A lighthearted look at political party names and what is really representative of America today.
Evans Liberal Politics, October 6, 2010, by Jim Evans:
I think it’s time for a Party expert to weigh in on the whole new Party scene happening in America. On the one hand, I have worked in advertising, marketing and now as a political consultant for quite a few years. On the other side of things, having attended Ohio University — one of the premier party schools in America — I consider myself to have a better perspective than most on this situation. As I am also a Patriot, it therefore is my duty to share with America deeper insights into the Possibilities of Potential Third Parties.
American Politics, 2010 Edition:
First off, let’s examine the whole concept of The Tea Party.
Click the Evans Liberal Politics Getaway Car to Visit Paul’s Playlist of Rock & Pop Hits * #1 Rated by Google *

|
Unless you are a four year old girl with a plastic china set, the Tea Party label really shouldn’t excite you. Seriously — Tea? Isn’t anyone familiar with the phrase “Tea Totalers”? It’s a phrase used to indicate the exact opposite of a Party, in a different sense of the word. And, increasingly with every Christine O’Donnell press release I see, it also accurately describes what people like her would do to our country if we let them run it — Total it. As in a wreck that is too expensive to fix. But one thing for sure — these people are proving that no Tea Party is complete without some nutty fruitcakes.
The Coffee Party sounds attractive at first, but when I visualize the local Starbucks, and see bug-eyed, over-caffeinated people with no jobs, using wi-fi and chatting on Facebook about how they have no money, I think — of course you have no money! You don’t have a job and you are buying $5 coffee! And then it occurs to me — simply on the principle of more experience in deficit spending, plus the embracing of internet technology, The Coffee Party wins out over the Tea Party as being more qualified to run our government.
But is that really a good Party? Maybe if you graduated from Miami of Ohio. But for an Ohio U. guy — the kind who tells his Ohio State friends “I’m sorry about the beating Ohio gave you guys Saturday (of course, I’m talking about the mascots, not the football game” — the answer is No, that’s not a good party.
So let’s get serious. What we really need is The Reefer Party.
See if you can follow my logic, here.
The t-shirts would be cooler, because they would be tie-dye. There wouldn’t be any mad rantings about hating classes of people — the rally cry would be more like “I love you, dude!” And the economic recovery plan could be solely based on increased Dorito sales.
Plus, if we had some whack job who couldn’t pronounce an Iranian leader’s name, or thought they could see Russia from their doorstep, we would simply say, “How good is their stash?”
It might result in more teenage pregnancies. The candidates might lose track of their train of thought mid-sentence, and rely on a catch phrase to bail them out — like, I don’t know, maybe “you betcha!” Wait, that’s already in use by Tea Party types…. Oh, well.
The Reefer Party — they might make claims that are totally off the wall, and cave in completely under the pressure of sober interviews meant to judge intelligence, character and competency. That’s to be expected from stoners.
OMG — I think Sarah Palin has already invented this Party! Maybe I missed something. Maybe she really represents The THC Party.
That new Party would, however, face a stiff challenge from The Tequila Party.
Not surprisingly, this Party would have a solid Mexican immigration plan. A little salt on the hand, a twist of lime, and everyone does a shot. Whoever gets the worm gets citizenship.
That might work in the Southwest, but in the Heartland, I see a strong uprising from The Beer Party.
This Party would naturally be fond of Pork — preferably a nice grilled sausage with brown mustard. Conventions would be held in the parking lots of pro football games. And instead of loyalty oaths, only breathalyzers would be required.


