Robert Reich: The Great Decoupling of Corporate Profits from Jobs

Evans Liberal Politics
July 27, 2010

 

Robert Reich: The Great Decoupling
of Corporate Profits from Jobs

 

The Great Decoupling of Corporate Profits from Jobs, Robert Reich.org, July 26, 2010, by Robert Reich, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

Second-quarter earnings reports are coming in, and they’re making Wall Street smile. Corporate profits are up. And big American companies are sitting on a gigantic pile of money. The 500 largest non-financial firms held almost a trillion dollars in the second quarter, and that money pile is growing larger this quarter. Profits that plummeted in the recession have bounced back. Big businesses have recovered almost 90 percent of what they lost.

CompUSA Best Sellers

So with all this money and profit, they’ll start hiring again, right? Wrong – for three reasons.

First, lots of their profits are coming from their overseas operations. So that’s where they’re investing and expanding production.

GM now sells more cars in China than it does in the US, but makes most of them there. The company now employs 32,000 hourly workers in China. But only 52,000 GM hourly workers remain in the United States – down from 468,000 in 1970.

GM isn’t just hiring low-tech assembly workers in China. Last week the firm broke ground there on a $250 million advanced technology center to develop batteries and other alternative energy sources.

You and I and other American taxpayers still own over 60 percent of GM. We bought GM to save GM jobs, remember?

GM officials say no American taxpayer money is being used to expand in China. But money is fungible. Because of our generosity, GM can now use the dollars it doesn’t have to spend in the United States meeting its American payrolls and repaying its creditors, for new investments in China.

Second, big U.S. businesses are investing their cash in labor-saving technologies. This boosts their productivity, but not their payrolls.

Last Friday, for example, Ford reported a $2.6 billion second-quarter profit. The firm is already more than two-thirds the way to equaling its record 1999 profits. But due to labor-saving technologies, Ford now has half as many employees as it did a decade ago.

Wall Street analysts are happy with Ford’s “commitment to keeping capacity in check,” according to the Wall Street Journal. Ford shares rose 5.2 percent Friday. “Keeping capacity in check” is the Street’s way of saying “no new hiring.” In fact, the Street is advising investors to sell the stocks of companies that talk openly of expanding capacity.

Finally, corporations are using their pile of money to pay dividends to their shareholders and buy back their own stock – thereby pushing up share prices.

Last Friday, GE announced it would raise its dividend by 20 percent and reinstate its share-buyback plan. It’s GE’s first dividend increase since the company cut its dividend in early 2009. As a result, GE shares are up more than 5% in the past few days.

Bottom line: Higher corporate profits no longer lead to higher employment. We’re witnessing a great decoupling of company profits from jobs.

The next supply-side economist who tells you companies need more incentive (i.e. lower taxes) before they’ll hire is living on another planet.

The reality is this: Big American companies may never rehire large numbers of workers. And they won’t even begin to think about hiring until they know American consumers will buy their products. The problem is, American consumers won’t start buying against until they know they have reliable paychecks.

Watch Foreclosures on Pace for Record, AP Video on YouTube — 1:01

here. The above article is from Reich’s new blog, and can be viewed here.

Thanks to Professor Reich for permission to publish his articles on an ongoing basis.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 150 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google


Certified Online Pharmacy - Lowest Price Guaranteed

  • Video Converter

    August 23rd, 2010

    Reply

    it was very interesting to read.

  • Video Converter

    August 23rd, 2010

    Reply

    This is an extremely excellent site you have going here. The matter is very informative and straight to the point. Excited to read more about your blog next time.

  • Fleshlight Drach

    August 11th, 2010

    Reply

    I think its funny how everyone here is so quick to jump on the illegal “Mexicans” that are in this country. What about ALL the Asian’s that are here illegally? I do agree that we need immigration reform but for ALL illegal immigrants not just pick and choose. For those who say we need the jobs for “hard-working Americans”, well they are more than welcome to go out to the fields, deal with heat or freezing cold and pick the fruit and vegetables that we all eat on a daily basis. However, a lot of those crying are the ones sitting on their butts collecting welfare. No one has to agree with me, this is just MY OPINION

  • Divina Beers

    August 8th, 2010

    Reply

    How do you do it, awesome SERP ranking of your website, Google pointet me directly to your site and what I found here is awesome, thanks guys.

  • Mark Hildebrandt

    August 2nd, 2010

    Reply

    That’s not how I see it.

    Who cares if money is “fungible”? Fact is, it was the Obama administration that negotiated all terms of the GM bailout. If anyone dislikes any aspect about how GM is operating, where they are investing, who is being hired, etc., look to the Obama administration who hired the new GM car czar Steven Rattner. The Obama administration is in charge and responsible now!

    Next “fact”. Big business has always invested in labor saving technology because that increases profits, which is the primary objective of capitalistic businesses. This is not a new trend related to “The Greart Decoupling of Corporate Profits from Jobs” …. unless someone is trying to whip up anti-capitalism sentiment. Profits are necessary so governments can tax business as a means of acquiring funds for marginally successful government sponsored programs. More importantly, capitalism is the single most proven method to allocate resources and foster innovation. If America abandons capitalism, many of our brightest entrepreneurs will leave the US for greener pastures that reward innovation and success. Which leads to the last “fact”.

    Last “fact” is the reason big business won’t hire American workers. It has far less to do with Americans preference or financial ability to purchase products than it does with business exercising their freedom not to expand under economic conditions that are extremely uncertain and volatile due to governement policies that are anti-business, enacted by elected officials that don’t read the proposed laws before they pass them. Put more simply, it would be a very “poor investment” to expand and hire workers under current conditions.

    Bottom line, government mandates and interference in how business is conducted have caused companies to greatly reduce investing (read “create jobs”) in America. They have the freedom to pay more dividends, buy back stock, or invest capital in countries other than the U.S. I suspect that continuing to revoke the “freedoms” businesses have will not change anything, other than make a very bad situation worse.

  • Janine Partington

    July 28th, 2010

    Reply

    I totally agree. That is pretty much how I see it. Great!

  • No trackbacks yet

Leave a Comment

* are Required fields