Posts Tagged ‘Alan Grayson’

Grayson: GOP ‘a hopeless sellout party’

Evans Liberal Politics
January 4, 2011

 

Grayson: GOP ‘a hopeless sellout party’

Grayson: GOP ‘a hopeless sellout party’, The Raw Story, January 4, 2011, by Sahil Kapur, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Alan Grayson is exiting Congress the same way he spent much of his time in it: excoriating Republicans.In an interview with the New York Times, the first-term liberal firebrand ousted in November unleashed perhaps his most fiery string of attacks against the party he last year accused of wanting sick people to “die quickly.”

Perfectmatch.com

Republicans, he charged, are “a hopeless sellout party that will never do anything constructive for ordinary  people in this country.”Incoming Speaker John Boehner? A “tool of special interest.”

The tea party movement? “[B]ought and paid for by the enormously rich and the selfish.”

Unusually for a freshman, Grayson, who represented Florida’s mildly right-leaning 8th district, quickly became a high-profile figure in the 111th Congress with his ferocious slams against conservative politicians and public figures.

He captured the attention of progressives who frequently gripe that Democrats lack the fighting spirit that characterizes the Republican Party, and lack the determination to pursue their ideals.

Grayson’s aim was to be pugnacious — a Democrat “with guts,” as he put it — for which he earned the wrath of the conservative establishment and was heavily targeted by the GOP for defeat in the November election.

He described his opponent, former Florida state legislator Daniel Webster, as a “bizarre fundamentalist.”

The outgoing congressman also expressed reservations about the Obama administration and his own party, lamenting that they are neglecting core constituencies within their own base.

He questioned the impact of extending the Bush tax cuts on President Barack Obama’s “credibility.”

While he’s likely to remain on the radar of progressives out of office, Grayson did not eliminate the possibility of running for Congress again, he said, “if that’s what people want.”

Hey Spam Commenters: I approve comments individually. The only spam comments I approve are the ones I feel like approving. And this is basically a “clean” website: No comments with links to porn, gambling or most forums are going to ever get approved. Give it up. I’ve got great anti-spam commenting software called Askimet. Yes, some of the spam comments get approved: because I FEEL like it. Give it up, spammers. You ain’t never no more going to get your comments approved so give it up. Go try to spam your links elsewhere.

Visit our well known Guide to Liberal News & Politics on the Web, where you find out where to find out the truth.

Have a Listen to Our Playlists of Classic Rock Only Music, the Liberal Christian Rock Playlist, or Pure Electronic Music, or just have a Listen to the master Playlist of 230 Rock, Pop & Electronic Hits. Get your music fix while you browse the news.

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

Video – Obama Tax Compromise – Ed Schultz: We Are Being Held Hostage

Evans Liberal Politics
December 16, 2010

 

Video – Obama Tax Compromise
Ed Schultz: We Are Being Held Hostage

Another Hard November

Evans Liberal Politics
November 8, 2010


Another Hard November

 

Another Hard November, Truthout, November 5, 2010, by William Rivers Pitt, OpEd, quoted verbatim:

I am beginning to loathe November. Every second year, we as a nation endure the paroxysm of election, and every second year seems to be more demented than the last. Do not get me wrong: I am a devotee of the church of democracy, and I get a deep visceral thrill every time I get to cast a vote. But man oh man, it is a trying time every time, and never more so than over the last ten years.

Click the pretty lady
to Visit Paul’s Playlist for
Great Rock & Pop Music!
230 Hot Tracks!

a pretty brunette draped only in an American flag serves as a link to Paul's Playlist of great streaming electronic rock and pop music

2000 was the match to the fuse that blew the country apart.

2002 was Max Cleland getting compared to Osama bin Laden while Karl Rove told his fellow Republicans to “run on the war” in Iraq that was still five months from coming to pass.

2004 brought the unthinkable re-election of the worst president this nation has ever seen, with a little help from some gutter-low electoral hijinks in Ohio.

2006 saw the Democrats finally pushing back, only to take their new power and do little with it; the wars went on, the Bush program continued unabated, and the justice of impeachment was declared “off the table.”