It all sounds good for the common man, but the rich amongst us will want something different.
They will want The Costume Party.
Everyone will wear masks. No one will be able to see the ‘real you’– only the image you want to promote to the public. If you don’t dress up right, you won’t be let into the festivities. And of course, it is ‘invitation only’.
Kind of like our rulers want Washington to be right now, if you think about it. But do we even need a new “Costume Party?” We already have the GOP, right?
I know– it seems like I’m not taking the problems of our country seriously, at all. It seems like I am abandoning any pretense of dealing with reality.
What I am really abandoning is the joke that is American politics in 2010.
Let’s face it– the Democratic and Republican parties seem like they are just two puppets on the same billionaires’ hands. Like Punch and Judy, only in this play, it’s the public that gets whacked.
It takes one million Americans making $50,000 a year to make one Bill Gates. One member of the Walton family. Hell, it takes one thousand Oprahs to make one of them.
We spend over $30,000 a year to put people in prison. 90% of them wouldn’t be in that situation if we gave them a job making that much. And the super rich in this country think that only they should be able to have health care– or to put it more bluntly, it seems they want the poor to just die.
But we keep voting for the same two Parties that got us here.
It really brings a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘Party Crashing’, doesn’t it?
Because that’s what all these Parties seem to want to do to our country, our lives and our futures. America has been made into a nation of, by and for the rich.
In reality, though, the most accurate description of how the American public deals with politics could only be expressed by yet another new group label. Most Americans really seem to have their heads in the sand in regards to what established parties are doing to us and our once-proud nation. Only one label can truly capture our apathy, and our willingness to be ruled, and devastated, by our rich overlords:
The Slumber Party.
Evans Liberal Politics would like to welcome Jim Evans on board our team as a new contributor. Jim has worked as a political consultant since 2006 and before that worked in advertising and marketing. He has a rock album out in the band Ten of Clubs called "Sleight of Hand" that is really good. He is currently writing a novel to be titled "Agent 42-7". Visit Jim’s media-marketing website called Evans-Creations.com. You are invited to visit Jim on Facebook. Email Jim, here.
If you are interested in posting material as an author on Evans Liberal Politics and are serious about liberalism and changing the status quo in America, please feel encouraged to email Paul Evans.

