smiley but one that is blue in support of liberals and the Democratic Party is a link to the President's Weekly Address about Social Security "The President’s Weekly Address:" Honoring Social Security on it’s 75th anniversary, not privatizing it. White House audio — 3:16 Click the smiley to listen and just keep the player open to listen to more recent news and music.

Spiritual Cinema Circle

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 174 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

PPP National poll: Obama improves, health care reform gains, voters blame Bush

Evans Liberal Politics
August 11, 2010

 

PPP National poll: Obama improves,
health care reform gains, voters blame Bush

 

PPP National poll: Obama improves, health care reform gains, voters blame Bush, Daily Kos, August 11, 2010, by DemFromCT, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

If you are looking for some good news for Democrats, this national poll (not commissioned by Daily Kos, MoE +/- 4) has a whiff of not-so-bad to go with the “if only…”

OCInkjet.com 250x250 banner,<br /> image is updated by season.

After an unusually bad July in PPP’s national poll, President Barack Obama has seen a lot of improvement on several fronts. His national approval rating has rebounded, moving from 48-47 in June, to 45-52 last month, back to 47-48 now. For five of the last eight months, Obama has been one point above or below breaking even; in others, he was two points below and four points above.

PPP has asked voters’ approval of Obama’s health care plan for 12 months now, and with 46% approving and 48% disapproving, that is the highest level of approval and the second best approval margin since the first month, September 2009, when it was 45-46. This marks a huge shift since July (40-53). In another improvement for Obama, 50% still say they prefer having Obama as president, compared to 43% who would rather have George W. Bush back. In April, Obama won only 48-46. While independents this year generally favor Republican candidates and disapprove of Obama, they prefer Obama against Bush, 53-36, versus April’s 49-37.

When asked who they think is more responsible for the state of the economy, 49% picked Bush, to 40% choosing Obama. Independents say Bush, 52-38. Fewer Republicans, 75%, pick Obama than Democrats pick Bush, 81%.

While this is still a rough time for Democrats, the reports of Obama’s political death are greatly exaggerated.

Note also, the health care improvement is not isolated to this poll. See Kaiser poll: Health care reform support reaches new high.

Now, here’s a drum I’ve been beating:

“July could’ve been a blip on the radar. Obama’s more overt use of Bush in his stump speech of late could resonate with voters, particularly with independents who don’t want to return to past economic policies,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling.

There’s still time for D-leaning indies to come home, but they won’t unless we go out and give them a reason to. Reminding them of what Republicans under Bush did to us is good policy as well as good politics.

Still, keep in mind Obama’s on a 2012 cycle while House and Senate Democrats are looking at 2010.

*****

DemFromCT is a longtime member of the Daily Kos community with interests ranging from polling to Iraq to bird flu, and has graciously agreed to allow us here at Evans Liberal Politics to publish his articles on an ongoing basis. He is a founding editor of Flu Wiki (www.fluwikie.com) and its sister site, the Flu Wiki Forum (www.newfluwiki2.com). Since its inception in June 2005, Flu Wiki has grown into an international clearinghouse of pandemic influenza information and links.

You can view his diaries at Daily Kos, here. DemFromCT is a featured writer at Daily Kos, and you can read more about him here. You are invited to email DemFromCT.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?

Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! See Help a Christian Family in Need. The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 164 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Obama attacks Bush policies in Bush’s home state

a brown fist grasps a lightning bolt in this article on Obama in Texas attacking Republican policiesa brown fist grasps a lightning bolt in this article on Obama in Texas attacking Republican policies

Evans Liberal Politics
August 10, 2010

 

Obama attacks Bush policies
in Bush’s home state

 

Obama attacks Bush policies in Bush’s home state, Reuters, August 10, 2010, by Ross Colvin, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Texas (Reuters) – President Barack Obama attacked the economic policies of his Republican predecessor George W. Bush in Bush’s home state on Monday as evidence of the way Republicans would operate if given power in November 2 U.S. congressional elections.

a determined and rather grim Barack Obama looks left in this article about Obama in Texas

At a fund-raising event for Democrats in Dallas, where Bush now lives, Obama said the former president’s “disastrous” policies had driven the U.S. economy into the ground and turned budget surpluses into deficits.

Obama defended his repeated references to Bush’s policies, saying they were necessary to remind Americans of the weak economy he inherited from Bush in January 2009.

