Obama administration wants more warrantless surveillance of Americans

Evans Liberal Politics
July 30, 2010

 

Obama administration wants more
warrantless surveillance of Americans

 

Tech News About Your Privacy

 

Obama administration wants more warrantless surveillance of Americans, Daily Kos, July 29, 2010, by Joan McCarter, used with permission, quoted verbatim:

As Yglesias says, “The End of Probable Cause.” WaPo reports:

Perfectmatch.com

The Obama administration is seeking to make it easier for the FBI to compel companies to turn over records of an individual’s Internet activity without a court order if agents deem the information relevant to a terrorism or intelligence investigation.

The administration wants to add just four words — “electronic communication transactional records” — to a list of items that the law says the FBI may demand without a judge’s approval. Government lawyers say this category of information includes the addresses to which an Internet user sends e-mail; the times and dates e-mail was sent and received; and possibly a user’s browser history. It does not include, the lawyers hasten to point out, the “content” of e-mail or other Internet communication.

This power would be conferred upon the same FBI whose agents have “cheated on tests on how to legally conduct domestic surveillance cases.” Maybe this is just the administration’s way of making sure these people won’t have to cheat on future tests–not they won’t have to worry about the pesky details of conducting domestic surveillance legally, since they won’t have to worry about warrants.

Matt raises the question of “misused work resources . . . for personal purposes.” The larger concern, and anybody who lived through Nixon and is old enough to remember it will share it, is the very real potential for the systematic misuse of information for political purposes. It’s happened before and will happen again, and our government should at least have to go through the niceties of taking actual legal steps in order to spy on us. As Matt also points out, it’s not that hard. All it takes is “some kind of cause—probable cause, let’s say—to suspect someone of involvement in terrorism, [is to] just get a warrant.”

Probable cause and warrants. The stuff of democracy. The stuff, in fact, of the Constitution, the fourth amendment to be precise.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

TigerDirect Best Sellers

See ‘Private’ Browsing Sessions Not As Private As You Think, The Huffington Post, July 29, 2010, by Catherine Smith, excerpt quoted verbatim:

Surfing the Internet with a web browser’s “private mode” enabled may not keep users’ information as safe as they think, Switched reports, citing research conducted at Carnegie Mellon University.

Carnegie Mellon’s Collin Jackson told New Scientist that some sites may leave data on a computer’s hard drive, even if they were accessed while private browsing was enabled, effectively providing traces of what sites you’ve visited.

As Jackson and his team note, “sites visited while browsing in private mode should leave no trace on the user’s computer.” And yet, Jackson tells New Scientist that a hacker could “guess what sites you’ve been to based on traces left behind.” Switched summarizes the dilemma: “when your average surfer turns on the private mode in a browser, they expect their tracks to be erased, and erased they’re not.”

See Breaking a Promise on Surveillance, N.Y. Times Editorial, July 29, 2010, excerpt quoted verbatim:

It is just a technical matter, the Obama administration says: We just need to make a slight change in a law to make clear that we have the right to see the names of anyone’s e-mail correspondents and their Web browsing history without the messy complication of asking a judge for permission.

It is far more than a technical change. The administration’s request, reported Thursday in The Washington Post, is an unnecessary and disappointing step backward toward more intrusive surveillance from a president who promised something very different during the 2008 campaign.

In a 1993 update to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Congress said that Internet service providers have to turn over to the F.B.I., on request, “electronic communication transactional records.” The government says this includes the e-mail records of their subscribers, specifically the addresses to which e-mail messages were sent, and the times and dates. (The content of the messages can remain private.) It may also include Web browsing records. To get this information, the F.B.I. simply has to ask for it in the form of a national security letter, which is an administrative request that does not require a judge’s signature.

But there was an inconsistency in the writing of the 1993 law. One section said that Internet providers had to turn over this information, but the next section, which specified what the F.B.I. could request, left out electronic communication records. In 2008, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion saying this discrepancy meant the F.B.I. could no longer ask for the information. Many Internet providers stopped turning it over. Now the Obama administration has asked Congress to make clear that the F.B.I. can ask for it.

Jay Rockefeller offers the amazing opinion in Senate testimony that in his view it would have been better if the internet had never existed Jay Rockefeller — “It would have been better if the internet had never existed” – CSpan2 — 2:45 Amazing.

See Gates Assails WikiLeaks Over Release of Reports, July 29, 2010, by Charlie Savage.