In 2008, we were spared the horror of “President McCain and Vice President Palin,” only to be handed half a loaf after half a loaf after half a loaf by a Democratic congressional majority that could not get out of its own way, and by a White House that sought compromise from a GOP minority that, quite simply, wanted the new president and his whole party dead.

There was a hint of an idea after 2008 that the insanity of the previous eight years had been broken, finally and forever, but it did not last. Now, in this year of our Lord 2010, we have endured yet another deranged November, and the same American people who had been so victimized by savage GOP policy decided their best bet was to let the wolf back inside the fence.

(And P.S., gentle Truthout reader: if you are of a mind to fill the comments section of this article with exclamations about the equivalence of the two parties, I would invite you to save your energy; anyone who can not or will not see the difference between a person like Sharron Angle and a person like Harry Reid would be well-served by spending some time in a padded room wearing a coat that laces up in the back)

(Seriously)

The first Tuesday of the month of November has come and gone, and this is the point in the exercise where people in my line of work are expected – nay, required – to indulge in a load of what-does-it-all-mean navel-gazing. For the most part, it all comes out to be nothing more or less than an avalanche of verbal diarrhea from so-called “experts” who allegedly should know better, but clearly don’t. This particular November has been no exception, and the only reason I haven’t put a bullet through my television is because I like watching the Celtics, Bruins and Patriots too much. Maybe I’m weak, but there are other channels besides CNN, and I am thankful for small favors because of it.

What does it all mean?

Let’s see.

It means that the US House of Representatives, and to a lesser extent the US Senate, have once again been transformed into a theater of the absurd. Rep. Allen West of Florida is proud to have tortured an Iraqi policeman during his tour of duty, and prouder still to be a member of an outlaw motorcycle gang. Rep. Vicky Hartzler thinks God told her to amend her state’s constitution to ban gay marriage. Rep. Tim Walberg believes the best use of the House of Representative’s time would be to pursue impeachment proceedings against President Obama to determine the validity of his birth certificate. Senator Rand Paul sounds like he will block efforts to pay the national debt, despite the fact that such an act would cripple the dollar and annihilate the global economy.

The beat goes on.

It means that we should all be prepared to deal with the House Select Subcommittee investigation into the validity of Mr. Obama’s citizenship, whether he is a secret Muslim fascist communist socialist terrorist mole, and maybe even whether or not he is, in fact, the re-incarnation of Adolf Hitler. For sure, it means there will be very public hearings into the “fact” that global warming is a fraud. It means everyone working in the White House better get themselves a good lawyer and have a cool quarter million dollars handy for legal fees, because if history (read: the 1990′s) is any guide, a Republican House squared off against a Democratic administration means a blizzard of subpoenas from various GOP-chaired committees over anything and everything they can think of. The GOP learned this tactic during the Clinton years, and they will do it again. In short, the new Republican House will treat this Democratic president the way the Democratic House should have treated the Bush administration, but with no cause other than to disrupt and dismember.

Why Pay More? $7.49 .COM Domains from GoDaddy.com 468x60

It means that Alan Grayson’s strong, strident voice will no longer be heard. Worse, it means that Russ Feingold is gone, which is a tragedy beyond reckoning, almost beyond comprehension. His final words to his constituents – “Thank you. Thank you for your support over the years. Representing Wisconsin in the Senate has been the greatest honor of my life and together we accomplished many great things. No one has ever had such a strong foundation of support as I have. You gave me my backbone. In the words of Bob Dylan: ‘But my heart is not weary. It’s light and free. I’ve got nothing but affection for those who have sailed with me.’ Forward!” – fail to convey the pathos left in the wake of his sudden, terrible absence.