“The policies that crashed the economy, that undercut the middle class, that mortgaged our future, do we really want to go back to that, or do we keep moving our country forward?” Obama said at another fund-raising event in Austin, referring to Bush’s eight years as president.

In reminding voters about the policies of the unpopular Bush, Obama is trying to protect his fellow Democrats’ majorities in Congress and limit anticipated Republican gains.

On November 2, voters will choose all 435 members of the House of Representatives and 37 members of the 100-seat Senate.

Republicans say they doubt Obama’s effort to cite Bush as a reason to vote against them in November will work because Americans are more concerned about getting or keeping a job.

“When we talk about this ‘going back’ thing, I notice that some Republicans say, ‘Well, he just wants to bash the previous administration, he’s looking backwards.’ … No, no, no. The reason we’re focused on it is because the other side isn’t offering anything new,” Obama said in Austin.

He said later in Dallas that Republicans were simply offering “retreads” of economic policies that “got us into this mess in the first place” and had no new ideas to offer voters.

One part of Bush’s legacy remains a subject of intense debate in Washington — the tax cuts for all Americans he steered through Congress in 2001 and 2003.

These expire at the end of this year, and a pitched battle has begun over whether to extend all or part of them.

Obama and the Democrats say tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 a year should be ended to help close the U.S. budget deficit. Republicans argue that no taxes should rise in a time of economic peril.

Obama, grappling with the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s, 9.5 percent unemployment, wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, soaring budget deficits and an impatient electorate, said all that Republicans have done is try to obstruct him at every turn.

Read the full story here.

See Obama to GOP: I’m pretty good at politicking, remember?, CNN, August 9, 2010, by CNN Wire Staff,excerpt quoted verbatim:

(CNN) — President Barack Obama warned Republicans on Monday that he is back in campaign mode.

In a fundraising speech in Austin, Texas, Obama complained that while his administration has been governing the country since January 2009, Republicans have been trying to obstruct progress.

“There has been a fundamental lack of seriousness on the other side,” Obama said. “We’ve spent the last 20 months governing; they have spent the last 20 months politicking.”

In reference to the upcoming November congressional elections, Obama said: “Well, we can politick for three months. They forgot I’m pretty good at politicking.”

The speech repeated the main campaign themes Obama has mentioned in recent months, particularly his assessment of GOP proposals as a repeat of failed policies from the previous administration.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! See Help a Christian Family in Need. The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 164 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

It’s Nasty In Colorado This Primary Day

Evans Liberal Politics
August 9, 2010

 

It’s Nasty In Colorado This Primary Day

 

It’s Nasty In Colorado This Primary Day, NPR, August 9, 2010, by Liz Halloran, photo montage of Denver courtesy of Wikipedia, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Voters in four states will go to the polls Tuesday and pick their party’s fall candidates, but perhaps no races are being watched more closely than the primary contests for governor and the U.S. Senate in Colorado. There, the expected has taken a back seat to the astonishing.

Wikipedia montage photo of scenic highlights of Denver, Colorado

Plagiarism? Check. Gender politics? Check. Charges of Wall Street coziness? Check. Competing presidential endorsements? Check. Bicycle-sharing as a United Nations plot? Check. Selling house for campaign cash? Check.

Add to that the last-minute gubernatorial candidacy of an independent party spoiler in the name of former five-term conservative Rep. Tom Tancredo, and the political situation in Colorado is “pandemonium,” says Denver-based pollster Floyd Ciruli.

GOP’S Dimmed Hopes — For Now


That the chaos is largely playing out in the Republican contests doesn’t bode well for a party that had viewed the state as highly promising territory.

Party leaders had great hopes this fall of picking up the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Democrat Michael Bennet and of recapturing the governor’s office being vacated by one-term Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter.

Bennet, the former Denver school superintendent, was appointed to the seat in January 2009 after then-Sen. Ken Salazar was tapped by President Obama to become interior secretary.

“I thought that the Republicans here had a very good chance to take back a significant amount of the political landscape they used to control out here,” Ciruli says. “And up until early June every poll consistently showed that they had a 5-point generic lead statewide — whatever the matchup.”

“But it’s now all up in the air here,” he says.

What Happened?


Democrats, as they do nationally, looked increasingly vulnerable in Colorado.

The ailing economy is local voters’ top issue, and one that doesn’t favor the party in power. Statewide unemployment is north of 8 percent.