*****

To make a Word or .pdf document of an article, or share or email it, simply load the individual article by clicking the dark blue title at the very top, or use the icons beneath the article.

We’re Counting on You!
Tell Your Friends About Evans Liberal Politics!

Listen to 150 Rock and Pop Hits!


Paul's Playlist of the best streaming rock, pop and electronic music

#1 Rated by Google

  • 150 diflucan

    February 25th, 2011

    Reply

    There are certainly a couple more details to take into consideration, but thank you for sharing this information.

  • Credit Report

    August 25th, 2010

    Reply

    Your site looks wonderful, I can tell how much time you have put into it. I am going to save it and will make sure to visit often.

  • Legalsounds

    August 24th, 2010

    Reply

    Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I’ll be coming back and I hope you post again soon.

  • Eddie Staelens

    August 24th, 2010

    Reply

    Hi there can I reference some of the information here in this post if I reference you with a link back to your site?

    • Paul

      August 24th, 2010

      Reply

      Hey Eddie, sure, use any information on the site, excerpt that most of the pictures are royalty free unless they say Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. Links are highly appreciated. Cordially, the owner, Paul Evans

  • Rodney Welsh

    August 21st, 2010

    Reply

    Great post and website! I have bookmarked it and will check back ofter. I also linked you to my site.

  • Nice information, many thanks to the author. It is incomprehensible to me now, but in general, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and good luck!

  • Nuby

    August 16th, 2010

    Reply

    I hope you have a good day! Very good article, well written and very thought out. I am looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future.

  • Tamara Bieniek

    August 15th, 2010

    Reply

    “It’s pointless to get hung up on whether or not this is a mosque or community center with a prayer room or whatever. ” No. It is EXACTLY the point.

  • Trenton Mckoon

    August 15th, 2010

    Reply

    You’re talking about actions. If the ACTIONS taken at the mosque violate the law, they should be punished. At this point, “conservatives” want the government to restrict speech. That’s wrong, and it will backfire.

  • I admit, I haven’t been on this webpage in a long time… however it had been another pleasure to see It is such an important topic and ignored by so numerous, even professionals. I thank you to assist making individuals more aware of possible issueGreat stuff as typical…

  • Tax Attorney Jobs

    August 11th, 2010

    Reply

    Does anyone here have any suggestions on how to find a job or do a good interview? I am set to graduate this spring and want to get a head start on trying to find a job.

  • Minimum Wage

    August 10th, 2010

    Reply

    I hope you have a good day! Very good article, well written and very thought out. I am looking forward to reading more of your posts in the future.

  • This place just keeps improving every time I show up. You should honestly be pleased.

  • Kyle Silvestri

    August 8th, 2010

    Reply

    Why have you removed my post but let useless stuff like the comments above this be allowed? I am posting useful stuff for people who are serious about making money… Ill post it again, please dont remove it this is useful information. Heya guys. I want to share a new Clickbank product with you. It is called Mobile Monopoly. Its been on the market for just over a month and is already the most selled product on Clickbank. It shows brand new techniques on how to earn money with Mobile Marketing. Mobile Market is MASSIVE right now for making money, it is booming and i know you with this Ebook you really can make thousands per month. Mobile Marketing is booming right now, just like the .com did in the late 90′s. Get your share of the money. Mobile Monopoly – Just check the site out. I promise you that you wont regreat it. This Ebook is for everyone who is intrested in making money online.

  • Beverly Fritchley

    August 5th, 2010

    Reply

    Hello guys, I have a fantastic way to make tons of money online creating blogs. I presume this is primaraly for the website bloggers but there are probably more bloggers reading this. I have already made thousands using the techniques detailed in the product and it has only been 2 months. Free Money Making Blog By Blogging To The Bank

  • Berry Davise

    August 1st, 2010

    Reply

    Interesting.

  • Usually I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this article really forced me to do so! Thanks, really nice article.

  • This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.

  • Coach outlet

    August 28th, 2010

    Reply

    i actually like your web web page. Its pretty informative. Goodbye!…

  • Thanks for the fantastic submit. I’ll take the notes you’ve written….

  • [...] be willing to speak up to prevent the next catastrophe?Email Deep Harm: deep_harm AT yahoo.comSee Obama administration wants more warrantless surveillance of Americans, Daily Kos on Evans Liberal Politics, July 30, 2010, by Joan McCarter. News on privacy, the [...]

Leave a Comment

* are Required fields