It means the “mainstream” news media had a chance to explain what happened on Tuesday with honesty and accuracy, and once again blew it, as expected. This was not an election proving America is a “center-right nation,” whatever the hell that means. In 2006 and 2008, the Democrats won a slew of House seats in districts that had historically rejected them out of hand. This happened because the Bush administration and the GOP were so God-awful that even their own people rejected them. In 2008, for example, several dozen districts elected a Democrat to the House while simultaneously going for McCain. What happened on Tuesday had some to do with the economy, very little to do with the so-called “Tea Party,” and almost everything to do with those several dozen House seats snapping back to their normal states of being.

It means that Tuesday was bad, but could have been worse. It means the GOP better put up or shut up, unless they want the insane yahoos that just got elected to run wild and hurl the party into a highly destructive civil war. It means the Obama administration is going to have to play small-ball for a while, and rely quite a bit more on Executive Orders than on legislation. It means the economy is going to get worse before it gets better. It means we will have more opportunities to watch these “small government” GOP hypocrites grow the government exponentially, as they did during the Bush years, while lying about it with their bare faces hanging out. It means that if Mr. Obama doesn’t get it into his head that the GOP cannot be compromised with, then he will be a one-termer as sure as water is wet.

It also means that I’m going to give the newly-empowered GOP a week – maybe two – before I start caterwauling about why they haven’t fixed the economy, joblessness, the wars, terrorism and the fact that my pants don’t fit right. According to the GOP, Obama and the Democrats were expected to cure all that ails us the very bleeding minute they walked in the door two years ago, and last I heard, turnabout is fair play.

So, yeah, the clock is ticking. And yeah, things are about to get very weird around here.

Spiritual Cinema Circle

Recommended: MSNBC Folds!! Keith Olbermann back on Tuesday! UpdatedX2 – A Mention in NYT!, Daily Kos, November 7, 2010, by Diogenes2008.

See Dems Take a Pounding in the Mid-Terms: Progressives Not Bold Enough, Says Caucus Leader, AlterNet, November 3, 2010, by Adele M. Stan.

Update: See In Lame-Duck Session, a Hint of the Governing to Come, The New York Times, The Caucus, November 7, 2010, by John Harwood.

Note by Evans Liberal Politics owner Paul Evans: Obviously, if you are reading this, you can see that we’re back ‘on the air’ with more news for you. For me, it has been a hard November indeed, and a hard October before that. The details are actually rather personal, but if you care, would please keep me in your thoughts? Please feel encouraged to drop me an email if you’d like to say hi.

Check out our Famous Guide to Liberal News & Politics on the Web, the best guide to where to find "The Truth" in the news around the web.


Check out Paul’s Playlist of 230 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


NEW! For our readers: Check out our 40 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! We really need to have more viewers to continue to operate. Could you help us out and tell your friends about us?

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

Happy Halloween on Evans Liberal Politics

Evans Liberal Politics
October 6, 2010

 

Happy Halloween on Evans Liberal Politics


The Monster Mash
Evans Liberal Politics Style!


Click Here
Personalize funny videos
and birthday eCards at JibJab!


Check out Paul’s Playlist of 206 Rock and Pop Hits, and have fun with all the artists you love while you surf the web.


NEW! For our readers: Check out our 40 song "Only Classic Rock Playlist", now on its own page!


Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Can you help us today? If you value liberal and progressive ideas and politics, please simply share Evans Liberal Politics with friends and contacts to keep free, independent and liberal journalism alive. Thanks in advance.

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

‘Peculiar’ Tea Party happenings blamed on ‘dirty’ Dem tricksters

Evans Liberal Politics
August 9, 2010

 

‘Peculiar’ Tea Party happenings
blamed on ‘dirty’ Dem tricksters

 

‘Peculiar’ Tea Party happenings blamed on ‘dirty’ Dem tricksters, The Raw Story, August 9, 2010, by Ron Brynaert, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Could paranoia end up being the self-destroyer of the Tea Party movement?

Or, as the tagline for the new AMC series Rubicon puts it, perhaps it’s true that “not every conspiracy is a theory.” Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you.

funny photo of an Elephant headed into an archway which is too small for him highlights this article of Tea Party dirty tricks

A Fox News article claims,

In New Jersey, a “Tea Party” candidate surfaces but local activists haven’t heard of him. In Michigan, a Democratic operative appears closely tied to a slate of candidates running under the Tea Party banner. In Florida, conservative activists are locked in court over the right to use the Tea Party name.