NEW! For our readers: Check out our 40 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!
Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on  | Follow Paul Evans on  |
What’s in a Name? – Party Labels as Representative of the American Political Experience
Evans Liberal Politics
October 6, 2010
What’s in a Name? – Party Labels
as Representative of the American Political Experience
A lighthearted look at political party names and what is really representative of America today.
Evans Liberal Politics, October 6, 2010, by Jim Evans:
I think it’s time for a Party expert to weigh in on the whole new Party scene happening in America. On the one hand, I have worked in advertising, marketing and now as a political consultant for quite a few years. On the other side of things, having attended Ohio University — one of the premier party schools in America — I consider myself to have a better perspective than most on this situation. As I am also a Patriot, it therefore is my duty to share with America deeper insights into the Possibilities of Potential Third Parties.
American Politics, 2010 Edition:
First off, let’s examine the whole concept of The Tea Party.
Click the Evans Liberal Politics
Getaway Car to Visit Paul’s
Playlist of Rock & Pop Hits
* #1 Rated by Google *
Unless you are a four year old girl with a plastic china set, the Tea Party label really shouldn’t excite you. Seriously — Tea? Isn’t anyone familiar with the phrase “Tea Totalers”? It’s a phrase used to indicate the exact opposite of a Party, in a different sense of the word. And, increasingly with every Christine O’Donnell press release I see, it also accurately describes what people like her would do to our country if we let them run it — Total it. As in a wreck that is too expensive to fix. But one thing for sure — these people are proving that no Tea Party is complete without some nutty fruitcakes.
The Coffee Party sounds attractive at first, but when I visualize the local Starbucks, and see bug-eyed, over-caffeinated people with no jobs, using wi-fi and chatting on Facebook about how they have no money, I think — of course you have no money! You don’t have a job and you are buying $5 coffee! And then it occurs to me — simply on the principle of more experience in deficit spending, plus the embracing of internet technology, The Coffee Party wins out over the Tea Party as being more qualified to run our government.
But is that really a good Party? Maybe if you graduated from Miami of Ohio. But for an Ohio U. guy — the kind who tells his Ohio State friends “I’m sorry about the beating Ohio gave you guys Saturday (of course, I’m talking about the mascots, not the football game” — the answer is No, that’s not a good party.
So let’s get serious. What we really need is The Reefer Party.
See if you can follow my logic, here.
The t-shirts would be cooler, because they would be tie-dye. There wouldn’t be any mad rantings about hating classes of people — the rally cry would be more like “I love you, dude!” And the economic recovery plan could be solely based on increased Dorito sales.
Plus, if we had some whack job who couldn’t pronounce an Iranian leader’s name, or thought they could see Russia from their doorstep, we would simply say, “How good is their stash?”
It might result in more teenage pregnancies. The candidates might lose track of their train of thought mid-sentence, and rely on a catch phrase to bail them out — like, I don’t know, maybe “you betcha!” Wait, that’s already in use by Tea Party types…. Oh, well.
The Reefer Party — they might make claims that are totally off the wall, and cave in completely under the pressure of sober interviews meant to judge intelligence, character and competency. That’s to be expected from stoners.
OMG — I think Sarah Palin has already invented this Party! Maybe I missed something. Maybe she really represents The THC Party.
That new Party would, however, face a stiff challenge from The Tequila Party.
Not surprisingly, this Party would have a solid Mexican immigration plan. A little salt on the hand, a twist of lime, and everyone does a shot. Whoever gets the worm gets citizenship.
That might work in the Southwest, but in the Heartland, I see a strong uprising from The Beer Party.
This Party would naturally be fond of Pork — preferably a nice grilled sausage with brown mustard. Conventions would be held in the parking lots of pro football games. And instead of loyalty oaths, only breathalyzers would be required.
It all sounds good for the common man, but the rich amongst us will want something different.
They will want The Costume Party.
Everyone will wear masks. No one will be able to see the ‘real you’– only the image you want to promote to the public. If you don’t dress up right, you won’t be let into the festivities. And of course, it is ‘invitation only’.
Kind of like our rulers want Washington to be right now, if you think about it. But do we even need a new “Costume Party?” We already have the GOP, right?
I know– it seems like I’m not taking the problems of our country seriously, at all. It seems like I am abandoning any pretense of dealing with reality.
What I am really abandoning is the joke that is American politics in 2010.
Let’s face it– the Democratic and Republican parties seem like they are just two puppets on the same billionaires’ hands. Like Punch and Judy, only in this play, it’s the public that gets whacked.
It takes one million Americans making $50,000 a year to make one Bill Gates. One member of the Walton family. Hell, it takes one thousand Oprahs to make one of them.
We spend over $30,000 a year to put people in prison. 90% of them wouldn’t be in that situation if we gave them a job making that much. And the super rich in this country think that only they should be able to have health care– or to put it more bluntly, it seems they want the poor to just die.
But we keep voting for the same two Parties that got us here.
It really brings a whole new meaning to the phrase ‘Party Crashing’, doesn’t it?
Because that’s what all these Parties seem to want to do to our country, our lives and our futures. America has been made into a nation of, by and for the rich.
In reality, though, the most accurate description of how the American public deals with politics could only be expressed by yet another new group label. Most Americans really seem to have their heads in the sand in regards to what established parties are doing to us and our once-proud nation. Only one label can truly capture our apathy, and our willingness to be ruled, and devastated, by our rich overlords:
The Slumber Party.
Evans Liberal Politics would like to welcome Jim Evans on board our team as a new contributor. Jim has worked as a political consultant since 2006 and before that worked in advertising and marketing. He has a rock album out in the band Ten of Clubs called "Sleight of Hand" that is really good. He is currently writing a novel to be titled "Agent 42-7". Visit Jim’s media-marketing website called Evans-Creations.com. You are invited to visit Jim on Facebook. Email Jim, here.
If you are interested in posting material as an author on Evans Liberal Politics and are serious about liberalism and changing the status quo in America, please feel encouraged to email Paul Evans.
Check out Paul’s Playlist of 206 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.
NEW! For our readers: Check out our 40 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!
Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on

Follow Paul Evans on

[Translate]