And Obama, whose win in Colorado with 53.7 percent of the vote in the 2008 presidential race suggested a political swing away from the GOP, has seen his approval ratings in the state plummet to 38 percent.

Colorado Republicans had recruited candidates who, on paper, looked strong — from former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton for Senate to former six-term Rep. Scott McInnis for governor.

Both now are in dead heats with party upstarts.

Senate Race


Norton, endorsed by Arizona Sen. John McCain, the party’s 2008 presidential candidate, is battling Ken Buck, the Weld County district attorney and a Tea Party favorite endorsed by emerging conservative kingmaker Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina.

(Buck, however, may have alienated some Tea Party adherents recently when, in a private conversation with a Democratic operative, he was recorded saying: “Will you tell those dumb asses at the Tea Party to stop asking questions about birth certificates when I’m on the camera?”)

Buck, who was referring to those who question whether Obama was born in the United States, has also mixed it up with Norton over footwear.

In videotaped comments from a gathering of conservatives, Buck was shown answering a question about why party members should vote for him with this: “Because I do not wear high heels,” but “cowboy boots, they have real bulls- – - on them.”

Buck defended the comment as a response to Norton ads that question his “manhood.”

Polls show Norton, who made some hay with the high heels comment, with a slim lead. She has raised more than $2.87 million for her campaign; Buck has raised $1.26 million.

Obama Vs. Clinton?


The Democrats’ Senate contest pits Obama-endorsed Bennet against Andrew Romanoff, who secured former President Bill Clinton’s endorsement — and recently sold his house to infuse cash into his insurgent campaign.

Romanoff, a former state speaker of the house, has used a series of hard-hitting and controversial advertisements — criticized as unfair by some in the party — to link Bennet with Wall Street interests.

Bennet, a lawyer and businessman who served in the Clinton administration, was also the subject of a recent New York Times article critical of the way he structured school funding as superintendent in Denver, where the financing terms have now become a financial drain. Bennet’s campaign has dismissed the criticism.

Though Clinton has not been on the campaign trail for Romanoff, he recorded a pitch for the candidate that will be sent as a robo call to potential voters in the final hours of the hard-fought campaign. The popular former president’s endorsement has given the challenger some credibility, says Joannie Braden, a Democratic consultant in Denver.

“Bill Clinton is a very popular Democrat and I think it was a meaningful endorsement,” Braden says.

Obama has recorded automated calls for Bennet that started last week.

And though the pollster Ciruli says that Obama’s endorsement is increasingly seen as a wash among state voters, Bennet has a huge fundraising edge: $7.7 million raised as of July 21, compared with the $1.9 million raised by Romanoff.

Bennet holds a slight lead in the race.

“It’s tight sneakers,” Braden says of the Romanoff-Bennet contest.

The downside for Democrats, strategists say of the historically expensive race, is that no matter who emerges from the negative campaign will be covered with that bitter residue. ….

Read the full story, including information about the governor’s race, here.

See Tom Tancredo Hands Colorado to Democrats, KicK: Making Politics Fun, August 9, 2010, by Rack Jite.

Dan Balz handicaps the very competitive Colorado US Senate races UPDATE: "Colorado Senate Contests:" Dan Balz handicaps the very competitive Colorado US Senate primaries. — 5:50

thumbnail of a candidate for US Senate in Colorado stumping for votes is used as a link for audio news about the Colorado US Senate primary race "Midterm Elections 2010: Colorado Senate Race Gets Rocky:" Audio news on the US Senate race in Colorado from CQPolitics. — 4:58

See today’s article Bob Swern on Economic Incompetence as a separate page. An expose on business and economic incompetence featuring Robert Reich, Paul Krugman, Chris Whalen and Yves Smith. Daily Kos and Evans Liberal Politics, August 9, 2010, by Bob Swern.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! See Help a Christian Family in Need. The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 164 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

‘Peculiar’ Tea Party happenings blamed on ‘dirty’ Dem tricksters

Evans Liberal Politics
August 9, 2010

 

‘Peculiar’ Tea Party happenings
blamed on ‘dirty’ Dem tricksters

 

‘Peculiar’ Tea Party happenings blamed on ‘dirty’ Dem tricksters, The Raw Story, August 9, 2010, by Ron Brynaert, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Could paranoia end up being the self-destroyer of the Tea Party movement?