The list of peculiar Tea Party happenings goes on and on.

As the midterm election nears, allegations are surfacing across the country that Democrats are exploiting conservatives’ faith in the Tea Party name by putting up bogus candidates in November — the claim is that those “Tea Party” candidates will split the GOP vote and clear the way for Democratic victories.

The theories may prove to be more than just conspiracy talk. Some of the allegations are coming directly from local Tea Party activists who are trying to flag the media and election officials as soon as they smell something fishy on the ballot. And they say they’ve got proof.

Last Friday, Politico reported, “Nationally, Democrats say they intend to campaign against the tea party movement. But locally, Democratic officials and activists in at least four states now stand accused of collaborating with tea party candidates in an attempt to sabotage Republican challengers in some of the closest House races in the nation.”

“The Democrats have come to the realization that they can’t win on issues, and with their flawed candidates, so they are forced to skirt the rules by running candidates who they hope can split the vote with Republicans,” said Paul Lindsey, a National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman.

Democratic officials deny there is any grand conspiracy.

“The DCCC has nothing to do with this,” said Ryan Rudominer, a spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee

Politico’s Jeane Cummings reports, “But the evidence of campaign tampering in at least two states is hard to dismiss. In Michigan, the party chairman in suburban Detroit’s Oakland County now concedes that one of his top aides played a role in helping nine tea party candidates get onto the ballot for various offices across the state — including the open 1st Congressional District and the 7th Congressional District, held by vulnerable freshman Democratic Rep. Mark Schauer.”

At US News & World Report, Robert Schlesinger argues, “Shouldn’t the sturm und the drang be directed against the Tea Partyers here?”

Even Fox News concedes, “Tea Party activists since the beginning of the year have been trying to get a judge to declare that candidates running under the “Florida Tea Party” have nothing to do with other Tea Party activists in the state. They’ve accused local lawyer Fred O’Neal and former radio host Doug Guetzloe of trying to ‘hijack’ the movement by creating the Tea Party group. They claim the defendants are trying to leverage the Tea Party group to make money but also cite alleged ties between the founders and Democratic Rep. Alan Grayson.”

This is the problem with mentality that’s driving a lot of Tea Party activists (and a disturbing number of progressives, including, apparently, Rep. Henry Waxman who recently suggested he wouldn’t miss some conservative Democrats likely not to be returning): an emphasis on ideological purity that makes losing nobly preferable to winning but achieving less than 100 percent of one’s objectives. When you get into that mind-set, sabotaging a party nominee in order to “send a message” seems pretty reasonable. And by extension it’s better to be a pure minority in Congress than a broad majority.

So don’t blame the Democrats for handing over bullets when conservatives are forming up into the proverbial circular firing squad.

Dean Chambers, blogging at the Examiner, believes, “What can and should be done in every instance of the fakers, is for the Real Tea Party groups to out them as the fakes they are and inform their supporters to NOT be fooled by the imposters. And in addition to and while doing that, they should educate the public on the trickery Democrats are willing to use to FOOL the public into electing their candidates again. It’s more than time for the public to learn their lesson. Knowing this, are you still going to vote for the Democrats again?”

Follow Evans Liberal Politics and Paul Evans on
Twitter logo link for Evans Liberal Politics on Twitter

Follow Paul Evans on
Facebook logo link to follow Paul Evans on Facebook

We’re Counting on YOU! Please share Evans Liberal Politics with friends! While we enjoy a certain level of popularity on the web, in order for us to keep bringing you the latest in liberal news and politics, we really need you to SHARE Evans Liberal Politics with your friends and contacts. Please help us out — we bring you the latest in liberal and progressive news and politics just to share the truth and promote liberalism. Can you help us today?
Please consider making a $5 or $10 donation to Evans Liberal Politics. We bring you the news and all things liberal for free out of love of people and liberalism, but a fellow has to eat! See Help a Christian Family in Need. The button to donate via PayPal is located at the top right of every page (or use this handy link), and your kind help is greatly appreciated.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 164 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Grayson Debunks Poll Number and Tea Party Myths

