David Axelrod On Sanctioning Secretly Funded Groups: It’s Not Healthy ‘But It’s The System We Have’, The Huffington Post, May 1, 2011, by Sam Stein: Evans Liberal Politics would like to thank Mr. Stein for permission to republish his work on an ongoing basis.

Look for Sam Stein, Robert Reich; DemFromCT, Bob Swern, Joan McCarter & MinistryOfTruth from Daily Kos; plus news from AlterNet, Truthout & Campaign for America’s Future and articles from out partner The Raw Story on Evans Liberal Politics, your source for U.S. liberal news and politics.

Here at Evans Liberal Politics, our problem is not finding insightful, cutting edge journalism to report for you. Paul Evans, the sole owner and operator of this site was forced by poverty to take an actual job out in the marketplace, so that he simply does not have all that much time to work on the news. We really need someone out there to step up to the plate and help us provide my readers with the news we want to give them. If interested in working for us please email me or call 330-262-0571 anytime. We would be happy to train you and enthusiasm counts for more than experience. Thanks ~ Paul

*****

Sam Stein: WASHINGTON — David Axelrod, the president’s senior communications adviser, spent much of the 2010 election cycle warning against the rise of anonymously funded, conservative non-government groups, going so far as to frame them as a threat to democracy itself.

On Sunday, he blessed the emergence of those same organizations on the Democratic side of the aisle, calling it a bitter but necessary pill to swallow for both the party and campaign finance reformers.

“Let’s be clear,” Axelrod said on “Meet the Press.” “This independent group that was formed was formed in response to the ones that spent hundreds of millions of dollars in the last campaign to defeat Democratic candidates [with] undisclosed, large contributions. And we tried to pass a law [the DISCLOSE Act] through the Congress that would force … all groups to disclose who was giving them the money so the public could see. It got 59 Democratic votes in the United States Senate, 41 Republicans blocked it. And so, of course, now there’s a reaction to what happened, because Democrats are sitting there saying, ‘We can’t play under two sets of rules.’ … We should walk down to Capitol Hill and urge them to pass the law and that will govern both Republicans and Democrats and everybody will be playing under one set of rules.”

“I don’t think this is healthy,” he added. “I don’t think this is good. But it is the system we have. And you can’t expect one side to operate under one set of rules and the other side to operate under another.”

The idea that Democrats are leaning on outside government groups as a response to being flooded by them in 2010 does, in some respect, ignore the massive amounts of money union groups put into those midterm races. For campaign finance reform advocates — chief among them former Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) — it also strikes a poor strategic note: forfeiting the political advantages that come with the moral high ground.

But for the White House and allied officials and campaign committees, it’s not all that difficult a decision. The potential to run tens of millions of dollars worth of television ads attacking Republican candidates is obviously alluring. But so is the capacity to sustain a major opposition research operation, which, according to officials familiar with the plans for these outside groups, will be an organizational imperative for the presidential cycle.

See Russ Feingold: Priorities USA ‘Playing With The Devil’, The Huffington Post, April 29, 2011, by Sam Stein.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a look at the master playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.