Or, as the tagline for the new AMC series Rubicon puts it, perhaps it’s true that “not every conspiracy is a theory.” Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you.

funny photo of an Elephant headed into an archway which is too small for him highlights this article of Tea Party dirty tricks

A Fox News article claims,

In New Jersey, a “Tea Party” candidate surfaces but local activists haven’t heard of him. In Michigan, a Democratic operative appears closely tied to a slate of candidates running under the Tea Party banner. In Florida, conservative activists are locked in court over the right to use the Tea Party name.

The list of peculiar Tea Party happenings goes on and on.

As the midterm election nears, allegations are surfacing across the country that Democrats are exploiting conservatives’ faith in the Tea Party name by putting up bogus candidates in November — the claim is that those “Tea Party” candidates will split the GOP vote and clear the way for Democratic victories.

The theories may prove to be more than just conspiracy talk. Some of the allegations are coming directly from local Tea Party activists who are trying to flag the media and election officials as soon as they smell something fishy on the ballot. And they say they’ve got proof.

Last Friday, Politico reported, “Nationally, Democrats say they intend to campaign against the tea party movement. But locally, Democratic officials and activists in at least four states now stand accused of collaborating with tea party candidates in an attempt to sabotage Republican challengers in some of the closest House races in the nation.”

“The Democrats have come to the realization that they can’t win on issues, and with their flawed candidates, so they are forced to skirt the rules by running candidates who they hope can split the vote with Republicans,” said Paul Lindsey, a National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman.

Democratic officials deny there is any grand conspiracy.

“The DCCC has nothing to do with this,” said Ryan Rudominer, a spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee

Politico’s Jeane Cummings reports, “But the evidence of campaign tampering in at least two states is hard to dismiss. In Michigan, the party chairman in suburban Detroit’s Oakland County now concedes that one of his top aides played a role in helping nine tea party candidates get onto the ballot for various offices across the state — including the open 1st Congressional District and the 7th Congressional District, held by vulnerable freshman Democratic Rep. Mark Schauer.”

At US News & World Report, Robert Schlesinger argues, “Shouldn’t the sturm und the drang be directed against the Tea Partyers here?”

Even Fox News concedes, “Tea Party activists since the beginning of the year have been trying to get a judge to declare that candidates running under the “Florida Tea Party” have nothing to do with other Tea Party activists in the state. They’ve accused local lawyer Fred O’Neal and former radio host Doug Guetzloe of trying to ‘hijack’ the movement by creating the Tea Party group. They claim the defendants are trying to leverage the Tea Party group to make money but also cite alleged ties between the founders and Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson.”

This is the problem with mentality that’s driving a lot of Tea Party activists (and a disturbing number of progressives, including, apparently, Rep. Henry Waxman who recently suggested he wouldn’t miss some conservative Democrats likely not to be returning): an emphasis on ideological purity that makes losing nobly preferable to winning but achieving less than 100 percent of one’s objectives. When you get into that mind-set, sabotaging a party nominee in order to “send a message” seems pretty reasonable. And by extension it’s better to be a pure minority in Congress than a broad majority.

So don’t blame the Democrats for handing over bullets when conservatives are forming up into the proverbial circular firing squad.

Dean Chambers, blogging at the Examiner, believes, “What can and should be done in every instance of the fakers, is for the Real Tea Party groups to out them as the fakes they are and inform their supporters to NOT be fooled by the imposters. And in addition to and while doing that, they should educate the public on the trickery Democrats are willing to use to FOOL the public into electing their candidates again. It’s more than time for the public to learn their lesson. Knowing this, are you still going to vote for the Democrats again?”

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! See Help a Christian Family in Need. The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 164 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Close Senate Primary Races to Test Depth of Voter Discontent

Evans Liberal Politics
August 8, 2010

 

Close Senate Primary Races
to Test Depth of Voter Discontent

 

Close Senate Races to Test Depth of Voter Discontent, © The New York Times, August 8, 2010, by Carl Hulse, excerpt quoted verbatim:

GREENWOOD VILLAGE, Colo. – Two Senate primaries that were supposed to be tranquil affairs have turned into roaring Rocky Mountain shoot-outs that could provide the best test yet of how deeply anti-establishment, anti-Washington sentiment is running this year.

NE Ohio Computer Repair


We’ll Fix or Optimize It For Less!