Evans Liberal Politics
July 9, 2010

 

Grayson Debunks Poll Number and Tea Party Myths

 

Conyers throws in with Grayson, co-sponsors ‘War is Making You Poor Act’

Evans Liberal Politics
June 30, 2010

 

Conyers throws in with Grayson,
Co-sponsors ‘War is Making You Poor Act’

 

Conyers throws in with Grayson, co-sponsors ‘War is Making You Poor Act’, The Raw Story, June 30, 2010, by Stephen C. Webster, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

It seems that Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) would agree, perpetual war is making you poor.To begin rectifying the situation, he’s joined with Congressman Alan Grayson (D-FL) in co-sponsoring the “War is Making You Poor Act,” which would limit defense spending to $548.9 billion: the exact figure alloted in the fiscal year 2011 budget.

The act also seeks to utilize an additional $159.3 billion set aside for “discretionary” operations abroad to relieve the full federal income tax burden on every American’s first $35,000 earned per year, or up to $70,000 per year for married couples.

According to Detroit publication MLive, Conyers, who chairs the powerful House Committee on the Judiciary, is adding his name to the roster of support.

“I believe that the thing we need to do is to take that $159 billion that the President has set aside – we’re not saying he has to stop the war, we’re not giving a cut-off date for the war – we’re simply saying you need to fund that out of the base budget of $549 billion,” Grayson said of his bill. “And we take 90 percent of that and give it back to the American people.”

He’s also launched an online petition in support of the “War is Making You Poor Act”. At time of this writing it had accrued over 45,000 signatures.

Surprisingly enough, even some conservatives see the legislation as a potential positive.

“Each troop we send to Afghanistan costs the public $1 million per year,” National Review‘s E.D. Kain noted. “That’s $1 million siphoned out of the U.S. economy and shipped overseas to the mountains of Afghanistan and the Iraqi deserts. As Veronique de Rugy pointed out in 2008, for years many of these costs were hidden, not even included in the Pentagon’s defense budget. This obscures not only the real cost of war, but the costs of all the extraneous programs our tax dollars end up going toward in the name of national defense.”

He goes on to call Grayson’s bill “a good start” toward slashing America’s massively bloated defense budget.

“The costs of the war have been rendered invisible,” Grayson said on the floor of the House. “There’s no draft. Instead, we take the most vulnerable elements of our population, and give them a choice between unemployment and missile fodder. Government deficits conceal the need to pay in cash for the war.

“We put the cost of both guns and butter on our Chinese credit card. In fact, we don’t even put these wars on budget; they are still passed using ‘emergency supplemental’. A nine-year ‘emergency’.

“Let’s show Congress the cost of these wars is too much for us.”

The bill, H.R. 5353, is currently before the House Armed Services and Ways and Means committees.

This video is from C-Span, broadcast May 20, 2010.

BOEHN-head view of the day: See Afghanistan or Social Security? Boehner Says We Have to Choose, Campaign for America’s Future, June 29, 2010, by Richard (RJ) Eskow. Easy choice, that. ~ Paul Evans

See Senate Confirms Petraeus As War Commander, The New York Times, June 30, 2010, by Carl Hulse.

Alan Grayson on the War Is Making You Poor Act


*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on YOU!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 140 Rock and Pop Tracks


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

Alan Grayson: We Beat the Fed

banner from Representative Alan Grayson's email newsletter

Evans Liberal Politics
May 12, 2010

 

Alan Grayson: We Beat the Fed

 

We Beat the Fed, The Huffington Post, May 11, 2010, by Rep. Alan Grayson, also sent as an emailing, Grayson image from emailing, quoted verbatim:

The Senate just voted, 96-0, to audit the Federal Reserve. Soon, we will know what the Federal Reserve did with the trillions of dollars that it handed out during the financial crisis.