Phone 330-202-7661

Ohio's Fastest Growing Computer Repair and Optimization Service - Northeast Ohio Computer Repair and Optimization

With the fierce duels to be settled Tuesday, independent analysts and party operatives say the contests between Republicans Ken Buck and Jane Norton and Democrats Michael Bennet and Andrew Romanoff are close, making it uncertain which two contenders will be left standing to compete in November for a seat that appears up for grabs.

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. Mr. Bennet, appointed to a fill a Senate vacancy last year, and former Lt. Gov. Norton were blessed early on by the party hierarchy. They were to breeze to their respective nominations by virtue of the fundraising help and stature the White House could provide Mr. Bennet, 45, and the standing and credibility lent to Ms. Norton, 55, by the imprimatur of leading Republicans and the Chamber of Commerce.

But Mr. Romanoff, a 43-year-old former state House speaker, and Mr. Buck, a 51-year-old veteran prosecutor, could not be dissuaded from challenging the favored choices. Now they find themselves with a chance to win.

Should they triumph, it would represent a stinging repudiation of the Obama administration, which has put serious presidential muscle behind Mr. Bennet, as well as the Washington Republicans who coalesced around Ms. Norton.

“It would be a huge slam in both cases on the respective establishments,” said Floyd Ciruli, a veteran independent pollster based in Denver.

Policy differences in the races are subtle. Both Mr. Buck and Ms. Norton promise to cut federal spending, repeal the new health care law and get tough on immigration; Mr. Bennet and Mr. Romanoff pledge to help create jobs, aid struggling families and push alternative energy sources. Given the common policy themes, the insurgent-versus-establishment narrative has loomed large.

Mr. Buck has built his campaign around the notion that he is the outsider, playing that card to the hilt as he traveled the state to meet with Tea Party activists and like-minded groups while castigating Congressional Republicans as well as Democrats for the nation’s economic straits.

He notes that Ms. Norton has been endorsed by most sitting Republican senators, got fundraising help from the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, is the sister-in-law of a top Republican consultant in Washington, and was encouraged to join the race by Senator John McCain of Arizona, who appeared with Ms. Norton during the weekend.

Mr. Buck, in contrast, has been endorsed by Senator Jim DeMint, the South Carolina conservative who has split with party leaders on backing challengers this year. But unlike other fire-breathing conservatives who have defeated Republicans embraced by party heavyweights in Kentucky, Nevada and Utah, Mr. Buck is no newcomer to politics.

Born in New York and educated at Princeton, he served as then Representative Dick Cheney’s lawyer during the Iran-Contra hearings and worked three years for the Justice Department. He served 14 years in Colorado’s U.S. attorney’s office before being elected district attorney of Weld County, north of Denver, in 2004.

“I am not saying I don’t have a lot of connections,” Mr. Buck said in an interview in his Denver campaign office. “I am saying I am not the candidate of Washington, D.C.”

His extensive government resume is not lost on Ms. Norton, who scoffs at her opponent’s efforts to claim the outsider mantle and points out that he is married to a former co-chair of the state party.

“It is a clever thing to brand yourself as,” Ms. Norton said during an appearance at a picnic for Arapahoe County Republicans in this up-scale conservative bastion outside Denver. “But he has been a government lawyer for how many years? I am the only native-born Coloradan, the only one in this race on both the Republican and Democratic side who isn’t an Ivy League attorney.” ….

Read the full story here.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 162 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

White House pours oil on troubled gulf waters – in time for the mid-term elections

Evans Liberal Politics
August 7, 2010

 

White House pours oil on troubled gulf waters
in time for the mid-term elections

 

White House pours oil on troubled gulf waters – in time for the mid-term elections, Guardian.co.uk, The Observer, August 8, 2010, by Tim Webb, excerpt quoted verbatim:

It turns out Tony Hayward may be right: the Deepwater Horizon spill is destined to be just a drop in the media ocean

Perfectmatch.com

Was Tony Hayward right all along? That was the unexpected question faced by Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, last week. The departing BP chief executive told me back in May that the amount of leaking oil was “tiny” in relation to the “very big ocean” in the Gulf of Mexico. Fixing me with a steely glare, he told me I was “missing the point” when I asked about the environmental damage. The operation to contain the spill by burning, skimming and dispersing the oil was “proving to be extraordinarily effective” he said. The infamous comments – along with other ill-judged attempts to play down the scale of the disaster – made him public enemy number one in the US and helped seal his fate.

But last week a report from US government scientists appeared to endorse his view. Apparently, only a quarter of the estimated 4.9m leaked barrels of crude still remains at large. The rest has been burned, collected, skimmed, dispersed or naturally degraded, just as Hayward said. As BP began its operation to seal the capped well for good, President Barack Obama declared that the oil had been contained.

One reporter went off-script and quoted Hayward’s comments, asking Gibbs if the administration owed the BP boss an apology. Gibbs insisted Hayward had still been wrong. After all, stopping the oil is the president’s victory to claim, not BP’s – particularly with mid-term elections coming up.

The victory parade has echoes of the infamous “mission accomplished” declaration by Bush after the Iraq invasion – and is just as premature. Official data on the oil disaster has consistently proved to be inaccurate or misleading. The language used in the four-page report certainly appears to put a positive sheen on the disaster. It describes the “vast underwater plumes” of oil found by independent scientists as “diffuse clouds” formed of “microscopic droplets”. It categorises such oil as “dispersed” and, by implication, nothing to worry about. No matter that BP had used 2m gallons of toxic dispersant to break down the oil and stop it from reaching the shore.

The record amount of dispersant used probably saved the fragile eco-system of the Louisiana marshes – and certainly helped the public relations story – but environmentalists say that the damage to the marine environment, while less visible, will be severe and long-lasting. Independent scientists also accused the White House of putting a positive spin on the report: a different reading of the data would show that three-quarters of the leaked oil was still in the water if dissolved or dispersed oil were included. The White House seems to have more confidence in the oil-gobbling abilities of Mother Nature than many scientists. Pointing to a pie chart showing the different categories of leaked oil, Gibbs said: “I don’t think you could certainly dismiss the role that Mother Nature has played.”

It is true the oil has stopped gushing into the gulf. But what else has really changed? Hayward has fallen on his sword. US politicians are talking tough about introducing new safety regulations. MMS – the discredited regulator of offshore drilling, some of whose staff were literally in bed with oil industry employees – has changed its name. But Mike Sawyer, an independent oil engineer in Houston, says it’s impossible for even a determined regulator to effectively monitor hundreds of offshore installations in the gulf. “Operators run circles around them,” he says. ….

Read the full story here.

US agency rules out health
threat from oil dispersants


See US agency rules out health threat from oil dispersants, AFP on The Raw Story, August 7, 2010, by AFP, gay rights graphic from Progress Ohio, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Christian Science Monitor:
Gay Rights in California
GOP Reaction Muted



graphic link to Christian Science Monitor article on gay rights and California which says 'If You Don't Like Gay Marriage Blame Straight People - They're the Ones Who Keep Having Gay Babies'

Dispersants used to break up crude leaking from a ruptured Gulf of Mexico oil well are not likely to accumulate in seafood and affect humans, the US Food and Drug Administration said.

In a letter released Friday addressing concerns raised by a US lawmaker, the regulatory body said it was highly unlikely that the chemicals used to break up spilled crude into small particles would enter the food chain.

The “FDA has determined that the chemical dispersant currently used to combat the Deepwater Horizon… have a low potential for bioconcentration in seafood species,” the agency said.

“Although seafood is exposed to the dispersant, the inherent properties of the dispersants minimize the possibility of their being present in food,” the letter continued.

“There is no information at this time to indicate that they pose a public health threat from exposure through the consumption of seafood.”

The letter came in response to concerns raised by Representative Ed Markey, who chairs the House Energy and Environment subcommittee.

Some 1.84 million gallons of dispersant have been used to tackle crude spilling from a Gulf of Mexico well ruptured by an April 20 explosion that ripped through the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig, killing 11.

But See Corexit BP dispersant makes oil disappear:Toxic aftermath in food chain, environment to last years, Examiner.com, August 5, 2010, by Maryann Tobin.

Watch Corexit Oil will enter the food chain like DDT !! Say goodbye to the Bald Eagle, ABC on YouTube — 2:31.

And watch BP Oil Spill: The REAL Dangers of Corexit As Explained By A Scientific Expert, YouTube video — 4:39.

See BP risks Obama row by hinting it may return to stricken oil well, Guardian.co.uk on Evans Liberal Politics, August 6, 2010, by Suzanne Goldenberg.

See Top 15 Dumbest Quotes About the Gulf Oil Spill, About.com, by Daniel Kurtzman (no date given).

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 162 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google