A few months ago, such a vote would have been unthinkable. One senior Treasury official claimed he would fight to stop an audit ‘at all costs’. Senator Chris Dodd predicted that an audit would spell economic doom, while Senator Judd Gregg attacked accountability for the Fed as “pandering populism”.

Click the Class War
Sign to Visit Our Famous
Guide to Liberal Politics!

protest sign saying 'They Only Call It Class War When We Fight Back

Today, both the Treasury Department and Senator Dodd support this amendment. As for Judd Gregg, he was just on the floor of the Senate discussing — of all people — 19th century populist Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan.

What happened?

People Power is what happened. We built a coalition of people on the right and the left, ordinary citizens and economists, ex-regulators and politicians, all with one question for which we demanded an answer: “What happened to our money?”

No longer can Ben Bernanke get away with saying, “I don’t know.”

Now, we’re going to know who got what, and why.

Releasing this information will show that the Federal Reserve’s arguments for secrecy are — and have always been — a ruse, to cover up the handing out of hundreds of billions of dollars like party favors to the Wall Street favorites who brought the American economy to the brink of ruin.

But our work isn’t quite done. The Senate audit provision isn’t as strong as what we passed in the House. The Senate provision has only a one-time audit, whereas what we passed in the House would allow audits going forward. There will be a conference committee that will merge the provisions from the two bills.

The need for audits and oversight over Fed handouts going forward is great. The financial crisis isn’t over, and neither are the Fed’s secret bailouts. Earlier this week, the Federal Reserve announced it was going underwrite the Greek bailout by lending dollars to the central banks of Europe, England, and Japan. The loans may never be paid back, the Fed accepts the risk that the dollar will strengthen in the meantime, and the interest rate charged by the Fed is very likely at below-market rates. So such loans are in effect just a subsidy, to bail out foreigners.

The Fed has not been chastened. It is bolder and more of a rogue actor than ever. It’s clear that without full audit authority going forward, the Fed will continue to give out “foreign aid” without Congressional or even Executive permission.

And it will do so in secret.

So we will be fighting on to get a full audit from the conference committee.

But let’s not lose sight of what we have accomplished so far — real independent inquiry into the Fed, and its incestuous relationships with Wall Street banks. For the first time ever.

Our calls, emails, lobbying, blogging, and support really mattered. We made it happen.

Today, we beat the Fed.

See 96-0: Fed Audit Passes Senate, The Huffington Post, May 11, 2010, by Ryan Grim, excerpt quoted verbatim:

UPDATE – 12:10 p.m. – The amendment to open the Fed to a one-time audit of its lending between December 1, 2007 and the present passed 96-0.

* * * * *

Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), the Federal Reserve’s most outspoken defender, came out in support of an amendment by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) to force transparency on the Federal Reserve. Gregg’s surprising support gives the amendment a major boost.

The Sanders amendment began as a reflection of language passed by the House and cosponsored by Reps. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) that would authorize a broad audit of the Fed. In negotiations with Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and officials from the Fed, Sanders scaled back his audit and restricted it to a one-time look at lending activity from December 1, 2007 until the present — information that the Fed has so far fought to keep from disclosing. It goes further in some respects than the Paul-Grayson measure, in that it mandates the disclosure of recipients of Fed largesse. (Background on the compromise here.)

Follow Rep. Alan Grayson on Twitter: twitter.com/alangrayson.

Sign the petition in support of HR1207 and S604 to AUDIT THE FED!

See Exposing the Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Makes Money Out of Thin Air, AlterNet, May 12, 2010, by Terrence McNally.

See the Amazon purchase page for and perhaps buy Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country (Paperback), Amazon.com, by William Greider: $14.28.

Also at Amazon: Meltdown: How Greed and Corruption Shattered Our Financial System and How We Can Recover (Paperback), by Katrina vanden Heuvel and the editors of the Nation: $11.92.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share, print or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top.

We know, if you come here repeatedly,
you like Evans Liberal Politics. So, all we ask is that you
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

80 Great Electronic Rock and Pop Tracks


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming electronic rock
#1 Rated by Google